Thunderstruck Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I don't think so, its growing day by day, with the realisation of forever Tory rule. 56 from 59 MPs and a whitewash this May, add to this Brexit when we vote in, then BJ as PM. Aye, minority. A good percentage of no voters would vote yes, when all argument's are won. Not all no voters are concrete Brits. 33% of the electorate at last reckoning and that was before the "Black Hole" became so glaringly obvious. I have yet to meet or hear from a "Yes supporter" who can explain how we would be moving forward from the Indy Day without Oil Revenues, without a currency, without any long term plan for anything of any substance. The silent majority were right, the silent majority remains right. Even Wee Nicky had to concede that yesterday - she knows we dodged a bullet and she knows it will be many years before the economic planets will align again. Her problem is keeping the more frothy Nats onside in the meantime - how long before they jump the SNP ship or internal dissent splits the party? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The first paragraph is so ludicrous and untrue that I'm not prepared to read the rest.Spot on about the unionists losing the plot.Theyre all the same who fly that UF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 They got 55% when it mattered most when Scotland was asked the most direct and unambiguous question of all.Aye, all together maybe but you obviously missed my (& your) point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Are you still trying to be English?. Last time I checked I was a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It doesn't look like that is changing any time soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 33% of the electorate at last reckoning and that was before the "Black Hole" became so glaringly obvious. I have yet to meet or hear from a "Yes supporter" who can explain how we would be moving forward from the Indy Day without Oil Revenues, without a currency, without any long term plan for anything if any substance. The silent majority were right, the silent majority remains right. Even Wee Nicky had to concede that yesterday - she knows we dodged a bullet and she knows it will be many years before the economic planets will align again. Her problem is keeping the more frothy Nats onside in the meantime - how long before they jump the SNP ship or internal dissent splits the party? You still talking pish with this 33%.If you don't vote that's your problem. So 49.9%. Silent majority. Aye right. Flutes and drums make some noise. Gideons just fell down his own blackhole. ?20b oh dear, no ?20b surplus then. Cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Last time I checked I was a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It doesn't look like that is changing any time soon.Enjoy it.It's not gonnae last much longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 You still talking pish with this 33%. If you don't vote that's your problem. So 49.9%. Silent majority. Aye right. Flutes and drums make some noise. Gideons just fell down his own blackhole. ?20b oh dear, no ?20b surplus then. Cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuts. 33% of the Electorate, Bud. It's the only consistent measure. Please don't bring sectarianism into this debate. It demeans you. Cuts - I'll worry when UK follows the self-imposed, grievance-building cuts of the Scottish (SNP) Government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 That's not very new Scotland or democratic. Should the SNP have packed up shop in 1979? Or 1992? Or 1997? Or 1999? Never looked like winning a majority then. No of course not but you obviously didnt read the post I was replying to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Author Share Posted March 13, 2016 Why? I think you'll find hell freezing over, before labour folk ever vote tory. They might not vote SNP but they'll never vote for that filth. The majority of people are filth are they. Pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 53% of Scots born residents voted yes. 73% of ruk born residents voted no. 420.000 ruk residents at the time. No won by 187,000 votes. Well, the majority of Scots voted Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The majority of people are filth are they. PatheticTory aren't the Majority in Scotland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Author Share Posted March 13, 2016 33% of the Electorate, Bud. It's the only consistent measure. Please don't bring sectarianism into this debate. It demeans you. Cuts - I'll worry when UK follows the self-imposed, grievance-building cuts of the Scottish (SNP) Government. He's unable to seperate the issue of sectarianism.. Tells you all you need to know about the level of intellect your dealing with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Author Share Posted March 13, 2016 Tory aren't the Majority in Scotland. But no voters are and your not respectful of those views either.. Make your mind up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 But no voters are and your not respectful of those views either.. Make your mind upRespect no voters, why?.As I've said The majority of Scots voted Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 He's unable to seperate the issue of sectarianism.. Tells you all you need to know about the level of intellect your dealing withNo, its shows the blinkered world you live in.The majority of no voters in the West, were represented at George sq. They voted with only on issue in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des' Dad Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Sunday Herald - today (SNP supporting newspaper) NICOLA Sturgeon is already thinking of ?the best time to have another referendum?, her predecessor Alex Salmond has claimed, despite the First Minister insisting the public will decide the date. Contradicting the official SNP position that the timing lies in the hands of the people, Salmond said Sturgeon would personally time it ?very carefully? to help secure a Yes vote. The opposition parties last night claimed the former First Minister had ?let the cat out of the bag? about plans to ignore the No vote 18 months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 No, its shows the blinkered world you live in. The majority of no voters in the West, were represented at George sq. They voted with only on issue in mind. What a load of rubbish and such a bigoted remark. I live in the West (Glasgow), have done all of my life and the vast majority of my friends and colleagues voted no. None of them were in George square the next day, none of them have season tickets at Ibrox, none of them are in a lodge etc or whatever goes through your mind about No voters. What we all did have in common was the fact that we were in agreement that the Yes campaign had no clear fiscal policy, too many unanswered questions and would have led to uncertainty. The fact is AS missed a trick, for someone who's sole existence was independence they couldn't really answer questions on how the country would progress if it was a Yes vote. You are a perfect example of the loud minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 No, its shows the blinkered world you live in. The majority of no voters in the West, were represented at George sq. They voted with only on issue in mind. It's not a coincidence that ned central (Glasgow and Dundee) were two of the few areas that voted yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaymarketJambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 What a load of rubbish and such a bigoted remark. I live in the West (Glasgow), have done all of my life and the vast majority of my friends and colleagues voted no. None of them were in George square the next day, none of them have season tickets at Ibrox, none of them are in a lodge etc or whatever goes through your mind about No voters. What we all did have in common was the fact that we were in agreement that the Yes campaign had no clear fiscal policy, too many unanswered questions and would have led to uncertainty. The fact is AS missed a trick, for someone who's sole existence was independence they couldn't really answer questions on how the country would progress if it was a Yes vote. You are a perfect example of the loud minority. How is the likes of aussieh the loud minority when SNP won 56 seats last's year's Westminster election and are on course to win this year's Holyrood election by another landslide? Also when vote SNP you are voting for a party that wants Scottish independence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irufushi Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 What a load of rubbish and such a bigoted remark. I live in the West (Glasgow), have done all of my life and the vast majority of my friends and colleagues voted no. None of them were in George square the next day, none of them have season tickets at Ibrox, none of them are in a lodge etc or whatever goes through your mind about No voters. What we all did have in common was the fact that we were in agreement that the Yes campaign had no clear fiscal policy, too many unanswered questions and would have led to uncertainty. The fact is AS missed a trick, for someone who's sole existence was independence they couldn't really answer questions on how the country would progress if it was a Yes vote. You are a perfect example of the loud minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 high rates in income tax, with the jobs boom. Simple. Who blames England, if the roles were reversed and we owned England id do the same. Id also give them a piss take devolution make them think its something that its not. Stop thinking unionist have some sort of intellect, they're brain power was there for all to see at George sq and its there every July. Give me strength. So the majority of those voting in the referendum were brain dead Orange bigots and all the Yes voters were scrupulous and fair minded in their dissection of the issues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Respect no voters, why?. As I've said The majority of Scots voted Yes. I;m not going right through the thread but unless you're adopting a distinctly racial view of what a "Scot" is they patently didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 How is the likes of aussieh the loud minority when SNP won 56 seats last's year's Westminster election and are on course to win this year's Holyrood election by another landslide? Also when vote SNP you are voting for a party that wants Scottish independence. Because we are referring to the referendum where 55.3% of the votes case were No. Therefore as a Yes voter the poster is in the minority. if you want to look at the General election and use that as a benchmark for a referendum result using a first past the post voting system isn't correct. So assuming those voting SNP would want independance (as you say) then they got 50% of the popular vote, so still not a majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaymarketJambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Because we are referring to the referendum where 55.3% of the votes case were No. Therefore as a Yes voter the poster is in the minority. if you want to look at the General election and use that as a benchmark for a referendum result using a first past the post voting system isn't correct. So assuming those voting SNP would want independance (as you say) then they got 50% of the popular vote, so still not a majority. Point taken. But if you don't want independence don't vote SNP, but people vote for the SNP in big numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QT. Has Dundee moved to England?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I;m not going right through the thread but unless you're adopting a distinctly racial view of what a "Scot" is they patently didn't.You all like numbers.55.3% voted no. 44.7% voted yes. 53% of Scots born residents voted yes. 73% of rUK born residents voted no. So we're out voted by Brits. No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QT. Has Dundee moved to England?. Was certainly a surprise to hear people from Dundee who could speak English Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Point taken. But if you don't want independence don't vote SNP, but people vote for the SNP in big numbers. That may still happen, however I think a lot of people who may have voted for the SNP will be wary of doing so, now that Sturgeon has said she will start to build a case for a second referendum. Now we all know that another referendum may be many years away but with Sturgeon coming out with that it may scare some folks into thinking there will be another one in a couple of years or so, and personally I don't think there is much appetite for another referendum so soon after the last one. I think she's made a mistake here in announcing this just now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Give me strength. So the majority of those voting in the referendum were brain dead Orange bigots and all the Yes voters were scrupulous and fair minded in their dissection of the issues? As I said previously, two of the few places that voted yes have the highest proportion of neds - Dundee and Glasgow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 What a load of rubbish and such a bigoted remark. I live in the West (Glasgow), have done all of my life and the vast majority of my friends and colleagues voted no. None of them were in George square the next day, none of them have season tickets at Ibrox, none of them are in a lodge etc or whatever goes through your mind about No voters. What we all did have in common was the fact that we were in agreement that the Yes campaign had no clear fiscal policy, too many unanswered questions and would have led to uncertainty. The fact is AS missed a trick, for someone who's sole existence independence they couldn't really answer questions on how the country would progress if it was a Yes vote. You are a perfect example of the loud minority. Aye, where?In the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 You all like numbers. 55.3% voted no. 44.7% voted yes. 53% of Scots born residents voted yes. 73% of rUK born residents voted no. So we're out voted by Brits. No? Probably from the same "trustworthy source" that told us the majority of every group (apart from the over-50s) voted "Yes". That's the sort of arithmetic (deeply flawed) that appeals to those who think they were cheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Probably from the same "trustworthy source" that told us the majority of every group (apart from the over-50s) voted "Yes". That's the sort of arithmetic (deeply flawed) that appeals to those who think they were cheated.No the paper of your 'Vow'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBJambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Probably from the same "trustworthy source" that told us the majority of every group (apart from the over-50s) voted "Yes". That's the sort of arithmetic (deeply flawed) that appeals to those who think they were cheated. The only 2 figures that can be accounted for are the first 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The only 2 figures that can be accounted for are the first 2.Did you think they don't know who voted and for what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBJambo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Did you think they don't know who voted and for what? So they individually checked each of the ballot papers then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Aye, where? In the minority. aye, where, what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 So they individually checked each of the ballot papers then Exactly, the clearly didn't. He is just quoting a study done by someone in Edinburgh Uni who did sample surveys post the referendum and has used those results to make broad assumptions Regardless if its correct or not, the people of Scotland voted and the result was clear, this wasn't a vote based on place of birth - which was the wishes of the SNP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Exactly, the clearly didn't. He is just quoting a study done by someone in Edinburgh Uni who did sample surveys post the referendum and has used those results to make broad assumptions Regardless if its correct or not, the people of Scotland voted and the result was clear, this wasn't a vote based on place of birth - which was the wishes of the SNP next one will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Our EU friends and refugees will help rebuild the ruins of Scotland it has become through WM rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie1874 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 next one will be. Why, because doing it the other way didn't work, so move the goal posts and not allow people the right to vote where they live? How about only letting people who voted Yes in the last one, vote in the next one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Why, because doing it the other way didn't work, so move the goal posts and not allow people the right to vote where they live? How about only letting people who voted Yes in the last one, vote in the next one? Sound.But if you don't mind, I'm gonnae watch MY country play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 As I said previously, two of the few places that voted yes have the highest proportion of neds - Dundee and Glasgow.You did yes. The person I quoted seems to have a different view Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irufushi Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Sound. But if you don't mind, I'm gonnae watch MY country play. You are British, deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Sound. But if you don't mind, I'm gonnae watch MY country play. OUR country pal.Not just yours. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 OUR country pal. Not just yours. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Mine, yours won yesterday.Pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 You are British, deal with it. Great British, not British that's England and annexed Wales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Mine, yours won yesterday. Pal. Pretty much what I expected from you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 next one will be. To be fair aussieh, it hardly shows Scotland in a positive light if we only let those who are born here have a vote. Hardly inclusive and welcoming! Plus the non-Scots I know we're largely pro Indy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 To be fair aussieh, it hardly shows Scotland in a positive light if we only let those who are born here have a vote. Hardly inclusive and welcoming! Plus the non-Scots I know we're largely pro Indy. A joke of a decision. Voting against Scotland for another to call the shots, these non Scots would probably rather die than vote no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.