Gorgiewave Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Will it protect the working man's right to take industrial action? Doubt it. I quite like human rights, don't see why they should be abolished. They're not just abolishing human rights, FFS, as if the Glorious Revolution, American Revolution and French Revolution had never happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 do you get any expenses for your job, doctor jambo?For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here!I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc? No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB Unless hes a doggy doctor??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here! I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc? No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB Unless hes a doggy doctor??? I work a lot of nights and odd shifts and, in my spare time run my own business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo89 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 For a doctor he dpends quite a fair bit of time on here! I thought they were all stressed out with the 14 hour days etc? No wonder the waiting times are getting longer........theyre all on JKB Unless hes a doggy doctor??? Doctor of chiropracty nap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 I work a lot of nights and odd shifts and, in my spare time run my own business. So you are in private practice. Somehow i am not surprised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboX2 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angus_Robertson Not much of a Story Which is the non-story? The bed? The ?1,200 TV? The home cinema system? Or the corkscrew? Makes Jim's ?1.39 irn bru look saintly. And yes all at it etc, but c'mon, Robertson was pummelling Labour over Irn-Bru, what help in his job is any of that giving him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 So you are in private practice. Somehow i am not surprised. OUtside the hospitals we all are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 OUtside the hospitals we all are Thats why I'm not surprised. If you worked in a hospital you would not be on JKB all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wibble Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Dump it and replace with relevant British Act. Conservatives want to amend it because amended version will protect the working man and his family in the UK. Also, we will be able to hold the Act makers to. Account whereas Human Rights Act dreamt up bu people who are unaccountable to UK citizens.Protect the working man? Number one priority of the Tories. You have to be having a laugh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboX2 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Dump it and replace with relevant British Act. Conservatives want to amend it because amended version will protect the working man and his family in the UK. Also, we will be able to hold the Act makers to. Account whereas Human Rights Act dreamt up bu people who are unaccountable to UK citizens. Quick history on Human Rights, the UK and the ECHR: 1939-45 - WW2. A lot of bad, undemocratic, inhumane and all round nasty stuff happens. Appals the peoples of Europe. 1945-46 - Nuremberg trials against war criminals is engaged. David Maxwell-Fyfe, scots lawyer, Tory and government minister, leads the prosecution of numerous Nazi and Facists over breaches of human rights and the atrocities of the holocaust and war crimes. 1947-49 - Moves to European integration begin though the Council of Europe. Fyfe leads the pan-European parliamentary group on legal affairs and human rights. Group comes up with a statue to protect human rights... 1949-51 - Council of Europe drafts the European Convention of Human Rights. Fyfe and the UK government heavily involved in the drafting. 1952- today - Europe has a Human Righs court in Strasbourg and a charter of fundamental protections for all Europeans against their state governments. The ECHR is non-EU and open to the citizens of all members of the Council of Europe to appeal under at Strasbourg. Many nations incorporate it into national law from the off and allow citizens to appeal the charter rights in domestic courts rather than going straight to Strasbourg. This domesticates rights. UK doesn't. But the Courts begin to read in Strasbourg jurisprudence themselves over time and an ad hoc application slowly develops. 1997 - Labour win landslide. Manifesto promises the Human Rights Act. 1998 - Parliament debates, scrutinises and passes the Human Rights Act. ECHR rights can now be directly appealed to in UK courts. Courts given powers to "read in" (bend the interpretation of Acts of Parliament) to be compatible or declare the provision incompatible - not invalidating law but registering a political concern over the law being compatible with the convention. Years fly by. We're all happy. Prisoners can't vote. Blanket ban, doesn't matter about your sentence or crime, you can't vote. UK courts reject this outright. Appeal to Strasbourg - reasonable judgment says blanket bans are against the charter on the right to vote. Can ban prisoners but need to make it clearer than a blanket ban. Tories furious. Reaction - blame European Courts and withdraw the HRA. The Convention is a British convention. The Human Rights Act a British Act passed by the UK Parliament. The issue the Tories have isn't with Europe or the Convention. It's with British Supreme Court judges using the HRA too well to interpret laws to protect people's rights from torture or deprivation of their rights. Strasbourg can't change law in Britain. It can suggest change and say the UK is breaching the convention. But all that last bit means is we pay an annual fine to the Court for our breach - miniscule sum in the Justice Bill. It's up to the government to amend. The Bill of a Rights is going to be identical. I mean, go and look at the ECHR and tell me which rights you'd exclude for a Bill of Rights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo1185 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Scot Tories are predominantly against the HRA policy as are the Welsh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I know it's a personal thing but who did you vote for in the referendum and the General Election?I didn't vote. I couldn't in the former but would have abstained on principle. I didn't in the GE because I have dual nationality now so I believe it isn't appropriate to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maple Leaf Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I didn't vote. I couldn't in the former but would have abstained on principle. I didn't in the GE because I have dual nationality now so I believe it isn't appropriate to do so. Completely agree. imo, ex-pats should tread carefully when involving themselves in UK politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 OUtside the hospitals we all areA few disturbing issues involving your prof exposed today, doctor.Poverty is your greatest business plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it.... ImageUploadedByTapatalk1431499643.490999.jpg Freedom of speech, ba bye Edited May 13, 2015 by aussieh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rab87 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it.... ImageUploadedByTapatalk1431499643.490999.jpg You got a source on that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 You got a source on that?Id need to go right back through my Twitter feed. I had a quick look there but I can't remember what one I saw it on. It's to do with extremist views. I'll have a look later when I've got more time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 The Bill of a Rights is going to be identical. I mean, go and look at the ECHR and tell me which rights you'd exclude for a Bill of Rights. So, why change it then? I expect any Bill of Rights to fail to mention any employment rights that appear in the HRA, because that's what the Tories are about, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToadKiller Dog Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) Bit here exposing some of the made up headlines from the media and the Tory party http://rightsinfo.org/infographics/the-14-worst-human-rights-myths/ Edited May 13, 2015 by ToadKiller Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 So, why change it then? I expect any Bill of Rights to fail to mention any employment rights that appear in the HRA, because that's what the Tories are about, imo. Perhaps it will also hasten the demise of corroboration in Scotland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SE16 3LN Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 You got a source on that? It was quoted on Radio 4 this morning. Talking about stirring up "radical Islamic" views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo1185 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) Highest employment figure on record announced this morning. Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%. Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly. Edited May 13, 2015 by jambo1185 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Highest employment figure on record announced this morning. Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%. Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly. My arse average earnings increased by anything! Probably did for the boardroom lot and the bankers but not for most of the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Highest employment figure on record announced this morning. Average earnings increased by 1.9% in the year to March, 0.2% up on the previous month. Excluding bonuses, pay rose by 2.2%. Balanced out by Bank of England revising down its growth forcasts slightly. fiddled stats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Will it protect the working man's right to take industrial action? Doubt it. I quite like human rights, don't see why they should be abolished. Protect the working man? Number one priority of the Tories. You have to be having a laugh? One of the first things Cameron did when he took power in the coalition with the lib-dems was to double the cost of industrial tribunals, pricing many out of appealing against things like constructive dismissal. This is a quote from Davey C. I wonder what people would make it if Ms Sturgeon or someone from the Nats said it.... ImageUploadedByTapatalk1431499643.490999.jpg This fits with the Snooper's Charter championed by May and also Cameron's nonsensical rhetoric about conspiracy theorists and peaceful demonstrations being considered "non-violent terrorism". In most countries, MPS govern on behalf of the people. This corporate stooge acts like a corrupt dictator demonstrating nothing but contempt for the citizens he is meant to represent. Expect that delayed water cannon decision to be pushed through any moment now, probably on the backs of that recent demo as your right to peaceful demonstration (or even the right to meet in groups in public) are removed along with your rights under the ECHR, your rights to blog, your rights to freedom from being spied upon, your right to strike in various industries etc etc And some on this thread had the temerity to label SNP/Indy supporters as fascists!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rand Paul's Ray Bans Posted May 13, 2015 Author Share Posted May 13, 2015 Authoritarians, eh. Depressingly predictable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Authoritarians, eh. Depressingly predictable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 One of the first things Cameron did when he took power in the coalition with the lib-dems was to double the cost of industrial tribunals, pricing many out of appealing against things like constructive dismissal. This fits with the Snooper's Charter championed by May and also Cameron's nonsensical rhetoric about conspiracy theorists and peaceful demonstrations being considered "non-violent terrorism". In most countries, MPS govern on behalf of the people. This corporate stooge acts like a corrupt dictator demonstrating nothing but contempt for the citizens he is meant to represent. Expect that delayed water cannon decision to be pushed through any moment now, probably on the backs of that recent demo as your right to peaceful demonstration (or even the right to meet in groups in public) are removed along with your rights under the ECHR, your rights to blog, your rights to freedom from being spied upon, your right to strike in various industries etc etc And some on this thread had the temerity to label SNP/Indy supporters as fascists!! That's why I posted it mate. There's a few regular posters who must have an egg or two on their faces over this tbh. Cameron even wants things like Whatsapp banned because it can't be snooped on and monitored. But SNP bad bad bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 "For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone." That is very worrying indeed! Dave obviously thinks that people obeying the law have something to hide and may be pursued and harassed by the state. This links into the the scrapping of the HRA and the introduction of his Snooper's Charter. Free speech is fecked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rand Paul's Ray Bans Posted May 13, 2015 Author Share Posted May 13, 2015 police looking into possibility of electoral fraud in South Thanet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiewave Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record: 1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda". 2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police." 3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law. In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked." 4. The Named Person. 5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated. 6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need. "It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record: 1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda". 2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police." 3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law. In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked." 4. The Named Person. 5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated. 6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need. "It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-32683817 Best place in Europe for equality regards the above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record: 1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda". 2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police." 3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law. In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked." 4. The Named Person. 5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated. 6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need. "It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615 It's hardly the same level but equally I reject and oppose the SNP's tendency towards nannying. Police Scotland may have been a good concept on paper - however extending the bullish, zero tolerance approach used by Strathclyde Police, perhaps borne out of necessity with the gang/knife crime prevalent in Glasgow, across the whole of Scotland was not. Whataboutery does not, however, protect anyone from the deliberate erosion of rights that will continue under the, quite frankly, fascist Conservative agenda. Labour were bad enough with their ramping up of the surveillance state to ensure the UK is ridiculous in it's over-use of CCTV and their opposition to strong encryption for electronic communication (let's forget they actually had a proposal at comittee level to place low-level x-ray machines and listening devices in lamposts to snoop into citizens rucksacks) but they, nor the slightly nannying SNP, hold no torch to the freedoms the Tories will gleefully strip from us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 police looking into possibility of electoral fraud in South Thanet. Thought that Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog looked a bit dodgy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiewave Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-32683817 Best place in Europe for equality regards the above. It's been obvious for weeks that you don't care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2NaFish Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 It's been obvious for weeks that you don't care. More tears and snotters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiewave Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 More tears and snotters. The first line of every 45er's autobiography: The tale of a man who built himself an illusion to live by Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2NaFish Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 The first line of every 45er's autobiography: The tale of a man who built himself an illusion to live by I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiewave Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense. Are you mad these days, toona? Is it because your imperial masters love you long time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Draper Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm not a 45er. More strawman nonsense. Don't knock the strawman argument. Without it, GW would have about 30 posts to his name, rather than 9,579. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiewave Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Don't knock the strawman argument. Without it, GW would have about 30 posts to his name, rather than 9,579. Strawmen and Ad Hominem are equally likewise just as bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 It's been obvious for weeks that you don't care. Eh? Scotland being the most equal place in Europe for lgbt rights is a good thing, surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Draper Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Eh? Scotland being the most equal place in Europe for lgbt rights is a good thing, surely? Of course it's a good thing, but you've shown him up (again) to be a slaverer, so he's irritated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2NaFish Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Are you mad these days, toona? Is it because your imperial masters love you long time? Strawman then gibberish. Atleast the tears and snotters have mixed up your usual MO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambos are go! Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Anyone who says MacAskill was fit for purpose is a slaver. I've derided him a few times over the years as easily led and not a leader IMO. A puppet on the string of the Police, Big Eck and other vested interests IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rand Paul's Ray Bans Posted May 13, 2015 Author Share Posted May 13, 2015 Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record: 1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda". 2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police." 3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law. In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked." 4. The Named Person. 5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated. 6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need. "It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615 Indeed. Correct. But your immediate jump to whataboutery betrays a lack of actual care for the issues currently at hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Anyone who says MacAskill was fit for purpose is a slaver. I've derided him a few times over the years as easily led and not a leader IMO. A puppet on the string of the Police, Big Eck and other vested interests IMO. As a Labour man should you not be concerning yourself more with our extreme right wing UK government. Sorry i forgot Labour hate the SNP more than the Tories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Before we all get into a tizz, let's see the SNP's record: 1. Reported to the UN by the Scottish Human Rights Commission "amid growing fears of an "illiberal" law-and-order agenda". 2. "Scotland has the highest level of stop and search in the UK, with the number also estimated to be nine times greater than the rate of New York police." 3. "Of the 519,213 searches recorded between April and December 2013, more than 70% were not rooted in law. In its submission, the SHRC focused on the volume of searches and noted that children had been frisked." 4. The Named Person. 5. The threat to abolish the need for corroboration, now thankfully defeated. 6. Police officers routinely carrying guns even when there is no apparent need. "It is a significant development that Kenny MacAskill's bullish and illiberal approach to stop and search, scrapping corroboration, and armed police will now be reviewed on an international level because of concerns over the impact they will have on human rights www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/un-asked-to-monitor-scots-law-and-order.24967615 OK now you have got that of your chest. What do you as a Labour voter think of much more threatening moves by the Tories to restrict our civil liberties. Hope you dont mind me asking but how come you got to vote in the GE and will you get a vote at Holyrood 2016 and Euro Referendum ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieh Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 The HRA is Enshrined in Scots Law, so whats the consequences if the Uk government try to impose this Uk wide, it must throw other laws up in the air. The PF office will be . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.