Jump to content

Israel starts ground offensive in Gaza.


Eckauskas

Recommended Posts

Geoff Kilpatrick

 

 

 

Here are my thoughts on "suicide bombings".

 

The condemnation of suicide bombings is based upon the supposition that innocent civilians or non combatants as someone called them earlier are unjustly murdered.

 

If a Palestinian blows himself up in a restaurant in Tel Aviv and kills a young couple in their twenties the general consensus would be that the couple had no part to play in the bombardment and siege of The Gaza Strip and should therefore be left alone.

 

There is an argument to be made.

 

The Israeli Government and by extension the Israeli Defence Forces are not a private organisation. They are elected, funded, comprised of and operate purely on the behest of Israeli citizens. If you are a citizen of Israel you elect the politicians that send the IDF to Palestine. If you are an Israeli citizen your taxes pay for the F16's, Apache Helicopters and Hellfire missiles that go with it. In short they are in fact the ones who are complicit in committing the crimes. As such it is hard to complain when the people you are terrorising fight back.

 

With the inability to strike the IDF in the absence of any military hardware the Palestinians resorted to blowing themselves up or sending home made rockets into Israel itself as a last recourse.

 

As we have all seen from the last few weeks the Israeli Defence Force itself has no objections to killing "innocent civilians" in the course of carrying out its military aims.

 

Why should the Palestinians be held to a higher standard?

So there are no such things as terrorists and victims are collateral damage brought on by the actions of others. You are Gerry Adams and I claim ?5!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 615
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here are my thoughts on "suicide bombings".

 

The condemnation of suicide bombings is based upon the supposition that innocent civilians or non combatants as someone called them earlier are unjustly murdered.

 

If a Palestinian blows himself up in a restaurant in Tel Aviv and kills a young couple in their twenties the general consensus would be that the couple had no part to play in the bombardment and siege of The Gaza Strip and should therefore be left alone.

 

There is an argument to be made.

 

The Israeli Government and by extension the Israeli Defence Forces are not a private organisation. They are elected, funded, comprised of and operate purely on the behest of Israeli citizens. If you are a citizen of Israel you elect the politicians that send the IDF to Palestine. If you are an Israeli citizen your taxes pay for the F16's, Apache Helicopters and Hellfire missiles that go with it. In short they are in fact the ones who are complicit in committing the crimes. As such it is hard to complain when the people you are terrorising fight back.

 

With the inability to strike the IDF in the absence of any military hardware the Palestinians resorted to blowing themselves up or sending home made rockets into Israel itself as a last recourse.

 

As we have all seen from the last few weeks the Israeli Defence Force itself has no objections to killing "innocent civilians" in the course of carrying out its military aims.

 

Why should the Palestinians be held to a higher standard?

 

So you think suicide bombings are a legitimate form of resistance. Cool, think I'll leave it there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

So you think suicide bombings are a legitimate form of resistance. Cool, think I'll leave it there.

 

In the absence of military hardware it's an understandable form of resistance from a population that feels helpless. Not an action I personally would engage in or feel comfartable encouraging others to commit but then again I have never seen my family blown to bits in my own home.

 

I can only assume that your grievance is the fact that as you see it innocent civilians are killed.

 

The only answer I have unfortunately is that's war.

 

It's a bit rich to attack a group of people with the full might of your armed forces and then cry foul when they have the audacity to fight back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Murray

In the absence of military hardware it's an understandable form of resistance from a population that feels helpless. Not an action I personally would engage in or feel comfartable encouraging others to commit but then again I have never seen my family blown to bits in my own home.

 

I can only assume that your grievance is the fact that as you see it innocent civilians are killed.

 

The only answer I have unfortunately is that's war.

 

It's a bit rich to attack a group of people with the full might of your armed forces and then cry foul when they have the audacity to fight back.

 

So if you had seen your family or loved ones blown up on a bus, at a wedding or in the local shopping mall, would you expect your goverment to use the full might at their disposal to make sure such atrocities never happened again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

So if you had seen your family or loved ones blown up on a bus, at a wedding or in the local shopping mall, would you expect your goverment to use the full might at their disposal to make sure such atrocities never happened again?

 

Well that's the chicken and the egg isn't it. What came first?

 

You clearly believe that Israel is reacting to Hamas rocket attacks and suicide bombings and I believe it's the other way around.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the absence of military hardware it's an understandable form of resistance from a population that feels helpless. Not an action I personally would engage in or feel comfartable encouraging others to commit but then again I have never seen my family blown to bits in my own home.

 

I can only assume that your grievance is the fact that as you see it innocent civilians are killed.

 

The only answer I have unfortunately is that's war.

 

It's a bit rich to attack a group of people with the full might of your armed forces and then cry foul when they have the audacity to fight back.

 

The exact excuse Israel would use when bombing residential areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

The exact excuse Israel would use when bombing residential areas.

 

The difference is Israel is the aggressor. It is Israel that initiates these conflicts. They occupy Palestinian land, control every facet of Palestinian life and routinely murder Palestinians with impunity.

 

When the Palestinians fight back they are castigated and labeled terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

 

 

 

Well that's the chicken and the egg isn't it. What came first?

 

You clearly believe that Israel is reacting to Hamas rocket attacks and suicide bombings and I believe it's the other way around.

Does it really matter what came first? What most people want is for violence to stop. However, in your binary pro-Palestinian world, the Israelis are the epitome of evil and therefore you are creating a narrative which justifies any Palestinian action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Murray

The difference is Israel is the aggressor. It is Israel that initiates these conflicts. They occupy Palestinian land, control every facet of Palestinian life and routinely murder Palestinians with impunity.

 

When the Palestinians fight back they are castigated and labeled terrorists.

 

The reason they control every facet of Palestinian life is to stop a return to the almost daily use of suicide bombers from day's gone past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason they control every facet of Palestinian life is to stop a return to the almost daily use of suicide bombers from day's gone past

 

....and the reason suicide bombers carried out these terrible acts?

A bad morning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Benoit

 

 

 

The difference is Israel is the aggressor. It is Israel that initiates these conflicts. They occupy Palestinian land, control every facet of Palestinian life and routinely murder Palestinians with impunity.

 

When the Palestinians fight back they are castigated and labeled terrorists.

 

 

I've agreed with pretty much all you've posted until now but can't disagree with this more. Targeting civilians on either side is reprehensible and cannot ever be condoned or excused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

I've agreed with pretty much all you've posted until now but can't disagree with this more. Targeting civilians on either side is reprehensible and cannot ever be condoned or excused.

 

I can't fault you for that as its a very difficult argument to try and defend. One that I'm not entirely sure how to go about. I simply feel uncomfortable pointing the finger of blame at Palestinians when I feel they are acting purely in self defence.

 

Were Palestinians to start blowing themselves up in cafes in Sweden or Japan I would obviously be outraged as it would be an attack without provocation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong but did the United Kingdom not engage in the bombing of civilian areas in Germany during World War Two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't fault you for that as its a very difficult argument to try and defend. One that I'm not entirely sure how to go about. I simply feel uncomfortable pointing the finger of blame at Palestinians when I feel they are acting purely in self defence.

 

Were Palestinians to start blowing themselves up in cafes in Sweden or Japan I would obviously be outraged as it would be an attack without provocation.

 

Did you think the IRA were justified in detonating bombs in areas populated by civilians? Hypothetically speaking, do you think the Iraqi resistance would have been justified in blowing themselves up on UK soil in areas populated by civilians? Going by your logic the British public voted for and financed the government that invaded their country so I'd have to surmise that you wouldn't view it as unjust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

Correct me if I'm wrong but did the United Kingdom not engage in the bombing of civilian areas in Germany during World War Two?

 

Yes they did.

 

And your moral equivalence is what, precisely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Yes they did.

 

And your moral equivalence is what, precisely?

 

Do you think the Citizens of the United Kingdom found it acceptable at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

Do you think the Citizens of the United Kingdom found it acceptable at the time.

 

I would say that the vast majority of the citizens of the UK didn't know or care what the bombs were doing precisely. They were just glad that Germany was being bombed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I would say that the vast majority of the citizens of the UK didn't know or care what the bombs were doing precisely. They were just glad that Germany was being bombed.

 

Exactly.

 

They were happy or glad as you put it "innocent civilians" were being murdered. Why? Because those very same innocent civilians were waging war on them.

 

The point I'm attempting to make is that our opinions of what is abhorrent or morally right or wrong alter depending on our circumstances.

 

70 years ago Brits felt justified in bombing civilian areas. Today they would probably balk at the idea as they no longer feel threatened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

 

 

 

Exactly.

 

They were happy or glad as you put it "innocent civilians" were being murdered. Why? Because those very same innocent civilians were waging war on them.

 

The point I'm attempting to make is that our opinions of what is abhorrent or morally right or wrong alter depending on our circumstances.

 

70 years ago Brits felt justified in bombing civilian areas. Today they would probably balk at the idea as they no longer feel threatened.

So in your view both Israelis and Palestinians are fair game?

 

By that logic, if Israel decided to liquidate Gaza and the West Bank they would be fully justified!

 

:vrface:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you think the IRA were justified in detonating bombs in areas populated by civilians? Hypothetically speaking, do you think the Iraqi resistance would have been justified in blowing themselves up on UK soil in areas populated by civilians? Going by your logic the British public voted for and financed the government that invaded their country so I'd have to surmise that you wouldn't view it as unjust?

 

Keeping it in context,you could say The Stern Gang were justified in killing British ministers in Israel? Which they did!

I think we can all agree that it is a big,FO mess!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest C00l K1d

Excuse my ignorance, but why has this suddenly all kicked off again?

 

This has been going on for years, how come it's suddenly all over the news and folk seem to be taking a massive interest?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

Excuse my ignorance, but why has this suddenly all kicked off again?

 

This has been going on for years, how come it's suddenly all over the news and folk seem to be taking a massive interest?

It escalated after the kidnappings, which were newsworthy. Firing rockets and applying siege conditions wasn't deemed newsworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It escalated after the kidnappings, which were newsworthy. Firing rockets and applying siege conditions wasn't deemed newsworthy.

No rockets were fired for 18 months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick

 

No rockets were fired for 18 months

Fair enough. The point still stands though that the conflict was out of the media's consciousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheMaganator

A YouTube video of an interview with one of the sons of a founding member of Hamas.

He rejected their teachings and converted to Christianity.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Benoit

I think he's mistaking no rockets fired by Hamas with no rockets fired from Palestine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A small number of rockets were fired from Palestinian territory against the wishes of Hamas who attempted to prevent this. Some argue they could have been more forceful in their preventive methods but obviously they are walking an incredible delicate line in attempting to police Palestinian militant groups when Israel are continuing to blockade the area, demolish homes and further encroach on Palestinian territory with illegal settlements.

 

Unfortunately criminality will be prevalent in any area that is subject to the conditions placed on the Palestinian people. Whatever your view of the conflict it is obvious that the only way for progress and the end of mass killings is for Israel to agree to concessions regarding the economic blockade.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hamas lack any Command and Control system to run it's rocket force. It's all terrorist cells operating with a lot of independence. It's hard to enforce cease fires on their part and have all members running off the same script. Israel on the other hand can stop and go in minutes. They need to be longer ceasefires to ensure they are adhered to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of ceasefires -

 

85.6% of Israeli's oppose prospect of ceasefire

 

http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Poll-865-percent-of-Israelis-oppose-cease-fire-369064

 

Effectively without meaningful international intervention this conflict will not end any time soon. Israeli public opinion is so far to the right that Netanyahu can either choose further attacks or political destruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is Israel is the aggressor. It is Israel that initiates these conflicts. They occupy Palestinian land, control every facet of Palestinian life and routinely murder Palestinians with impunity.

 

When the Palestinians fight back they are castigated and labeled terrorists.

Correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So another thing. Israel is deemed to be occupying Gaza and the other Arab areas as it controls entry (hence the tunnels). UN "law" says occupiers are responsible for safety of citizens.

 

Suppose bombing and killing them is to make them safer under Israeli PR. Arab world getting angrier. Won't end well for Israel or its supporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of ceasefires -

 

85.6% of Israeli's oppose prospect of ceasefire

 

http://www.jpost.com...ase-fire-369064

 

Effectively without meaningful international intervention this conflict will not end any time soon. Israeli public opinion is so far to the right that Netanyahu can either choose further attacks or political destruction.

 

I don't necessarily doubt the gist of the findings but I'd question how robust that poll is.

504 respondents for a Jewish Israeli population of 6.1 million or thereabouts...?

 

I've found this thread really interesting by the way, great level of debate...mostly.. :laugh:

matt84's contributions have been especially strong, thanks for taking the time to set out your arguments so well. Really appreciated that. Great reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sooner the Zionist colonial savages leave Palestine the better. Sadly I can't see it happening until the world standing of the US declines much further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alwaysthereinspirit

The sooner the Zionist colonial savages leave Palestine the better. Sadly I can't see it happening until the world standing of the US declines much further.

Better for whom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions

10565032_684078988339206_1052256682352770882_n.jpg?oh=ff96ea6bf030af99045caf7be26138bc&oe=54570491

 

How far is this war crime going to go on, yes there will be a cease fire like all the one before and then it will start again but this time they have crossed the line ,the number of children killed has now made this butchery a genocidal insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alwaysthereinspirit

10565032_684078988339206_1052256682352770882_n.jpg?oh=ff96ea6bf030af99045caf7be26138bc&oe=54570491

 

How far is this war crime going to go on, yes there will be a cease fire like all the one before and then it will start again but this time they have crossed the line ,the number of children killed has now made this butchery a genocidal insanity.

You really want to go with Genocide or Genocidal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

10565032_684078988339206_1052256682352770882_n.jpg?oh=ff96ea6bf030af99045caf7be26138bc&oe=54570491

 

How far is this war crime going to go on, yes there will be a cease fire like all the one before and then it will start again but this time they have crossed the line ,the number of children killed has now made this butchery a genocidal insanity.

 

I don't like death and destruction.

 

The explosion in the picture most probably was a direct hit on a rocket launcher or other weapon containing fuel hence the fire ball. A very dramatic picture indeed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fourcandles

 

 

You really want to go with Genocide or Genocidal?

 

When you see the size of that plume of flame against the block of flats you realise the size of munitions that are being used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like death and destruction.

 

The explosion in the picture most probably was a direct hit on a rocket launcher or other weapon containing fuel hence the fire ball. A very dramatic picture indeed.

 

This is tongue in cheek,aye?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alwaysthereinspirit

When you see the size of that plume of flame against the block of flats you realise the size of munitions that are being used.

That certainly is a lot of smoke. What was the address of this explosion. I cant tell from the photo of the exact distance the explosion is from the building in the foreground.

I cant even tell where this explosion happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

This is tongue in cheek,aye?

 

No. It's an observation of the reaction that's taken place as a result of a bomb or shell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AlphonseCapone

Is it accurate there has never been an independent Palestinian state in history and has always been under the control of other powers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...