Jump to content

*** Other Scottish football match thread, for anyone who gives a ****


tartofmidlothian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • neilnunb

    237

  • Hearts007

    204

  • Mikey1874

    165

  • Sertse

    118

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Smith's right boot

Who gives a **** what rangers propose or how they voted, anyone thinking they're our "football friend" has their head up their arse. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jonnothejambo
5 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

Who gives a **** what rangers propose or how they voted, anyone thinking they're our "football friend" has their head up their arse. 

 

 

 

Agreed, but if they stop the Mhanks getting their tainted 9.83 in a row then we can look forward to fun and games. 

 

The seethe from these East End pricks will be a hoot.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
1 minute ago, jonnothejambo said:

 

Agreed, but if they stop the Mhanks getting their tainted 9.83 in a row then we can look forward to fun and games. 

 

The seethe from these East End pricks will be a hoot.

 

 

It would be, that is for sure. 

Lennon's meltdown will be glorious, in fact, scrap that-I'd rather see him  melt down after the final. 

Edited by Smith's right boot
Link to post
Share on other sites
jonnothejambo
2 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

 

It would be, that is for sure. 

Lennon's meltdown will be glorious, in fact, scrap that-I'd rather see him  melt down after the final. 

 

Aye. You never know, it may even happen. 

 

Boyce gets the winner. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Horatio Caine
1 minute ago, jonnothejambo said:

 

Aye. You never know, it may even happen. 

 

Boyce gets the winner. 

I think we'll be more up for that than we were for Dunfermline on Friday

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

Who gives a **** what rangers propose or how they voted, anyone thinking they're our "football friend" has their head up their arse. 

 

 

 

Has anyone even used the term "football friend" (apart from you)? 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Horatio Caine said:

I think we'll be more up for that than we were for Dunfermline on Friday

 

One thing for sure, if Lenny survives till then his team's nerves may well be pretty well shredded for the final.

Link to post
Share on other sites
alwaysthereinspirit
1 hour ago, JDK2020 said:

 

They proposed reconstruction that would have saved Hearts, Thistle and Stranraer. Full stop. 

Well not exactly full stop. There was a couple of side notes that had to be discussed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3fingersreid
1 hour ago, JDK2020 said:

 

I wonder how things would had panned out if McInnes hadn't shat out of the manager's job at Ibrox prior to SG's arrival?

I don’t think he’d have got them to where slippy’s got them to at present . 

For the time mcinnes has had ,his team is piss poor . I dare say I’ll be told but they’ve been in the top 4 for a long time , but so they bloody well should’ve been given that Hearts, hibs and rangers weren’t competing against them for a few seasons . Over rated manager , vastly over rated team ( dirty *******s at that ) and a set of supporters that wouldn’t be out of place in a shitehoose. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
16 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

Has anyone even used the term "football friend" (apart from you)? 😀

 

Yes, a TV show. 

Obviously the humour and sarcasm was lost on you. 

 

 

 

 

i-just-want-play-football-c9dffdbbb98196a37c07dd3b3a9852a6.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
The Real Maroonblood
3 hours ago, 1971fozzy said:

Hopefully they will score 3 or 4 more to boost the goal difference even more. They look a really good side tbh. 
I take no pleasure saying that but anything to stop these filthy mhanks getting their 9.75 in a row

They're certainly being rewarded for their years of cheating. 

Filth.

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, 3fingersreid said:

I don’t think he’d have got them to where slippy’s got them to at present . 

For the time mcinnes has had ,his team is piss poor . I dare say I’ll be told but they’ve been in the top 4 for a long time , but so they bloody well should’ve been given that Hearts, hibs and rangers weren’t competing against them for a few seasons . Over rated manager , vastly over rated team ( dirty *******s at that ) and a set of supporters that wouldn’t be out of place in a shitehoose. 

This post should receive a sticky on the front page , be sent daily to our Aberdonian interloper and a gold star for you Mr D 👌🏻 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3fingersreid
18 minutes ago, sadj said:

This post should receive a sticky on the front page , be sent daily to our Aberdonian interloper and a gold star for you Mr D 👌🏻 

I’ve never had a gold star before , I’m fair chuffed 😂😂😂

 

2 minutes ago, sadj said:

Only just realised Hibs hibs’d it yesterday 🤣

It’s such a common occurrence it’s easy to miss one out 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 3fingersreid said:

I don’t think he’d have got them to where slippy’s got them to at present . 

For the time mcinnes has had ,his team is piss poor . I dare say I’ll be told but they’ve been in the top 4 for a long time , but so they bloody well should’ve been given that Hearts, hibs and rangers weren’t competing against them for a few seasons . Over rated manager , vastly over rated team ( dirty *******s at that ) and a set of supporters that wouldn’t be out of place in a shitehoose. 

 

I'm pretty sure he would have been punted long before this TBH. Surprised that the sheep have persisted with McInnes for so long given that the sheep fans generally hate him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alwaysthereinspirit said:

Well not exactly full stop. There was a couple of side notes that had to be discussed.

 

OK, but I'm quite sure AB would not have given those side notes a second thought if it had a chance of being voted through, and I think nobody on here either.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

I'm pretty sure he would have been punted long before this TBH. Surprised that the sheep have persisted with McInnes for so long given that the sheep fans generally hate him. 

He was probably given a hefty new contract to stop him going to Rangers so it would be expensive to get rid of him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

Yes, a TV show. 

Obviously the humour and sarcasm was lost on you. 

 

 

 

 

i-just-want-play-football-c9dffdbbb98196a37c07dd3b3a9852a6.jpg

 

 

Er, well obviously. 😏

 

So, it was in fact entirely irrelevant to anything that had been discussed up to that point?   😄

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Tazio said:

He was probably given a hefty new contract to stop him going to Rangers so it would be expensive to get rid of him. 

 

I believe he was (given a new contract to keep him). I'm just completely mystified as to why. They may be an objectionable shower up there but IMO their club has more potential than what he has been able to realise for them so far. I thought Dave Cormack was ambitious but keeping McInnes doesn't bear that out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Smith's right boot said:

Rangers are a cracking side. 

Hosing teams right left and centre domestically and in Europe. 

Gerrard deserves credit and I like him Tbh. 

 

Still financially doped cheating *******s as an institution tho and anyone thinking they cared about us during the covid reconstruction talks needs a kick in the clackerbag. 

 

 

 

Behave. They're no more financially doped than the current Hearts set up - which spends millions it doesn't have on a stand it can't afford, for starters. The Rangers board have consistently converted their debt/soft loans  to shares and Hearts have a very rich benefactor - end result is the same : 2 clubs spending money they don't have thanks to rich benefactors. 

If you're going to accuse another club of "financial doping " then you should  take a good look at how Hearts have been bailed out of the shit for the last 4 years. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
alwaysthereinspirit
14 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

OK, but I'm quite sure AB would not have given those side notes a second thought if it had a chance of being voted through, and I think nobody on here either.

Scottish football is weak enough without the two @$$ cheeks taking more of the little talent available. Pretending they’ll have a chance to progress through the ranks to the big team. All the while starting players from all over the world while paying them 20 times what the rest of us can afford. No thanks from me to the Newco/Celtic Colts.

OF Colts are not done to help anyone in Scottish football but themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, alwaysthereinspirit said:

Scottish football is weak enough without the two @$$ cheeks taking more of the little talent available. Pretending they’ll have a chance to progress through the ranks to the big team. All the while starting players from all over the world while paying them 20 times what the rest of us can afford. No thanks from me to the Newco/Celtic Colts.

OF Colts are not done to help anyone in Scottish football but themselves.

 

Well, obviously not saying the colts proposal should be on the wish list of top ten things to ever happen but it would have been largely overlooked for most if it had been the means to keep Hearts in the top division.

Would AB have voted against?

Would you?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
15 minutes ago, NANOJAMBO said:

Behave. They're no more financially doped than the current Hearts set up - which spends millions it doesn't have on a stand it can't afford, for starters. The Rangers board have consistently converted their debt/soft loans  to shares and Hearts have a very rich benefactor - end result is the same : 2 clubs spending money they don't have thanks to rich benefactors. 

If you're going to accuse another club of "financial doping " then you should  take a good look at how Hearts have been bailed out of the shit for the last 4 years. 

 

Did our last accounts not show a profit?

 

Rangers have shown losses every year since thier re birth. 

 

Comparing loans/ finance to build a major capital project v building a squad every season to chase a dream is the same thing right enough. 

 

What a load of shite in an attempt to defend rangers overspending and cheating ( again). 

 

A very emotional and decent effort at defending them tho, fair enough. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
alwaysthereinspirit
9 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

Well, obviously not saying the colts proposal should be on the wish list of top ten things to ever happen but it would have been largely overlooked for most if it had been the means to keep Hearts in the top division.

Would AB have voted against?

Would you?

I’d have been against it.

But then I’d also have been against demoting a team during a world pandemic.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
35 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

 

Er, well obviously. 😏

 

So, it was in fact entirely irrelevant to anything that had been discussed up to that point?   😄

 

It wasn't irrelevant, folk posting that rangers are some kind of ally to Hearts and were helping us during the covid shite and they are some kid of good guy, or friend- a football friend if you will. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smith's right boot said:

 

Did our last accounts not show a profit?

 

Rangers have shown losses every year since thier re birth. 

 

Comparing loans/ finance to build a major capital project v building a squad every season to chase a dream is the same thing right enough. 

 

What a load of shite in an attempt to defend rangers overspending and cheating ( again). 

 

A very emotional and decent effort at defending them tho, fair enough. 

 

 

I didn't defend Rangers - I simply compared their over spending with Hearts overspending : it's the same thing.  Two clubs spending revenues they don't generate - and  you're dressing one up as capital spend against player purchase as if it makes any difference.

 

Rangers main shareholders wrote their debt off as required and Hearts have done exactly the same through James Anderson. 

 

Very emotional... 😆

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

It wasn't irrelevant, folk posting that rangers are some kind of ally to Hearts and were helping us during the covid shite and they are some kid of good guy, or friend- a football friend if you will. 

 

😄😀  So, nobody actually said "football friends" or even suggested that they were football friends? 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
28 minutes ago, NANOJAMBO said:

I didn't defend Rangers - I simply compared their over spending with Hearts overspending : it's the same thing.  Two clubs spending revenues they don't generate - and  you're dressing one up as capital spend against player purchase as if it makes any difference.

 

Rangers main shareholders wrote their debt off as required and Hearts have done exactly the same through James Anderson. 

 

Very emotional... 😆

 

 

It was a staunch defence of rangers financial situation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
1 minute ago, JDK2020 said:

 

😄😀  So, nobody actually said "football friends" or even suggested that they were football friends? 👍

 

No I did. 

 

:wtfvlad:

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, alwaysthereinspirit said:

I’d have been against it.

But then I’d also have been against demoting a team during a world pandemic.

 

 

Yeah, I take your second point for sure.

But would you have voted against sevco's colt proposal if voting for it had saved Hearts (& thistle and stranraer)?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

No I did. 

 

:wtfvlad:

 

Lol, I sincerely hope you are nowhere near as obtuse as you are trying to make out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

 

It was a staunch defence of rangers financial situation. 

It was not a "staunch" anything so ditch the deliberately emotional language and debate the simple point : Hearts overspend just like Rangers do or stop embarrassing yourself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
Just now, NANOJAMBO said:

It was not a "staunch" anything so ditch the deliberately emotional language and debate the simple point : Hearts overspend just like Rangers do or stop embarrassing yourself. 

 

Compare the last 5 years of Hearts yearly accounts and rangers last 5 years and you'll find out who's embarrassing themselves over defending rangers finances and comparing them to ourselves. 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Smith's right boot said:

 

Compare the last 5 years of Hearts yearly accounts and rangers last 5 years and you'll find out who's embarrassing themselves over defending rangers finances and comparing them to ourselves. 

 

 

 

 

Once again : I'm not defending Rangers finances. I couldn't care less what they spend or how they finance it. But for some reason you're really touchy about the idea that Hearts excess spending is somehow comparable to Rangers. You throw deliberately  inflammatory language around and attack me as defending Rangers - just because I compare THEIR overspending with Hearts ? 

 

In simple terms - you have no issue with Hearts spending money they don't have while accuse Rangers of "financial doping". 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
2 minutes ago, NANOJAMBO said:

Once again : I'm not defending Rangers finances. I couldn't care less what they spend or how they finance it. But for some reason you're really touchy about the idea that Hearts excess spending is somehow comparable to Rangers. You throw deliberately  inflammatory language around and attack me as defending Rangers - just because I compare THEIR overspending with Hearts ? 

 

In simple terms - you have no issue with Hearts spending money they don't have while accuse Rangers of "financial doping". 

 

 

Have our last 5 years accounts shown a loss? 

 

Our finances are not the same. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smith's right boot said:

 

 

Have our last 5 years accounts shown a loss? 

 

Our finances are not the same. 

Do you want to go back to the main point : Hearts overspend, Rangers overspend. You're OK with one but not the other ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Smith's right boot
Just now, NANOJAMBO said:

Do you want to go back to the main point : Hearts overspend, Rangers overspend. You're OK with one but not the other ? 

 

Another thread required. 

 

Hearts have not overspent if they do not show a loss, rangers are overspending if theirs do show a loss. 

I believe they have shown a loss every year since they were formed, big ones. 

 

I am not OK with a football cub built on a success with continued losses  while others live within their means. 

I view that as a form of  cheating. 

 

They cheated before, they are cheating now and rangers accounts and financial situation is no where near ours. Different in many ways. 

For example Taking on finance to build a major  project such as a stand  is also a different matter, every business and indeed most individuals would need to raise capital for this. 

 

Rangers are financially doped cheating *******s, but tbf to Gérrard they are a good side. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
alwaysthereinspirit
59 minutes ago, JDK2020 said:

 

Yeah, I take your second point for sure.

But would you have voted against sevco's colt proposal if voting for it had saved Hearts (& thistle and stranraer)?

 

 

Me personally? Yes.

I don’t even remember if it ever got to an actual vote.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I wouldn't care who wins the league but I have to make an exception for this season.  We had to sit and suffer during the summer as Celtic instigated calling the league and then rigging a vote between member clubs.  Celtic only cared about themselves and we were the ones that had to take the hit for the global pandemic.  They got the tainted title and time to prepare for the Champions League qualifiers.  It was absolutely delightful seeing them schooled by the the Hungarian champions and losing the £m's that went with it.  It's now even funnier seeing them well behind Rangers in the title race and embarrassing themselves even further in the Europa League.  I really hope that fat odious prick Lawell is hurting like hell right now along with their manky fans.  And hopefully it only gets worse for them as Rangers pull further clear in the title race.  

 

Take your medicine Celtic.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, alwaysthereinspirit said:

Me personally? Yes.

I don’t even remember if it ever got to an actual vote.

 

 

TBH I dont remember either. Most probably the DOncaster/Lawwell faction blocked it at some point.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Randy Marsh said:

Normally I wouldn't care who wins the league but I have to make an exception for this season.  We had to sit and suffer during the summer as Celtic instigated calling the league and then rigging a vote between member clubs.  Celtic only cared about themselves and we were the ones that had to take the hit for the global pandemic.  They got the tainted title and time to prepare for the Champions League qualifiers.  It was absolutely delightful seeing them schooled by the the Hungarian champions and losing the £m's that went with it.  It's now even funnier seeing them well behind Rangers in the title race and embarrassing themselves even further in the Europa League.  I really hope that fat odious prick Lawell is hurting like hell right now along with their manky fans.  And hopefully it only gets worse for them as Rangers pull further clear in the title race.  

 

Take your medicine Celtic.

 

👍 Spot on!

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Randy Marsh said:

Normally I wouldn't care who wins the league but I have to make an exception for this season.  We had to sit and suffer during the summer as Celtic instigated calling the league and then rigging a vote between member clubs.  Celtic only cared about themselves and we were the ones that had to take the hit for the global pandemic.  They got the tainted title and time to prepare for the Champions League qualifiers.  It was absolutely delightful seeing them schooled by the the Hungarian champions and losing the £m's that went with it.  It's now even funnier seeing them well behind Rangers in the title race and embarrassing themselves even further in the Europa League.  I really hope that fat odious prick Lawell is hurting like hell right now along with their manky fans.  And hopefully it only gets worse for them as Rangers pull further clear in the title race.  

 

Take your medicine Celtic.

:JJ: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, NANOJAMBO said:

It was not a "staunch" anything so ditch the deliberately emotional language and debate the simple point : Hearts overspend just like Rangers do or stop embarrassing yourself. 

 

You haven't suggested anything anywhere that could somehow be construed as a suggestion that Rangers and Hearts are "football friends" by any chance have you?

Just wondering...  😄

Link to post
Share on other sites

We get to see Rangers blow an 11 point lead, or Celtic failing to achieve 10 IAR.

 

Either outcome works for me, so I'll be loving whatever happens with these mobs, come end of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Cruyff said:

Rangers smoking this league is very :pleasing:

Hopefully Lemon can cling on to his job until Christmas. 

 

Lennon will get to the cup final, may be his last game as manager. If the players want rid of him it could well be in our favour!

Link to post
Share on other sites
KyleLafferty

How anyone can slag Mcinnes as a manager is beyond belief. They are always the best of the rest which what we should be. Has to rebuild most years and still gets 3rd. He should have won a trophy or two but at least he gets to semis and finals.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, KyleLafferty said:

How anyone can slag Mcinnes as a manager is beyond belief. They are always the best of the rest which what we should be. Has to rebuild most years and still gets 3rd. He should have won a trophy or two but at least he gets to semis and finals.

 

McInnes has achieved great consistency.

 

Just that level above like Celtic in Cup semi, they seem to really struggle with. A clue as to their strength being their weakness. That way they play of being very solid v weaker teams can get blown away by quality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...