Jump to content

Coronavirus Super Thread ( merged )


CJGJ

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Ray Gin said:

 

As complete guesses, I think to some degree Scotland is playing catch up. England had far higher cases back in the winter and all those people now have natural immunity.

 

Maybe also more indoor mixing up here too through crapper weather, plus our schools went back earlier.

 

It's an odd one, I just had a look at the case rates on the government website and it may not be the best thing to look at buy looks like Scotland are nearly double the cases per 100k. That's a serious amount, even allowing for natural immunity given we now have the vaccine to offset that disparity.

 

I do think cases will accelerate here as more time is spent back at school but I'm not really sure what the solution is to that. I don't think shifting the burden onto another industry is the way to go, especially given as it won't actually have much effect (or we'd already be seeing the rates go up)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • JudyJudyJudy

    7875

  • Victorian

    4204

  • redjambo

    3883

  • The Real Maroonblood

    3626

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It won't surprise me if there is another Covid passport u-turn from Westminster before the year is out.

 

Schools, universities and offices all returning will drive up numbers and lead to hospitalisations unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nucky Thompson
5 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

It won't surprise me if there is another Covid passport u-turn from Westminster before the year is out.

 

Schools, universities and offices all returning will drive up numbers and lead to hospitalisations unfortunately. 

They've already said that they'll keep it on the back burner. 

 

It's not really a u-turn as they only talked about it. Nothing was passed through parliament.

 

Boris is setting out his Winter Covid plans on Tuesday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Victorian said:

But M'Lud.  I reject your 5 year custodial sentence.  It's draconian.  If I'm as bad a lad as the law thinks then I should be given a life term.  

We encourage you not to rape, pillage and murder. It doesn't protect you but if we all do it then we're all protecting each other.

Don't worry, we aren't enforcing this, so if you do see a murderer, rapist or pillager then try to reason with them, coax, cajole and empathise but please don't stigmatise them. 

You've all done weely, weely, well so far and I, as FM, am so pwoud of you all.🤣

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Albert
26 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

It won't surprise me if there is another Covid passport u-turn from Westminster before the year is out.

 

Schools, universities and offices all returning will drive up numbers and lead to hospitalisations unfortunately. 

Your last word was not terribly convincing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NANOJAMBO said:

Says a guy who quotes the Daily Mail.  Hilarious. 


:laugh: 
 

2 hours ago, Enzo Chiefo said:

We encourage you not to rape, pillage and murder. It doesn't protect you but if we all do it then we're all protecting each other.

Don't worry, we aren't enforcing this, so if you do see a murderer, rapist or pillager then try to reason with them, coax, cajole and empathise but please don't stigmatise them. 

You've all done weely, weely, well so far and I, as FM, am so pwoud of you all.🤣

 

 


:cornette: Get help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Nucky Thompson said:

Most of them last Monday, a few the week before.

 

It's a bit silly wishing Covid on them, just so that they look worse than Scotland

Who wishes covid? You? It's inevitable they'll see the same rise as we did. But carry on.

 

Anyway, how's your super spreading going. Still a success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nucky Thompson
39 minutes ago, ri Alban said:

Who wishes covid? You? It's inevitable they'll see the same rise as we did. But carry on.

 

Anyway, how's your super spreading going. Still a success?

Aye, I'm now spreading it the other way seeing as Scotland has the highest rates in Europe 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ri Alban said:

Who wishes covid? You? It's inevitable they'll see the same rise as we did. But carry on.

 

Anyway, how's your super spreading going. Still a success?

 

Why is it inevitable? We were repeatedly told the main source of spreading was pubs and hospitality (hence why it was targeted most). That's all been open unrestricted down here for nearly 2 months yet we don't have massive rises.

 

Either we won't see the same rises, or (as some of us expected) hospitality isn't and never was a major issue and was instead targeted as an easy target.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jonesy said:

Are home PCR tests delivered by Royal Mail or courier?

 

And, if you give someone a lift to a drive-through PCR test (masked up, windows open), do you count as a close contact and have to isolate if they test positive? 

 

I've tried searching for the above info online and haven't found anything.

 

 

I think it is royal mail. I would assume that if they test positive you would be counted as a close contact. Maybe if you are driving someone to get a test arrange to get one yourself to cover that scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

16 minutes ago, jonesy said:

Are home PCR tests delivered by Royal Mail or courier?

I think anything ordered from the NHS is delivered by Royal Mail, certainly my first LFT kit was.

 

I ordered a "Day 2" PCR test from Randox last week for my return from holiday. It was delivered by the courier DPD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Footballfirst said:

Bad news for Livingston as the UK government has pulled out of their vaccination contract with Valneva.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58499064

 

I suppose the danger here was that Valneva and any of the other vaccines still in trials would get left behind, in as much as they are first generation vaccines, whilst Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, Janssen etc, will I'd imagine, be working on their second generation vaccines.

Valneva etc would always be playing catch-up, not saying there isn't a place or need for them, just maybe not in the UK anymore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said:

 

I suppose the danger here was that Valneva and any of the other vaccines still in trials would get left behind, in as much as they are first generation vaccines, whilst Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, Janssen etc, will I'd imagine, be working on their second generation vaccines.

Valneva etc would always be playing catch-up, not saying there isn't a place or need for them, just maybe not in the UK anymore.

 


The theory suggested that the Valneva vaccine would be better at dealing with variants as it’s a whole inactivated virus. 
 

Have the government had early sight of the trial data and not liked what they’ve seen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Apache Mal said:

Have the government had early sight of the trial data and not liked what they’ve seen? 

Probably decided that they didn't need another 100m vaccine doses, so have looked for a way to cancel the contract and save cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patrick Harvey getting it in the passport debate and claiming he isn't a hypocrite for changing his mind in 6 weeks.

Says that they were just to coerce people to get vaccinated and a threat to civil liberties bit the figures have now changed nlnot him getting power. 

F the lot of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jonesy said:

While I'm not vaccine hesitant, I'd certainly think twice before pumping my body full of a) anything French other than wine or pastis and b) anything 'made' in West Lothian.

 

Can see exactly why they've been ditched.

tbf anything from west lothain is usually the one getting pumped rather than doing the pumping 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jonesy said:

The wee weirdo is quite short and so, with his low centre of gravity I imagine doing a u-turn wasn't too hard for him.

After a decade, veggies are supposed to start leaning towards the sun.  You can't notice it with him because of his low sense of gravity.

He got it from a couple in the debate and he was rattled. 

Said that the huge rise in cases changed his mind rather than power.   

I was at an event he wa talking at and he was alright.  This shows him in his true political light.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that the SG will welcome a decision by the CMOs to recommend vaccinations for 12-15 year olds, primarily because it will help suppress the level of community spread.

 

I also think that they will use that decision to backtrack a bit on vaccine passports, by suggesting that the VPs were being used as a means of increasing the uptake of vaccines, which will now be achieved by vaccinating 12-15 year olds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Auldbenches said:

Patrick Harvey getting it in the passport debate and claiming he isn't a hypocrite for changing his mind in 6 weeks.

Says that they were just to coerce people to get vaccinated and a threat to civil liberties bit the figures have now changed nlnot him getting power. 

F the lot of them

 

Being for/against them on the grounds of coercion and a risk to civil liberties is idealistic. 

 

Being for or against them based on figures is pragmatic.

 

He could have been honest and said they're a necessary evil, but I'm guessing he didn't. Not a good look for a politician who's purpose is idealism (green credentials) to be easily swayed by pragmatic arguments. 

 

"I'm no longer in favour of protecting the planet as the figures to make it happen are just too unpalatable for me"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jonesy said:

Yeah, pretty sure, like most folk, he's not a bad egg and believes in what he's doing.

 

But he's now so deep into the Holyrood bubble that he won't be able to comprehend how much of a hypocrite he is.

I agree with the Foster above who said there's nothing wrong with being politically pragmatic but this is it with him in this case. 

The article he wrote and what was quoted from was a very hard stance against passports and now they are worth it.

Voters don't forget these things, just ask the liberals. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Apache Mal said:


The theory suggested that the Valneva vaccine would be better at dealing with variants as it’s a whole inactivated virus. 
 

Have the government had early sight of the trial data and not liked what they’ve seen? 

 

Probably just not needed in the UK anymore, which has to be a good thing, and is also good, because the richer countries have been accused of buying up all the stock and hoarding the vaccines, the UK by cancelling this order have just made it's 100m doses available for possibly poorer nations to have the chance to be able to buy supplies of a vaccine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

I suspect that the SG will welcome a decision by the CMOs to recommend vaccinations for 12-15 year olds, primarily because it will help suppress the level of community spread.

 

I also think that they will use that decision to backtrack a bit on vaccine passports, by suggesting that the VPs were being used as a means of increasing the uptake of vaccines, which will now be achieved by vaccinating 12-15 year olds.

 

Probably.  Swinney seemed to allude to minimal use of vaccine certification.  Perhaps a toe in the water towards stepping back from it a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Victorian said:

Now Yousaf is saying that large events entry may be spot check based as one option.

 

They're definitely in the process of a rethink or U-turn.

 

No football ground is going to spot check anybody. Oor Humza can get in his uninsured vehicle and bolt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The season of data issues may be on us again. I'll produce the stats anyway, but be aware that the figures may be off today and tomorrow.

 

Scottish numbers: 13 September 2021

Summary

  • 4,241* new cases of COVID-19 reported [-1,671; down from 7,065 a week ago]
  • 40,749* new tests for COVID-19 that reported results [-14,897]
    • 11.3*% of these were positive [-0.2%]
  • 0 new reported death(s) of people who have tested positive (noting that Register Offices are now generally closed at weekends) [=]
  • 90 people were in intensive care yesterday with recently confirmed COVID-19 [+2]
  • 1,048 people were in hospital yesterday with recently confirmed COVID-19 [+29]
  • 4,142,783 people have received their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccination and 3,785,214 have received their second dose [+2,167; +7,753]

*Please note that due to IT issues, the figures reported today are likely to be an underestimate of the total tests and cases. All affected data will be included in tomorrow’s reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been a few reports in the papers recently that states that most of the patients in hospital in the UK are fully vaccinated. This statement is correct, but it total misrepresents the effectiveness of the vaccine because of the uptake in the population. (the graphic explains why)

E7y1KCiWYAICZg9.jpg

Edited by haggis58
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind today's data issue, here are the latest trend stats:

 

      7-day per-100,000 cases                
Council Area WHO   Today Yesterday     11 Sep 10 Sep 9 Sep 8 Sep 7 Sep ... 1 Sep
Scotland 4   725 776 -51   785 818 817 809 815 ... 747
                           
West Dunbartonshire 4   1158 1228 -70   1245 1321 1296 1227 1199 ... 1105
East Renfrewshire 4   1006 1055 -49   1048 1091 1075 1073 1091 ... 1080
North Lanarkshire 4   960 1034 -74   1085 1155 1196 1236 1250 ... 1261
Inverclyde 4   954 1054 -100   1095 1151 1168 1135 1243 ... 1238
Renfrewshire 4   910 981 -71   1033 1078 1102 1123 1132 ... 1041
Glasgow City 4   848 937 -89   956 1014 1036 1032 1046 ... 989
Midlothian 4   842 875 -33   877 890 888 905 895 ... 754
Dundee City 4   831 851 -20   858 859 845 792 827 ... 697
North Ayrshire 4   826 899 -73   891 892 837 857 836 ... 772
South Lanarkshire 4   821 893 -72   909 966 987 981 1006 ... 1013
West Lothian 4   805 832 -27   781 817 822 778 765 ... 668
Clackmannanshire 4   801 833 -32   909 944 975 990 990 ... 704
East Dunbartonshire 4   795 868 -73   874 913 956 1006 997 ... 1150
East Ayrshire 4   788 834 -46   811 813 781 747 722 ... 627
Fife 4   787 813 -26   820 849 830 795 784 ... 597
Falkirk 4   733 801 -68   782 845 848 838 843 ... 690
Stirling 4   679 717 -38   696 699 695 651 664 ... 628
South Ayrshire 4   677 734 -57   697 715 721 706 721 ... 658
Edinburgh City 4   645 704 -59   705 744 723 726 753 ... 722
Aberdeenshire 4   637 660 -23   666 670 621 568 552 ... 424
Argyll & Bute 4   615 681 -66   748 763 784 809 826 ... 712
Aberdeen City 4   553 580 -27   590 607 588 542 549 ... 414
Highland 4   534 584 -50   609 632 611 614 612 ... 531
Dumfries & Galloway 4   512 533 -21   541 589 566 576 573 ... 620
East Lothian 4   510 573 -63   558 584 608 606 652 ... 604
Angus 4   480 515 -35   533 551 544 540 567 ... 430
Scottish Borders 4   451 464 -13   440 453 462 495 463 ... 430
Perth & Kinross 4   395 405 -10   400 394 384 358 352 ... 297
Moray 4   271 281 -10   247 260 254 259 244 ... 183
Shetland Islands 4   267 249 +18   280 337 310 306 289 ... 262
Orkney Islands 4   259 228 +31   223 147 147 129 89 ... 67
Na h-Eileanan Siar 3   140 136 +4   147 166 189 223 181 ... 170
                           
                           
7-day averages     Today Yesterday     11 Sep 10 Sep 9 Sep 8 Sep 7 Sep ... 1 Sep
Tests     53583 55218 -1635   54130 55345 54395 53496 53518 ... 46368
Cases     5658 6061 -403   6126 6391 6376 6314 6365 ... 5832
Positivity rate %     11.3 11.7 -0.4   12.1 12.3 12.5 12.6 12.7 ... 13.3
Deaths     11.0 11.0 0.0   11.0 11.1 9.4 10.1 9.0 ... 6.0
                           
All Vaccinations     9324 9949 -625   10370 10587 11496 11576 12093 ... 15364
1st Dose     2432 2737 -305   3010 3040 3228 3220 3227 ... 2844
2nd Dose     6892 7212 -320   7360 7547 8268 8356 8866 ... 12520
                           
All in hospital     949 909 +40   867 822 776 732 696 ... 524
Non-ICU     865 828 +37   789 748 705 666 633 ... 473
ICU     84 81 +3   78 74 71 66 63 ... 51
Edited by redjambo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Real Maroonblood
3 minutes ago, redjambo said:

Bearing in mind today's data issue, here are the latest trend stats:

 

      7-day per-100,000 cases                
Council Area WHO   Today Yesterday     11 Sep 10 Sep 9 Sep 8 Sep 7 Sep ... 1 Sep
Scotland 4   725 776 -51   785 818 817 809 815 ... 747
                           
West Dunbartonshire 4   1158 1228 -70   1245 1321 1296 1227 1199 ... 1105
East Renfrewshire 4   1006 1055 -49   1048 1091 1075 1073 1091 ... 1080
North Lanarkshire 4   960 1034 -74   1085 1155 1196 1236 1250 ... 1261
Inverclyde 4   954 1054 -100   1095 1151 1168 1135 1243 ... 1238
Renfrewshire 4   910 981 -71   1033 1078 1102 1123 1132 ... 1041
Glasgow City 4   848 937 -89   956 1014 1036 1032 1046 ... 989
Midlothian 4   842 875 -33   877 890 888 905 895 ... 754
Dundee City 4   831 851 -20   858 859 845 792 827 ... 697
North Ayrshire 4   826 899 -73   891 892 837 857 836 ... 772
South Lanarkshire 4   821 893 -72   909 966 987 981 1006 ... 1013
West Lothian 4   805 832 -27   781 817 822 778 765 ... 668
Clackmannanshire 4   801 833 -32   909 944 975 990 990 ... 704
East Dunbartonshire 4   795 868 -73   874 913 956 1006 997 ... 1150
East Ayrshire 4   788 834 -46   811 813 781 747 722 ... 627
Fife 4   787 813 -26   820 849 830 795 784 ... 597
Falkirk 4   733 801 -68   782 845 848 838 843 ... 690
Stirling 4   679 717 -38   696 699 695 651 664 ... 628
South Ayrshire 4   677 734 -57   697 715 721 706 721 ... 658
Edinburgh City 4   645 704 -59   705 744 723 726 753 ... 722
Aberdeenshire 4   637 660 -23   666 670 621 568 552 ... 424
Argyll & Bute 4   615 681 -66   748 763 784 809 826 ... 712
Aberdeen City 4   553 580 -27   590 607 588 542 549 ... 414
Highland 4   534 584 -50   609 632 611 614 612 ... 531
Dumfries & Galloway 4   512 533 -21   541 589 566 576 573 ... 620
East Lothian 4   510 573 -63   558 584 608 606 652 ... 604
Angus 4   480 515 -35   533 551 544 540 567 ... 430
Scottish Borders 4   451 464 -13   440 453 462 495 463 ... 430
Perth & Kinross 4   395 405 -10   400 394 384 358 352 ... 297
Moray 4   271 281 -10   247 260 254 259 244 ... 183
Shetland Islands 4   267 249 +18   280 337 310 306 289 ... 262
Orkney Islands 4   259 228 +31   223 147 147 129 89 ... 67
Na h-Eileanan Siar 3   140 136 +4   147 166 189 223 181 ... 170
                           
                           
7-day averages     Today Yesterday     11 Sep 10 Sep 9 Sep 8 Sep 7 Sep ... 1 Sep
Tests     53583 55218 -1635   54130 55345 54395 53496 53518 ... 46368
Cases     5658 6061 -403   6126 6391 6376 6314 6365 ... 5832
Positivity rate %     11.3 11.7 -0.4   12.1 12.3 12.5 12.6 12.7 ... 13.3
Deaths     11.0 11.0 0.0   11.0 11.1 9.4 10.1 9.0 ... 6.0
                           
All Vaccinations     9324 9949 -625   10370 10587 11496 11576 12093 ... 15364
1st Dose     2432 2737 -305   3010 3040 3228 3220 3227 ... 2844
2nd Dose     6892 7212 -320   7360 7547 8268 8356 8866 ... 12520
                           
All in hospital     949 909 +40   867 822 776 732 696 ... 524
Non-ICU     865 828 +37   789 748 705 666 633 ... 473
ICU     84 81 +3   78 74 71 66 63 ... 51

👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Lord BJ said:

Medical officers recommending one dose of Pzifer for 12-15 year old

Wonder why just the one dose? 
Think I’ll stick to advice of the JCVI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GBJambo said:

Wonder why just the one dose? 
Think I’ll stick to advice of the JCVI

 

Well the JCVI advice is not advice for the public to pick and choose their own decision.  It's their advice feeding in the SAGE and the government.  The joint CMOs also advise the government and the government makes the decision based on what they're advised and their own social and economic considerations.

 

If the JCVI say no and the CMOs say yes,  the public doesn't have the competence to decide which is right.  Anyone choosing the JCVI is likely to be inclined against the vaccine anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Victorian said:

 

Well the JCVI advice is not advice for the public to pick and choose their own decision.  It's their advice feeding in the SAGE and the government.  The joint CMOs also advise the government and the government makes the decision based on what they're advised and their own social and economic considerations.

 

If the JCVI say no and the CMOs say yes,  the public doesn't have the competence to decide which is right.  Anyone choosing the JCVI is likely to be inclined against the vaccine anyway.

 

Doesn't that leave then at an impasse? They don't have the competence to decide which is right, so should they take action, or not?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taffin said:

 

Doesn't that leave then at an impasse? They don't have the competence to decide which is right, so should they take action, or not?

 

 

Parents should and will make their own choice.  What I'm saying is that the JCVI does not advise the public to enable their choice.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jonesy said:

The divergence does highlight the nonsense that was the follow the science sloganeering used last year (by both politicians and those seeking to belittle those who disagreed with government decisions). Science is neither monolithic nor accurate. It's simply the processes of understanding the world around us in increasingly accurate ways.

 

There has always been a few contradictions in that way.  The governments do tend to follow the science but certainly don't follow all of the science.  Such a thing is sometimes impossible if there's a direct conflicting position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Victorian said:

 

Parents should and will make their own choice.  What I'm saying is that the JCVI does not advise the public to enable their choice.  

 

👍👍 I get you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, indianajones said:

Scientists say do not vaccinate children. 


Govts  vaccinate children anyway.

 

 

 

 

Its not as straightforward or simple as the statement above - I would advise reading the actual JCVI statement on the above  - they actually state the benefits of vaccination are marginally positive - but for balance also detail the negatives.  In reality they advised taking on board a range of other sets of advice - not all strictly health related - more societal.  There is loads more than set down below - both for and against - but people really need to time to read and understand these arguments are not binary.

 

Overall, the committee is of the opinion that the benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms (tables 1 to 4) but acknowledges that there is considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms. The margin of benefit, based primarily on a health perspective, is considered too small to support advice on a universal programme of vaccination of otherwise healthy 12 to 15-year-old children at this time. As longer-term data on potential adverse reactions accrue, greater certainty may allow for a reconsideration of the benefits and harms. Such data may not be available for several months.

JCVI has considered commentary from stakeholders on the benefits of vaccination on the operation of schools and the educational impact of the pandemic on children and young people. JCVI is constituted with expertise to allow consideration of the health benefits and risks of vaccination and it is not within its remit to incorporate in-depth considerations on wider societal impacts, including educational benefits. The government may wish to seek further views on the wider societal and educational impacts from the chief medical officers of the 4 nations, with representation from JCVI in these subsequent discussions. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of vaccination in children and young people on peer-to-peer transmission and transmission in the wider (highly vaccinated) population. Estimates from modelling vary substantially, and the committee is of the view that any impact on transmission may be relatively small, given the lower effectiveness of the vaccine against infection with the Delta variant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, haggis58 said:

E7y1KCiWYAICZg9.jpg

 

This is a great wee diagram. 

Would love one that gave the same type of stats but this time instead of hospitalisation it's deaths.

 

The problem is there'll be some folks out there that still point to the bottom of the page and go "more people with the vaccine getting ill" cause they are incapable of understanding.

 

Thanks for sharing though. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mysterion said:

 

This is a great wee diagram. 

Would love one that gave the same type of stats but this time instead of hospitalisation it's deaths.

 

The problem is there'll be some folks out there that still point to the bottom of the page and go "more people with the vaccine getting ill" cause they are incapable of understanding.

 

Thanks for sharing though. 👍

Coincidentally, earlier today, the ONS published death figures with regard to vaccination status, for England, covering the first half of this year.

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand2july2021

 

The main point was:

  • In England, between 2 January and 2 July 2021, there were 51,281 deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19); 640 occurred in people who were fully vaccinated, which includes people who had been infected before they were vaccinated.

 

Table 1: There were 640 deaths involving COVID-19 of people who had received both vaccination doses
Count of deaths involving COVID-19 and percentage of all deaths by vaccination status, England, deaths occurring between 2 January and 2 July 2021
Vaccination status Deaths involving
COVID-19
Non-COVID-19
deaths
Percent of
all deaths
All deaths regardless of vaccination status 51,281 214,701 19.3
Unvaccinated  38,964 65,170 37.4
Deaths within 21 days of first dose 4,388 14,265 23.5
Deaths 21 days or more after first dose  7,289 66,533 9.9
Deaths within 21 days of second dose 182 11,470 1.6
Deaths 21 days or more after second dose  458 57,263 0.8
Edited by Footballfirst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Taffin said:

 

Being for/against them on the grounds of coercion and a risk to civil liberties is idealistic. 

 

Being for or against them based on figures is pragmatic.

 

He could have been honest and said they're a necessary evil, but I'm guessing he didn't. Not a good look for a politician who's purpose is idealism (green credentials) to be easily swayed by pragmatic arguments. 

 

"I'm no longer in favour of protecting the planet as the figures to make it happen are just too unpalatable for me"

 

Expecting any politician to be honest is wishful thinking in the extreme. Having spent all my working life dealing with politicians I can assure you that honesty is a very rare commodity. For them politics is a game and they will tell what they consider to be inconsequential little white lies just to score points over any opponent, to get votes or most often, to look after number one, themselves; the truth is of no consequence and even when caught out they will come up with some guff like 'it wasn't meant to be interpreted like that' or 'I said what I thought was correct at the time.' Us, the general public, are simply pawns to be used with no thought for the consequences. In Scotland the Covid passport was announced with a set start date but with no practical thought of how it would work for the sole purpose of political point scoring in Sturgeon's ongoing but extremely tedious and boring game of Scotland v England.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, henryheart said:

 

Expecting any politician to be honest is wishful thinking in the extreme. Having spent all my working life dealing with politicians I can assure you that honesty is a very rare commodity. For them politics is a game and they will tell what they consider to be inconsequential little white lies just to score points over any opponent, to get votes or most often, to look after number one, themselves; the truth is of no consequence and even when caught out they will come up with some guff like 'it wasn't meant to be interpreted like that' or 'I said what I thought was correct at the time.' Us, the general public, are simply pawns to be used with no thought for the consequences. In Scotland the Covid passport was announced with a set start date but with no practical thought of how it would work for the sole purpose of political point scoring in Sturgeon's ongoing but extremely tedious and boring game of Scotland v England.   

 

You'll find no arguments on the above from me. Good post 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

Coincidentally, earlier today, the ONS published death figures with regard to vaccination status, for England, covering the first half of this year.

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand2july2021

 

The main point was:

  • In England, between 2 January and 2 July 2021, there were 51,281 deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19); 640 occurred in people who were fully vaccinated, which includes people who had been infected before they were vaccinated.

 

Table 1: There were 640 deaths involving COVID-19 of people who had received both vaccination doses
Count of deaths involving COVID-19 and percentage of all deaths by vaccination status, England, deaths occurring between 2 January and 2 July 2021
Vaccination status Deaths involving
COVID-19
Non-COVID-19
deaths
Percent of
all deaths
All deaths regardless of vaccination status 51,281 214,701 19.3
Unvaccinated  38,964 65,170 37.4
Deaths within 21 days of first dose 4,388 14,265 23.5
Deaths 21 days or more after first dose  7,289 66,533 9.9
Deaths within 21 days of second dose 182 11,470 1.6
Deaths 21 days or more after second dose  458 57,263 0.8

 

For me the most important figure in the above stats is that almost 39,000 unvaccinated people died in the same period that only 640 double vaccinated people died involving Covid-19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • davemclaren changed the title to Coronavirus Super Thread ( merged )
  • JKBMod 12 featured, locked, unlocked and unfeatured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...