Jump to content

The 2015 General Election Megathread


Rand Paul's Ray Bans

Recommended Posts

Gorgiewave

Will it protect the working man's right to take industrial action? Doubt it.

 

I quite like human rights, don't see why they should be abolished.

 

They're not just abolishing human rights, FFS, as if the Glorious Revolution, American Revolution and French Revolution had never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • aussieh

    1284

  • JamboX2

    893

  • TheMaganator

    818

  • Boris

    639

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Pans Jambo

do you get any expenses for your job, doctor jambo?

For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here!

I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc?

No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB

Unless hes a doggy doctor???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doctor jambo

For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here!

I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc?

No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB

Unless hes a doggy doctor???

I work a lot of nights and odd shifts and, in my spare time run my own business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here!

I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc?

No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB

Unless hes a doggy doctor???

Doctor of chiropracty nap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work a lot of nights and odd shifts and, in my spare time run my own business.

 

So you are in private practice.

Somehow i am not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is the non-story? The bed? The ?1,200 TV? The home cinema system? Or the corkscrew?

 

Makes Jim's ?1.39 irn bru look saintly.

 

And yes all at it etc, but c'mon, Robertson was pummelling Labour over Irn-Bru, what help in his job is any of that giving him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doctor jambo

So you are in private practice.

Somehow i am not surprised.

OUtside the hospitals we all are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OUtside the hospitals we all are

 

Thats why I'm not surprised.

If you worked in a hospital you would not be on JKB all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dump it and replace with relevant British Act. Conservatives want to amend it because amended version will protect the working man and his family in the UK. Also, we will be able to hold the Act makers to. Account whereas Human Rights Act dreamt up bu people who are unaccountable to UK citizens.

Protect the working man? Number one priority of the Tories.

 

You have to be having a laugh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dump it and replace with relevant British Act. Conservatives want to amend it because amended version will protect the working man and his family in the UK. Also, we will be able to hold the Act makers to. Account whereas Human Rights Act dreamt up bu people who are unaccountable to UK citizens.

Quick history on Human Rights, the UK and the ECHR:

 

1939-45 - WW2. A lot of bad, undemocratic, inhumane and all round nasty stuff happens. Appals the peoples of Europe.

 

1945-46 - Nuremberg trials against war criminals is engaged. David Maxwell-Fyfe, scots lawyer, Tory and government minister, leads the prosecution of numerous Nazi and Facists over breaches of human rights and the atrocities of the holocaust and war crimes.

 

1947-49 - Moves to European integration begin though the Council of Europe. Fyfe leads the pan-European parliamentary group on legal affairs and human rights. Group comes up with a statue to protect human rights...

 

1949-51 - Council of Europe drafts the European Convention of Human Rights. Fyfe and the UK government heavily involved in the drafting.

 

1952- today - Europe has a Human Righs court in Strasbourg and a charter of fundamental protections for all Europeans against their state governments. The ECHR is non-EU and open to the citizens of all members of the Council of Europe to appeal under at Strasbourg.

 

Many nations incorporate it into national law from the off and allow citizens to appeal the charter rights in domestic courts rather than going straight to Strasbourg. This domesticates rights. UK doesn't. But the Courts begin to read in Strasbourg jurisprudence themselves over time and an ad hoc application slowly develops.

 

1997 - Labour win landslide. Manifesto promises the Human Rights Act.

 

1998 - Parliament debates, scrutinises and passes the Human Rights Act. ECHR rights can now be directly appealed to in UK courts. Courts given powers to "read in" (bend the interpretation of Acts of Parliament) to be compatible or declare the provision incompatible - not invalidating law but registering a political concern over the law being compatible with the convention.

 

Years fly by. We're all happy. Prisoners can't vote. Blanket ban, doesn't matter about your sentence or crime, you can't vote. UK courts reject this outright. Appeal to Strasbourg - reasonable judgment says blanket bans are against the charter on the right to vote. Can ban prisoners but need to make it clearer than a blanket ban.

 

Tories furious. Reaction - blame European Courts and withdraw the HRA.

 

The Convention is a British convention. The Human Rights Act a British Act passed by the UK Parliament.

 

The issue the Tories have isn't with Europe or the Convention. It's with British Supreme Court judges using the HRA too well to interpret laws to protect people's rights from torture or deprivation of their rights.

 

Strasbourg can't change law in Britain. It can suggest change and say the UK is breaching the convention. But all that last bit means is we pay an annual fine to the Court for our breach - miniscule sum in the Justice Bill. It's up to the government to amend.

 

The Bill of a Rights is going to be identical. I mean, go and look at the ECHR and tell me which rights you'd exclude for a Bill of Rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

I know it's a personal thing but who did you vote for in the referendum and the General Election?

I didn't vote.

 

I couldn't in the former but would have abstained on principle. I didn't in the GE because I have dual nationality now so I believe it isn't appropriate to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maple Leaf

I didn't vote.

 

I couldn't in the former but would have abstained on principle. I didn't in the GE because I have dual nationality now so I believe it isn't appropriate to do so.

 

Completely agree.  :thumbsup:

 

imo, ex-pats should tread carefully when involving themselves in UK politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OUtside the hospitals we all are

A few disturbing issues involving your prof exposed today, doctor.

Poverty is your greatest business plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack D and coke

This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it....

post-912-14314992127551_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack D and coke

You got a source on that?

Id need to go right back through my Twitter feed. I had a quick look there but I can't remember what one I saw it on. It's to do with extremist views. I'll have a look later when I've got more time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Bill of a Rights is going to be identical. I mean, go and look at the ECHR and tell me which rights you'd exclude for a Bill of Rights.

 

So, why change it then?

 

I expect any Bill of Rights to fail to mention any employment rights that appear in the HRA, because that's what the Tories are about, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thunderstruck

So, why change it then?

 

I expect any Bill of Rights to fail to mention any employment rights that appear in the HRA, because that's what the Tories are about, imo.

Perhaps it will also hasten the demise of corroboration in Scotland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got a source on that?

It was quoted on Radio 4 this morning. Talking about stirring up "radical Islamic" views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highest employment figure on record announced this morning.

 

Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%.

 

Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly.

Edited by jambo1185
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pans Jambo

Highest employment figure on record announced this morning.

 

Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%.

 

Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly.

My arse average earnings increased by anything!

Probably did for the boardroom lot and the bankers but not for most of the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highest employment figure on record announced this morning.

 

Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%.

 

Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly.

fiddled stats.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it protect the working man's right to take industrial action? Doubt it.

 

I quite like human rights, don't see why they should be abolished.

 

 

Protect the working man? Number one priority of the Tories.

 

You have to be having a laugh?

One of the first things Cameron did when he took power in the coalition with the lib-dems was to double the cost of industrial tribunals, pricing many out of appealing against things like constructive dismissal.

 

This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it....

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1431499643.490999.jpg

 

This fits with the Snooper's Charter championed by May and also Cameron's nonsensical rhetoric about conspiracy theorists and peaceful demonstrations being considered "non-violent terrorism".

 

In most countries, MPS govern on behalf of the people. This corporate stooge acts like a corrupt dictator demonstrating nothing but contempt for the citizens he is meant to represent. Expect that delayed water cannon decision to be pushed through any moment now, probably on the backs of that recent demo as your right to peaceful demonstration (or even the right to meet in groups in public) are removed along with your rights under the ECHR, your rights to blog, your rights to freedom from being spied upon, your right to strike in various industries etc etc

 

And some on this thread had the temerity to label SNP/Indy supporters as fascists!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack D and coke

One of the first things Cameron did when he took power in the coalition with the lib-dems was to double the cost of industrial tribunals, pricing many out of appealing against things like constructive dismissal.

 

 

This fits with the Snooper's Charter championed by May and also Cameron's nonsensical rhetoric about conspiracy theorists and peaceful demonstrations being considered "non-violent terrorism".

 

In most countries, MPS govern on behalf of the people. This corporate stooge acts like a corrupt dictator demonstrating nothing but contempt for the citizens he is meant to represent. Expect that delayed water cannon decision to be pushed through any moment now, probably on the backs of that recent demo as your right to peaceful demonstration (or even the right to meet in groups in public) are removed along with your rights under the ECHR, your rights to blog, your rights to freedom from being spied upon, your right to strike in various industries etc etc

 

And some on this thread had the temerity to label SNP/Indy supporters as fascists!!

That's why I posted it mate. There's a few regular posters who must have an egg or two on their faces over this tbh.

 

Cameron even wants things like Whatsapp banned because it can't be snooped on and monitored.

 

But SNP bad bad bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."

 

That is very worrying indeed!

Dave obviously thinks that people obeying the law have something to hide and may be pursued and harassed by the state.

This links into the the scrapping of the HRA and the introduction of his Snooper's Charter.

 

Free speech is fecked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorgiewave

Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record:

 

1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda".

2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police."

3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law.

In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked."

4. The Named Person.

5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated.

6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need.

 

"It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights

 

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record:

 

1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda".

2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police."

3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law.

In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked."

4. The Named Person.

5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated.

6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need.

 

"It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights

 

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-32683817

 

Best place in Europe for equality regards the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record:

 

1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda".

2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police."

3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law.

In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked."

4. The Named Person.

5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated.

6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need.

 

"It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights

 

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615

It's hardly the same level but equally I reject and oppose the SNP's tendency towards nannying. Police Scotland may have been a good concept on paper - however extending the bullish, zero tolerance approach used by Strathclyde Police, perhaps borne out of necessity with the gang/knife crime prevalent in Glasgow, across the whole of Scotland was not.

 

Whataboutery does not, however, protect anyone from the deliberate erosion of rights that will continue under the, quite frankly, fascist Conservative agenda. Labour were bad enough with their ramping up of the surveillance state to ensure the UK is ridiculous in it's over-use of CCTV and their opposition to strong encryption for electronic communication (let's forget they actually had a proposal at comittee level to place low-level x-ray machines and listening devices in lamposts to snoop into citizens rucksacks) but they, nor the slightly nannying SNP, hold no torch to the freedoms the Tories will gleefully strip from us. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

police looking into possibility of electoral fraud in South Thanet. :lol:

 

Thought that Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog looked a bit dodgy.

:bobby:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorgiewave

More tears and snotters.

 

The first line of every 45er's autobiography:

 

The tale of a man who built himself an illusion to live by

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first line of every 45er's autobiography:

 

The tale of a man who built himself an illusion to live by

I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorgiewave

I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense.

 

Are you mad these days, toona? Is it because your imperial masters love you long time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Draper

I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense.

 

Don't knock the strawman argument. Without it, GW would have about 30 posts to his name, rather than 9,579.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorgiewave

Don't knock the strawman argument. Without it, GW would have about 30 posts to his name, rather than 9,579.

 

Strawmen and Ad Hominem are equally likewise just as bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been obvious for weeks that you don't care.

Eh?

 

Scotland being the most equal place in Europe for lgbt rights is a good thing, surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Draper

Eh?

 

Scotland being the most equal place in Europe for lgbt rights is a good thing, surely?

 

Of course it's a good thing, but you've shown him up (again) to be a slaverer, so he's irritated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you mad these days, toona? Is it because your imperial masters love you long time?

Strawman then gibberish. Atleast the tears and snotters have mixed up your usual MO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jambos are go!

Anyone who says MacAskill was fit for purpose is a slaver. I've derided him a few times over the years as easily led and not a leader IMO. A puppet on the string of the Police, Big Eck and other vested interests IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rand Paul's Ray Bans

Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record:

 

1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda".

2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police."

3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law.

In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked."

4. The Named Person.

5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated.

6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need.

 

"It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights

 

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615

 

Indeed. Correct.

 

But your immediate jump to whataboutery betrays a lack of actual care for the issues currently at hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who says MacAskill was fit for purpose is a slaver. I've derided him a few times over the years as easily led and not a leader IMO. A puppet on the string of the Police, Big Eck and other vested interests IMO.

 

As a Labour man should you not be concerning yourself more with our extreme right wing UK government.

Sorry i forgot Labour hate the SNP more than the Tories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record:

 

1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda".

2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police."

3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law.

In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked."

4. The Named Person.

5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated.

6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need.

 

"It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights

 

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615

 

OK now you have got that of your chest.

What do you as a Labour voter think of much more threatening moves by the Tories to restrict our civil liberties.

Hope you dont mind me asking but how come you got to vote in the GE and will you get a vote at Holyrood 2016 and Euro Referendum ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The HRA is Enshrined in Scots Law, so whats the consequences if the Uk government try to impose this Uk wide, it must throw other laws up in the air.

The PF office will be :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...