Bazzas right boot Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Mibbees aye, mibbees naw. Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 7 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said: Exactly why i said to some im a arsehole Or probably to many i am I don’t think you’re an arsehole, but I do think you are prejudiced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, Olly Lee's left boot said: Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Olly Lee's left boot said: Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍 More like the wife decided it was a great idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, Morph said: Sorry didn’t mean to have a go, there are just some utter cretins in this thread and folk have the brass neck to give it the “don’t need awareness, we’re a completely inclusive society”. We’re not even a completely inclusive forum. Cannot imagine what it’s like being a gay hearts fan reading some of this utter pish. The same as a straight person reading this pish tbh. The undercurrent of racism, homaphobia, bigotry and sexism is an eye opener. Takes all kinds tho, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 14 minutes ago, Weakened Offender said: Why do they need protected if the country is so nice? Why do we need any form of protection laws for anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy Soutar Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Morgan said: I don’t think you’re an arsehole, but I do think you are prejudiced. Fair enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: More like the wife decided it was a great idea. The GK household pecking order. The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: More like the wife decided it was a great idea. Who’s wife? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, Olly Lee's left boot said: The GK household pecking order. The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 😉 He’s only third? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beave1874 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 4 hours ago, Hercules said: I’ve not read much of this thread either, but I’m sorry, if I see a man with a dress on, I have to have a double take. To me that’s not normal. I know normal isn’t the correct word but it’s all I have. I get that. So frequent now almost every 2nd day...hence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 8 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: Never been a fan on the girl on girl either tbh Like to see porn stars with stiffys on your screen do you? Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 8 hours ago, PTBCAL said: At the end of the day everyone should respect everyone’s beliefs regardless if they agree with them Nonsense. Respect is earned. I will never respect the teachings of religious scripture for example and I SHOULD never have to. Should you have to respect the beliefs of Adolf Hitler? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 9 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: I fail to see what the big deal is here,ive never done any harm by gay people the are free to do what the wish i just dont believe its right but whatever they choose to do is upto them. What they do is against my beliefs thats all,they and folk on here more than entitled to be against what i think thats fine by me It is as right and natural as opposite sex for the fact it is nature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 10 hours ago, kila said: Good luck keeping those real feelings bottled up He doesn't like girl on girl but yet he thinks being gay is wrong I will say this now. There is NOTHING better in this world than girl on girl. I'd take sniffing the bedsheets after 2 hot women have been rolling about in them all night ovet Hearts winning the league* *may not be strictly true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWJ Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, i8hibsh said: Nonsense. Respect is earned. I will never respect the teachings of religious scripture for example and I SHOULD never have to. Should you have to respect the beliefs of Adolf Hitler? I call Godwin! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, FWJ said: I call Godwin! Wasn't referenced during talking about anything bad but yeah it was relevant. I just don't get the whole 'you must respect someone's beliefs'. Utter poppycock. I will respect only beliefs I see as decent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Bizarre this has been moved because people have went off topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 9 hours ago, Olly Lee's left boot said: The GK household pecking order. The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 21 hours ago, Marvin said: I bet you first typed fags, realising your faux pas changed it to ciggies before anyone noticed I didn't get as far as actually typing it but yes I had to revise my original thought...🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 10 hours ago, colinmaroon said: Wasn't going to post on this thread but the exaggerated blaspheming does it. Two people in the last while have been in the courts fighting unfair dismissal and discrimination for their beliefs. Richard Page, long serving Justice of the Peace said in a private conversation that he believed a child was better served being brought up by a mother and father. Someone overheard and reported him and as a result he was sacked as a JP and lost his non-exec director of an NHS Trust. He appealed and lost as the judge said, and I quote, "He had the right to believe what he believed but not to articulate it!" - Staggering!!! Felix Ngole kicked off his social work course because he said on his own Facebook page he believed in the Bible's view on marriage, that is between a man and a woman, and he has just won in the Court of Appeal after losing his first appeal in the High Court. Again, he was reported anonymously! In the court hearings, the University argued that Felix had ‘lacked insight’ into the effect of his posts on social media. During his Fitness to Practice hearing, the University had told him that the expression of his Christian views was unacceptable and was effectively told either to renounce his faith or stay silent on pain of losing his career. Yet Felix says he felt he could not surrender his faith. In some shocking exchanges from the High Court hearing, the University of Sheffield implied that Felix was not allowed to express the Christian viewpoint on same-sex marriage or homosexuality on any public forum, including in a church. The Court of Appeal condemned the position of the university whereby people would live in fear if private expressions of views were overheard and could be reported anonymously. The Court ruled that: “The mere expression of views on theological grounds (e.g. that 'homosexuality is a sin') does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views will discriminate on such grounds.” It was further recognised that Felix had never been shown to act in a discriminatory fashion. The hypocrisy of the secular forces who say that they can say what they like, including bitter and abusive attacks on Christians and Christ and yet don't even allow Christians to "articulate" their beliefs in public reveals the new bolshevism that is socially engineering this country and, they say it's all for the better!!! Open your eyes! 20% of young females self-harm; 18% of young people think life isn't worth living. Suicide rates accelerating. There's a line from a hymn by Graham Kendrick, "we have sacrificed our children on the altar of our gods." The law is that gay sex is legal and we obey the law but, the frantic bile of the Humanist Association against any simple expression of the faith they hate with a passion draws the most vitriolic abuse - all in the name of tolerance, of course. PS If you want to take me to court for expressing Biblical views on homosexuality, I would ask for several other offences to be taken into account. For example, I preach against lying, stealing, hatred, religious teaching that emphasises truth but leaves out love and emphasising love but leaving out the Truth etc. Live your lives as you want as long as you stay within the law but, if the law goes against your beliefs - e.g. what did the gay rights do in that situation and yet the hypocrites say they can do it but you Christians can't. They spend all their times forcing B & B operators out of business for their beliefs; suing bakers etc. It is the human condition, with a few wonderful exceptions, the best of which was that swear word that's constantly used on here, Jesus, to become the abuser and there is more abuse directed in high profile cases against Christians than Islamaphobia, homophobia. Welcome to the age of Christophobia!!! Related to this, I see there's a doctor who is claiming religious discrimination as the reason he was sacked. Based on the fact that he said he would refuse to use the "she" pronoun when dealing with a transgender man. In that instance, he shouldn't have a leg to stand on. If his employer says that's the policy, that employees use the pronouns the patient identifies with, he follows their policy or ****s off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy Soutar Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Sarah O said: Like to see porn stars with stiffys on your screen do you? Interesting. I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said: I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended And what is it about homosexuality that makes you think it isn't as nature intended? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said: I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended Is it natural to want to watch people procreating? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Boris said: Is it natural to want to watch people procreating? Probably. It's not like all the animals in the field are all trying to sneak off for a bit of clandestine pumping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy Soutar Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Boris said: Is it natural to want to watch people procreating? We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Normthebarman said: Probably. It's not like all the animals in the field are all trying to sneak off for a bit of clandestine pumping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 9 hours ago, Olly Lee's left boot said: The undercurrent of racism, homaphobia, bigotry and sexism is an eye opener. The good old days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Soapy Soutar said: We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others? Cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, Boris said: Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others? Cool. He's got a point. I'm pretty open minded but I draw the line at a Dirty Sanchez or Cleveland Steamer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, Governor Tarkin said: The good old days. Brings a tear to the eye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 27 minutes ago, Normthebarman said: Related to this, I see there's a doctor who is claiming religious discrimination as the reason he was sacked. Based on the fact that he said he would refuse to use the "she" pronoun when dealing with a transgender man. In that instance, he shouldn't have a leg to stand on. If his employer says that's the policy, that employees use the pronouns the patient identifies with, he follows their policy or ****s off. Dr "Got your test results sir" Man in dress "it is Madam actually" Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, i8hibsh said: Dr "Got your test results sir" Man in dress "it is Madam actually" Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer" Well played, sir. Well played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 21 minutes ago, i8hibsh said: Dr "Got your test results sir" Man in dress "it is Madam actually" Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Boris said: Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others? Cool. You could make a solid arguement that the sexual practices which have evolved over millions of years in order to optimise the survival of the species are as close to 'normal' as you are likely to get. Sexual preferences are a completely different kettle of fish. Edited July 12, 2019 by Governor Tarkin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Soapy Soutar said: We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman I think we can all get on board with a bit Fake Taxi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Watching a naked man have sex with a woman or watching a gorgeous naked woman have sex with a woman is a bit of a no brainer. Each to their own but to me only a 'wrong un' would choose the former. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, i8hibsh said: Watching a naked man have sex with a woman or watching a gorgeous naked woman have sex with a woman is a bit of a no brainer. Each to their own but to me only a 'wrong un' would choose the former. You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. Edited July 12, 2019 by Normthebarman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 6 minutes ago, Normthebarman said: You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. I just miss the days of top shelf skag mags - was just a better all round experience, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 The Dr who was sacked was rightly fired. he let his own prejudice interfere with his job. If you cannot treat a patient with respect in the manner they wish because of some 2000 year old book, then its time to leave. HIs views are not based on anything apart from dogma- its not medical opinion and research guiding his stance in any way. NOt sure why everyone has got all touchy about pronouns either. If its an issue - then use the persons name! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 23 minutes ago, i8hibsh said: I just miss the days of top shelf skag mags - was just a better all round experience, Dunno if im showing my age a bit here but I remember the days being out with my mates up the woods or whatever and finding bags full of some old bongo mags. They must’ve had to clear room for fresh and took a bag out a walk with the dog to discreetly discard up the wids🤷🏽♂️😂 Kids nowadays don’t know the stress of buying your first bongo mag either! Now that was pressure had to wait for a quiet moment in the shop and quickly try to get the purchase done sharpish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: I like to watch a man. FTFY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman Sexist... Woman can be plumbers too. 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 13 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: Oh well seems im also a arsehole Do you feel guilt for liking Wham? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said: I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended What if the lady uses a strap on to pleasure the man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 54 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: The Dr who was sacked was rightly fired. he let his own prejudice interfere with his job. If you cannot treat a patient with respect in the manner they wish because of some 2000 year old book, then its time to leave. HIs views are not based on anything apart from dogma- its not medical opinion and research guiding his stance in any way. NOt sure why everyone has got all touchy about pronouns either. If its an issue - then use the persons name! Interesting, but we back folk who's religion don't allow them to touch meat. I don't disagree with you or agree but reference your last point, that works both ways. The recipient was also touchy about using he/ she, otherwise it would have been a none issue. Why can the person who identify as x but is biologicaly y take offence and take a stand, but the doctor in this case is not allowed to use he/ she as they feel correct ? I'm with you, why not just use thier name or the term they want, but also, coming full circle why can't a person use he or she as they see fit as well. The doctor lost their job, because of this it's not just a slap on the wrist. Back to my earlier point, it now seems OK to be offended in the name of equality / freedom of speech but not OK to offend anyone, in the slightest in the sake of the same cause. It's a contraindication. Also, I feel the sensitivity levels are now a bit off and by going all out for diversity / equality etc we are now doing more damage as it is getting a bit silly. Freedom of speech / equality of opportunity/ expression of will and opinion, and therefore debate by it's nature cause offence. The line, imo of where it's breaking the law is now an issue, it actually goes against the principles in which it set out to protect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Des Lynam said: What if the lady uses a strap on to pleasure the man? That's called the jackpot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Normthebarman said: You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. So that's what you view when not watching The Famous Your point about our female friends watching girl on girl is true, an ex of mine used to quite enjoy it. So if it comes up in my browsing history then you know why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, Marvin said: So that's what you view when not watching The Famous Your point about our female friends watching girl on girl is true, an ex of mine used to quite enjoy it. So if it comes up in my browsing history then you know why. I had to google those stats. Honest, guv...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 21 minutes ago, Olly Lee's left boot said: Interesting, but we back folk who's religion don't allow them to touch meat. I don't disagree with you or agree but reference your last point, that works both ways. The recipient was also touchy about using he/ she, otherwise it would have been a none issue. Why can the person who identify as x but is biologicaly y take offence and take a stand, but the doctor in this case is not allowed to use he/ she as they feel correct ? I'm with you, why not just use thier name or the term they want, but also, coming full circle why can't a person use he or she as they see fit as well. The doctor lost their job, because of this it's not just a slap on the wrist. Back to my earlier point, it now seems OK to be offended in the name of equality / freedom of speech but not OK to offend anyone, in the slightest in the sake of the same cause. It's a contraindication. Also, I feel the sensitivity levels are now a bit off and by going all out for diversity / equality etc we are now doing more damage as it is getting a bit silly. Freedom of speech / equality of opportunity/ expression of will and opinion, and therefore debate by it's nature cause offence. The line, imo of where it's breaking the law is now an issue, it actually goes against the principles in which it set out to protect. The thing is, private entities and institutions are allowed to have their own rules as long as they don't break the law. Which is why a lot have even more stringent rules than the law requires. If they say employees have to follow certain procedures, then that's what employees have to do. If the doc was not in employment, he could call them whatever he likes. Or at least until it reaches the stage of harassment. Using it once or twice would be fine. If the person asked them to stop as they found it offensive, and the doctor continued to habitually use the wrong pronoun, then that could be classed as harassment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.