deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Whatever Imagine if you asked any country on this planet and went: "Here, would like the raw product and the subsequent tax take from North Sea oil on your door step?" "Nah, its shite, no thanks, keep it" [emoji23] Keep up with the smileys etc. The truth is the NS revenues to the country at $50 per barrel are next to zero. And Ecks 24 billion barrels recoverable was a downright lie. But you of course will fall for it. go on post a few more smileys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Don Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 There's hardly a proper Politician in the SNP. They are mostly looney, inbred, anti English foamers and as for that wee weedy green party dude SNP are xenophobic bitter bigots and hell bent on independence at any cost even if it means destroying this country to get it. Sturgeons passive aggressive stance is contemptible. I've just read her utterly ridiculous comments she does not seek confrontation with the U.K. Government then a few sentences later she basically does that very thing by stating she will enter talks in good faith and willing to compromise but only if the U.K. Government agree to her demands. How stupid and moronic can this woman get? Obviously her daft wee lap dogs will all be foaming and thrashing themselves into comas over this. Seriously though this is supposed to be the first minister of Scotland she is a disgrace. Thankfully TM will slap her down again and she'll be shown up for the bitter twisted little xenophobe that she is. Never has a political party created so much division and anger in Scotland than what the SNP have caused. They won't be happy until we're another Northern Ireland. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Keep up with the smileys etc. The truth is the NS revenues to the country at $50 per barrel are next to zero. And Ecks 24 billion barrels recoverable was a downright lie. But you of course will fall for it. go on post a few more smileys. Was it you that said there was 10-15 years max left? [emoji23] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo lodge Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Great to see the 15 or so nutters with flags outside Holyrood celebrating their masters victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Was it you that said there was 10-15 years max left? [emoji23] Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Keep up with the smileys etc. The truth is the NS revenues to the country at $50 per barrel are next to zero. And Ecks 24 billion barrels recoverable was a downright lie. But you of course will fall for it. go on post a few more smileys. https://www.oilandgaspeople.com/news/13802/billion-barrel-oil-field-discovered-west-of-shetland/ "beyond 2050" "its absolutely colossal" ?It would be quite easy to say it is 800million barrels and it probably wouldn?t be difficult to get to a billion." "The super find comes in stark contrast to many stories that Scotlands oil is running out" "Hurricane Energy's Chief Executive Officer Robert Trice said: ?We believe that the Greater Lancaster area is a single hydrocarbon accumulation, making it the largest undeveloped discovery on the UK Continental Shelf." Aye ok, deeside [emoji23] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidsnot Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 SNP are xenophobic bitter bigots and hell bent on independence at any cost even if it means destroying this country to get it. Sturgeons passive aggressive stance is contemptible. I've just read her utterly ridiculous comments she does not seek confrontation with the U.K. Government then a few sentences later she basically does that very thing by stating she will enter talks in good faith and willing to compromise but only if the U.K. Government agree to her demands. How stupid and moronic can this woman get? Obviously her daft wee lap dogs will all be foaming and thrashing themselves into comas over this. Seriously though this is supposed to be the first minister of Scotland she is a disgrace. Thankfully TM will slap her down again and she'll be shown up for the bitter twisted little xenophobe that she is. Never has a political party created so much division and anger in Scotland than what the SNP have caused. They won't be happy until we're another Northern Ireland. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Cast your mind back to the traitorous *******s who sold Scotland's soul for English gold,you keep it laddie,you can be proud saying you kissed Judas/Mundell,well done you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Potter Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 The other one the halfwit used the other day was "onionist" Must have really worked that brain cell thinking up that bit of comical genius. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Lol, can feel the seeth if the 2nd indy vote does not happen, be running round like headless chickens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 https://www.oilandgaspeople.com/news/13802/billion-barrel-oil-field-discovered-west-of-shetland/ "beyond 2050" "its absolutely colossal" ?It would be quite easy to say it is 800million barrels and it probably wouldn?t be difficult to get to a billion." "The super find comes in stark contrast to many stories that Scotlands oil is running out" "Hurricane Energy's Chief Executive Officer Robert Trice said: ?We believe that the Greater Lancaster area is a single hydrocarbon accumulation, making it the largest undeveloped discovery on the UK Continental Shelf." Aye ok, deeside [emoji23] I don't disagree with that. But you are not too bright. The question is how much revenue will this field generate? Firstly, if it goes to development, all previous exploration costs are automatically carried forward tax deductible from future revenues. Then add the development costs, either a platform or a number of platforms, or FPSO, or other form of subsea development, including wells. Probably around $10 billion. Then the operating costs, requiring other a pipeline (unlikely given the location) or an FPSO with export tanker offtake. Field life at least 20 years say, maybe more., but all that time the operating costs are incurred and are tax deductible. What is left is liable for tax but unless the Govt put a sensible tax deal on the table the development will not proceed and even if it does the revenue to the exchequer will be pretty small. Post some laughing smiley please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Don Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Lol, can feel the seeth if the 2nd indy vote does not happen, be running round like headless chickens. Imagine the seethe when they are told NO again hahaha Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I love this woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I love this woman. A god fearing weirdo? I can see why she's so loveable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 A happy Aussie H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Mooth is in her element. It wouldn't surprise me if she secretly wants the referendum. A huge opportunity to have her ego massaged. Labour hasn't decided what it wants and is incapable of conveying a coherent message. Any remain campaign seems certain to be dominated and possibly even officially led by Mooth. That increases the leave vote share by a few points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Mooth is in her element. It wouldn't surprise me if she secretly wants the referendum. A huge opportunity to have her ego massaged. Labour hasn't decided what it wants and is incapable of conveying a coherent message. Any remain campaign seems certain to be dominated and possibly even officially led by Mooth. That increases the leave vote share by a few points. If you're gibbering on about this girl, then bring it on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 If you're gibbering on about this girl, then bring it on. Get in ! Love seeing that horrible ferret shot down like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I don't disagree with that. But you are not too bright. The question is how much revenue will this field generate? Firstly, if it goes to development, all previous exploration costs are automatically carried forward tax deductible from future revenues. Then add the development costs, either a platform or a number of platforms, or FPSO, or other form of subsea development, including wells. Probably around $10 billion. Then the operating costs, requiring other a pipeline (unlikely given the location) or an FPSO with export tanker offtake. Field life at least 20 years say, maybe more., but all that time the operating costs are incurred and are tax deductible. What is left is liable for tax but unless the Govt put a sensible tax deal on the table the development will not proceed and even if it does the revenue to the exchequer will be pretty small. Post some laughing smiley please. Dunno why Hurricane bother then, you should write a wee email to the guy I quoted last and explain he is wasting his time. After all, you teach the snowplough for a living, that's enough for him to sit up a listen I would've thought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 If you're gibbering on about this girl, then bring it on. I think she's an impressive performer. No doubt. But one fact that cannot be denied is that she's a Tory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 HAVE A POLL TO SEE IF THE COUNTRY WANTS A REFERENDUM KRANKIE ( We dont) By the way what about these absolute bawbags outside parliament with the flags - deary me. There an online petition, shame it's mostly English people who have signed it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I think she's an impressive performer. No doubt. But one fact that cannot be denied is that she's a Tory. A former BBC reporter too, another link to that institution of bastion, truth and honesty. :-/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 A happy Aussie H. What's the problem here? Is it because he's probably (!?)gay, or a Yes voter? Does it disagree with God and Mother Theresa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 What's the problem here? Is it because he's probably (!?)gay, or a Yes voter? Does it disagree with God and Mother Theresa? Why presume his sexuality? No need for the faux offence. ..Aussieh can take a joke and dish it out as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Dunno why Hurricane bother then, you should write a wee email to the guy I quoted last and explain he is wasting his time. After all, you teach the snowplough for a living, that's enough for him to sit up a listen I would've thought? Hurricane will of course profit. They took the exploration risk. They will pay the development costs. So it's only right that they get a good rate of return hence a profit otherwise they will not attract the investment costs. What you can't understand is that it's how much the treasury will get, not Hurricane. And btw Hurricane are based in England. You can't tell the difference between treasury share and investor share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I like Sid, he sounds like a decent Tim. Chortle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Hurricane will of course profit. They took the exploration risk. They will pay the development costs. So it's only right that they get a good rate of return hence a profit otherwise they will not attract the investment costs. What you can't understand is that it's how much the treasury will get, not Hurricane. And btw Hurricane are based in England. You can't tell the difference between treasury share and investor share. Based in England but where are their investors based? You think oil exploration is a wee man going about with dividing rods in a wee rowing boat in the middle of nowhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelicropcircle Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I'm really unsure how every week between my two vehicles to average a guess of 80 litres which is 057.95 per litre fuel duty ?46.36 per week FD could be bad for a Scottish Gov ? Or any gov come to think of it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I think she's an impressive performer. No doubt. But one fact that cannot be denied is that she's a Tory. There's a lot (more) of them about these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 There's a lot (more) of them about these days. Everyone's entitled to an opinion but it's a shame that the Brave New Independent Scotland displays open contempt for a large percentage of the population. I was hoping for better tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidsnot Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I like Sid, he sounds like a decent Tim. Fiver in the post bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Based in England but where are their investors based? You think oil exploration is a wee man going about with dividing rods in a wee rowing boat in the middle of nowhere? At the moment they don't have any investors other than private equity to fund the exploration costs. To fund the development they will need to attract billions of new capital. They won't get any funding unless the rate of return is attractive. And at current oil price, which the funding will be based on, is such that tax take on the field will have to be small. But the more drivel you post the more the reality comes out to smack you in the pus. More smileys please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Everyone's entitled to an opinion but it's a shame that the Brave New Independent Scotland displays open contempt for a large percentage of the population. I was hoping for better tbh You have to hand it to the SNP and Jeremy Corbyn, they've increased the likelihood of a lot of people in Scotland deciding to vote Tory for purely pragmatic reasons ie to get rid of the Natz. An early Scottish election would be interesting in a PR system where every vote counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Everyone's entitled to an opinion but it's a shame that the Brave New Independent Scotland displays open contempt for a large percentage of the population. I was hoping for better tbh It's the job of the Yes campaign to persuade others to vote Yes. Doing this by smileys, tick-tocks and glib comments about Yoons will not persuade anyone to change their vote. In fact it may work against them as more peeps see they are not credible. Mintit etc. Rofl etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 At the moment they don't have any investors other than private equity to fund the exploration costs. To fund the development they will need to attract billions of new capital. They won't get any funding unless the rate of return is attractive. And at current oil price, which the funding will be based on, is such that tax take on the field will have to be small. But the more drivel you post the more the reality comes out to smack you in the pus. More smileys please. Where did the private equity come from then? Who put it in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Fiver in the post bud. Just don't **** us on Sunday, that's all I ask. I could play golf instead if it's a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Where did the private equity come from then? Who put it in? Er........ Private Equity Companies often underwritten by banks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Er........ Private Equity Companies often underwritten by banks. So who are these private equity companies that are underwritten by banks but its private investment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 So who are these private equity companies that are underwritten by banks but its private investment? You are getting confused again. Google Private Equity Firm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 You are getting confused again. Google Private Equity Firm I'm not confused. I dated one of the "rock sniffers" when this was going on. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-12117549 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 He's never mentioned Celtic once on this thread, it's a political one. You're the one constantly banging on about republicanism, Celtic and your daft implied sectarian rubbish. What has Earl Haig got to do with Indy2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidsnot Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Just don't **** us on Sunday, that's all I ask. I could play golf instead if it's a nice day. I can see Dundee beating the Sheep on Friday so it could well be a draw,it's free on Sky Sports mix on Sunday so as long as Hearts don't win and break our unbeaten record then I'll be happy with that,deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I can see Dundee beating the Sheep on Friday so it could well be a draw,it's free on Sky Sports mix on Sunday so as long as Hearts don't win and break our unbeaten record then I'll be happy with that,deal? Post that fiver, it'll pay for golf balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coconut doug Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Good post Doug. It's nice to see that respectful, articulate and informed debate is still possible from time to time. I've already agreed with Pans Jambo that Norway has managed its oil wealth far better than we have. They do have about double what we have but that's not to say ours couldn't have been better managed. Norway has huge state control of its oil. But it has open free market economics for everything else. It just shows the folly of applying the same philosophy to everything. Free market economics usually works best but by no means always. Unfortunately, the days of $100 a barrel oil are probably long gone for a while with the World awash with cheap oil and huge overstock, a situation likely to continue for several years with plentiful cheap shale oil in America. It's ridiculous that we appear to be ruled and governed by dogma. This is what the future offers the UK. There is no prospect of change It's a major reason why we need to remove ourselves from the UK asap. The idea that you would bail out the banks in the way we did it but not invest in your own national assets defines the UK for me. Labour and Tory governments sold national assets at knock down prices to the rich and when that ran out they mortgaged the future with PFI and equivalents. Soon we will have private companies, many American, providing services and having an even bigger share of the NHS budget. The Tax burden will increase to pay for the services and their profits in a similar way to the railways. The only people who will gain are the private investors. Like the railways it will result in poorer service and higher costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I'm not confused. I dated one of the "rock sniffers" when this was going on. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-12117549 Then why did you ask? How did the Cairn wells turn out? How's your mate Bill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Then why did you ask? How did the Cairn wells turn out? How's your mate Bill? Cairn found the exact amount of diddly squat. But I found out how these small independent (there's that word again) companies finance themselves. Do you think Shell, BP and the rest were laughing at them calling them too poor, too wee, too stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Cairn found the exact amount of diddly squat. But I found out how these small independent (there's that word again) companies finance themselves. Do you think Shell, BP and the rest were laughing at them calling them too poor, too wee, too stupid? Well now you should know that Hurricane will need to finance the development of their discovery. That will be billions. As you claim to be loaded maybe you could sub them a few million. Think of the massive "bonanza" that you will get back in profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Well now you should know that Hurricane will need to finance the development of their discovery. That will be billions. As you claim to be loaded maybe you could sub them a few million. Think of the massive "bonanza" that you will get back in profit. I sure that won't be a problem them getting capital now if it proves to be true what they have found. Unfortunately, I'm only liquid up to ?100,000 but I could sell everything I own and possibly make just under a ?million. That should be enough to fund the works T bar...maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboX2 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 You have to hand it to the SNP and Jeremy Corbyn, they've increased the likelihood of a lot of people in Scotland deciding to vote Tory for purely pragmatic reasons ie to get rid of the Natz. An early Scottish election would be interesting in a PR system where every vote counts. No it wouldn't. The SNP are still in the lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelicropcircle Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 You have to hand it to the SNP and Jeremy Corbyn, they've increased the likelihood of a lot of people in Scotland deciding to vote Tory for purely pragmatic reasons ie to get rid of the Natz. An early Scottish election would be interesting in a PR system where every vote counts. If someone could go back to the 2014 version and grab a few tripper quotes on how he hates tories. I'd go but I'm Scotland Yard on the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trapper John McIntyre Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 No it wouldn't. The SNP are still in the lead. Yes it does. Being in the lead doesn't guarantee a majority as the Greens may well lose a lot of secondary votes this time. It would be a risky thing for the gnatz to call a snap election right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manaliveits105 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 SNP have lost the support of many voters with their poor performance on key issues , the fact they went back on their once in a generation premise, the fact that Sturgeon is a dislikeable person, and to cut it short the majority of scots do not want indyref2 within the forseeable future but crack on and get a bloody nose .Those woofters outside parliament today probably convinced a few more undecided that snp is not the way forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.