been here before Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Just now, Brick Tamland said: The Club Formerly Known As Rangers Ahhhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 100% the correct decision, which allows us to bask a bit longer in the joy that the weapons grade tears and snotters that Celticfootballclub and the greatest self entitled tramps in the world are drowning in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmfcbilly Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: Changed the kick to the head being a red card after this. De Jong was a dirty bassa. He had only one intention here and wasn't to challenge for the ball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky jamboa Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Ha ha! F U smeltic!! 🖕 The club and particularly Rodgers need to be hauled over the coals for his outburst on Sunday. It needs nipped in the bud the way they behave. Deliberately putting pressure on the SPFL and referees not to give any decision against them, regardless of whether its wrong or not. The media don't help either by not calling it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxteth O'Grady Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Sooperstar said: 😂 They should have doubled the suspension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gershwin Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozzyonthefence Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Wee Mikey said: On previous occasions the miscreant accepts the e.g. 2 game ban as an appeal deemed as frivolous would see it extended. Not this time, though? Hmmm ... I think it’s because they have a fast track appeal now whereas clubs used to appeal so a player could play the next game but the appeal wouldn’t be heard until after that game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2205ian Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Largo said: Both Yang & Mayo red card stands Head high boot to head & Celtic appeal red card……nuts! Mayo (Killie) stranglehold on Dundee player going through on goal & Derek McInnes does not even think it’s a foul. He is confused in his own words. No Derek you are as bad as Brenda appealing the red card! Some of the pundits also need to hold their head in shame trying to defend the VAR decisions on Sunday at Tynecastle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Don’t think there’s a club in world football who win so much, and yet are so easy to reduce into a pile of froth and snotters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 So a head high boot showing studs to a opponents face is considered dangerous and as such, is a red card offence. Was his boot that high? Yes. Did the referee check the VAR monitor just to be sure about it? Yes. Red card. Dangerous play. WTF are Celtic on about??? WTF are the pumdits on about??? The Celtic penalty award was wrong. Cochrane was the one who was barged into, not the other way around. Argue as you please about the Hearts penalty award but the ‘hand ball’ in the box has been awarded all season regardless of circumstances. It may be wrong but its consistant. Oh, and Shanklands baw hair was off-side at his chalked off goal. Crltic were lucky it was only 2-0. Could have been 3-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanks said no Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkirkhmfc1874 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Ger it right up them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Idle Talk Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 9 minutes ago, Pans Jambo said: So a head high boot showing studs to a opponents face is considered dangerous and as such, is a red card offence. Was his boot that high? Yes. Did the referee check the VAR monitor just to be sure about it? Yes. Red card. Dangerous play. WTF are Celtic on about??? WTF are the pumdits on about??? The Celtic penalty award was wrong. Cochrane was the one who was barged into, not the other way around. Argue as you please about the Hearts penalty award but the ‘hand ball’ in the box has been awarded all season regardless of circumstances. It may be wrong but its consistant. Oh, and Shanklands baw hair was off-side at his chalked off goal. Crltic were lucky it was only 2-0. Could have been 3-0. They were lucky it wasn't more than three. We fluffed a couple of great opportunities to make it a much more embarrassing afternoon for them. Four or five was on the cards if we just had a little bit more composure in the final third. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hackney Hearts Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Here's something to consider for Yang, for next time he's allowed to play: If a ball's at head height, why not head it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCant Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 hour ago, Australis said: The old firm are making it harder and harder for officials to give decisions against them. Beaton and Robertson must now be in more danger of being attacked, thanks to Brenda. First penalty given against celtic in the league, and they are kicking and screaming about ot. Hope our football authorities stand up to them both. Dunno much about Robertsons affiliations but Beaton is well documented to be a Rangers fan and should be nowhere near any game that has a possible implication for Rangers. Until there is a determination to resolve that anomaly (and others) the entire refereeing spectrum in this country has zero credibility Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meister Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Let’s be 100% clear on this. Celtic did not in any way appeal this because they thought it wasn’t a red, they knew it was. They also knew the appeal would fail and they could play the hard done by party in all this. It’s a ****ing farce. Get. It. Right. ****ing. Up. Them. No one is buying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts_fan Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 I wish someone in the media, or even John Beaton himself, would just come out and say the Hearts penalty was legitimate, because it was. As someone pointed out here previously, the Celtic player Johnston handles it with his elbow as it falls out the air. Stonewall penalty. One TV angle on Sportscene showed the change in direction. Sour grapes, Celtic. GIRUY. Red card legit. Penalty legit. Fair and square. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gar jambo Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 10 minutes ago, Hackney Hearts said: Here's something to consider for Yang, for next time he's allowed to play: If a ball's at head height, why not head it? Because that would be Glasgow kiss ! Jail for that ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 35 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said: Don’t think there’s a club in world football who win so much, and yet are so easy to reduce into a pile of froth and snotters. How true is that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferryjambo99 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 The fact that John Beaton has been appointed to a Scottish cup quarter final this weekend (incidentally Robertson is his 4th official) shows that the SFA feels the decisions were completely correct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 hour ago, Seaside Dave said: Should give us another 3 points for this Imagine the seeth🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 11 minutes ago, Ferryjambo99 said: The fact that John Beaton has been appointed to a Scottish cup quarter final this weekend (incidentally Robertson is his 4th official) shows that the SFA feels the decisions were completely correct A sellick match? Imagine the melt down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 49 minutes ago, 2205ian said: Head high boot to head & Celtic appeal red card……nuts! Mayo (Killie) stranglehold on Dundee player going through on goal & Derek McInnes does not even think it’s a foul. He is confused in his own words. No Derek you are as bad as Brenda appealing the red card! Some of the pundits also need to hold their head in shame trying to defend the VAR decisions on Sunday at Tynecastle. Still less of a red card than the wrestling of LS by a killie player first home game and in the box, another very strong penalty shout within 1 minute of this at the 2nd league match early in this Season Vanished from all video coverage too, except, I'm guessing, Hearts TV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, Wee Mikey said: On previous occasions the miscreant accepts the e.g. 2 game ban as an appeal deemed as frivolous would see it extended. Not this time, though? Hmmm ... Certainly was frivolous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 53 minutes ago, Shanks said no said: 🤣🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john thomas Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 4 hours ago, WDJ87 said: Said it at the time the BBC were not challenging him on any of his pish. Dunno why I expected more tbh Think BM , quite subtly , at the end of the interview asked about Celtic's penalty award . Thought it was an effective way to make the point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armageddon Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, gnasher75 said: The club’s appeal over the red card shown to Hyunjun Yang in Sunday’s game at Tynecastle has been dismissed at an SFA hearing today (Tuesday). A club spokesperson said: “We have received notification that the club's claim has been dismissed. “Clearly we are surprised and extremely disappointed at this decision.” Hyunjun Yang will now receive a two-match suspension. “EXTREEMLY DISSAPOINTIT” 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 What a weekend that was, sometimes it's great being a Jambo😎😎 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigO Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Remember last season when we were all over Celtic and VAR sent Cochrane off incorrectly and they went on to win to clinch the league and ruin our chances of 3rd? Remember the outcry?! No? Not remember?? All the pundits crying, the drmands for audio and VAR reviews? Mind? No? Hmmmm, funny that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Jambo Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Glorious. Pumped then pumped again. 👋👋👏👏 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EH11 2NL Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 9 hours ago, Rocky jamboa said: Ha ha! F U smeltic!! 🖕 The club and particularly Rodgers need to be hauled over the coals for his outburst on Sunday. It needs nipped in the bud the way they behave. Deliberately putting pressure on the SPFL and referees not to give any decision against them, regardless of whether its wrong or not. The media don't help either by not calling it out. The media are a disgrace, every headline has it as a controversial red card. Nothing controversial about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Agent Dale Cooper Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, EH11 2NL said: The media are a disgrace, every headline has it as a controversial red card. Nothing controversial about it. To be fair it has aroused differing opinions so it is controversial. Controversial doesn't mean wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Fredrickson Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 BBC Scotland football site still has no mention of the appeal failing https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/scottish-premiership Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 (edited) 52 minutes ago, EH11 2NL said: The media are a disgrace, every headline has it as a controversial red card. Nothing controversial about it. The controversy is folk not understanding the rules, with things like he " didn't mean it", he "was going for the ball", I actually agree that these should be factors in any decision, but under the rules they are not. The pundits etc are just not understanding the rules. As for celtic, for Rogers to publicly back the ref in the St mirren red card then come out with this bull shite is just embarrassing, he should be called out for it and asked to explain his bi polar views and the appeal. To complain about our pk, but not mention theirs as a foul on Cochrane and not even checked just sums the walloper up! Even celtic fans are admitting their pk was a joke, at least ours- again under the rules is a pk. Although imo that handball rule is just getting silly now. Edited March 6 by Bazzas right boot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad Magic Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 The more these incidents happen with officials unofficially “associated” to one of the opposite sides of the OF the more likely we are to finally get impartial referees ie ones not from the west coast. Something we have been calling for for some time. Having west coast referees is now actually backfiring spectacularly! Love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kila Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Did the suspension not used to get increased if you failed the appeal once upon a time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtgj Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 27 minutes ago, Carl Fredrickson said: BBC Scotland football site still has no mention of the appeal failing https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/scottish-premiership There's a bit in today's gossip column: Celtic have been left astonished by the decision to uphold Yang Hyun-Jun's red card - and are yet to be given a reason for their claim being dismissed. (Scottish Sun) I don't know how they can be astonished. It was as clear a red card as could be. The only astonishing thing was that it was originally given as a yellow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Japan Jambo Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 9 hours ago, Ferryjambo99 said: The fact that John Beaton has been appointed to a Scottish cup quarter final this weekend (incidentally Robertson is his 4th official) shows that the SFA feels the decisions were completely correct Just so helps that Celtic penalty aside, they were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Fredrickson Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, dtgj said: There's a bit in today's gossip column: Celtic have been left astonished by the decision to uphold Yang Hyun-Jun's red card - and are yet to be given a reason for their claim being dismissed. (Scottish Sun) I don't know how they can be astonished. It was as clear a red card as could be. The only astonishing thing was that it was originally given as a yellow. I saw that bit in the gossip column but one would imagine that an impartial media site should have an article about it. Plenty of articles backing up the rancid teams claims though. It is depressing how the media are scared of the two uglies and allow pundits and managers to spout pish without challenging them on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Japan Jambo Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 33 minutes ago, Carl Fredrickson said: BBC Scotland football site still has no mention of the appeal failing https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/scottish-premiership Lickspittles, sycophants and toadies. Only Tom English posses a backbone, the rest just kowtow, a complete waste of taxpayer money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soonbe110 Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 10 hours ago, JimmyCant said: Dunno much about Robertsons affiliations but Beaton is well documented to be a Rangers fan and should be nowhere near any game that has a possible implication for Rangers. Until there is a determination to resolve that anomaly (and others) the entire refereeing spectrum in this country has zero credibility Robertson is just incompetent. Proves it every time he refs our games. An incompetent ref needs a strong var like Beaton. Otherwise look at his errors, their pen, our pen (didn’t see handball), red card (only gave yellow), Shanklands dis goal (allowed it to stand), Johnston’s assault on Tait (only yellow) The pitch officials got just about every contentious call wrong. As I said, just incompetent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex member of the SaS Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Celtic complaining about the penalty. The reason is obvious! Sevco went a whole season and more without conceding, therefore to even things up Celtic have to get the same, and the penalty on Sunday ruins their chase to do so. They will have to lobby the GFA to reset the clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manaliveits105 Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 49 minutes ago, kila said: Did the suspension not used to get increased if you failed the appeal once upon a time? I'm sure our honest media will be all over this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex member of the SaS Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, Bazzas right boot said: The controversy is folk not understanding the rules, with things like he " didn't mean it", he "was going for the ball", I actually agree that these should be factors in any decision, but under the rules they are not. The pundits etc are just not understanding the rules. As for celtic, for Rogers to publicly back the ref in the St mirren red card then come out with this bull shite is just embarrassing, he should be called out for it and asked to explain his bi polar views and the appeal. To complain about our pk, but not mention theirs as a foul on Cochrane and not even checked just sums the walloper up! Even celtic fans are admitting their pk was a joke, at least ours- again under the rules is a pk. Although imo that handball rule is just getting silly now. He didn't mean it and going for the ball are all things the ref should be considering at the time, It is not for pundits and the media to come out with such excuses. As for Sunday these excuses are frivolous as it was obviously dangerous even if he was trying for the ball and the ref needn't even think of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooks Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Did they not do a reveal of VAR mistakes in the second third of the season and we were on the wrong end of three or four ? Hardly plays in to their conspiracies now does it . Boyce gets booted in the chest and gets done for diving was one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kila Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 5 minutes ago, manaliveits105 said: I'm sure our honest media will be all over this Trying to find a recent example of it. 2022, Porteous against Aberdeen: https://www.footballscotland.co.uk/spfl/scottish-premiership/ryan-porteous-hibs-red-card-23473500 But their appeal against the red has been rejected by the Scottish FA, who have handed Porteous and extra game on top of his three-match suspension, with the panel deciding that it had "no prospect of success." Yang's red card surely had no prospect of success either given it was a high foot to the face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 12 hours ago, boag1874 said: I can see why they’re so angry, I mean it’s not like they have The least pens against in the league The most pens for in the league The least reds against in the league The least yellows against in the league The least fouls against in the league The highest no of fouls per booking in the league …do they? Hud oan… Don't suppose any journos thought to flag any of this? Thought not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casper Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, Bazzas right boot said: Even celtic fans are admitting their pk was a joke, at least ours- again under the rules is a pk. Although imo that handball rule is just getting silly now. There was nothing silly about our PK on Sunday. Johnston threw himself at a high ball arm first and the ball clearly hit it. For some reason all the press are saying it was given because the ball went on to hit the other guys arm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooks Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 That ugly wee troglodyte Johnston would have done less damage to Celtic in that game if he was playing in a maroon jersey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionDJambo Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 I would imagine that Rodger's post match criticism of the officials, and him specifically naming Beaton, had the appeals committee thinking that pandering to their appeal would not have gone down well with the referees association. His big mouth, and the media and pundit support it got, backfired on him. Either that, or Lawwell couldn't get there in time to give a rousing speech at the hearing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
63,400
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.