U.S. Politics megathread (merged)

[XB52]

5 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

And why is Fox any different to any other network. They all have political leanings to a certain party. I'll become tech savvy and post the videos when I can. Can obviously see this thread is left leaning as is the majority of the internet.

If you mean the majority on this thread don't want a racist rapist heading the 'so called' most powerful country on the planet then your probably right. Of course there are a couple of flat earthers to back you up

[JFK-1]

12 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

And why is Fox any different to any other network.

 

Are you for real? Okay how many others have been fined almost $800 million for knowingly lying and admitting to knowingly lying? With more cases to come.

 

You're being a useful idiot for them, they lie, they know it, you parrot it anyway. Carry on, we all know it so it has little effect here. People here aren't as gullible as you appear to be.

 

Asking what's the difference between Fox and others is actually a good joke, I must use it someplace.

[Day@theraces]

33 minutes ago, XB52 said:

If you mean the majority on this thread don't want a racist rapist heading the 'so called' most powerful country on the planet then your probably right. Of course there are a couple of flat earthers to back you up

 

Not a flat earther, just don't see the love in over a senile man heading the so called most powerful country. Although he's no likely just the mouth piece to wheel out whilst others in the Democrats make the decisions.

[Day@theraces]

26 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

 

Are you for real? Okay how many others have been fined almost $800 million for knowingly lying and admitting to knowingly lying? With more cases to come.

 

You're being a useful idiot for them, they lie, they know it, you parrot it anyway. Carry on, we all know it so it has little effect here. People here aren't as gullible as you appear to be.

 

Asking what's the difference between Fox and others is actually a good joke, I must use it someplace.

 

I'm not a fan of Fox or the liberal leaning news networks. Just find this thread amusing and how many of the posters on here would happily have Boden back as president. Surely the Democrats have a better candidate.

[Ulysses]

2 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

 

Surely the Democrats have a better candidate.

 

Ah, here.  If the Democrats put up @JFK-1, or @Watt-Zeefuik, or heaven help them even you or me, they'd still have a better candidate than the Republicans have.  Even if they hit us over the head with shovels first.  Repeatedly.

 

[Ulysses]

2 hours ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said:

You missed out rapist.

 

Indeed.  I'm not on top of my game today.   

[Watt-Zeefuik]

49 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

Don't know how to post YouTube videos on here on the my phone. It's the one where he talks about Gaza and opening borders then said he talked to the President of Mexico about it, getting him mixed up with Israel.

 

If you don't mind, here's the White House's YouTube channel. These are the full un-edited news conferences so you don't get editing bias. If you could just point to which one you mean, that'd be helpful.

 

https://www.youtube.com/user/whitehouse/videos

 

Biden absolutely mixes up words and says the wrong thing, but what's frustrating about this is that he's been doing that since the 70s. He's famous for it in US political circles. I keep hearing about his obvious cognitive decline and it's something I'd be worried about but every time I go looking for it it's just Joe Biden being the same Joe Biden he's always been, for good and ill, just talking a tad bit slower.

 

45 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

And why is Fox any different to any other network. They all have political leanings to a certain party. I'll become tech savvy and post the videos when I can. Can obviously see this thread is left leaning as is the majority of the internet.

 

The thing is there's no real liberal equivalent to Fox, where the entire commentary apparatus as well as the management structure and the editing of the news is effectively a wing of the Democratic party the way Fox basically is a wing of the Republican party. (Sean Hannity is literally a regular unpaid advisor to Trump.) The closest thing is MSNBC, and their morning show host is a retired Republican Congressman. The rest of the cable networks all aim for some kind of bullshit sense of "balance" or, like CNBC, just lean to a "pro-business" angle which usually favors Republicans too.

 

But to me the real answer is there's no good 24 hour cable news network and never will be. The entire premise is ridiculous. The closest thing to something worthwhile is CSPAN because at least they're just showing the everyday workings of Congress on the regular and it's hardly riveting viewing.

 

But Fox in particular is untrustworthy for things like videos because they actively edit things to make them look worse for Democrats. This isn't even a controversial statement, the Murdoch family is on public record about how they're trying to do this on the regular. That's why I'm pointing to the un-edited videos, because often times you see something on Fox that looks absolutely horrific and you get 15 seconds more context and it's clear they chopped it for effect.

[ehcaley]

10 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

 

Not a flat earther, just don't see the love in over a senile man heading the so called most powerful country. Although he's no likely just the mouth piece to wheel out whilst others in the Democrats make the decisions.

We have a live one here!Can't even work a phone and accuses Joe of being senile😜

[il Duce McTarkin]

22 minutes ago, Ulysses said:

 

Ah, here.  If the Democrats put up @JFK-1, or @Watt-Zeefuik, or heaven help them even you or me, they'd still have a better candidate than the Republicans have.  Even if they hit us over the head with shovels first.  Repeatedly.

 

 

Debatable.

[Ulysses]

2 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said:

 

Debatable.

 

Repeatedly.  Big heavy shovels.  This is not even up for debate.  Even if they cut Biden's head off and replaced it with a watermelon, he'd still be a better candidate than Russian agent chickpee poopypants guy.  Even if the watermelon wasn't a Democrat.

[Watt-Zeefuik]

7 minutes ago, Ulysses said:

 

Repeatedly.  Big heavy shovels.  This is not even up for debate.  Even if they cut Biden's head off and replaced it with a watermelon, he'd still be a better candidate than Russian agent chickpee poopypants guy.  Even if the watermelon wasn't a Democrat.

 

Before Trump, George W. Bush was absolutely the worst President of my lifetime and as ill as it would make me, if it was just GWB and DJT on the ballot, I wouldn't think twice about which one I was voting for. No hesitation.

[Ulysses]

Just now, Watt-Zeefuik said:

 

Before Trump, George W. Bush was absolutely the worst President of my lifetime and as ill as it would make me, if it was just GWB and DJT on the ballot, I wouldn't think twice about which one I was voting for. No hesitation.

 

It helps when a candidate - no matter how awful he or she is - isn't a traitor to the country they want to govern.   

[JFK-1]

33 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

 

I'm not a fan of Fox or the liberal leaning news networks. Just find this thread amusing and how many of the posters on here would happily have Boden back as president. Surely the Democrats have a better candidate.

 

I think you're acting senile. You come in here parroting Fox lines, then when told it's a Fox line you shift to so what's wrong with Fox? Then when told they're knowing and admitted liars fined almost $800 million you act like that never happened, or forgot it as quickly as it passed over the screen, and are suddenly not a fan of Fox at all.

 

If Biden were all over the place like that, I would be asking questions, Fox would be screaming senile, and you would likely be parroting it. And not a fan of 'liberal leaning news networks'  either? Despite the fact they're not in court for mass lying.  

 

What do you mean a fan? I'm not a fan of BBC news, I simply read news FFS, i'm not whooping or booing either. Does it need to entertain you in some way? Or simply be something you want to hear? If reality isn't what you want to hear then you're not a fan?

 

I don't actually want to hear a lot of it, at all, i'm 'not a fan' of reality either, but I can't pretend it doesn't exist by listening to an alternate reality that really doesn't exist. 

 

So where does someone like you actually get news? Got a guy on twitter? Facebook? An in ITK guy who gives you the real deal these global news hounds can't?

Listen to me, i'm trying to introduce you to reality. Biden is old, he is not senile, I guarantee you that. So take a step into reality by accepting this fact, he isn't senile.

 

So from there, somebody better than him you say, better how? Younger? What's better about that other than they're less likely to die in their sleep one night?

 

This job isn't an athletic event, if anything it's more akin to sitting at a table playing chess all day, Trump sat watching Fox all day, he is a fan. So again, what do you mean better than Biden?

At this time of international crisis and the insanity of the MAGA simpletons on the domestic front,  I can think of no one better because I can think of no one who has the experience he has.

 

And I don't know if anyone else could have dragged the country out of the disaster Trump left it it in to become the top performing major economy in the world. Leaving Europe trailing in their wake.

Here's a prediction, you don't even know what you mean by someone better, it's just another line you picked up. And to be fair it's a line others even on the democratic side have fallen for with little to no thought.

 

If anything their only valid complaint is that people say he's too old no matter how great a job he does. Which isn't the best optics but right now I don't give the proverbial flying about that, just the end product which is breaking records.

[Day@theraces]

36 minutes ago, ehcaley said:

We have a live one here!Can't even work a phone and accuses Joe of being senile😜

 

And you honestly think listening to him he is compensate. I don't use my phone much, different from working an android to leading the worlds superpower. But yeh I take everything back Joe Biden is cognitively firing on all cylinders. Silly me 😂

[Day@theraces]

2 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

 

I think you're acting senile. You come in here parroting Fox lines, then when told it's a Fox line you shift to so what's wrong with Fox? Then when told they're knowing and admitted liars fined almost $800 million you act like that never happened, or forgot it as quickly as it passed over the screen, and are suddenly not a fan of Fox at all.

 

If Biden were all over the place like that, I would be asking questions, Fox would be screaming senile, and you would likely be parroting it. And not a fan of 'liberal leaning news networks'  either? Despite the fact they're not in court for mass lying.  

 

What do you mean a fan? I'm not a fan of BBC news, I simply read news FFS, i'm not whooping or booing either. Does it need to entertain you in some way? Or simply be something you want to hear? If reality isn't what you want to hear then you're not a fan?

 

I don't actually want to hear a lot of it, at all, i'm 'not a fan' of reality either, but I can't pretend it doesn't exist by listening to an alternate reality that really doesn't exist. 

 

So where does someone like you actually get news? Got a guy on twitter? Facebook? An in ITK guy who gives you the real deal these global news hounds can't?

Listen to me, i'm trying to introduce you to reality. Biden is old, he is not senile, I guarantee you that. So take a step into reality by accepting this fact, he isn't senile.

 

So from there, somebody better than him you say, better how? Younger? What's better about that other than they're less likely to die in their sleep one night?

 

This job isn't an athletic event, if anything it's more akin to sitting at a table playing chess all day, Trump sat watching Fox all day, he is a fan. So again, what do you mean better than Biden?

At this time of international crisis and the insanity of the MAGA simpletons on the domestic front,  I can think of no one better because I can think of no one who has the experience he has.

 

And I don't know if anyone else could have dragged the country out of the disaster Trump left it it in to become the top performing major economy in the world. Leaving Europe trailing in their wake.

Here's a prediction, you don't even know what you mean by someone better, it's just another line you picked up. And to be fair it's a line others even on the democratic side have fallen for with little to no thought.

 

If anything their only valid complaint is that people say he's too old no matter how great a job he does. Which isn't the best optics but right now I don't give the proverbial flying about that, just the end product which is breaking records.

 

Don't have a dog in the fight. But why Is he when talking about Gaza bringing up the Mexican president. Has he got his walls mixed up.

[JFK-1]

4 minutes ago, Day@theraces said:

 

Don't have a dog in the fight. But why Is he when talking about Gaza bringing up the Mexican president. Has he got his walls mixed up.

 

You stop bothering me with this trivial vacuous dare I say seemingly senile shite till you go back and address what I already said to you, can you do that? Have you forgotten it exists already?

 

Let's see some deconstruction of that, focus FFS. Can you???

 

Here it is, again.

 

 

                       -----------------------------------

 

I think you're acting senile. You come in here parroting Fox lines, then when told it's a Fox line you shift to so what's wrong with Fox? Then when told they're knowing and admitted liars fined almost $800 million you act like that never happened, or forgot it as quickly as it passed over the screen, and are suddenly not a fan of Fox at all.

 

If Biden were all over the place like that, I would be asking questions, Fox would be screaming senile, and you would likely be parroting it. And not a fan of 'liberal leaning news networks'  either? Despite the fact they're not in court for mass lying.  

 

What do you mean a fan? I'm not a fan of BBC news, I simply read news FFS, i'm not whooping or booing either. Does it need to entertain you in some way? Or simply be something you want to hear? If reality isn't what you want to hear then you're not a fan?

 

I don't actually want to hear a lot of it, at all, i'm 'not a fan' of reality either, but I can't pretend it doesn't exist by listening to an alternate reality that really doesn't exist. 

 

So where does someone like you actually get news? Got a guy on twitter? Facebook? An in ITK guy who gives you the real deal these global news hounds can't?

Listen to me, i'm trying to introduce you to reality. Biden is old, he is not senile, I guarantee you that. So take a step into reality by accepting this fact, he isn't senile.

 

So from there, somebody better than him you say, better how? Younger? What's better about that other than they're less likely to die in their sleep one night?

 

This job isn't an athletic event, if anything it's more akin to sitting at a table playing chess all day, Trump sat watching Fox all day, he is a fan. So again, what do you mean better than Biden?

At this time of international crisis and the insanity of the MAGA simpletons on the domestic front,  I can think of no one better because I can think of no one who has the experience he has.

 

And I don't know if anyone else could have dragged the country out of the disaster Trump left it it in to become the top performing major economy in the world. Leaving Europe trailing in their wake.

Here's a prediction, you don't even know what you mean by someone better, it's just another line you picked up. And to be fair it's a line others even on the democratic side have fallen for with little to no thought.

 

If anything their only valid complaint is that people say he's too old no matter how great a job he does. Which isn't the best optics but right now I don't give the proverbial flying about that, just the end product which is breaking records.

[Bigsmak]

To anyone and everyone -

 

If you don't think that Fox news is lying to you then you have no issue watching this video. 

 

 

[il Duce McTarkin]

21 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

 

You stop bothering me with this trivial vacuous dare I say seemingly senile shite till you go back and address what I already said to you, can you do that? Have you forgotten it exists already?

 

Let's see some deconstruction of that, focus FFS. Can you???

 

Here it is, again.

 

 

                       -----------------------------------

 

I think you're acting senile. You come in here parroting Fox lines, then when told it's a Fox line you shift to so what's wrong with Fox? Then when told they're knowing and admitted liars fined almost $800 million you act like that never happened, or forgot it as quickly as it passed over the screen, and are suddenly not a fan of Fox at all.

 

If Biden were all over the place like that, I would be asking questions, Fox would be screaming senile, and you would likely be parroting it. And not a fan of 'liberal leaning news networks'  either? Despite the fact they're not in court for mass lying.  

 

What do you mean a fan? I'm not a fan of BBC news, I simply read news FFS, i'm not whooping or booing either. Does it need to entertain you in some way? Or simply be something you want to hear? If reality isn't what you want to hear then you're not a fan?

 

I don't actually want to hear a lot of it, at all, i'm 'not a fan' of reality either, but I can't pretend it doesn't exist by listening to an alternate reality that really doesn't exist. 

 

So where does someone like you actually get news? Got a guy on twitter? Facebook? An in ITK guy who gives you the real deal these global news hounds can't?

Listen to me, i'm trying to introduce you to reality. Biden is old, he is not senile, I guarantee you that. So take a step into reality by accepting this fact, he isn't senile.

 

So from there, somebody better than him you say, better how? Younger? What's better about that other than they're less likely to die in their sleep one night?

 

This job isn't an athletic event, if anything it's more akin to sitting at a table playing chess all day, Trump sat watching Fox all day, he is a fan. So again, what do you mean better than Biden?

At this time of international crisis and the insanity of the MAGA simpletons on the domestic front,  I can think of no one better because I can think of no one who has the experience he has.

 

And I don't know if anyone else could have dragged the country out of the disaster Trump left it it in to become the top performing major economy in the world. Leaving Europe trailing in their wake.

Here's a prediction, you don't even know what you mean by someone better, it's just another line you picked up. And to be fair it's a line others even on the democratic side have fallen for with little to no thought.

 

If anything their only valid complaint is that people say he's too old no matter how great a job he does. Which isn't the best optics but right now I don't give the proverbial flying about that, just the end product which is breaking records.

 

[Ked]

51 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

 

You stop bothering me with this trivial vacuous dare I say seemingly senile shite till you go back and address what I already said to you, can you do that? Have you forgotten it exists already?

 

Let's see some deconstruction of that, focus FFS. Can you???

 

Here it is, again.

 

 

                       -----------------------------------

 

I think you're acting senile. You come in here parroting Fox lines, then when told it's a Fox line you shift to so what's wrong with Fox? Then when told they're knowing and admitted liars fined almost $800 million you act like that never happened, or forgot it as quickly as it passed over the screen, and are suddenly not a fan of Fox at all.

 

If Biden were all over the place like that, I would be asking questions, Fox would be screaming senile, and you would likely be parroting it. And not a fan of 'liberal leaning news networks'  either? Despite the fact they're not in court for mass lying.  

 

What do you mean a fan? I'm not a fan of BBC news, I simply read news FFS, i'm not whooping or booing either. Does it need to entertain you in some way? Or simply be something you want to hear? If reality isn't what you want to hear then you're not a fan?

 

I don't actually want to hear a lot of it, at all, i'm 'not a fan' of reality either, but I can't pretend it doesn't exist by listening to an alternate reality that really doesn't exist. 

 

So where does someone like you actually get news? Got a guy on twitter? Facebook? An in ITK guy who gives you the real deal these global news hounds can't?

Listen to me, i'm trying to introduce you to reality. Biden is old, he is not senile, I guarantee you that. So take a step into reality by accepting this fact, he isn't senile.

 

So from there, somebody better than him you say, better how? Younger? What's better about that other than they're less likely to die in their sleep one night?

 

This job isn't an athletic event, if anything it's more akin to sitting at a table playing chess all day, Trump sat watching Fox all day, he is a fan. So again, what do you mean better than Biden?

At this time of international crisis and the insanity of the MAGA simpletons on the domestic front,  I can think of no one better because I can think of no one who has the experience he has.

 

And I don't know if anyone else could have dragged the country out of the disaster Trump left it it in to become the top performing major economy in the world. Leaving Europe trailing in their wake.

Here's a prediction, you don't even know what you mean by someone better, it's just another line you picked up. And to be fair it's a line others even on the democratic side have fallen for with little to no thought.

 

If anything their only valid complaint is that people say he's too old no matter how great a job he does. Which isn't the best optics but right now I don't give the proverbial flying about that, just the end product which is breaking records.

Tbh you come across as batshit as those you call out.

 

[Ked]

31 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said:

 

Lack off mare like

[henrysmithsgloves]

2 hours ago, Day@theraces said:

 Has he got his walls mixed up.

Someone mentioned ice cream?

[JFK-1]

1 hour ago, Ked said:

Tbh you come across as batshit as those you call out.

 

 

Tbh you come across as just as dumb. That's your capacity? Do you grasp how dumb ad hominem is? Or alternatively do you even know what it means? 

[il Duce McTarkin]

[Maple Leaf]

3 hours ago, Day@theraces said:

 

Don't have a dog in the fight. But why Is he when talking about Gaza bringing up the Mexican president. Has he got his walls mixed up.

You have clearly forgotten, or have chosen to ignore, that a couple of weeks ago that other elderly man in the race, Trump, mixed up Nikki Haley and Nancy Pelosi.  He thought that Nikki was in charge of security at the Capitol on January 6th.  How stupid is that, eh?  Trump is definitely in cognitive decline, right?

 

And at a recent campaign speech he couldn't count to six.  He's definitely lost it, right?

 

Trump is also a rapist.  And a liar.  And a grifter.  And a fraud.  And a traitor.  And he was a shite President.

 

And you want him to be re-elected????????????

[JFK-1]

A lawyer who worked for Trumps 2020 campaign explaining hoe he was 'tricked' into taking part in the Wisconsin fake electors scheme. He's one naïve lawyer if he truly believed all of this stolen election nonsense could have any serious legitimacy at such a late stage of appeals., Which initially in this interview he sort of does suggest he believed it still did have at least a potential scrap of legitimacy..

 

Then maybe about halfway through he starts saying that he was too scared not to follow up on it, even though he now knew Trump had lost the election, that he was too scared not to continue supporting the plot. And to be fair, Trump is actually seen on video saying to the guy i'm going to blame you if this doesn't come off.

 

This guy was in Wisconsin the equivalent of Mike Pence in DC, and he was too scared to be labelled as the one who lost Wisconsin for Trump. And to be fair, we all know what happened when Trump discovered Mike Pence had not "done the right thing" which became "hang Mike Pence" 

 

I will allow the guy some leeway on that, this is what we're facing now, he feared for himself and his family. It's literally like critics or opponents being intimidated in the Nazi rise to power of the 1920's to 30's.  I don't think even Hitler was so blatantly up front off his head as Trump is being. 

 

From 60 minutes

 

Andrew Hitt, who signed a phony electoral certificate for former President Trump in 2020, tells 60 Minutes that he and other Wisconsin Republican electors were tricked.

 

 

 

 

[Joey J J Jr Shabadoo]

14 hours ago, Day@theraces said:

 

And you honestly think listening to him he is compensate. I don't use my phone much, different from working an android to leading the worlds superpower. But yeh I take everything back Joe Biden is cognitively firing on all cylinders. Silly me 😂

How many other nonces do you admire?

[Ron Burgundy]

Some of the posters on here make the Scottish independence thread seem sane and well mannered. 

[CavySlaveJambo]

On 19/02/2024 at 00:25, JFK-1 said:

 

No one around here would claim that in his 80's Biden is the ideal candidate, but he's most definitely not senile, if he is he's been senile most of his life and seems to have managed. It's mindless Trump/MAGA shite being fed to the gullible who parrot it with no validation.

Most of what is being put down to him being senile and dementia, could in fact be due to Biden having a stutter.  Same symptom, different cause.  

[Mikey1874]

1 hour ago, Ron Burgundy said:

Some of the posters on here make the Scottish independence thread seem sane and well mannered. 

 

Nothing like Trump in Scotland is the difference.

[Lone Striker]

 

For anyone swooning at The Donald's latest brilliant business venture, and fancies shelling out a mere  $399  to make a fashion statement (but not in a good way) ...... here's  a   wee insight into the  scam  - oops sorry, brilliant business venture.

 

 

 

"Sneaker Con",  aye ?   

 

[Watt-Zeefuik]

George Takei gets real.

 

Quote

On this day 82 years ago, on February 19, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in the height of insanity of racism after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, signed Executive Order 9066.

 

It ordered all Japanese Americans on the West Coast to be summarily rounded up and imprisoned within 10 barbed wire prison camps, with no charges, no trial, no due process.

 

One day, a few months later, we saw two soldiers marching up our driveway, carrying rifles with shiny bayonets on them. They stopped up the porch right in front of our window and banged on the front door. My father answered, and one of the soldiers pointed the rifle at him, right in front of us, and ordered us out of our home. I had just turned five in April; it was May when they came to take us away.

 

My father gave my brother Henry and me two heavy suitcases. And we brought them out onto the driveway and waited for our mother to come out. When she did, she had our baby sister in one arm, a huge duffel bag in the other, and tears were streaming down her cheeks.

 

That is one morning that is seared into my memory. I will never be able to forget all the innocent people, my family included, who had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, most of who were law abiding U.S. citizens, who were suddenly categorized as ‘enemy aliens.’

 

Today, I hear terrifying words from political leaders today that once more raise the specter of what happened before, right here in America.

 

Donald Trump and his allies are talking about rounding up 11 million people and putting them into mass detention camps before deporting them.

 

There won’t be time for due process, to sort out who is documented and who is not. Homes will be lost. Businesses, too. Families will be torn apart. Lives will be ruined, over fear and ignorance, all to serve the ambitions and agendas of politicians.

I know, because I lived through it.

 

I say, never again. Not while I have one ounce of fight still left in me.

 

Join me. Fight this madness. Help keep America from repeating the mistakes of its past.

 

But Biden's kinda old, yanno...

[JFK-1]

3 hours ago, CavySlaveJambo said:

Most of what is being put down to him being senile and dementia, could in fact be due to Biden having a stutter.  Same symptom, different cause.  

 

That's my point, he's been a stutterer his whole life which affects brain to mouth interaction. That aside how dumb do you have to be to believe anything Fox says? Thick as shite I would say.

 

Maybe they need to be fined multiple billions more for the thick as shite to grasp it. And it would appear they're going to be.

[Gizmo]

19 hours ago, Day@theraces said:

 

And you honestly think listening to him he is compensate. I don't use my phone much, different from working an android to leading the worlds superpower. But yeh I take everything back Joe Biden is cognitively firing on all cylinders. Silly me 😂

The Republicans are just accusing Biden of what they know Trump to be. It's propaganda 101 straight from Pravda. 

 

[JFK-1]

I expect Fox are already following Trump and the GOP into Putin's pocket. And if Trump were president which I don't think for a moment will happen, but if he were all of the thick as shite Fox grunts will be in a whole new world they're too thick to contemplate

 

A world where the United States is aligned with not Europe, but rather with Russia/China. Thick as shite, and too thick to know it. Making Russia great again.

 

Trump waited days to say anything about Navalny. I expect in large part because Trump will know absolutely sweet FA about him, and wouldn't care either.

 

Someone will have told him that he's a political opponent and critic of Putin, Putin Putin tried to poison him then when he survived he threw him in jail and killed him slowly. 

 

'So grotesque': Trump for comparing himself to Navalny

 

 

 

 

[Ked]

17 hours ago, JFK-1 said:

 

Tbh you come across as just as dumb. That's your capacity? Do you grasp how dumb ad hominem is? Or alternatively do you even know what it means? 

Well I suppose in the scheme of things I am dumb.

I apologise that I personally attacked you but I feel you are deserving of it.

For the ravings about Assange.

 

I had to Google the ad hom stuff.

 

[Ked]

Who is telling the truth ?

 

[JFK-1]

2 minutes ago, Ked said:

Well I suppose in the scheme of things I am dumb.

I apologise that I personally attacked you but I feel you are deserving of it.

For the ravings about Assange.

 

I had to Google the ad hom stuff.

 

 

I'm trying to help you here, seriously. But you're being so incredibly stupid you say you were wrong to pull the ad hominem stupidity, and presumably now know what it means. Then did it again with your ravings about Assange.

 

Step at a time, try googling the Dunning–Kruger effect.   

[JFK-1]

As lawyer fees and legal judgments stack up against Donald Trump there is concern that his already weak ethical standards will be overcome by financial desperation and a willingness to entertain the assistance of unsavory people and world powers whose interests are contradictory to those of the United States.

 

 

[JFK-1]

So he's gone and done it again, defamed E. Jean Carroll again, seems it's not enough that he already owes her almost 100 million. How dumb do you need to be to miss how seriously stupid and erratic Trump is. Trump is like a malevolent even dumber version of Homer Simpson. Though Homer is slimmer and has a hair more.

 

'We’re watching': E. Jean Carroll’s attorney says Trump clearly 'cannot control himself'

 

 

 

[il Duce McTarkin]

1 hour ago, Ked said:

Well I suppose in the scheme of things I am dumb.

I apologise that I personally attacked you but I feel you are deserving of it.

For the ravings about Assange.

 

I had to Google the ad hom stuff.

 

 

Ked, you're wasting your time, bud. He'll just come back at you all angry and frothing at the mouth for trying to be reasonable. He's the most intelligent poster on the internet, and anyone that doesn't see this is thick, stupid, wilfully ignorant, etc. You deserve his partonising, condescension because he lives in NYC and you're just a nobody.

You best stick to drinking from puddles and leave the thinking to intelligent, insighful folk like him. You could also check out @Tazio's last couple of posts on the seethe thread if you fancy a bit of clarity.

 

 

Edited February 20 by il Duce McTarkin

[Ked]

18 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said:

 

Ked, you're wasting your time, bud. He'll just come back at you all angry and frothing at the mouth for trying to be reasonable. He's the most intelligent poster on the internet, and anyone that doesn't see this is thick, stupid, wilfully ignorant, etc. You deserve his partonising, condescension because he lives in NYC and you're just a nobody.

You best stick to drinking from puddles and leave the thinking to intelligent, insighful folk like him. You could also check out @Tazio's last couple of posts on the seethe thread if you fancy a bit of clarity.

 

 

Aken  bud was just a bit bored.

Al nip over right now and have a look.

 

[JFK-1]

2 hours ago, Ked said:

Aken  bud was just a bit bored.

Al nip over right now and have a look.

 

 

You just gave me a LOL, thanks. You see you have quoted someone stupid enough to do exactly what we just discussed is vacuously stupid, ad hominem. Raving like a lunatic, dare I say 'frothing at the mouth' while saying absolutely nothing but anything I have said, You know why? It can't.

 

You see what makes this all the funnier is that I know just one thing about it, that it's in ignore. I have no idea about it's posting history, no idea how long it's been in ignore. Could be years and likely is. Probably seen nothing from it in years than when you quote it there I see what I probably ignored it for in the first place.

I probably posted something it didn't like it couldn't argue with, it made an arse of itself pestering me with alerts containing nothing but ad hominem at best, i'm not patient I put it in ignore it didn't like that. And obviously I made the right decision, it's still doing what i'm guessing I ignored it for

 

One more observation, topical in a way. Trump is mentally deficient, so the GOP try to project the same thing on to Biden. This poster you're quoting, whoever/whatever it is, I'm clearly under its skin and in it's head rent free.

While it tries to project it's frothing at the mouth freaking out all angry stalking on to someone who knows nothing about it, can't recall ever interacting with it, and will instantly forget it again following this post.

 

If I say someone's being idiotic it's not because i'm angry, it's because I think they're being idiotic. While it will again likely be frothing at the mouth. Is that what you really want to be like too? 😉

[JFK-1]

Just posted by PBS Frontline

 

The Plea (full documentary) | Investigating Plea Bargains in the U.S. Justice System | FRONTLINE

 

The vast majority of felony convictions in the U.S. are the result of plea bargains, not jury trials. In this 90-minute documentary, FRONTLINE explored the moral, judicial and constitutional implications of plea bargains’ role in the justice system.

 

 

[Ked]

1 minute ago, JFK-1 said:

 

You just gave me a LOL, thanks. You see you have quoted someone stupid enough to do exactly what we just discussed is vacuously stupid, ad hominem. Raving like a lunatic, dare I say 'frothing at the mouth' while saying absolutely nothing but anything I have said, You know why? It can't.

 

You see what makes this all the funnier is that I know just one thing about it, that it's in ignore. I have no idea about it's posting history, no idea how long it's been in ignore. Could be years and likely is. Probably seen nothing from it in years than when you quote it there I see what I probably ignored it for in the first place.

I probably posted something it didn't like it couldn't argue with, it made an arse of itself pestering me with alerts containing nothing but ad hominem at best, i'm not patient I put it in ignore it didn't like that. And obviously I made the right decision, it's still doing what i'm guessing I ignored it for

 

One more observation, topical in a way. Trump is mentally deficient, so the GOP try to project the same thing on to Biden. This poster you're quoting, whoever/whatever it is, I'm clearly under its skin and in it's head rent free.

While it tries to project it's frothing at the mouth freaking out all angry stalking on to someone who knows nothing about it, can't recall ever interacting with it, and will instantly forget it again following this post.

 

If I say someone's being idiotic it's not because i'm angry, it's because I think they're being idiotic. While it will again likely be frothing at the mouth. Is that what you really want to be like too? 😉

By the time I got to the end of your post I forgot what we were on about.

Then I checked.

Ffs jfk .

You think I'm dumb etc.

I agree.

I try to do the same play the post.

Anyway was just making small dumb talk with mctarks .

Tbf to him he did warn me of your response. 

 

 

[Ked]

3 hours ago, il Duce McTarkin said:

 

Ked, you're wasting your time, bud. He'll just come back at you all angry and frothing at the mouth for trying to be reasonable. He's the most intelligent poster on the internet, and anyone that doesn't see this is thick, stupid, wilfully ignorant, etc. You deserve his partonising, condescension because he lives in NYC and you're just a nobody.

You best stick to drinking from puddles and leave the thinking to intelligent, insighful folk like him. You could also check out @Tazio's last couple of posts on the seethe thread if you fancy a bit of clarity.

 

 

What you done tae this guy ffs?

😆

[Tazio]

12 minutes ago, JFK-1 said:

 

You just gave me a LOL, thanks. You see you have quoted someone stupid enough to do exactly what we just discussed is vacuously stupid, ad hominem. Raving like a lunatic, dare I say 'frothing at the mouth' while saying absolutely nothing but anything I have said, You know why? It can't.

 

You see what makes this all the funnier is that I know just one thing about it, that it's in ignore. I have no idea about it's posting history, no idea how long it's been in ignore. Could be years and likely is. Probably seen nothing from it in years than when you quote it there I see what I probably ignored it for in the first place.

I probably posted something it didn't like it couldn't argue with, it made an arse of itself pestering me with alerts containing nothing but ad hominem at best, i'm not patient I put it in ignore it didn't like that. And obviously I made the right decision, it's still doing what i'm guessing I ignored it for

 

One more observation, topical in a way. Trump is mentally deficient, so the GOP try to project the same thing on to Biden. This poster you're quoting, whoever/whatever it is, I'm clearly under its skin and in it's head rent free.

While it tries to project it's frothing at the mouth freaking out all angry stalking on to someone who knows nothing about it, can't recall ever interacting with it, and will instantly forget it again following this post.

 

If I say someone's being idiotic it's not because i'm angry, it's because I think they're being idiotic. While it will again likely be frothing at the mouth. Is that what you really want to be like too? 😉

Possibly the most arrogant post I’ve seen on here in a long time. And that’s quite a thing. 

[Ked]

2 minutes ago, Tazio said:

Possibly the most arrogant post I’ve seen on here in a long time. And that’s quite a thing. 

It's quality .

And tbf he is serious about helping me.

That's to be encouraged I need all the help I can get.

Vacously stupid 🤣

 

 

 

 

 

[Tazio]

Just now, Ked said:

It's quality .

And tbf he is serious about helping me.

That's to be encouraged I need all the help I can get.

Vacously stupid 🤣

 

 

 

 

 

Well there’s the hilarious irony of him asking you to Google Dunning-Kruger.

[Watt-Zeefuik]

Philip Bump has a really good column in today's Washington Post. (Gift link here: https://wapo.st/42PgMak )

 

Among the things he finds in his research for the column is that of 300 national polls conducted in March going back to 1968, the *average* difference between the March polled margin and the actual electoral margin in November is 7 points. In no election was the difference between the March polling margin and the actual vote margin less than 4 points.

 

Both candidates are currently in the 44-46 zone nationally. It's highly unlikely that 10% of the vote remains undecided or goes to third party candidates. Trump's high water mark in polling and voting was in 2020 when he got 46.8% of the vote, I believe.

 

So one of the following things is going to happen:

 - That 10% of voters don't actually pick someone or pick a third party. That's really unlikely because of both things above.

 - Donald Trump exceeds every poll and his results from when he had the advantage of incumbency, hadn't incited an insurrection, and wasn't on trial for felonies. Then he wins.

 - Biden voters from 2020 go back to voting for him again at some level. The question is, are enough of those in the key swing states.

 

Obviously I think #3 is the most likely. But the degree to which it happens is the question.

[Ked]

2 minutes ago, Tazio said:

Well there’s the hilarious irony of him asking you to Google Dunning-Kruger.

Do you know I never noticed that part of his post 

His last reply using it as a descriptive term was what interested me.