Jump to content

Covid protocols - ‘Govt money wanted’


taylor75

Recommended Posts

Game has been re-arranged to Thursday 20th August with AFC next game delayed until the Sunday. Source SPFL Website.

 

Hope the "punishment" is to follow!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Beast Boy

    305

  • Pasquale for King

    271

  • Mikey1874

    253

  • Nookie Bear

    214

1 hour ago, martinb said:

There is no way the SPFL can award the points to St. J. in case something similar happens before the first Sevco/Cellic game.

If either of those two had a Covid problem you can be garaunteed you wouldn't hear about until after that match. Put your mortgage on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SpruceBringsteen
10 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

Think it’s more to do with the government firing a shot over the SPL’s bows. 

 

As it stands though Dave, "firing a shot" means Aberdeen have come out of this with a mild ticking off. Needs to be some kind of actual ramifications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gashauskis9

So here’s the scenario.  Due to this game being rearranged and the inevitable fixture congestion, other games will no doubt need to be postponed or moved about as the season progresses. Imagine St Johnstone are bottom by 1 point in Feb with a game in hand and the season is ended due to another outbreak.  They end up being relegated because of these 8 Aberdeen twats going on the piss.

 

Should be a forfeit and 3-0 to St J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

davemclaren
4 minutes ago, SpruceBringsteen said:

 

As it stands though Dave, "firing a shot" means Aberdeen have come out of this with a mild ticking off. Needs to be some kind of actual ramifications.

You should never hit the ship when firing A shot over the bows. The SPFL should deal with Aberdeen imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
1 hour ago, Mundaydog said:

I thought Hearts weren’t included in the Premiership agreement. We are playing part time players guys who can’t be in a ‘bubble’ due to potential work commitments 

We’ve been allowed back into training, they’re doing it in groups of eight. Not sure what our bubble arrangements are but they should be the same surely? Only two teams are PT, Arbroath and Alloa.

Edited by Pasquale for King
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jambof3tornado
2 hours ago, 7628mm said:

 

Not correct if you listened to NS in the briefing. The SG stated their case but it was the SFA/SPFL that have postponed the game.

 

The SG may have forced the SFA/SPFL to make the call but that is the SFA/SPFL's job to manage their business not the SG

The spfl were saying last night game on.

 

The spfl lack leadership and direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
15 minutes ago, gashauskis9 said:

So here’s the scenario.  Due to this game being rearranged and the inevitable fixture congestion, other games will no doubt need to be postponed or moved about as the season progresses. Imagine St Johnstone are bottom by 1 point in Feb with a game in hand and the season is ended due to another outbreak.  They end up being relegated because of these 8 Aberdeen twats going on the piss.

 

Should be a forfeit and 3-0 to St J.

Like Partick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

colinmaroon
5 minutes ago, Jambof3tornado said:

The spfl were saying last night game on.

 

The spfl lack leadership and direction.

 

 

Are you trying to say that what the authorities said last night has changed 180 degrees today?

 

Surely, that can't happen?

 

Is Cummings advising Doncaster?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
23 minutes ago, 2205ian said:

Game has been re-arranged to Thursday 20th August with AFC next game delayed until the Sunday. Source SPFL Website.

 

Hope the "punishment" is to follow!!

Not sure if their isolating players will be back by then 😆 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, gashauskis9 said:

So here’s the scenario.  Due to this game being rearranged and the inevitable fixture congestion, other games will no doubt need to be postponed or moved about as the season progresses. Imagine St Johnstone are bottom by 1 point in Feb with a game in hand and the season is ended due to another outbreak.  They end up being relegated because of these 8 Aberdeen twats going on the piss.

 

Should be a forfeit and 3-0 to St J.

Basically it would be **** them.As long as it does not effect Celtic or Rangers the Spfl/SFA could not give a **** about anybody and neither could the vast majority of their member clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, James1874f said:

Aberdeen should be hammered for that

 

Don't think Aberdeen should get hammered but the players themselves should get the book thrown at them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

Not sure if their isolating players will be back by then 😆 

They would be "free" to play in the re-arranged game on 20th, however only back training 1 or 2 days, but Peter Liewell has the game vs Celtic covered, refer below.......8 still missing

4 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

 

Nice to see "fair play" still priority for SPFL aka CFC.

 

On reflection, probably right. Perth do not deserve possible Covid infection, can't say the same for Darkhead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3fingersreid
1 hour ago, martinb said:

There is no way the SPFL can award the points to St. J. in case something similar happens before the first Sevco/Cellic game.

I was thinking more of deducting points from the sheep rather than give they other horrible *******s any points , however IF a precedent was set as you say , a little spike around rangers/celtic time it would certainly be interesting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
1 minute ago, Riccarton3 said:

Is there logic in this?

The only logic I see is that the re-imposition of lockdown measures in Aberdeen are initially only for a week.  If they are extended, then there is a case for the later games to be postponed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot

The game should have been played with Aberdeen using other players, how a game can be postponed because 1 team ****ed up is beyond me. 

 

It also, again highlights the adhoc nature of the spfl's approach and the problems of just making up solutions as problems arise. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
1 minute ago, 2205ian said:

They would be "free" to play in the re-arranged game on 20th, however only back training 1 or 2 days, but Peter Liewell has the game vs Celtic covered, refer below.......8 still missing

Nice to see "fair play" still priority for SPFL aka CFC.

 

On reflection, probably right. Perth do not deserve possible Covid infection, can't say the same for Darkhead!

More likely to catch something in Glasgow. Not sure how it’s safe for Hamilton to go to Aberdeen though, would hate the SG to step in again 😱😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

The only logic I see is that the re-imposition of lockdown measures in Aberdeen are initially only for a week.  If they are extended, then there is a case for the later games to be postponed.

I thought it had already been stated these players miss 3 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
1 minute ago, Riccarton3 said:

I thought it had already been stated these players miss 3 games.

Yes, the players will be unavailable for 10/14 days, but the general restrictions on pubs, travel etc., only apply for a week at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

Football was given concessions and as usual inch and mile comes to mind.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

The only logic I see is that the re-imposition of lockdown measures in Aberdeen are initially only for a week.  If they are extended, then there is a case for the later games to be postponed.

 

My reading is tomorrow's game is postponed to allow all Aberdeen's Covid procdures to be checked and reviewed. 

 

The positive results are less an issue. Its the fact that they ignored procdures. So Scottish Government is asking what else have you ignored. 

 

If they pass the review the games will go ahead. 

Edited by Mikey1874
Link to comment
Share on other sites

davemclaren
3 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

In case you haven’t noticed governments of all persuasions all around the world have been imposing themselves on most things recently. I think the anger is because the rules agreed with the SPFL were breached and two players may well have got covid from that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

They aint above the law of the land and its about time it was shown that they are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Government should shut it down and end the embarrassment.  They’ve gave Scottish football a chance to prove they can run the game safely during the pandemic and they’ve failed a few times already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DETTY29 said:

Football was given concessions and as usual inch and mile comes to mind.

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

 football is not a case of life and death (No punchline)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
2 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

 

Government is imposing itself on the whole of society.

 

Football lobbied for and was granted an exemption for elite sport/training/contact/bubbles, all subject to testing and adherence to the same controls as the rest of the population when outside their working environment.

 

Part of the general advice is groups of 8 from 3 households indoors.  Eight people from eight different households is not within the current guidelines.

 

The risk is that any infection inadvertently picked up outside football will be more likely to be transmitted because of their "work" environment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

In case you haven’t noticed governments of all persuasions all around the work have been imposing themselves on most things recently. I think the anger is because the rules agreed with the SPFL were breached and two players may well have got covid from that. 

"In case you haven't noticed"..... what a wonderfully condescending  way to answer a genuine point about football.

 

Again, what are the parameters for next time?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Footballfirst said:

 

Government is imposing itself on the whole of society.

 

Football lobbied for and was granted an exemption for elite sport/training/contact/bubbles, all subject to testing and adherence to the same controls as the rest of the population when outside their working environment.

 

Part of the general advice is groups of 8 from 3 households indoors.  Eight people from eight different households is not within the current guidelines.

 

The risk is that any infection inadvertently picked up outside football will be more likely to be transmitted because of their "work" environment.  

Thank you. A sensible and reasoned answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
1 minute ago, Fun Boaby said:

Again, what are the parameters for next time?  

 

Ask Neil Doncaster, then Nicola Sturgeon to see if they are agreed on what happens next.  If their views differ, then I think that ND will end up doing what NS says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Riccarton3 said:

Is there logic in this?

 

Yeah, it means Celtic get to play Aberdeen when the Dandies have 8 players unavailable, and rack up a cricket score

Neil (a very capable guy) consulted very widely with one member of the SPFL board before coming to this conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shooter McGavin

In the NBA, 343 players have been tested, 0 have tested positive.

 

Aberdeen have already had 2 confirmed and more likely to have it.

 

Sturgeon having to step in to cancel a game that Doncaster was going to sit back and let go ahead.

 

Shambles doesn’t even begin to cover it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, fancy a brew said:

 

Yeah, it means Celtic get to play Aberdeen when the Dandies have 8 players unavailable, and rack up a cricket score

Neil (a very capable guy) consulted very widely with one member of the SPFL board before coming to this conclusion.

Poor, Neil. He only just got the words vindicated and delighted out when the next test of his credentials appears. Harrowing times for the Chief Executive. At least Peter's got his back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

baxterd1974
22 minutes ago, Shanks said:

Government should shut it down and end the embarrassment.  They’ve gave Scottish football a chance to prove they can run the game safely during the pandemic and they’ve failed a few times already.

That would be a disaster for us.  We need games played, leagues completing and get out of the Championship. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpruceBringsteen said:

 

As it stands though Dave, "firing a shot" means Aberdeen have come out of this with a mild ticking off. Needs to be some kind of actual ramifications.


Absolutely spot on. They should be getting totally reamed for this. As it is, it’ll probably help them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

 

Ask Neil Doncaster, then Nicola Sturgeon to see if they are agreed on what happens next.  If their views differ, then I think that ND will end up doing what NS says.


She should just put a Peter Lawwell mask on. He’d happily eat dogshit if Peter told him to do it.

 

 

Edited by Special Officer Doofy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ToqueJambo
54 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

The game should have been played with Aberdeen using other players, how a game can be postponed because 1 team ****ed up is beyond me. 

 

It also, again highlights the adhoc nature of the spfl's approach and the problems of just making up solutions as problems arise. 

 

 

 

If I was St J I'd be fuming if the game is postponed. This is all on Aberdeen. Points should be awarded to St J if Aberdeen can't fulfil a fixture through their own actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

davemclaren
28 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

"In case you haven't noticed"..... what a wonderfully condescending  way to answer a genuine point about football.

 

Again, what are the parameters for next time?  

Whatever is agreed between the government and the SPFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ToqueJambo
39 minutes ago, Fun Boaby said:

Dangerous territory this. The Govt imposing themselves on football. What are then parameters for the  next time?  Is the anger of NS  because it was from a bar?  

 

The government has been shutting down nd reopening entire industries at will. They're in charge of public health. Scottish football got some special treatment and messed it up within 2 weeks.

Edited by ToqueJambo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ToqueJambo
2 hours ago, colinmaroon said:

 

 

St Johnstone should take them to court!

 

 

 

And the SPFL. It only costs £2,500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Special Officer Doofy said:


Absolutely spot on. They should be getting totally reamed for this. As it is, it’ll probably help them out.

Put literally everything in jeopardy and Cormack talks about relief at not forfeiting 3 points. Something wrong right there. If he had any integrity he'd allow his club to take that hit as a warning to others and also encourage utter compliance.

Edited by Riccarton3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...