Jump to content

****The All In One LGBTQ+ & Related Issues Mega Thread****

The Mighty Thor

By The Mighty Thor
in The Shed

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • JudyJudyJudy

    2412

  • Dawnrazor

    443

  • doctor jambo

    266

  • Unknown user

    218

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

cazzyy

cazzyy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said:

Oh he was just trying to be wide. I said i was against it so it meant i was against it . Whether it be gays or straight renting a womb but he was trying to trip me up.  LIke a lawyer might , hence the old bailey analogy.  It was really very simple. As for that other person constantly trying to get my attention he knows very well why I WILL never answer him. 

 

Do you mean me? Please yourself but it doesn't half paint a poor picture of you that you won't answer a simple question, why did you post it in this thread. Maybe it's because you know nobody would like your answer if you told the truth. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ked

Ked

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, cazzyy said:

 

Well I've asked a simple question 6 times and not had a reply so not everything is clear.

Plus it's had more about turns than an army regiment marching session so it's difficult to know what the views are at any given time.

It's?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Generic Username

Generic Username

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said:

Oh he was just trying to be wide. I said i was against it so it meant i was against it . Whether it be gays or straight renting a womb but he was trying to trip me up.  LIke a lawyer might , hence the old bailey analogy.  It was really very simple. As for that other person constantly trying to get my attention he knows very well why I WILL never answer him. 

 

No one was trying to trip you up, you just stated something that felt like it needed clarification as surely you wouldn't want your opinion to be misinterpreted, or you misrepresented in any way because of it.

 

I thought perhaps that while there may be a "moral" objection to it but with some wiggle room or a potential grey area but you've been able to clarify your position, and as I said to Ked, I'm certainly not suggesting you aren't allowed to hold that belief. 

 

Again, apologies if that's been interpreted as some attempt to "be wide" but given the medium we're dealing with surely an open dialogue is better than someone just replying and saying "away and stick your heid in an oven you crank".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ked

Ked

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Generic Username said:

 

No one was trying to trip you up, you just stated something that felt like it needed clarification as surely you wouldn't want your opinion to be misinterpreted, or you misrepresented in any way because of it.

 

I thought perhaps that while there may be a "moral" objection to it but with some wiggle room or a potential grey area but you've been able to clarify your position, and as I said to Ked, I'm certainly not suggesting you aren't allowed to hold that belief. 

 

Again, apologies if that's been interpreted as some attempt to "be wide" but given the medium we're dealing with surely an open dialogue is better than someone just replying and saying "away and stick your heid in an oven you crank".

If its a serious discussion I'm certainly up for it.

However you can get labelled for that.

 

The best outcome for a child us a father and a mother that ate biological.

As a base starter.

Agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Generic Username

Generic Username

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ked said:

If its a serious discussion I'm certainly up for it.

However you can get labelled for that.

 

The best outcome for a child us a father and a mother that ate biological.

As a base starter.

Agree?

 

Honestly, I'd disagree. I don't think a child cares about what you are biologically or your sexual preference. The best outcome for a child is a parent/care giver who is loving, caring and able to provide for them.

 

If they've got that in a home environment that's a mother & father, or a single mum, two guys, a grandmother - whatever the dynamic. That's what's most important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cazzyy

cazzyy

Posted
Posted
Just now, Generic Username said:

 

Honestly, I'd disagree. I don't think a child cares about what you are biologically or your sexual preference. The best outcome for a child is a parent/care giver who is loving, caring and able to provide for them.

 

If they've got that in a home environment that's a mother & father, or a single mum, two guys, a grandmother - whatever the dynamic. That's what's most important. 

 

:spoton:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cazzyy

cazzyy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ked said:

If its a serious discussion I'm certainly up for it.

However you can get labelled for that.

 

The best outcome for a child us a father and a mother that ate biological.

As a base starter.

Agree?

 

Nobody would surely dispute that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ked

Ked

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Generic Username said:

 

Honestly, I'd disagree. I don't think a child cares about what you are biologically or your sexual preference. The best outcome for a child is a parent/care giver who is loving, caring and able to provide for them.

 

If they've got that in a home environment that's a mother & father, or a single mum, two guys, a grandmother - whatever the dynamic. That's what's most important. 

Yes you are correct.

However in the main and without the effect of environmental surrounds.

The science of life success states unequivocally that a man and a woman produce the healthiest offspring when the partners are strong.

That's nit me saying it it's life staring you in the face.

 

Thanks good might and Hooe you enjoy the hocus ocus

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ked

Ked

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, cazzyy said:

 

Lighten up ffs, it wasn't deliberate.

Sorry.

Just indicative though.

Think it's you who needs to lighten up by the way.

Yer water tight

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Generic Username

Generic Username

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ked said:

Yes you are correct.

However in the main and without the effect of environmental surrounds.

The science of life success states unequivocally that a man and a woman produce the healthiest offspring when the partners are strong.

That's nit me saying it it's life staring you in the face.

 

Thanks good might and Hooe you enjoy the hocus ocus

 

I have absolutely no idea what "enjoy the hocus pocus" is implying.

 

I've also no idea what "the science of life" is. Of course a man and a woman will produce the healthiest offspring because that's literally the two components required to create life. Your question was if I agreed that a mother and father was the "best" outcome and I don't think it is. It's as an absolute minimum, one parental figure who's going to be able to provide all the basics - if that isn't there then the child has no chance.

 

So if they get that from a mother and father, brilliant. A single mother, brilliant. Two blokes, brilliant. An elderly relative, also brilliant. 

 

I'm sure we all know plenty of married couples who are absolute rockets and loads of single parents who put us all to shame with what an incredible job they do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gundermann

Gundermann

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Generic Username said:

 

Honestly, I'd disagree. I don't think a child cares about what you are biologically or your sexual preference. The best outcome for a child is a parent/care giver who is loving, caring and able to provide for them.

 

If they've got that in a home environment that's a mother & father, or a single mum, two guys, a grandmother - whatever the dynamic. That's what's most important. 

 

Yes. Attachment and care. That's all kids need.

 

They don't care if it's two dads, immigrants, different religions etc...  It's damaged, twisted adults that **** it up for kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cazzyy

cazzyy

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said:

Pretty much, yeah. Apologies if that offends. 

 

Homophobes stopped being offensive to me a while ago, you carry on big man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ked

Ked

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Generic Username said:

"if it's a serious discussion I'm certainly up for it"

 

*posts memes*

Touché.

 

 

Ya @#£.

 

I wax a bit leary last night apologies .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Generic Username

Generic Username

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Ked said:

Touché.

 

 

Ya @#£.

 

I wax a bit leary last night apologies .

 

No need to apologise my man. Hope you have had an enjoyable weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Day@theraces

Day@theraces

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said:

They’ve had trannies in the darts for years judging by the tits on some of the blokes. 

They were hitting 90+ averages not 50 + averages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JudyJudyJudy

JudyJudyJudy

Posted
Posted (edited)

More places of “ learning “ attempting to stifle free speech 🎤 concerning . But good on the person for telling their story about de transing and not being bullied into silence . 
 

https://yaf.org/news/professors-cancel-classes-host-healing-circle-ahead-of-yafs-chloe-cole-lecture-at-university-of-utah/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=newguard&fbclid=IwAR2VQThEcC93Be_wZGhiwiONBZm40YHi54WqqeFEjEx4shgFvhzjXJj6YFQ_aem_AUnCjABNLcnB-TRQYNUor9L9eAtzsKMSeEKSy9e2dLaBt3jILzW6Hc0nzz5wd9QhAqQ

 

 

IMG_6555.jpeg

Edited by JudyJudyJudy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JudyJudyJudy

JudyJudyJudy

Posted
Posted

CORRECT 

 

 

https://x.com/Jebadoo2/status/1732419059063329079?s=20

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
4Xz-PRb4_normal.jpg
 
1/ Today is the day the gender debate finally left twitter and it's a day for real hope. In a statement introducing a statutory instrument about international reciprocal gender recognition arrangements Kemi Badenoch made clear that the adults are now truly back in the room.
 

 

GArH2saWQAAWHLq.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JudyJudyJudy

JudyJudyJudy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said:

I sense the tide is turning and this "cult" are finally being seen for what they are.

Yep . Hopefully . People not falling for the “ victim “ bollocks and seeing how ludicrous it all is and how dangerous it is for women and girls. Plus the issues of the erasure of gay and lesbian identity , which was great to hear a politician mention too in parliament . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JudyJudyJudy

JudyJudyJudy

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Sarah O said:

https://x.com/CelticFC/status/1733148437753774270?t=0unO6g-mlkAawYE9T870RA&s=09

 

The replies to this, tide is turning. 

 
 
 
 
 
This was a great reply 
 
Stonewall? The ones who campaign for men to be allowed to cheat their way into women’s sports? Who campaigned to destroy women & girls sex based rights? Who call lesbians who refuse to accept blokes with penises as ‘lesbians’ ‘sexual racists’?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The White Cockade

The White Cockade

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said:

All of it 

it’s madness

bloke with long hair still a bloke

can dress and talk and live any way he wants i’ve absolutely no problem with that but there is no way in the world that the majority of people will go along with stating he’s now a woman 

it’s either delusional or mental illness but they need help not encouragement 

as many others have said you don’t encourage anorexics to diet because they think they are over weight 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
John Findlay

John Findlay

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, The White Cockade said:

it’s madness

bloke with long hair still a bloke

can dress and talk and live any way he wants i’ve absolutely no problem with that but there is no way in the world that the majority of people will go along with stating he’s now a woman 

it’s either delusional or mental illness but they need help not encouragement 

as many others have said you don’t encourage anorexics to diet because they think they are over weight 

His Adam's Apple couldn't stop moving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
New Town Loafer

New Town Loafer

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said:

Great news and a legal reminder to those crying “ transphobia “ 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12851073/Student-sued-professional-body-psychotherapists-thrown-course-expressing-gender-critical-views-reaches-settlement-discrimination-case.html
 

 

 

IMG_6675.jpeg

IMG_6676.jpeg

Indeed. Common sense prevailing, which is increasingly rare in today's wank society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JudyJudyJudy

JudyJudyJudy

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, New Town Loafer said:

Indeed. Common sense prevailing, which is increasingly rare in today's wank society.

Yes every day is now a victory for common sense and women and girls  safety , dignity and respect . Still a long way to go. 
 

 

Edited by JudyJudyJudy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thunder and Lightning

Thunder and Lightning

Posted
Posted

This makes it all clear, this is how we ended up with Naismith, he identified as a football manager and was given the job.

 

See, you can call yourself something without it actually being true!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
John Findlay

John Findlay

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Thunder and Lightning said:

This makes it all clear, this is how we ended up with Naismith, he identified as a football manager and was given the job.

 

See, you can call yourself something without it actually being true!! 

Why are Hearts not bottom of the league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...