FWJ Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Just now, doctor jambo said: On the LGBTQI+ thread? sure we can stray into talking about the boats, but it’s not really the place “No place for hyperbole” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, doctor jambo said: Really? I had no idea. In that case, my post can count towards CPD requirements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWJ Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Non-verifiable unfortunately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 16 minutes ago, FWJ said: Non-verifiable unfortunately Fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 25 minutes ago, Ulysses said: In that case, my post can count towards CPD requirements. Don’t worry the 50 hours rule was removed… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Just now, doctor jambo said: Don’t worry the 50 hours rule was removed… No CPD then. At least we still have the rest of the alphabet, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Humza - includes transwomen in the misogyny bill because men cannot tell the difference between trans women and women . Sorry, not buying that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 7 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Humza - includes transwomen in the misogyny bill because men cannot tell the difference between trans women and women . Sorry, not buying that Yes read that earlier . What an insult to women . The erasure of women continues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Yes read that earlier . What an insult to women . The erasure of women continues. No offence to them, but nobody is mistaking transwomen for women. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 10 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: No offence to them, but nobody is mistaking transwomen for women. An inconvenient truth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 He even used the word “ cis” to further insult women . https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw59e7dg2nlo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 16 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: He even used the word “ cis” to further insult women . https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw59e7dg2nlo What a ***^. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 28 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: He even used the word “ cis” to further insult women . https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw59e7dg2nlo I assume Humza will be protected too, given he’s a total *****. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 28 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said: What a ***^. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 (edited) 1 hour ago, JudyJudyJudy said: He even used the word “ cis” to further insult women . https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw59e7dg2nlo Won't spend an inordinate amount of time looking at the cass review is wild. I mean if you can't learn from the dangers of allowing the mutilation of children by the state for factless pandering to the mentally ill you're a fekin idiot . Never mind a misogyny bill to protect women being undermined by men dressed as women. On a selfish note get this clown as far away to fek from the independence movement. Edited April 16 by Ked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 10 minutes ago, Ked said: Won't spend an inordinate amount of time looking at the cass review is wild. I mean if you can't learn from the dangers of allowing the mutilation of children by the state for factless pandering to the mentally ill you're a fekin idiot . Never mind a misogyny bill to protect women being undermined by men dressed as women. On a selfish note get this clown as far away to fek from the independence movement. 👍👍👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Montpelier Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, JudyJudyJudy said: He even used the word “ cis” to further insult women . https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw59e7dg2nlo "Cis" That collection of letters alone (can't call it a word really) just serves to underline how much nonsence this all is. The SNP need to back away and take the Cass report seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, Lord Montpelier said: "Cis" That collection of letters alone (can't call it a word really) just serves to underline how much nonsence this all is. The SNP need to back away and take the Cass report seriously. Has anyone heard in real life or has anyone used the term "ciswoman"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 12 minutes ago, Ked said: Has anyone heard in real life or has anyone used the term "ciswoman"? Worst superhero ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 17 minutes ago, Ked said: Has anyone heard in real life or has anyone used the term "ciswoman"? Never heard anyone use that term in “ real life “ thank god Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 10 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: Worst superhero ever. How? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Origin of the trans flag Designed by Monica Helms, a cross dressing fetishist who wore his mums pants to get aroused. Baby pink and baby blue picked to represent young boys and young girls. We all supposed to march behind that flag ? Eh, naw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 https://x.com/HumzaYousaf/status/1780538424224571684 Humza Yousaf @HumzaYousaf · 7h Baroness Kennedy’s report clearly recommended that the proposed offences in a misogyny bill should apply where the victims are ‘women or those who perpetrators perceive to be women’ this aligns with existing legislation protecting people from abuse that is motivated by prejudice. The thread is just pure gaslighting dangerous nonsense from him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 17 Author Share Posted April 17 On 16/04/2024 at 12:49, il Duce McTarkin said: I've had my nose re-set 3 times on the NHS. You had to be told 3 times? That surprises me Guv ☹️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 (edited) 24 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: You had to be told 3 times? That surprises me Guv ☹️ Pugilism just wasn't for me, Thor. My snib sticks out like a shite in a trifle. Especially with those daft heid guards on. Edited April 17 by il Duce McTarkin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taffin Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 19 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said: Pugilism just wasn't for me, Thor. My snib sticks out like a shite in a trifle. Especially with those daft heid guards on. 🤣🤣🤣 What a turn of phrase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 On 16/04/2024 at 20:42, JudyJudyJudy said: Never heard anyone use that term in “ real life “ thank god I hear it every day in my workplace, can't say it's ever offended me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 11 hours ago, JudyJudyJudy said: It is all designed to avoid any possibility of being able to separate women from trans women. He seems utterly hell bent on totally amalgamating the two in all legislation put forwards. Its clearly deliberate, and he is removing female as a sex class entirely. Using the law to remove woman and female as a "thing". Machinery of the state eroding sex based rights. NO wonder the feminists are boiling with rage. All that suffrage , merely to have it all undone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: It is all designed to avoid any possibility of being able to separate women from trans women. He seems utterly hell bent on totally amalgamating the two in all legislation put forwards. Its clearly deliberate, and he is removing female as a sex class entirely. Using the law to remove woman and female as a "thing". Machinery of the state eroding sex based rights. NO wonder the feminists are boiling with rage. All that suffrage , merely to have it all undone. Yep it’s delibrate . He and his cronies hate women . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 7 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Yep it’s delibrate . He and his cronies hate women . Its really odd. Trying to reshape an entire society and culture to suit lobby groups is really weird. Its like the flag waving by the NHS- "all welcome here" They always were. the sign that says we treat all people equally is the one that says "NHS" no need for any others. its encoded into the organisation. we treat every single person equally- white, BAME, gay, sex offenders, fetishists, we are not allowed to deny anyone care.. so why do we need the flags? Its odd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Its really odd. Trying to reshape an entire society and culture to suit lobby groups is really weird. Its like the flag waving by the NHS- "all welcome here" They always were. the sign that says we treat all people equally is the one that says "NHS" no need for any others. its encoded into the organisation. we treat every single person equally- white, BAME, gay, sex offenders, fetishists, we are not allowed to deny anyone care.. so why do we need the flags? Its odd Attention seeking identity politics for people who can’t handle the fact that they may have to go through life being based on their actions, rather than their labels. I don’t care where you like to put your bits, nor what bits you may have or desire to have. And I’d kindly ask people not to be overly bothered about me and mine. And don’t expect me to treat you any differently just because you have a different predilection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 4 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Its really odd. Trying to reshape an entire society and culture to suit lobby groups is really weird. Its like the flag waving by the NHS- "all welcome here" They always were. the sign that says we treat all people equally is the one that says "NHS" no need for any others. its encoded into the organisation. we treat every single person equally- white, BAME, gay, sex offenders, fetishists, we are not allowed to deny anyone care.. so why do we need the flags? Its odd To indoctrinate . To try and convince people to subscribe to an ideology they do not wish to and have every legal right not to either , if they so wish . As I’ve said time and again it’s the compelled aspect of the this issue which angers me . People can believe whatever they wish but don’t demand that I believe it too . Also don’t be part of a movement whose aim is to eradicate women’s rights and erase gay and lesbian identity . Why would I ever support this ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueRiver Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-68844119 Pause on puberty blockers for under 18s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Just now, BlueRiver said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-68844119 Pause on puberty blockers for under 18s. WTF are puberty blockers? Surely puberty is a natural and important part of the life cycle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToadKiller Dog Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: WTF are puberty blockers? Surely puberty is a natural and important part of the life cycle? Been around for decades they are mainly used for precocious puberty ,kids who pubirty comes on too early as early onset can be dangerous . Also used on kids with short stature to help increase long bones and increase height . It's also used on adults for some cancers and some other conditions . Like all medicines it can have side effects . But it's not noticeably seen as dangerous for above . More recently they were still are used(dependent on where you are in the world ) for youths with gender issues to give a space of time to decide on what there gender is ,this is where the dispute is ,as evidence of how effective it is for such is seen as week ,with some claims the sideffects could cause harm . So sensible approach is to pause until more is known I guess . I Edited April 18 by ToadKiller Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 31 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: WTF are puberty blockers? Surely puberty is a natural and important part of the life cycle? My daughter suffered badly from asthma as a teenager. She was put on steroids, this extended her natural puberty by 12 months. Basically she started her monthly cycle, 12 months later than her female friends at school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 (edited) 18 minutes ago, ToadKiller Dog said: More recently they were still are used(dependent on where you are in the world ) for youths with gender issues to give a space of time to decide on what there gender is Insanity. Do they have pills that keep your hair translucent until you decide what colour it is? Edited April 18 by Jim_Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 minute ago, John Findlay said: My daughter suffered badly from asthma as a teenager. She was put on steroids, this extended her natural puberty by 12 months. Basically she started her monthly cycle, 12 months later than her female friends at school. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, ToadKiller Dog said: Been around for decades they are mainly used for precocious puberty ,kids who pubirty comes on too early as early onset can be dangerous . Also used on kids with short stature to help increase long bones and increase height . It's also used on adults for some cancers and some other conditions . Like all medicines it can have side effects . But it's not noticeably seen as dangerous for above . More recently they were still are used(dependent on where you are in the world ) for youths with gender issues to give a space of time to decide on what there gender is ,this is where the dispute is ,as evidence of how effective it is for such is seen as week ,with some claims the sideffects could cause harm . So sensible approach is to pause until more is known I guess . I there is also no evidence that puberty blockers improve either mental health, or gender dysphoria. there is evidence that commencing them "locks in" the transition. kids who get them almost all go on to cross sex hormones. those who dont almost all revert to their natural sex. there is definite evidence that puberty blockers are harmful and those harms are not reversible. all of this evidence has been around for years, it was exposed by Hannah Barnes and Helen Joyce et al. they were decried as transphobes and utterly ignored by GIDS as were the whistleblowers in the Tavistock. it all echoes the bradford grooming scandal where people were afraid to raise their heads for fear of the "bigot" smear- careers burned and livelihoods ruined. - see Graham LInehen for reference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 https://x.com/walterwhite444/status/1780870101614334324?s=46&t=Uyg6zS_aUfEwlXY6vOoxzQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 hours ago, doctor jambo said: there is also no evidence that puberty blockers improve either mental health, or gender dysphoria. there is evidence that commencing them "locks in" the transition. kids who get them almost all go on to cross sex hormones. those who dont almost all revert to their natural sex. there is definite evidence that puberty blockers are harmful and those harms are not reversible. all of this evidence has been around for years, it was exposed by Hannah Barnes and Helen Joyce et al. they were decried as transphobes and utterly ignored by GIDS as were the whistleblowers in the Tavistock. it all echoes the bradford grooming scandal where people were afraid to raise their heads for fear of the "bigot" smear- careers burned and livelihoods ruined. - see Graham LInehen for reference 👍👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 36 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: https://x.com/walterwhite444/status/1780870101614334324?s=46&t=Uyg6zS_aUfEwlXY6vOoxzQ never sure what this all has to do with humans too young to realise that santa is not real, nor is the easter bunny. yet we are surprised adults tell them they can change sex and they believe it? Kids are very vulnerable to suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 33 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Kids are very vulnerable to suggestion Yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, JudyJudyJudy said: https://x.com/walterwhite444/status/1780870101614334324?s=46&t=Uyg6zS_aUfEwlXY6vOoxzQ LGBT champions? Like, is there some kind of tournament? The Great British Camp-Off? Who can tie their Doc Martens the quickest? Best beard on a bird? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 36 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: never sure what this all has to do with humans too young to realise that santa is not real, nor is the easter bunny. yet we are surprised adults tell them they can change sex and they believe it? Kids are very vulnerable to suggestion. I am sceptical because I live the mantra, don't believe all you read, and only believe half of what you see. However a contradiction I personally see is this. They say the human brain is not fully matured until age 25, this is used as a reason/excuse not to goal someone. So how the hell can primary pupils decide they are homosexual, lesbian, bi-sexual, transgender or heaven forbid hetrosexual. I really believe we are treading on very dangerous ground here if there is an ounce of truth in this report/story. Why can't we just let children be children nowadays? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, John Findlay said: I am sceptical because I live the mantra, don't believe all you read, and only believe half of what you see. However a contradiction I personally see is this. They say the human brain is not fully matured until age 25, this is used as a reason/excuse not to goal someone. So how the hell can primary pupils decide they are homosexual, lesbian, bi-sexual, transgender or heaven forbid hetrosexual. I really believe we are treading on very dangerous ground here if there is an ounce of truth in this report/story. Why can't we just let children be children nowadays? Well quite . it has gone past “ be nice to everyone” which as a general message is good, right? To pushing kids away from normative behaviour as if it’s somehow dull. Asking questions they don’t understand . Kids don’t understand the consequences of their actions - hence why they have to live with an adult until they are 16. Changing sex and never having kids is not a biggie aged 12. They need left alone to grow up without adult interference, and that is not happening . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 hours ago, Jim_Duncan said: LGBT champions? Like, is there some kind of tournament? The Great British Camp-Off? Who can tie their Doc Martens the quickest? Best beard on a bird? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 50 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Well quite . it has gone past “ be nice to everyone” which as a general message is good, right? To pushing kids away from normative behaviour as if it’s somehow dull. Asking questions they don’t understand . Kids don’t understand the consequences of their actions - hence why they have to live with an adult until they are 16. Changing sex and never having kids is not a biggie aged 12. They need left alone to grow up without adult interference, and that is not happening . Yep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Duncan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 57 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: Well quite . it has gone past “ be nice to everyone” which as a general message is good, right? To pushing kids away from normative behaviour as if it’s somehow dull. Asking questions they don’t understand . Kids don’t understand the consequences of their actions - hence why they have to live with an adult until they are 16. Changing sex and never having kids is not a biggie aged 12. They need left alone to grow up without adult interference, and that is not happening . Well said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.