Griffiths

[bigsuperslim1874]

19 minutes ago, DH1986 said:

I’d have my doubts this is an isolated incident…..

 

 

On one of the Twitter feeds lt looked like there was another lassie too although no idea if it was an actual of age woman or not

Edited July 8, 2021 by bigsuperslim1874

[Seymour M Hersh]

Just now, Ray Gin said:

 

They're teenagers and therefore completely naive and generally idiots.

 

 

 

 

I was one in the 70's and there is nothing we did that was in any way comparable to this sort of behaviour. Just another reason to expose unsocial media. 

[Ray Gin]

Just now, Seymour M Hersh said:

 

I was one in the 70's and there is nothing we did that was in any way comparable to this sort of behaviour. Just another reason to expose unsocial media. 

 

 No but now their role models are the Kardashians and idiots from Love Island. They see them with their arses and tits hanging out on social media and think its something to aspire to.

 

[Seymour M Hersh]

1 minute ago, Ray Gin said:

 

 No but now their role models are the Kardashians and idiots from Love Island. They see them with their arses and tits hanging out on social media and think its something to aspire to.

 

 

Fair point Ray. 

[John Findlay]

1 hour ago, Deevers said:

There were moves here to ensure that anyone under the age of 18 was designated as a child. I don’t know if that was enshrined in law though. If it was he’s in big bother.

Yet 16yr old can vote in Scottish elections. The question at what age is a person a fully fledged adult?

[Jeff]

All these arguments about 16 year olds are irrelevant.

 

She was 15. Get his hard drives checked

[DH1986]

21 minutes ago, Ray Gin said:

 

 No but now their role models are the Kardashians and idiots from Love Island. They see them with their arses and tits hanging out on social media and think its something to aspire to.

 

Yep……

 

A magazine cover of Karen Carpenter in an aran polo neck jumper wasn’t exactly encouraging teenagers those days to strip off.

 

The internet has taken away the innocence of millions kids…….and it will only get worse as it’s not just pics of celebrities being plastered everywhere……it’s Chantel from Asda pouting like she’s Cindy Crawford with her little girl watching in the background.

 

 

[Sertse]

Where the **** are her parents? She was posting photos of herself in her underwear on social media at age FIFTEEN. Isn't she essentially producing illegal pornography by taking photos intended to be viewed in a sexual manner?

Guys a ****ing idiot and all that but come on. 

[Stu_HMFC]

40 minutes ago, Ray Gin said:

 

I wonder what keeps her with her millionaire partner?

Won't be the looks that's for sure 

[lou]

2 minutes ago, Sertse said:

Where the **** are her parents? She was posting photos of herself in her underwear on social media at age FIFTEEN. Isn't she essentially producing illegal pornography by taking photos intended to be viewed in a sexual manner?

Guys a ****ing idiot and all that but come on. 

Are you a parent? If so, don't be so deluded to think you can ever know everything is teenager is up to

[Sertse]

Just now, lou said:

Are you a parent? If so, don't be so deluded to think you can ever know everything is teenager is up to

I am a parent. If my daughter was posting seductive photos of herself on social media especially at 15 year old put it this way, she wouldn't do it again. I'm not defending Griffiths in the slightest. The question is why is everyone overlooking a child posting sexual images of themselves?

[Bozi]

13 minutes ago, Jeff said:

All these arguments about 16 year olds are irrelevant.

 

She was 15. Get his hard drives checked

30 year old Griffith's asking for DMs off a 15 year old is sick and deeply troubling.

 

In a sense it's worse than an (at the time of the incident) 18 year old Craig Thompson getting busted for asking a girl 3 years younger than him for the same, that was unacceptable, he was rightly placed on the sex offenders register and whilst the club didn't deal with it fantastically he never pulled on our jersey again. 

 

Plus going by Griffith's own Twitter account, not the first time he has been accused 

[lou]

8 minutes ago, Sertse said:

I am a parent. If my daughter was posting seductive photos of herself on social media especially at 15 year old put it this way, she wouldn't do it again. I'm not defending Griffiths in the slightest. The question is why is everyone overlooking a child posting sexual images of themselves?

My point is that's it's nigh on impossible to know what they are doing on social media, 

[Spitonastranger]

15 minutes ago, DH1986 said:

Yep……

 

A magazine cover of Karen Carpenter in an aran polo neck jumper wasn’t exactly encouraging teenagers those days to strip off.

 

The internet has taken away the innocence of millions kids…….and it will only get worse as it’s not just pics of celebrities being plastered everywhere……it’s Chantel from Asda pouting like she’s Cindy Crawford with her little girl watching in the background.

 

 

Ms World, Benny Hill etc the 70's were'nt as innocent in their portrayal of woman

[Forrest]

13 hours ago, Jambo_Gaz said:

An alleged beast is an alleged beast and should be treated as an alleged beast even if they have mental health issues. 

 

The "evidence" that people have seen certainly seems to point that way in this case, but I think you need to be very careful about that sentence.  Anybody can allege anything about anybody, and if it's done in a malicious manner with no factual evidence, then it can ruin someone's life.  To pick just one example, look at Cliff Richard.  As it happens, he did well financially out of it at the end of the day, but he must have been absolutely raging when it happened / the way it happened.

[Ray Gin]

15 minutes ago, Sertse said:

Where the **** are her parents?

 

Probably blocked from her social media, I would imagine.

[AlphonseCapone]

51 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said:

 

I can't get my head round them thinking doing this sort of thing is acceptable. 

 

I mean to me it's utterly daft, but teenagers aren't known for their thinking. It's different times to even when I was younger. I think there's a combination of, not thinking through the future consequences because social media is still relatively knew (like all these posts on twitter from 10 years ago being dragged up that folk at the time would have assumed disappeared into the ether) and a completely different attitude to the concept of being so public. 

[JackLadd]

4 minutes ago, Spitonastranger said:

Ms World, Benny Hill etc the 70's were'nt as innocent in their portrayal of woman

 

I miss the 70s tbh. You could offend who the hell you liked and nobody gave an eff. Free speech it is also called. Blair ended it. 

[Fitzroy Pointon]

5 minutes ago, Sertse said:

I am a parent. If my daughter was posting seductive photos of herself on social media especially at 15 year old put it this way, she wouldn't do it again. I'm not defending Griffiths in the slightest. The question is why is everyone overlooking a child posting sexual images of themselves?

 

A sad indictment of the world we live in. Everything is sexualised these days. Why blame the parents and not blame folk like Cardi B, who release songs about a "wet ass pussy" and those idiots who  produce Love Island. Girls, especially at that age, will see it as acceptable behavior these days. 

 

My oldest daughter is thirteen and this kind of stuff worries me sick, thinking of creeps like that oddity grooming young girls for pics and who knows what else.  

[lou]

2 minutes ago, JackLadd said:

 

I miss the 70s tbh. You could offend who the hell you liked and nobody gave an eff. Free speech it is also called. Blair ended it. 

What a stick in the mud making people accountable for being racist and sexist

[Ray Gin]

5 minutes ago, JackLadd said:

 

I miss the 70s tbh. You could offend who the hell you liked and nobody gave an eff. Free speech it is also called. Blair ended it. 

 

Plenty people did give an eff, that's why it's no longer acceptable.

[JackLadd]

Just now, lou said:

What a stick in the mud making people accountable for being racist and sexist

 

It should not be a criminal matter to use a word or phrase somebody doesn't like. The left are hypocrites of course with their rabid anti semitism. 

 

[lou]

Just now, JackLadd said:

 

It should not be a criminal matter to use a word or phrase somebody doesn't like. The left are hypocrites of course with their rabid anti semitism. 

 

Oh please **** off, your right wing bigoted ramblings are tedious

[James1874f]

5 minutes ago, Salad Fingers said:

 

A sad indictment of the world we live in. Everything is sexualised these days. Why blame the parents and not blame folk like Cardi B, who release songs about a "wet ass pussy" and those idiots who  produce Love Island. Girls, especially at that age, will see it as acceptable behavior these days. 

 

My oldest daughter is thirteen and this kind of stuff worries me sick, thinking of creeps like that oddity grooming young girls for pics and who knows what else.  

Good post Salad Fingers.

 

I have a young daughter also know exactly where you are coming from

[Homme]

26 minutes ago, Sertse said:

I am a parent. If my daughter was posting seductive photos of herself on social media especially at 15 year old put it this way, she wouldn't do it again. I'm not defending Griffiths in the slightest. The question is why is everyone overlooking a child posting sexual images of themselves?

 

Because they're a child.

[JackLadd]

1 minute ago, Ray Gin said:

 

Plenty people did give an eff, that's why it's no longer acceptable.

 

It was never that acceptable but it's becoming a crime to be a white male heterosexual and express any sentiments pro that identity. This has nothing to do with Griffiths btw, separate issue.

[Ray Gin]

Imagine someone pining for the days when you could get away with being a racist, sexist, xenophobic, bigot.

 

Just imagine the mindset of that type of person. Actually wishing they could discriminate and hurl vile abuse at people for their own personal kicks, without a shred of concern for the targets of said abuse.

 

That person is JackLadd. 

[JackLadd]

2 minutes ago, lou said:

Oh please **** off, your right wing bigoted ramblings are tedious

 

Your offended left wing petted lip proves my point and is exactly what is wrong with this country from the multi cult diversity obsession and wokery to knee taking. 

[Ray Gin]

1 minute ago, JackLadd said:

 

It was never that acceptable but it's becoming a crime to be a white male heterosexual and express any sentiments pro that identity. This has nothing to do with Griffiths btw, separate issue.

 

 

[JackLadd]

2 minutes ago, Ray Gin said:

Imagine someone pining for the days when you could get away with being a racist, sexist, xenophobic, bigot.

 

Just imagine the mindset of that type of person. Actually wishing they could discriminate and hurl vile abuse at people for their own personal kicks, without a shred of concern for the targets of said abuse.

 

That person is JackLadd. 

 

 

Americans have freedom of speech, we don't. You don't want free speech in case minority groups are offended I get it. Use of the term "vile abuse" is totally subjective when we live in a society that has zero tolerance of even mild depictions or terms. It Ain't Half Hot Mum banned from television because it shows Indians as servants or something. That to you and other far left is vile abuse.  

[sadj]

15 minutes ago, JackLadd said:

 

It should not be a criminal matter to use a word or phrase somebody doesn't like. The left are hypocrites of course with their rabid anti semitism. 

 

Jesus **** 🙈🙈🙈🙈

[Sertse]

18 minutes ago, Salad Fingers said:

 

A sad indictment of the world we live in. Everything is sexualised these days. Why blame the parents and not blame folk like Cardi B, who release songs about a "wet ass pussy" and those idiots who  produce Love Island. Girls, especially at that age, will see it as acceptable behavior these days. 

 

My oldest daughter is thirteen and this kind of stuff worries me sick, thinking of creeps like that oddity grooming young girls for pics and who knows what else.  

I agree however the parents are directly responsible for raising and protecting their child. Obviously it changes as they get older but at 15 people seem to just be like kids will be kids🤷

They're not out underage drinking, they're exposing themselves online to strangers and attracting attention from grown adults like 30 something Griffiths. I feel like I'm going mad that nobody seems to think anyone is at fault expect Griffiths here. How is it just accepted? I'm no prude. I'm not some religious nutjob. I just don't get how people can see a child posting images of themselves online and NOT ask questions of their parents.

[Longbaws]

51 minutes ago, Jeff said:

All these arguments about 16 year olds are irrelevant.

 

She was 15. Get his hard drives checked

His hard drive and anyone thats making the 16 year old remarks.

[Spitonastranger]

32 minutes ago, JackLadd said:

 

I miss the 70s tbh. You could offend who the hell you liked and nobody gave an eff. Free speech it is also called. Blair ended it. 

That wasnt the point the person was soying that women's bodies were not on show like today. Free speech give a rest. 

[mscjambo]

Growing up now kids are constantly putting themselves out there most of time unknowingly in a sexual way. They see these influencers on Instagram and women on love Island and look at their social media and think its the way to go. Working in a school I'm horrified by some experiences I hear of I terms of young kids online. 

 

We can argue the merits of them being online, on these platforms until the cows come home. But the bottom line is that at 15 she is a child. She might look older but in reality she's a child. 

 

Chances are she's not the first girl that he's had such conversations with. She may not look 15, but perhaps he should have checked how old she was before he proceeded. He deserves all he gets. 

[CF11JamTart]

6 minutes ago, Sertse said:

I agree however the parents are directly responsible for raising and protecting their child. Obviously it changes as they get older but at 15 people seem to just be like kids will be kids🤷

They're not out underage drinking, they're exposing themselves online to strangers and attracting attention from grown adults like 30 something Griffiths. I feel like I'm going mad that nobody seems to think anyone is at fault expect Griffiths here. How is it just accepted? I'm no prude. I'm not some religious nutjob. I just don't get how people can see a child posting images of themselves online and NOT ask questions of their parents.

 I disagree. 

 

It is absolutely Griffith's fault. 

 

He is an adult and has personal responsibility for not engaging with children in a predatory or exploitative way. 

 

I've got a daughter. I hope that I'm helping her to grow up with a decent set of values. But children are individuals and capable of their own decisions and actions. 

 

But there is a responsibility on the adult community not to take advantage or act in an immoral fashion. 

[Cruyff]

Leigh Griffiths is a disgrace as are those defending him. We shouldn't tolerate creatures like him in society. 

 

[OTT]

How does a thread about Griffiths being a wee creep end up being about Jenner? 😂

 

I really don’t understand how he could be so ****ing stupid. His last 3 years have been a total mess for his off field antics, and he’s just ****ed up a 4th 😭 What a total idiot. 

[Boab]

39 minutes ago, JackLadd said:

 

It was never that acceptable but it's becoming a crime to be a white male heterosexual and express any sentiments pro that identity. This has nothing to do with Griffiths btw, separate issue.

Well if it hasn’t, take it elsewhere so we can discuss the little shit…and not deviate to anyone’s perceived persecutions !

[i8hibsh]

Hate the thumb and could not care less if he spends the next 50 years being an arse buffet in Barlinnie, however these threads are so dangerous and I am staggered that they continue to be allowed.  I hope he gets a fair trial, like I do with every single human being on the planet and I hope justice prevails (whatever that may be).

 

I am sick to the beack teeth of these trial by media threads based on hear'say, accusations and scattered facts.

Edited July 8, 2021 by i8hibsh

[Fitzroy Pointon]

22 minutes ago, Sertse said:

I agree however the parents are directly responsible for raising and protecting their child. Obviously it changes as they get older but at 15 people seem to just be like kids will be kids🤷

They're not out underage drinking, they're exposing themselves online to strangers and attracting attention from grown adults like 30 something Griffiths. I feel like I'm going mad that nobody seems to think anyone is at fault expect Griffiths here. How is it just accepted? I'm no prude. I'm not some religious nutjob. I just don't get how people can see a child posting images of themselves online and NOT ask questions of their parents.

 

I get your anger, but I don't think it's just accepted by anyone. We don't really know how her parents have reacted. They could be devastated. As other's have mentioned, they probably didn't know what she was up to. Aside from checking her devices, what can they do? Teenagers will very rarely open up to their parents about who they are chatting with. It's hard but that's just life. Did you always tell your parents where you were going and what you were up to at all times when you were 15/16? I definitely didn't and that was in the days before you had a mobile and they could check where you were. I certainly wouldn't barge into my daughters room at random times to check what she was up to. All I can do is put my faith in her not to do things like this and try to educate her the best we can in what is right and what is wrong. Hopefully she takes heed of the advice, but a lot of girls wont. 

 

As an adult, Leigh Griffiths should know better. Even if she is sixteen, the fact that he continues to speak to her is borderline. Children need to be protected by adults, not preyed on by them, which appears to be the case here.  

 

 

[Thomaso]

21 minutes ago, Cruyff said:

Leigh Griffiths is a disgrace as are those defending him. We shouldn't tolerate creatures like him in society. 

 

Celtic will cancel the wee scumbags contract - and Hibs will welcome him back with open arms! They are made for one another. 😏

[Fitzroy Pointon]

6 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

Hate the thumb and could not care less if he spends the next 50 years being an arse buffet in Barlinnie, however these threads are so dangerous and I am staggered that they continue to be allowed.  I hope he gets a fair trial, like I do with every single human being on the planet and I hope justice prevails (whatever that may be).

 

I am sick to the beack teeth of these trial by media threads based on hear'say, accusations and scattered facts.

 

The fact is Griffiths is a weirdo. 

[i8hibsh]

Just now, Salad Fingers said:

 

The fact is Griffiths is a weirdo. 

 

 

Agreed.

[Gordon Ramsay]

4 minutes ago, Thomaso said:

Celtic will cancel the wee scumbags contract - and Hibs will welcome him back with open arms! They are made for one another. 😏

 

More than likely. 

[Bazzas right boot]

2 hours ago, Ray Gin said:

Even if he thought she was 16, 17 or even 18 doesn't really make a huge difference. This is a 30 year old man slithering about on social media asking wee teenage lassies to send him dirty pics. He's an absolute creep.

 

 

 

Yip. 

Sums it up. 

 

If true Ofc. 

[Bazzas right boot]

13 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

Hate the thumb and could not care less if he spends the next 50 years being an arse buffet in Barlinnie, however these threads are so dangerous and I am staggered that they continue to be allowed.  I hope he gets a fair trial, like I do with every single human being on the planet and I hope justice prevails (whatever that may be).

 

I am sick to the beack teeth of these trial by media threads based on hear'say, accusations and scattered facts.

 

Arse buffet. 

😭😭

 

Again, I find myself agreeing with you. 

 

[sadj]

15 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

Hate the thumb and could not care less if he spends the next 50 years being an arse buffet in Barlinnie, however these threads are so dangerous and I am staggered that they continue to be allowed.  I hope he gets a fair trial, like I do with every single human being on the planet and I hope justice prevails (whatever that may be).

 

I am sick to the beack teeth of these trial by media threads based on hear'say, accusations and scattered facts.

Coming from you with the threads you have started on here. 

[sadj]

3 minutes ago, Barack said:

Want a fair trial, but also want a person to be violently raped.

 

Quite the juxtaposition. 

 

Anyhoo...SHED!!!!!!!

👌🏻

[Cruyff]

14 minutes ago, Thomaso said:

Celtic will cancel the wee scumbags contract - and Hibs will welcome him back with open arms! They are made for one another. 😏

As much as I hate them both, I'd hope two top level SPL clubs would have the sense and the morality to wash their hands of him. I'd hope Hibs fans are as disgusted at his behaviour as much as everyone else, they ought to be.