Jump to content

Wage cut for players and staff (Statement on 24/4)


Bunny Munro

Recommended Posts

husref musemic
17 minutes ago, maroonsgotop said:

players union & players.....................................lemmings off a cliff

i imagine the union/Wishart WhatsApp chat is something like -

 

'stick with me lads and we can get hearts to pay damages and full wages'. followed by lots 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Pasquale for King

    336

  • Mikey1874

    241

  • soonbe110

    241

  • Last Laff

    234

19 minutes ago, Randy Marsh said:

I wonder which players are refusing to take a pay cut?  I would imagine Jamie Walker would probably be one. 

 

Based on what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JAMBONI said:

I think clause 12 can be invoked even after a wage cut/deferral.  As you say relegation and remaining debt free may be preferable to struggling in the premiership and cash strapped. Also a good opportunity to get rid of some of the rubbish that got us into the mess. 

 

Clause 12 can be used when football is suspended.

 

It doesn't have any clauses saying otherwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

Clause 12 can be used when football is suspended.

 

It doesn't have any clauses saying otherwise. 

Thanks for the information. 👍👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven’t really kept up with this Clause 12 stuff. Could anyone tell me what it is? I thought it was the ability to essentially make players redundant.

 

But have seen other suggestions that it is the ability to not pay the player until football returns? But the player would still be contracted to us and would resume their contract as normal once football is back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheOak88 said:

I haven’t really kept up with this Clause 12 stuff. Could anyone tell me what it is? I thought it was the ability to essentially make players redundant.

 

But have seen other suggestions that it is the ability to not pay the player until football returns? But the player would still be contracted to us and would resume their contract as normal once football is back.

 

2nd paragraph 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Baxfee said:

Hearts is the only club that appears to be in the real world. They are taking a fair and realistic stance on wages (could’ve been more severe if I’m being honest). Deferrals only work if we know that on 1st aug we would return to normal with full stadiums and big smiley faces. That’s not going to happen and most revenue streams will still be missing for most if not all of 2020. This is serious stuff for all clubs but they are continuing to stick their heads in the sand whilst putting the boot into AB. 

 

Good post, bud. 

 

Budge immediately put the club first and safeguarded our future with her swift response. I've been a critic of her running of Hearts but the wage reduction, particularly as we've no real idea when football can return to normal, was a sensible and sound decision. 

 

When Hearts emerge from this pandemic in rude financial health who'll care about the hand wringing, whining of our critics. 

 

Feck the lot and hell mend them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Lothian Jambo
7 minutes ago, martoon said:

 

Good post, bud. 

 

Budge immediately put the club first and safeguarded our future with her swift response. I've been a critic of her running of Hearts but the wage reduction, particularly as we've no real idea when football can return to normal, was a sensible and sound decision. 

 

When Hearts emerge from this pandemic in rude financial health who'll care about the hand wringing, whining of our critics. 

 

Feck the lot and hell mend them. 

Not sure we'll emerge in "rude financial health" but we could be in a better position than many 

 

Football is going to have a horrendous next 8 months or so you'd imagine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, East Lothian Jambo said:

Not sure we'll emerge in "rude financial health" but we could be in a better position than many 

 

Football is going to have a horrendous next 8 months or so you'd imagine 

 

Perhaps sound financial health but rude compared to others. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
1 hour ago, TheOak88 said:

I haven’t really kept up with this Clause 12 stuff. Could anyone tell me what it is? I thought it was the ability to essentially make players redundant.

 

But have seen other suggestions that it is the ability to not pay the player until football returns? But the player would still be contracted to us and would resume their contract as normal once football is back.

As Mikey said your 2nd paragraph covers it, a clause that only seems to be in players contracts in Scotland it appears. What I’m not sure is if you have to do it with all the players or can you pick and choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

As Mikey said your 2nd paragraph covers it, a clause that only seems to be in players contracts in Scotland it appears. What I’m not sure is if you have to do it with all the players or can you pick and choose.

Don't know for definite but I would imagine it would not be all or nothing.

The available money might be the key factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King

So let’s do some maths, our average wage is £138k. So around £11.5k a month. Apparently £7061 a month after tax. £3-500 a month on food? Utility bills £2-400? Mortgage (holiday 🤷🏾‍♂️) or rent (most likely)  of £1000-2k at most surely? Car £500-1k. Does that sound about right? 30% wage cut around £2k. That leaves you around £1k a month with not much to spend it on. Surely they can get someone to work out how much they spend and what they need? Are these figures realistic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
4 minutes ago, JamboAl said:

Don't know for definite but I would imagine it would not be all or nothing.

The available money might be the key factor.

You would imagine so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to say, I don't like the idea of Budge remaining open to dialogue with the players who are daft enough to get article 12'd. IMO they've rejected the offer to try and pressurise the club into paying 100% of the wages whilst fans lose wages and are put into dire straights. I don't believe that selfishness and bloody mindedness should be given the time of day after the deadline passes. Take it or leave it deal. 

 

The more I think about how long this lockdown situation could continue - specifically in relation to live sport, the more I wonder about the need for self preservation. Cut the players we don't want loose and keep who we want as long as possible. Its not nice, or altogether very ethical, but neither is demanding all of your thousands of pounds per week whilst regular people lose significant amounts of money and the club has no source of income. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JamboAndrew

I'm wishing wages were performance and final league place based. We would have saved loads this year.

 

But more seriously, it's a results driven business and I don't know why wages aren't more results dependant. Might motivate a few to actually try.

 

I say this having never looked at a footballers contract, but it seems to be majority based on a base salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Lothian Jambo
13 hours ago, davemclaren said:

Anyone whose contract expires end of May/June won’t be happy to agree I imagine. 

I think you're probably right

 

There is no easy outcome here. I do suspect those clubs who've publicly declared their intention to defer wages will be very anxious 

 

Ann Budge has acted arguably more decisively than most since the onset of this crisis. Arguably the most decisive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JamboAndrew said:

I'm wishing wages were performance and final league place based. We would have saved loads this year.

 

But more seriously, it's a results driven business and I don't know why wages aren't more results dependant. Might motivate a few to actually try.

 

I say this having never looked at a footballers contract, but it seems to be majority based on a base salary.

 

I think I recall an interview where Ann Budge stated that she preferred this model (higher basic, lower bonuses) as then staff would be more sure what their income would be.

 

I'm with you - a comfortable basic (enough to plan a reasonable lifestyle upon) and significant bonuses.

 

I'm not sure what bonuses are paid but in these days of Opta Statistics surely we could develop a system of bonus payments that doesn't primarily reward goal scoring and clean-sheeting? Whilst agreeing that scoring goals at one end and keeping 'em pout at the other end are the raison d'être of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play up Queen Ann ... don’t let these current players cripple the club. The supporters are a constant for Hearts;

 

HHGH, THEN, NOW, and FOREVER!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JamboAndrew
1 hour ago, Boof said:

 

I think I recall an interview where Ann Budge stated that she preferred this model (higher basic, lower bonuses) as then staff would be more sure what their income would be.

 

I'm with you - a comfortable basic (enough to plan a reasonable lifestyle upon) and significant bonuses.

 

I'm not sure what bonuses are paid but in these days of Opta Statistics surely we could develop a system of bonus payments that doesn't primarily reward goal scoring and clean-sheeting? Whilst agreeing that scoring goals at one end and keeping 'em pout at the other end are the raison d'être of football.

 

Yes, I think I recall that too.

 

They say money talks in football now. But it seems to be only TV folks, agents and players that are using money to their advantage. Clubs seem medieval in this respect.

 

I mean the talent in our team should not be where it is. So there should be financial penalties for them and the coaching team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lord Beni of Gorgie

Chelsea not taking a cut, donation to charity. 

 

Now that is all well and good but fails to take into account business costs that may well impact further on the club,  billionaire owners or not.

 

I wonder if billionaire owners will react, or do they need their play thing more, than to worry about the cost of Coronavirus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jambo-Fox said:

Play up Queen Ann ... don’t let these current players cripple the club. The supporters are a constant for Hearts;

 

HHGH, THEN, NOW, and FOREVER!


You been on rangers media recently? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In hindsight, Levein and MacPhee may have played a blinder here.  While our league position is somewhat disappointing 😂, we must have saved a fortune in bonus payments.

 

Maybe they saw this coming

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kiwidoug said:

In hindsight, Levein and MacPhee may have played a blinder here.  While our league position is somewhat disappointing 😂, we must have saved a fortune in bonus payments.

 

Maybe they saw this coming

 

I'm sure both Mercer and Robinson claimed (91-92; 97-98) that the bonuses were ripping the club financial wise.

 

Its getting that medium.

 

And Vlad was upping the bonus £1500 per game on a winning streak for some players.

 

 

Edited by DETTY29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we pay more in wages and less in bonuses, then I don’t see how 10-30% can be that much of a problem. By the time you take the tax off it and divide by 12, how much a month are they going to be missing? Add in the fact folk will probably be spending less due to the closure of bars, restaurants, gyms etc.  They really need to get a perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jambo-Fox said:

NEVER - flute boy ...


Stop copying their slogans then. 👍

 

Flute boy? How the fk does that make sense? :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kiwidoug said:

In hindsight, Levein and MacPhee may have played a blinder here.  While our league position is somewhat disappointing 😂, we must have saved a fortune in bonus payments.

 

Maybe they saw this coming

 


Aye, overpaying loads of shite for years and years with even less motivation is a blinder.  Levein and MacPhee are ****ing criminals the way they have internally ****ed the club. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Last Laff said:


Stop copying their slogans then. 👍

 

Flute boy? How the fk does that make sense? :lol: 

I do not have a clue about what you are referring to you do not make sense .... feels like you are just trying  picking a fight with a random stranger - make sense or shut up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jambo-Fox said:

I do not have a clue about what you are referring to you do not make sense .... feels like you are just trying  picking a fight with a random stranger - make sense or shut up


Your “then, now, forever” is a slogan on hun media.  Pardon if it took it the wrong way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Last Laff said:


Your “then, now, forever” is a slogan on hun media.  Pardon if it took it the wrong way. 

No problem! TBH it was plagiarised,  imitation is the most sincere form of flattery!

737B067B-227C-47BD-9B82-D8C9DDC40EEC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any player that doesn't accept should just leave. 

 

The guys that stay will be committed to the club. It'll get rid off most of the bad apples. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the wages will be hitting the bank accounts (or not)in the next few days.

I wonder who will be first to break cover and supplement their income by crying and bitching about how they've been impoverished by that nasty Mrs Budge.

We could have a book on it , any guesses  ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players have simply failed to realise that they have to play in front of us when this is all done. By next week we will know every single person who hasn’t accepted the cuts as they’ll be article 12’d. How any of them think they can ever play in maroon again I’ll never know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, busby1985 said:

The players have simply failed to realise that they have to play in front of us when this is all done. By next week we will know every single person who hasn’t accepted the cuts as they’ll be article 12’d. How any of them think they can ever play in maroon again I’ll never know. 

As I've said before, do some of them think they are in a privileged position compared to millions who are making enormous sacrifices.

 

Some people are luckier than others.  They have bern able to stay in employment and retain their earnings.  Our players are not in that category.  Any one of them who refuses to make a sacrifice should never wear our jersey again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jambo-Fox said:

No problem! TBH it was plagiarised,  imitation is the most sincere form of flattery!

737B067B-227C-47BD-9B82-D8C9DDC40EEC.jpeg


Genuine apologies mate 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheOak88 said:

I haven’t really kept up with this Clause 12 stuff. Could anyone tell me what it is? I thought it was the ability to essentially make players redundant.

 

But have seen other suggestions that it is the ability to not pay the player until football returns? But the player would still be contracted to us and would resume their contract as normal once football is back.

 

13 hours ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

2nd paragraph 

 

Hang on, we can clause 12 them for a period of time and not pay them a bolt and then force them to honour the rest of their contract? What if clausing them means 6 months, a year? They have to just sit on their arse with no income till we decide we want them back?

No chance, that can't be right.

Fair enough if it means they can't sign for anyone else but we can't just recall them.

Edited by graygo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume clause 12 is unilateral , I.e it has to be applied to all players even if they have agreed a cut?

 

everyones circumstances are different so hard to comment on players who may just be looking after their families. As a FOH contributer would I want my cash to top up their wages when most haven’t given an arse all year in the league - no chance. 
 

flip side is if there is a remote chance of season resuming i want the players fully motivated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig
6 hours ago, graygo said:

 

 

Hang on, we can clause 12 them for a period of time and not pay them a bolt and then force them to honour the rest of their contract? What if clausing them means 6 months, a year? They have to just sit on their arse with no income till we decide we want them back?

No chance, that can't be right.

Fair enough if it means they can't sign for anyone else but we can't just recall them.

I think players have the option to walk away from their contract if clause 12 is applied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig
37 minutes ago, Hood09 said:

I assume clause 12 is unilateral , I.e it has to be applied to all players even if they have agreed a cut?

 

everyones circumstances are different so hard to comment on players who may just be looking after their families. As a FOH contributer would I want my cash to top up their wages when most haven’t given an arse all year in the league - no chance. 
 

flip side is if there is a remote chance of season resuming i want the players fully motivated. 

Surely every player contract is independent of anyone else's, so each decision would be made individually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope that Budge gets every player, that has not accepted a deal, and tells them they are 12'ved and can leave whenever they feel like it. If as has been said by many on here we are going to be demoted/ expelled/ relegated we will not be needing them. The current circumstances make it imperative that the future of the club is protected! Ms Budge did exactly the right thing at the outset but she now must carry through what she said she would do with players who would not accept the club's terms. I can think of no other industry where someone would expect to still be in a job let alone draw a wage when they are idle.

Edited by jock _turd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

queensferryjambo
10 hours ago, Last Laff said:

Flute boy? How the fk does that make sense? :lol: 

 

 

Don't shoot the messenger but it does make sense, your board name is Last Laff, presumably a reference to Kyle Lafferty who according to the song he is 'seven foot and plays the flute'.

 

Hence flute boy?

 

Is that possibly the logic? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s seems to be dawning on the hobos that wage cuts are inevitable.

 

You have to remember they have done it heroically and there way is different from Hearts. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Last Laff said:


Itch on my back, oh yeah here pops up the irritation 💪

More likely caused by the lack of soap and water.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, jock _turd said:

I hope that Budge gets every player, that has not accepted a deal, and tells them they are 12'ved and can leave whenever they feel like it. If as has been said by many on here we are going to be demoted/ expelled/ relegated we will not be needing them. The current circumstances make it imperative that the future of the club is protected! Ms Budge did exactly the right thing at the outset but she now must carry through what she said she would do with players who would not accept the club's terms. I can think of no other industry where someone would expect to still be in a job let alone draw a wage when they are idle.

Re your first sentence I think that option may still be on the table.  She told them already that they can tear up their contract and Dikamona did so, albeit temporarily, it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, queensferryjambo said:

 

 

Don't shoot the messenger but it does make sense, your board name is Last Laff, presumably a reference to Kyle Lafferty who according to the song he is 'seven foot and plays the flute'.

 

Hence flute boy?

 

Is that possibly the logic? 

 

 


Yeah I was stupidly trying to think up some random old firm logic for the comment and forget my own username :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, graygo said:

 

 

Hang on, we can clause 12 them for a period of time and not pay them a bolt and then force them to honour the rest of their contract? What if clausing them means 6 months, a year? They have to just sit on their arse with no income till we decide we want them back?

No chance, that can't be right.

Fair enough if it means they can't sign for anyone else but we can't just recall them.

I honestly don't know but why the **** would we want the ****ing lazy tossers back anyway ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, David McCaig said:

I think players have the option to walk away from their contract if clause 12 is applied.

 

Thanks, that makes more sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Last Laff said:


Yeah I was stupidly trying to think up some random old firm logic for the comment and forget my own username :lol: 

How can you forget your username ? 

Unless of course 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...