wavydavy Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 hour ago, Deevers said: Yep, you are right about the media. Funny how they sit on their hands and remain silent about the trail of hellish refereeing and VAR decisions that go the way of either side of the Old Firm week in, week out. Looking at the decisions he’s moaning about all of them were technically correct. Now the penalty Celtic got was actually a shocker I notice he didn’t make any comment about that. We’ll see if done powers that be have any balls when it comes to dealing with him. I think we’ll just hear the carpet being lifted and the sound of the sweeping brush. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavydavy Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 hours ago, Ferryjambo99 said: Gets away with a yellow as the point of contact is on top of the foot rather than above the ankle. However given the speed of the challenge I imagine a red card would be supported too If that had been Cammy Devlin making that challenge would it have been a yellow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWJ Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Disappointed it wasn’t Charlie ‘Abergreen’ Mulgrew on, TBH. Would love to have seen his greetin’ pus telling us that we shouldn’t have Shankland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merrymac Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 16 hours ago, JennytheJambo said: Did a St Mirren player not see red after catching Hart in the face, didn’t see them complaining about that. I think that is the one he is talking about here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upgotheheads Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 17 hours ago, brownkg said: as i mentioned earlier and no celtic player's arms not figure in the decision You can legally play the ball with your ear, Shankland's right ear is clearly offside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCrae Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 5 hours ago, saxondale said: What's the issue with the rule, and what should change? The rule where a players toe can rule a goal out for offside is wrong. The change I would make is : If any part of a players body that a goal can be scored with is onside, the player is onside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxondale Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 11 minutes ago, McCrae said: The rule where a players toe can rule a goal out for offside is wrong. The change I would make is : If any part of a players body that a goal can be scored with is onside, the player is onside. A couple of things wrong with that IMO: - a toe is part of the foot, and there would be no way to distinguish between the two - the rule change you suggest will encounter the same issue; with officials drawing a line between defender and the onside body part Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1971fozzy Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 hour ago, FWJ said: Disappointed it wasn’t Charlie ‘Abergreen’ Mulgrew on, TBH. Would love to have seen his greetin’ pus telling us that we shouldn’t have Shankland. This. He’d be a fuming shaking wreck. Probably still in a state as I type Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 12 hours ago, mscjambo said: We don't have enough cameras in scottish var. It's a cheap version. In England you'd have 2 more cameras. Not particularly for this call, but our system is simply done on the cheap A drone high above the pitch could create perfectly symmetrical overlays on the pitch to assist VAR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.