Niemi Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/DJSHenderson Would recommend following this BBC reporter if you're interested in the live tweets. Quicker and without the biased slant james on the dole man posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambovambo Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 David Henderson? @DJSHenderson 2m2 minutes ago Mike Mcgill there was a vibrant debate and a clear divide at the heart of RFC "vibrant debate", eh ? Would have loved to have witnessed that ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swavkav Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/DJSHenderson Would recommend following this BBC reporter if you're interested in the live tweets. Quicker and without the biased slant james on the dole man posts I follow both, phone going mental, boss ain't amused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 5m5 minutes ago Agreement? says Murray Group retains the right to negotiate with HMRC a "Full and final settlement of the tax case" on behalf of Rangers. James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 4m4 minutes ago Replying to @jamesdoleman Also says Whyte cannot reach his own deal with HMRC over EBT issue without permission from Murray This is the crown witness, what do you make of this Did SDM create the appearance that Rangers RIP WOULD reach a settlement of the big tax case ? Is this what is being portrayed in court ? CW bought the club for ?1 WITH the wee tax case liability - but not the big one ? Was he actually set up ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 14s14 seconds ago More McGill agrees Rangers came close to breaching their overdraft limit in 2010. Says bank could have begun insolvency proceedings Edited May 5, 2017 by ...a bit disco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 **** me! John James not holding back here! https://johnjamessite.com/ Why was Ann Budge's name dragged into this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Why was Ann Budge's name dragged into this? Something about the team finishing 5th and Rangers ineligibility for Europe due to 'financial irregularities'. Think he mentioned it in a previous blog post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 2m2 minutes ago More Findlay asks if the bank decided to go to Ticketus? McGill says was a board decision You were the finance supremo? That's a flattering term James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 2m2 minutes ago More Findlay "There will be no flattery here" Donald's on fire today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 10s10 seconds ago More Court adjourns for lunch, back at 2pm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Something about the team finishing 5th and Rangers ineligibility for Europe due to 'financial irregularities'. Think he mentioned it in a previous blog post? Cheers, thanks for the explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sraman Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Why was Ann Budge's name dragged into this? I'm not sure but a good guess would be that the arsehole knows his own club are complicit in all of this shit and he's hoping that someone else will do the dirty work for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Cheers, thanks for the explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Kings origional take over was halted as his assets in the UK were frozen and also did not involve paying back the bank. Board tried to do deal with big tax case, but naw says Hector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Now asking about due diligence on CW, said it was limited, and they did not employ somebody to do this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute agoMore McGill agrees only "very limited due diligence on Mr Whyte" Findlay "who did you hire to do it" McGill "We didn't" James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute agoMore McGill says Whyte's name was in the public domain and "the press" would be investigating him. Off the radar... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 They found nothing, after the "off the radar wealth" I fould out enough doing my own research to warrant alarm bells ringing, it was clear that his cyber footprint had been cleansed, which meant he had something to hide, that took 1.5 hours. he was banned as a director, looks like they did less than the SFA's FPP test??? my god nobody who makes money can hide in plain sight, you have to ask why. Finding nothing in the case is finding something and that is big and never good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Dan Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute ago More McGill agrees only "very limited due diligence on Mr Whyte" Findlay "who did you hire to do it" McGill "We didn't" James Doleman? @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute ago More McGill says Whyte's name was in the public domain and "the press" would be investigating him. Off the radar... Tell me he's joking when he said the press would be "investigating" him!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Am I reading this right the where it all went wrong meeting at the dorchester they wanted to knock down Ibrox to build flats, but as it was listed they could not? AS for the we will leave it to the press to do Due Dilligence....I nearly spat out my tea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Am I reading this right the where it all went wrong meeting at the dorchester they wanted to knock down Ibrox to build flats, but as it was listed they could not? AS for the we will leave it to the press to do Due Dilligence....I nearly spat out my tea Ahhh Looks like he was asking if they were not concerned that property dealer would not just build flats and you should do more due diligence....we had no reason to? WTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Dan Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Not even his financial record and ban from being a director would cause you doubt his words!!! James Doleman @jamesdoleman McGill "We had no reason to doubt what he (Whyte) was telling us 3:20 pm ? 5 May 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzbomb1958 Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Biggest club in the world and they don't hire someone to check craigy boy out but let the papers do it jeezo how do these guys become directors ,free craigy ,it should be who was supposedly running that club in the dock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 They found nothing, after the "off the radar wealth" I fould out enough doing my own research to warrant alarm bells ringing, it was clear that his cyber footprint had been cleansed, which meant he had something to hide, that took 1.5 hours. he was banned as a director, looks like they did less than the SFA's FPP test??? my god nobody who makes money can hide in plain sight, you have to ask why. Finding nothing in the case is finding something and that is big and never good You've said this before, about his dad IIRC, what exactly makes you think that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) You've said this before, about his dad IIRC, what exactly makes you think that? If you search on Craig or Thomas Whyte in Google you can see the message that tells you stuff has been removed - Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe Edited May 5, 2017 by 269miles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Am I reading this right the where it all went wrong meeting at the dorchester they wanted to knock down Ibrox to build flats, but as it was listed they could not? AS for the we will leave it to the press to do Due Dilligence....I nearly spat out my tea Surely they would have known that already after the stooshie about building the new top deck on the old stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 If you search on Craig or Thomas Whyte in Google you can see the message that tells you stuff has been removed - Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe If you search for my old mum it says that at the bottom too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 If you search for my old mum it says that at the bottom too. Weird. Just checked under various family names and got the same thing. Is this a standard message now on Google search pages ? I thought it was something did under "right to be forgotten" legislation . At least that's what I was told . It looks like a standard message that appears on any search with a proper name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 If you search on Craig or Thomas Whyte in Google you can see the message that tells you stuff has been removed - Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe I've tried a few, it looks like any human being will bring up that result - unless we think Mrs B is hiding something too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnybob72 Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 If you search for my old mum it says that at the bottom too. Maybe she was tabling a bid for Rangers as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ1984 Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Sure Craigyboys dad runs a debt collection firm (oh the irony) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Maybe she was tabling a bid for Rangers as well? She probably has more money than Whyte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 She probably has more money than Whyte. She would only go as high as 85p, Whyte outbid her. Smart lady, she knew not to waste the other 15p By the way, can we just take a moment to re-rejoice in the fact that rangers were screwed by Green and Whyte? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamdub Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 She would only go as high as 85p, Whyte outbid her. Smart lady, she knew not to waste the other 15p By the way, can we just take a moment to re-rejoice in the fact that rangers were screwed by Green and Whyte? With Minty starting the whole process.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 It's like I said before, if Murray was only expecting ?1 for Rangers then there was no need to check Whyte had the funds. Bank had security over Ibrox and Murray Park anyway so it didn't matter to them whether Whyte had the readies or not to repay the overdraft. The crime that has been committed is as per the indictment, s678 (3) that you cannot take over a PLC with money that is being raised from the company in a side deal. Whyte will get up to 2years and/or a fine as per s680 of Companies Act as he clearly did break the law. All this court case is doing washing some other people's dirty laundry in public too. ie Findlay and Whyte are taking the opportunity to make HBOS look bad and either make SDM and King look bad or perhaps set them up for criminal charges to be brought too... Having said this it is a jury trial, and if Whyte is to have any chance of getting off it will be in a jury trial... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skodef Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Whits all this shit about a Lithuanian bank with links to organised crime in an attempted takeover bid.In the Daily Rubbish. Do I detect a massive wiff of anti Hearts agenda here. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Whits all this shit about a Lithuanian bank with links to organised crime in an attempted takeover bid.In the Daily Rubbish. Do I detect a massive wiff of anti Hearts agenda here. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk No, you detect other Lithuanian banks who collapsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skodef Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 No, you detect other Lithuanian banks who collapsed.OK thanks for that.What would have happened if the unnamed Lithuanian bank did take over them. Would have been very interesting Geoff. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Slim Stylee Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Whits all this shit about a Lithuanian bank with links to organised crime in an attempted takeover bid.In the Daily Rubbish. Do I detect a massive wiff of anti Hearts agenda here. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk Nothing to do with us. It's about a failed takeover bid by Andrew Ellis and another rich Vlad - in this case Antonov - who owned a Lithuanian bank but was engulfed with rumours of links to organized crime. Murray knocked back two bids from Ellis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 OK thanks for that.What would have happened if the unnamed Lithuanian bank did take over them. Would have been very interesting Geoff. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk Probably. What ifs are the delightful part of this whole fable though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 OK thanks for that.What would have happened if the unnamed Lithuanian bank did take over them. Would have been very interesting Geoff. Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk The bank was Bankas Snoras, with Vladimir Antonov as a major shareholder. The bank was nationalised by the Lithuanian authorities because of a number of irregularities not long before Ukio Bankas collapsed. Antonov also got involved with Portsmouth before it went into administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 **** me! John James not holding back here! https://johnjamessite.com/ He doesn't. A bit hypocritical though, going on about referees cheating in their favour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 He doesn't. A bit hypocritical though, going on about referees cheating in their favour. Hypocritical is to be expected, given that this arsehole pretended to be a Rangers fan when he launched his blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Hypocritical is to be expected, given that this arsehole pretended to be a Rangers fan when he launched his blog. He has a point about McMurdo - His evidence would be mega-popcorn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 The bank was Bankas Snoras, with Vladimir Antonov as a major shareholder. The bank was nationalised by the Lithuanian authorities because of a number of irregularities not long before Ukio Bankas collapsed. Antonov also got involved with Portsmouth before it went into administration. My earlier post. Bank of England warned the FA . He never got near it IIRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 My earlier post. Bank of England warned the FA . He never got near it IIRC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portsmouth_F.C. I know it's Wiki, but Antonov's company CSI took ownership of the club on 1 June 2011. He resigned as chairman of the club on 29 November 2011 after Bankas Snoras and then CSI went into administration. Portsmouth followed suit on 17 February 2012. A BBC article from the day of the takeover states that he had passed the FA's FPP test http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/13614706 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
269miles Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portsmouth_F.C. I know it's Wiki, but Antonov's company CSI took ownership of the club on 1 June 2011. He resigned as chairman of the club on 29 November 2011 after Bankas Snoras and then CSI went into administration. Portsmouth followed suit on 17 February 2012. A BBC article from the day of the takeover states that he had passed the FA's FPP test http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/13614706 Fair do's. I distinctly recall reading (probably Guardian) that everyone was warned this guy was using the Lith bank as his own "piggy bank". Maybe the FA ignored the warnings in the end. Happy to be corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Fair do's. I distinctly recall reading (probably Guardian) that everyone was warned this guy was using the Lith bank as his own "piggy bank". Maybe the FA ignored the warnings in the end. Happy to be corrected. It may well be that the BoE warned the FA once he was in situ, and certainly should have done once the Lithuanian banking authorities started taking action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 Kris Boyd has the answer folks - get Minty Murray back in. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/969934/rangers-david-murray-kris-boyd/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 Kris Boyd has the answer folks - get Minty Murray back in. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/969934/rangers-david-murray-kris-boyd/ That whole article! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 Kris Boyd has the answer folks - get Minty Murray back in. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/969934/rangers-david-murray-kris-boyd/ There is scraping the barrel and then there is Kris Boyd. Is Scottish football so bereft of talent that this huddy gets radio/written time. To espouse his gibberish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BelgeJambo Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Nowt happening today in the Big Case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts