1874robbo Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 We've received a number of complaints about unauthorised pictures being posted on this thread. The pictures are great, but if they weren't taken by you, please make sure that you have the permission of the owner. Thanks. Name and shame!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irufushi Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallas Green Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Jesus wept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheetah Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sairyinthat Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 We've received a number of complaints about unauthorised pictures being posted on this thread. The pictures are great, but if they weren't taken by you, please make sure that you have the permission of the owner. Thanks. Take it you cheerfully look at all pictures posted on here though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gershwin Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 I'm no IP legal eagle but surely we can share any pictures we want on here as we're not using them for commercial purposes? Creative commons and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locky Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 My excitement for next season is unbearable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 So some folk cannae just share pictures of the stand that's being part funded by the fans without needing credit or payment? Photographers are snowflake arseholes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardbresslawsarmchair Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 So for those who harped on about the corners, and have now moved onto to the next lame duck being safe standing, I might as well be involved and insist we replace the floodlights with Giant Lead Crystal Chandelliers it would provide a touch of class, however we need to stop wearing scarfs and wear smoking jackets and cravats instead old boys. Anyhoo any latest photos from beyond trumps wooden wall? The massive difference with the debate over filling in the corners and safe standing is one of them is viable and affordable and a decent proportion of our home support are quite keen on it, i have no doubt at some point in the near future the club will have to look at safe standing because of demand, anyway less chance of my smoking jacket getting crushed if i am standing | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigC Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 No, the picture remains property of the owner and is only available under Creative Commons if they state it is. You can't assume that because someone posts an image online, they are happy for the world to use it however they wish. Even although it's unlikely you'll get sued, if it's not yours, you can't just do what you want with it. I've lifted a few photos off here for the Facebook group I set up to share images of the stand as it develops, usually with the owners permission. I have made a couple of mistakes and been picked up on it, which is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
been here before Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 (edited) Some people are awffy precious souls. Incidently Im not giving my permission for anyone to quote that. Edited March 7, 2017 by been here before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Some people are awffy precious souls. Incidently Im not giving my permission for anyone to quote that. I once said that, back in the eighties You'll be hearing from my lawyers well, maybe not... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babywhalo Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
been here before Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 I once said that, back in the eighties You'll be hearing from my lawyers well, maybe not... Thats it I've got the petted lip out and sittong here in a ragin' huff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Taking pictures of a building site with a few bulk bags and site huts and getting all upset because someone posts them on a fans forum I genuinely feel embarrassed for the person who complained Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kila Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 (edited) Taking pictures of a building site with a few bulk bags and site huts and getting all upset because someone posts them on a fans forum I genuinely feel embarrassed for the person who complained I imagine they want folk to go to their group Facebook page instead (there's a few I think) so everyone sees their name. Attention seeking... If the person had just wanted credit and was fine with that being added to the post, fair enough, but a take down request when the photo is being used to generate discussion among their own fans is really quite poor! Luckily there's a few of us on kickback that take our own photos and post them here for all to see and discuss. Edited March 7, 2017 by kila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Luckily there's a few of us on kickback that take our own photos and post them here for all to see and discuss. That's the way it should be and what fans forums are all about. A lot of people don't have Facebook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamboelite Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 The massive difference with the debate over filling in the corners and safe standing is one of them is viable and affordable and a decent proportion of our home support are quite keen on it, i have no doubt at some point in the near future the club will have to look at safe standing because of demand, anyway less chance of my smoking jacket getting crushed if i am standing | Great so can you give me the breakdown of its viability and cost in relation to the new stand ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paulo Sergio Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 It's mah picture! But seriously, what kind of sad life must you lead to complain about someone sharing your photographs of Tynecastle. A stadium which all of us own btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamtartan74 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 (edited) thought I would just send 2 or 3 of mine just to have some pics of the old stand on match day, pics not great but anyone welcome to use or share or do whatever u want with them lol, why I have to give permission is silly but hey ho. No idea why one of them sent twice. Edited March 7, 2017 by jamtartan74 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chat Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 (edited) "It's my picture" Pathetic behaviour. Edited March 7, 2017 by Le Chat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kila Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Shows what a productive winter it's been off the park. What an eyesore the shambles in front of the auld stand really was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 I imagine they want folk to go to their group Facebook page instead (there's a few I think) so everyone sees their name. Attention seeking... If the person had just wanted credit and was fine with that being added to the post, fair enough, but a take down request when the photo is being used to generate discussion among their own fans is really quite poor! Luckily there's a few of us on kickback that take our own photos and post them here for all to see and discuss. There's exactly what's happening. Quite sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinger Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 I imagine they want folk to go to their group Facebook page instead (there's a few I think) so everyone sees their name. Attention seeking... If the person had just wanted credit and was fine with that being added to the post, fair enough, but a take down request when the photo is being used to generate discussion among their own fans is really quite poor! Luckily there's a few of us on kickback that take our own photos and post them here for all to see and discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars plastic Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 So, what if the folk that run this site tell the greetin faced pricks to go take a flying one to themselves about using their photos? In reality, what are they going to do?? They'll probably be offline just now too busy scanning the BBC for swearing after the watershed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 (edited) So, what if the folk that run this site tell the greetin faced pricks to go take a flying one to themselves about using their photos? In reality, what are they going to do?? They'll probably be offline just now too busy scanning the BBC for swearing after the watershed. FWIW Public ContentWhen you post content on your Facebook page, you have the ability to configure privacy options regarding who can view that content. While some content may be strictly controlled, the majority of content is simply posted as "public." According to Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, any image posted with the Public setting carries the implicit acknowledgment that said photo is available for access and use by anyone -- including entities not on Facebook. While permission for use is considered polite, it is not a prerequisite. Privacy-Controlled ContentFacebook posting also includes the ability to control who can see content. Privacy-controlled content is something of a grey area, as the content is still being posted to Facebook, but only to specific users and therefore not "publicly" per se. If the photos are considered an invasion into the privacy of the subject, they may file a request to have the content deleted from Facebook. However, it can be assumed that anyone allowed access may make use of it with limited permission. I wonder if these people complaining whoever they may be realise that any photo you upload to Facebook actually becomes their property as well which they can use in any way they wish. Edited March 7, 2017 by hughesie27 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
151 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 "It's my picture" Pathetic behaviour. Why have you used a photo taken of a Hibs fan leaving the "relegation party"? I hope you got permission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelicropcircle Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 We've received a number of complaints about unauthorised pictures being posted on this thread. The pictures are great, but if they weren't taken by you, please make sure that you have the permission of the owner. Thanks. FFS seriously it's a building site... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamtartan74 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 some more, 6-0 Motherwell last season I think, my last time and probably the very last time in the main stand [emoji53] might try switch seats for one last game if possible to get 2 together before the season ends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Yeah hopefully get more pictures of old stand before it goes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toggie88 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 FFS seriously it's a building site... This. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanks said no Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Had to take a photo of the wall I had loo ked at so many times Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Good, I know we're all excited about the new stand, but the old girl won't be around for long and it's time to start savouring and appreciating her while we can. As many photos of the old stand as you can for us expats to get all emotional over please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernardbresslawsarmchair Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Great so can you give me the breakdown of its viability and cost in relation to the new stand ?? Its viable because the club nearly went with it when they thought they could increase capacity only the 1/1 ratio stopped this,if i remember correctly it cost celtic about ?250,000 for 2,300 rail seats that included removal of the seats that were there, so basically about 2 months FOH subs, just think it will be something the fans will push for when we get control of the club, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 STOAP UZINMA PIKCHURS!!!1!!!1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Its viable because the club nearly went with it when they thought they could increase capacity only the 1/1 ratio stopped this,if i remember correctly it cost celtic about ?250,000 for 2,300 rail seats that included removal of the seats that were there, so basically about 2 months FOH subs, just think it will be something the fans will push for when we get control of the club, The new foh leader is a big supporter of safe standing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Its viable because the club nearly went with it when they thought they could increase capacity only the 1/1 ratio stopped this,if i remember correctly it cost celtic about ?250,000 for 2,300 rail seats that included removal of the seats that were there, so basically about 2 months FOH subs, just think it will be something the fans will push for when we get control of the club, Plus the cost of altering the rake? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Its viable because the club nearly went with it when they thought they could increase capacity only the 1/1 ratio stopped this,if i remember correctly it cost celtic about ?250,000 for 2,300 rail seats that included removal of the seats that were there, so basically about 2 months FOH subs, just think it will be something the fans will push for when we get control of the club, It's not viable unless the rules change. Our stands are too steep for safe standing to be added. It may have been possible at the planning stage if they'd made the stands less steep, but now, no. End of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Good, I know we're all excited about the new stand, but the old girl won't be around for long and it's time to start savouring and appreciating her while we can. As many photos of the old stand as you can for us expats to get all emotional over please! Yeah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanks said no Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Plus the cost of altering the rake? The rake is already there if they had decided to use the existing enclosure terracing, then build the steeper seated stand behind it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
station_jambo Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 The rake is already there if they had decided to use the existing enclosure terracing, then build the steeper seated stand behind it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk That would require us going back to planning surely! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_HMFC Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 From last Wednesday v County. I've probably already posted similar photos (because it's from my seat [emoji38]) but it was under the lights and the new pitch was down as well. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August Landmesser Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 From last Wednesday v County. I've probably already posted similar photos (because it's from my seat [emoji38]) but it was under the lights and the new pitch was down as well. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk It's been said before, and it'll be said again, but the with truss up, it highlights that the place will look stunning when the stand's finished. We could make Tynie a cauldron of noise if we wanted... or a bear pit of booooooooos. Either way, it'll be cracking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scabber Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 The rake is already there if they had decided to use the existing enclosure terracing, then build the steeper seated stand behind it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I dont think there is a hope in hell they would consider safe standing in front of the directors box even if they could Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanks said no Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I dont think there is a hope in hell they would consider safe standing in front of the directors box even if they couldI agree, safe standing ship has sailed, given the rake angle of the 4 stands and the small playing surface it will be another generation before it will be considered Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mullen13 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Safe standing is a waste of time and money. Just have a singing section in lower Gorgie where nobody sits down anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kila Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Safe standing is a waste of time and money. Just have a singing section in lower Gorgie where nobody sits down anyway. But then we wouldn't be 'safe' It'll be interesting to see what the folk in the likes of lower N do in the new stand if they occupy similar seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Safe standing is a waste of time and money. Just have a singing section in lower Gorgie where nobody sits down anyway. Stand whole game at some away games Just depends how strict the stewarding is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 It's been said before, and it'll be said again, but the with truss up, it highlights that the place will look stunning when the stand's finished. We could make Tynie a cauldron of noise if we wanted... or a bear pit of booooooooos. Either way, it'll be cracking. Ah we can have banners made up...'Welcome to THE Hell!' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
station_jambo Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Ah we can have banners made up...'Welcome to THE Hell!' Bring out the big flag. Bring back fireworks Phil also! That generated atmosphere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.