jack D and coke Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 No, Brits voted No. I'll give the leave voters and Trump voters one thing. THEY'RE NOT SHITEBAGS. Give England a vote for Independence, they'll not shite themselves. No vote , remain vote, tells you what a bunch of shitebags we really are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Murray Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Pound making a bit of recovery due to the US election results http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/pound-sterling-value-donald-trump-dollar-president-win-currency-exchange-a7411126.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H1B5 Owner Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Pound making a bit of recovery due to the US election results http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/pound-sterling-value-donald-trump-dollar-president-win-currency-exchange-a7411126.html Not least in part downinvestors initially fleeing the USD as an even bigger risk than Brexit UK. FTSE down a bit as a result (See saw). Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Nope. Ever get the feeling that every word you say is not your own? Ever get the feeling that you can't take a piss unless someone has hashtagged #takeapiss? Chortle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 A poem for all you remoaners out there. I voted out You voted in Now my vote isn't important Cos you didn't win (credit to a lady on twitter). Amazing stuff, prize winning even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Amazing stuff, prize winning even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Amazing stuff, prize winning even. You lost deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 You lost deal with it. Taking their time with this Artcle 50 though. How come? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 You lost deal with it. I'm sound with it mate. Don't get upset with me because you posted some utter shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Taking their time with this Artcle 50 though. How come? Best things come to those who wait. Show some patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 13, 2016 Author Share Posted November 13, 2016 So when exactly will brexit mean brexit?. It's holding up Indy, we've a wall of our own to build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
132goals1958 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result LOLZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result ^^^ stolen off a comment from the Scotsman website. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result How terribly original of you. http://newsthump.com/2016/11/12/nicola-sturgeon-refuses-to-accept-result-of-england-vs-scotland-match/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
132goals1958 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 ^^^ stolen off a comment from the Scotsman website. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Wrong again--- copied from a completely different source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Wrong again--- copied from a completely different source Robot ^^^ Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Robot ^^^ Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk If ever ironic is never understood then a history of your posts should be given as a lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 If ever ironic is never understood then a history of your posts should be given as a lesson. Thought you gave up on this thread a while ago jakey? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoolfordsHearts Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Nicola Sturgeon has ordered the match between England Vs Scotland be replayed as the overwhelming majority of Scots didn't want that result Looks like you've got a good few bites with that one. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samgolden Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 I don't recollect May or anyone on the Brexit side talking about red lines. It's the remainers (sorry soft Brexiters as they are now known) who have been talking about preconditions or "must haves" determined by parliament in advance of triggering Article 50 and the START of negotiations. I can't believe they are stupid enough or naive enough to think you can go into a negotiation with the other side knowing your "must haves" (and knowing that you cannot be bluffing because it is a condition agreed by parliament) and expect to get anything from the negotiation. Soft Brexit = Remain. Am I correct that the Royal perogative can't be used because the remain MPs want a vote on it as the Referendum was not the result they wanted and it had to go to a vote what Eu laws were incorporated into UK Law without them being discussed was the Royal progative used then anyway who is behind this Gina Miller The Elite "Follow the Money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Looks like you've got a good few bites with that one. lol. I'm thinking Farage and Boris got more though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 They don't like an independent Scotland, now they don't like an independent UK? Clearly too wee, too stupid! http://www.scotsman.com/news/rbs-chief-banks-could-pull-out-of-britain-without-brexit-plan-1-4286324 Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 No, because hard brexit will mean the loss of the "financial passport" that banks need in order to trade inside the EU. They'll all leave for Frankfurt in order to preserve that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Am I correct that the Royal perogative can't be used because the remain MPs want a vote on it as the Referendum was not the result they wanted and it had to go to a vote what Eu laws were incorporated into UK Law without them being discussed was the Royal progative used then anyway who is behind this Gina Miller The Elite "Follow the Money The royal prerogative was certainly used to incorporate decades of EU law into UK law. The Supreme Court has still to decide on appeal on whether it can be used to trigger Article 50. From what I've read there seems a reasonable chance that the high court got it wrong by saying that parliament must approve a triggering of Article 50 because it makes a fundamental change to peoples' rights. It doesn't - there will need to be parliament approval on repealing EU laws and the agreed terms for leaving after negotiation. And the author of Article 50 has said triggering it is not an irrevocable decision to leave. Blocking triggering Article 50 or imposing public and firm negotiating bottom lines simply stops or makes impossible negotiation of the terms for Brexit. Which is what this is all about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee_Mellon Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 I'm thinking Farage and Boris got more though In what way? Please explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The domino effect will ensure article 50 is never triggered Who will the nippy wee ankle biter beg with and bleat to next ? She must realise now no main players gives a shit what she says anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboX2 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The domino effect will ensure article 50 is never triggered Who will the nippy wee ankle biter beg with and bleat to next ? She must realise now no main players gives a shit what she says anyway. I have said this before, but rather than sending letters to Trump on US-Scottish relations or jet off on non-official meetings with the junior ministers of Germany and Belgium on Brexit, she should get on with governing. If she was to use and harness devolution to make Scotland better and practiced what she was preaching about an inclusive, socially just and open society then she might in 5 years time win an independence vote and be able to be a social justice campaigning PM. As it stands, she's shouting in a hurricane. Even if we were independent right now the likes of Hollande, Merkel, Putin and Trump would hardly be interested in her views as none of their politics align with hers (albeit I think the SNP since 2014 have increasingly lost direction and seem more like what they opposed than what they were). Whilst I didn't vote for Brexit, there's a huge opportunity for more powers for her government with it. She should be pushing more here than maintaining her current path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 If ever ironic is never understood then a history of your posts should be given as a lesson.Watch those glass hooses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 Looks like you've got a good few bites with that one. lol. Indy2,oops, I mean 2nd game in June. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 I have said this before, but rather than sending letters to Trump on US-Scottish relations or jet off on non-official meetings with the junior ministers of Germany and Belgium on Brexit, she should get on with governing. If she was to use and harness devolution to make Scotland better and practiced what she was preaching about an inclusive, socially just and open society then she might in 5 years time win an independence vote and be able to be a social justice campaigning PM. As it stands, she's shouting in a hurricane. Even if we were independent right now the likes of Hollande, Merkel, Putin and Trump would hardly be interested in her views as none of their politics align with hers (albeit I think the SNP since 2014 have increasingly lost direction and seem more like what they opposed than what they were). Whilst I didn't vote for Brexit, there's a huge opportunity for more powers for her government with it. She should be pushing more here than maintaining her current path. Don't you worry, she's repairing the damage your mob caused, in fine style.Never again will slab be allowed to inflict carnage on Scotland. Scotland v the Tory(red or blue) until independence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 I love how all the remainders are all constantly talking about ?Article 50? every second of every day now. I would wager a bet that to a man not one of them had ever even heard about it or knew of it till the leave vote. Now everyone is an expert on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnold Rothstein Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Don't you worry, she's repairing the damage your mob caused, in fine style. Never again will slab be allowed to inflict carnage on Scotland. Scotland v the Tory(red or blue) until independence. How exactly is she repairing it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 How exactly is she repairing it?How's life? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 How exactly is she repairing it? Too busy throwing her toys out the pram. She really has got a face like a skelped arse every time she gets trumped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The domino effect will ensure article 50 is never triggered Who will the nippy wee ankle biter beg with and bleat to next ? She must realise now no main players gives a shit what she says anyway. What domino effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Just read Wee Nip's biog on the gov.scot website and her first paragraph sums her up "Nicola Sturgeon is Scotland?s first female First Minister and the first female to lead any of the devolved UK administrations." One sentence and she makes reference to her sex twice. Why is this even important. Why does everything she does have to be about sex? And thank **** I do not mean intercourse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 I have said this before, but rather than sending letters to Trump on US-Scottish relations or jet off on non-official meetings with the junior ministers of Germany and Belgium on Brexit, she should get on with governing. If she was to use and harness devolution to make Scotland better and practiced what she was preaching about an inclusive, socially just and open society then she might in 5 years time win an independence vote and be able to be a social justice campaigning PM. As it stands, she's shouting in a hurricane. Even if we were independent right now the likes of Hollande, Merkel, Putin and Trump would hardly be interested in her views as none of their politics align with hers (albeit I think the SNP since 2014 have increasingly lost direction and seem more like what they opposed than what they were). Whilst I didn't vote for Brexit, there's a huge opportunity for more powers for her government with it. She should be pushing more here than maintaining her current path. The SNP government does not even make much use of the powers it has, because the SNP is a one issue coalition, which has to avoid upsetting the left, right and centre because voters across the political spectrum contribute to support for independence. So the SNP does easy things that won't offend anyone (tuition fees, care for elderly) especially when they don't cost voters anything. The SNP for example cannot use its existing tax raising powers to help deliver social justice because it would lose votes for independence. So Nicola keeps herself busy and in the headlines by making meaningless gestures on matters on which the Scottish Government has no say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Just read Wee Nip's biog on the gov.scot website and her first paragraph sums her up "Nicola Sturgeon is Scotland?s first female First Minister and the first female to lead any of the devolved UK administrations." One sentence and she makes reference to her sex twice. Why is this even important. Why does everything she does have to be about sex? And thank **** I do not mean intercourse! She should be ashamed that she is not also the first gay or transgender FM. But maybe still time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 She should be ashamed that she is not also the first gay or transgender FM. But maybe still time? It's what motivates wee Patrick Harvie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Just read Wee Nip's biog on the gov.scot website and her first paragraph sums her up "Nicola Sturgeon is Scotland?s first female First Minister and the first female to lead any of the devolved UK administrations." One sentence and she makes reference to her sex twice. Why is this even important. Why does everything she does have to be about sex? And thank **** I do not mean intercourse! Probably because there is still a huge gender gap so it's something to be proud of and inspiring to other females out there. Your ignorance is off the charts at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 Just read Wee Nip's biog on the gov.scot website and her first paragraph sums her up "Nicola Sturgeon is Scotland?s first female First Minister and the first female to lead any of the devolved UK administrations." One sentence and she makes reference to her sex twice. Why is this even important. Why does everything she does have to be about sex? And thank **** I do not mean intercourse! Them the facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted November 14, 2016 Author Share Posted November 14, 2016 The SNP government does not even make much use of the powers it has, because the SNP is a one issue coalition, which has to avoid upsetting the left, right and centre because voters across the political spectrum contribute to support for independence. So the SNP does easy things that won't offend anyone (tuition fees, care for elderly) especially when they don't cost voters anything. The SNP for example cannot use its existing tax raising powers to help deliver social justice because it would lose votes for independence. So Nicola keeps herself busy and in the headlines by making meaningless gestures on matters on which the Scottish Government has no say. They didn't put council tax up then, I must've dreamt that.Could always go and crush, I mean sit in tanks or clean carpets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Probably because there is still a huge gender gap so it's something to be proud of and inspiring to other females out there. Your ignorance is off the charts at times. Gender gap where? I have never seen it in my working life. Even as I look around my office now I do not see it. There have only been 5 (not including acting) First Minister?s in Scotland and 1 has been female. 2 out of the past 6 UK PMs have been female. Men tend to make better leaders, I know this will sit uncomfortably with some (the name callers) but it is kinda fact. Like it or not women in general do not command the respect that men do in high up positions, even from women who tend to hate each other by nature. Men also do not have children, for this blame no-one but nature. I see a lot of affirmative action out there and it is horrendous. To employ someone because they are a certain sect, race, gender etc is as wrong as to not employ someone for it. I look around the world and it is becoming almost fashionable to have a female as leader now. I hope all for reasons that they are the best suited but I fear not. What female do you think should have been Scotland?s first Minister before Wee Nip? Who has been unfairly overlooked because of her sex? Please tell me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Just read Wee Nip's biog on the gov.scot website and her first paragraph sums her up "Nicola Sturgeon is Scotland?s first female First Minister and the first female to lead any of the devolved UK administrations." One sentence and she makes reference to her sex twice. Why is this even important. Why does everything she does have to be about sex? And thank **** I do not mean intercourse! Then use the word gender! You gave me the dry boak there talking about sex and cranky in the same sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Then use the word gender! You gave me the dry boak there talking about sex and cranky in the same sentence. Lol, I wanted to do 'a funny'. You mean you don't visualise her on your bed in nothing but Sussies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Lol, I wanted to do 'a funny'. You mean you don't visualise her on your bed in nothing but Sussies? That's it! We're done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 That's it! We're done! Ok I wont whatsapp you the picture then!! Sheesh some people need to come out of the closet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Probably because there is still a huge gender gap so it's something to be proud of and inspiring to other females out there. Your ignorance is off the charts at times. But does she think people might not have noticed that she is a woman? I don't remember Thatcher or Merkel banging on about being the first female. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.