jamboinglasgow Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Whatever anyone thinks of Bryson, he will be a Hearts player in January for a fraction of what we've offered, or next summer on a free!!! no he wont, this is a myth that has appeared, he is contracted till 2013. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 True, if you looked at the correct groups rather than using lower groups to prove a point. http://www.facebook.com/search/?post_form_id=d4b360eaac8037cb67070bee834d9e7a&q=&init=quick&sid=0.1380262380647373#!/group.php?gid=228247553158&ref=search I chose to ignore that group as the creators were from Bristol so obviously created in a frenzy of new signing excitement last year therefore including artificial appreciation. The Athlete/basic Wikipedia pages provide a fairer reflection imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wibble Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 think he means fitness wise. I thought it was quite obvious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 I chose to ignore that group as the creators were from Bristol so obviously created in a frenzy of new signing excitement last year therefore including artificial appreciation. The Athlete/basic Wikipedia pages provide a fairer reflection imo. So you are saying you'd rather have Suso than Hartley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tott Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 How would that work then? Russian transfer window is still open is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acey Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 So you are saying you'd rather have Suso than Hartley? Suso will score far more goals from open play. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Suso will score far more goals from open play. FACT. That wasn't the question. Which would you rather have in your team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 So you are saying you'd rather have Suso than Hartley? I'm saying VR has his finger on the pulse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi must stay Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 think he means fitness wise. didn't know he was injured. Still, when he plays he'll get them goals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 SteauaNeedarest = desperately out of touch with the people. Mr Romanov = the common touch and hip to the jive as always. Keep rrrrrocking the main stage Mr R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CavySlaveJambo Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Think it was meant to be this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acey Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 That wasn't the question. Which would you rather have in your team? I'm honestly not taking the piss when I say that Suso will be worth more to Hearts in the long run than Hartley would have been. No way of ever knowing for sure though, so we'll just have to trust Mr Romanov's sterling work for HMFC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 SteauaNeedarest = desperately out of touch with the people. Mr Romanov = the common touch and hip to the jive as always. Keep rrrrrocking the main stage Mr R. Well i'll just have to give up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Well i'll just have to give up. Completely un-Kickback-like post imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_92 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Kello C.Thomson Barr Bouzid WallaceJonsson PalazuelosSuso Templeton DriverKyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Our three most effective outfield players so far this season have been C.Elliot, Temps and Suso. That's it, that's the list. Why anyone would knock the guy (Suso) is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Kello C.Thomson Barr Bouzid WallaceJonsson PalazuelosSuso Templeton DriverKyle Did you miss the world cup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Our three most effective outfield players so far this season have been C.Elliot, Temps and Suso. That's it, that's the list. Why anyone would knock the guy is beyond me. I seriously think you should re-read this thread, no one has knocked Suso - I suggested Hartley would have been more preferable imo than keeping Suso. I trust this verifies your recurring point based on complete fabrication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Completely un-Kickback-like post imo. How so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Why the ban/closed thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 We got more than one striker. We have a good keeper. We didn't sell either of our most valuable players (Wallace or Driver) for about 30% of their true value to the Old Firm. I say overall - GOOD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_92 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Did you miss the world cup? Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 I seriously think you should re-read this thread, no one has knocked Suso - I suggested Hartley would have been more preferable imo than keeping Suso. I trust this verifies your recurring point based on complete fabrication. I suggest you re-read your earlier post, #2 on this thread, and then tell me who has and hasn't knocked Suso. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 I suggest you re-read your earlier post, #2 on this thread, and then tell me who has and hasn't knocked Suso. After asking if the OP was joking? If you scroll down a bit further you should be able to read that I agreed Suso has had a good start to the season. But whatever fits your agenda. I suggest you get a grip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 How so? Because you backed down - or at least, preferred the option of a quiet life to maintaining the argument. That never happens on JKB! You were supposed to keep arguing for the next three pages, become increasingly angry and emotional, and call Acey a horny handed son of a hobo if he didn't agree with you. That's how it works round here... isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Because you backed down - or at least, preferred the option of a quiet life to maintaining the argument. That never happens on JKB! You were supposed to keep arguing for the next three pages, become increasingly angry and emotional, and call Acey a horny handed son of a hobo if he didn't agree with you. That's how it works round here... isn't it? Well, I can always have a different approach. Hence the reason I am apparently out of touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 SteauaNeedarest = desperately out of touch with the people. Mr Romanov = the common touch and hip to the jive as always. Keep rrrrrocking the main stage Mr R. Mr. Romanov after reading SteauaNeedarest's posts this evening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Our three most effective outfield players so far this season have been C.Elliot, Temps and Suso. That's it, that's the list. Why anyone would knock the guy (Suso) is beyond me. The response that both Suso and Temps got from 12k Fans when they were subbed on Sunday says all that needs to be said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I suggest you get a grip. Well that's dampened my mood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Yeah. I just meant most teams that lined up this way were boring to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I just meant most teams that lined up this way were boring to watch. Christ. Did they win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB-14 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Mr. Romanov after reading SteauaNeedarest's posts this evening Yes I believe that was after I said your layout was good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Yes I believe that was after I said your layout was good. Too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_92 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I just meant most teams that lined up this way were boring to watch. We're away at Celtic Park, not really bothered about being entertaining. Plus the 4 teams in the semi-final all played that system, including Germany, who were hardly boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblair182 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I just meant most teams that lined up this way were boring to watch. The only thing boring about the 4-2-3-1 formation is people claiming that it's boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Christ. Did they win? Do i pay ?175 to be entertained? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 More to the point... Do we have good enough players to replicate Germany and Brazil? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Do i pay ?175 to be entertained? Yes. 1. ?175? Come again? 2. No, this is professional sport. And professional sport is about winning, which is plenty entertaining enough. Losers lose. Winners go home and **** the prom queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossHMFC93 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Nade leaving was enough for me tbh. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 More to the point... Do we have good enough players to replicate Germany and Brazil? No. So you think only top international sides can play 4-2-3-1. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 We're away at Celtic Park, not really bothered about being entertaining. Plus the 4 teams in the semi-final all played that system, including Germany, who were hardly boring. I said most not all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 So you think only top international sides can play 4-2-3-1. Unbelievable. No i think teams with shite central resources can't play 4-2-3-1. as for the ?175 comment i meant if it done well at celtic park despite having 6 defensive players hoofing the ball to Kyle it woul probably be our formation from then on... which i wouldn't like to see. Much rather go back to Csabas 4-5-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_92 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 More to the point... Do we have good enough players to replicate Germany and Brazil? No. Christ, I was just after a point or 3 at Parkhead. I didn't say we'd win the world cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 No i think teams with shite central resources can't play 4-2-3-1. as for the ?175 comment i meant if it done well at celtic park despite having 6 defensive players hoofing the ball to Kyle it woul probably be our formation from then on... which i wouldn't like to see. Much rather go back to Csabas 4-5-1. No. It'd be our formation on trips to Glasgow - as it bloomin' well should be! In central midfield, you may have a point. However, I think 4-4-2 in Glasgow equals suicide, and rather like what DC_92 has suggested. 4-2-3-1 with the right attitude (eg. commitment not to sitting too deep, but breaking with numbers whenever we have the chance) is the way to go in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 No. It'd be our formation on trips to Glasgow - as it bloomin' well should be! In central midfield, you may have a point. However, I think 4-4-2 in Glasgow equals suicide, and rather like what DC_92 has suggested. 4-2-3-1 with the right attitude (eg. commitment not to sitting too deep, but breaking with numbers whenever we have the chance) is the way to go in this case. I'd much rather attack a team that can't make the Europa League cheers. The last time we attacked a team that CAN make it we beat Zagreb 2-0. Leaving Forrest to attack the full back every time he gets the ball through sheer lack of width would be suicide IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acey Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Do i pay ?175 to be entertained? Yes. Well I pay more than you, and I'm happy with DC_92's lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Well I pay more than you, and I'm happy with DC_92's lineup. Just saying i don't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I'd much rather attack a team that can't make the Europa League cheers. The last time we attacked a team that CAN make it we beat Zagreb 2-0. Leaving Forrest to attack the full back every time he gets the ball through sheer lack of width would be suicide IMO. We were at home to Zagreb, and already 4-0 down too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Off the top of my head: Kevin Kyle Marian Kello Darren Barr Adrien Mworiec Stephen Elliott (Likely) Johnny Toto Wallace not sold Driver not sold Suso not sold Best window for ages. Top post. Best transfer window in a good few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 4-4-2 diamond will do me or 4-1-4-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.