Armageddon Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 hour ago, il Duce McTarkin said: Dan Wooton is definitely one of the good guys. What about Martin Branning though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costanza Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Dan Wooton is a Grade A ****. I hope this clarifies matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Feel under dressed watching it, unless I'm wearing a Allgemeine SS uniform 🧐 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 43 minutes ago, henrysmithsgloves said: Feel under dressed watching it, unless I'm wearing a Allgemeine SS uniform 🧐 You after one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 34 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said: You after one? 🤣🤣🤫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PH Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 7 hours ago, Costanza said: Dan Wooton is a Grade A ****. I hope this clarifies matters. It might, for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 12 hours ago, Sir PH said: Did you forget to post that Dan Wootton had been cleared by both the Met and Police Scotland? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/media/2024/feb/21/dan-wootton-cleared-of-alleged-criminal-behaviour-after-six-month-investigation Wootton is a utter cretin. He falls into the Salmond camp of self-confessed "errors of judgment" that haven't transgressed the boundaries of legality. If he is the shining knight of morality and that is the moral highground that gammons, incels, conspiracy nuts and alt-right snowflakes want to pin their hopes on, so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PH Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 16 minutes ago, Gundermann said: Wootton is a utter cretin. He falls into the Salmond camp of self-confessed "errors of judgment" that haven't transgressed the boundaries of legality. If he is the shining knight of morality and that is the moral highground that gammons, incels, conspiracy nuts and alt-right snowflakes want to pin their hopes on, so be it. He's been cleared. Your perception of him doesn't really matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 43 minutes ago, Sir PH said: He's been cleared. Your perception of him doesn't really matter. Correct on both counts . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 12 hours ago, il Duce McTarkin said: You after one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 5 hours ago, Sir PH said: He's been cleared. Your perception of him doesn't really matter. "Met Police dropped their investigation" doesn't entirely fill me with confidence either way. With or without those allegations hanging over him, it still remains that the guy comes across as deeply unpleasant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 36 minutes ago, I P Knightley said: "Met Police dropped their investigation" doesn't entirely fill me with confidence either way. With or without those allegations hanging over him, it still remains that the guy comes across as deeply unpleasant. Apparently still being investigated by The Sun relating to his time with them. That's a pretty low bar for moral standards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, I P Knightley said: "Met Police dropped their investigation" doesn't entirely fill me with confidence either way. With or without those allegations hanging over him, it still remains that the guy comes across as deeply unpleasant. 1 hour ago, Tazio said: Apparently still being investigated by The Sun relating to his time with them. That's a pretty low bar for moral standards. I’m betting you won’t have the attitude when / if Sturgeon is exonerated ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PH Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 12 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I’m betting you won’t have the attitude when / if Sturgeon is exonerated ! Innocent only means Innocent when it suits them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 14 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I’m betting you won’t have the attitude when / if Sturgeon is exonerated ! My feelings on Dan Wootton are entirely independent of the allegations against Nicola Sturgeon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 13 minutes ago, Sir PH said: Innocent only means Innocent when it suits them. Exactly 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 39 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I’m betting you won’t have the attitude when / if Sturgeon is exonerated ! Your obsession with her is quite worrying, I'd be utterly amazed if you can find a single post on here from me expressing any support or admiration for her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Tazio said: Your obsession with her is quite worrying, I'd be utterly amazed if you can find a single post on here from me expressing any support or admiration for her. It’s certainly weird behaviour from that poster but not unexpected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 I'm sure that if and when the investigation into Sturgeon ever ends and it turns out she hasn't committed any criminal act then the thousands of posts convicting her will be retracted. Not being a hypocrit and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, Tazio said: Your obsession with her is quite worrying, I'd be utterly amazed if you can find a single post on here from me expressing any support or admiration for her. Cool story bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 14 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Cool story bro Aw naw. I’ve been GIF’d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 7 minutes ago, Tazio said: Aw naw. I’ve been GIF’d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 12 hours ago, Sir PH said: He's been cleared. Your perception of him doesn't really matter. Not mine, on my own. But enough perceptions of him have compelled him to become a vlogger on You Tube. Some way from the highs of daytime telly and major newspaper gigs. Basically, no ordinary person would trust him as the boss of their son/ daughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PH Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 12 hours ago, Gundermann said: Not mine, on my own. But enough perceptions of him have compelled him to become a vlogger on You Tube. Some way from the highs of daytime telly and major newspaper gigs. Basically, no ordinary person would trust him as the boss of their son/ daughter. To be fair, telly, and especially newspapers, are not the main sources of news info these days. He's already a very wealthy man, and will no doubt make even more through his youtube channel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 There are all kinds of people in this world but the fact that there are folk out there that don't want to punch Dan Wootton in the face absolutely blows my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 2 hours ago, Sooperstar said: There are all kinds of people in this world but the fact that there are folk out there that don't want to punch Dan Wootton in the face absolutely blows my mind. How easily must your little mind be "blown"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 9 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: How easily must your little mind be "blown"? And such violent language too . Maybe needs anger management classes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PH Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 6 hours ago, Sooperstar said: There are all kinds of people in this world but the fact that there are folk out there that don't want to punch Dan Wootton in the face absolutely blows my mind. Ah, the good old, tolerant left..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis Reynolds Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Quote In order to do that, I need your support, especially so that I am able to travel to where the news is breaking The grift is strong with this one. Muh free speeeech. Few lapdugs on here I'm sure have already parted with some hard earned beans for the chance to s̶e̶n̶d̶ h̶i̶m̶ o̶n̶ h̶o̶l̶i̶d̶a̶y̶ join one of his special zoom calls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 26 Author Share Posted March 26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 14 minutes ago, Gundermann said: Its an investment they are happy with. Shaping the news agenda quite nicely. And well placed for the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 2 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: Its an investment they are happy with. Shaping the news agenda quite nicely. And well placed for the election. It demonstrates the length these spivs will go to try and control the narrative. With such a narrow audience you have to wonder why though? Presenters like Rees Mogg, McVey and Lee Anderson are hardly going to attract the average viewer so there must be a point when they go down the streaming route like Murdoch. They'll still have their market of permanently outraged screechbots trawling for reasons to be angry and it would be a damn sight cheaper than losing £30 odd million a year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Just now, i wish jj was my dad said: It demonstrates the length these spivs will go to try and control the narrative. With such a narrow audience you have to wonder why though? Presenters like Rees Mogg, McVey and Lee Anderson are hardly going to attract the average viewer so there must be a point when they go down the streaming route like Murdoch. They'll still have their market of permanently outraged screechbots trawling for reasons to be angry and it would be a damn sight cheaper than losing £30 odd million a year You never watch it do you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Just now, Seymour M Hersh said: You never watch it do you. I've seen clips - from on here I think. Dreadful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Just now, i wish jj was my dad said: I've seen clips - from on here I think. Dreadful. You should watch a couple of shows. They always have balance with their guests so you do get both sides of an argument. It might surprise you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Just now, Seymour M Hersh said: You should watch a couple of shows. They always have balance with their guests so you do get both sides of an argument. It might surprise you. I'll be sure to tune in. I've heard Rees Mogg get his arse handed to him - might have been shown on Newsnight so you might be onto something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 5 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: You should watch a couple of shows. They always have balance with their guests so you do get both sides of an argument. It might surprise you. Sort of. Anytime the main presenter or Tory argument is genuinely contested they quickly change the question, or in Wootons case, make a shite joke about the extreme left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 6 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: You should watch a couple of shows. They always have balance with their guests so you do get both sides of an argument. It might surprise you. Balance 😂 3 guests/presenters with one view shouting down the token guest with the opposite view. Or the 'balance' providing guest joining by sattelite link and being shut off when they start to get their point across. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 16 minutes ago, i wish jj was my dad said: It demonstrates the length these spivs will go to try and control the narrative. With such a narrow audience you have to wonder why though? Presenters like Rees Mogg, McVey and Lee Anderson are hardly going to attract the average viewer so there must be a point when they go down the streaming route like Murdoch. They'll still have their market of permanently outraged screechbots trawling for reasons to be angry and it would be a damn sight cheaper than losing £30 odd million a year Bear in mind also though that the rest of the media reports what happens on GB News. They are helping shape the debate. Certainly influencing the Conservative Party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB52 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 7 minutes ago, Sooperstar said: Balance 😂 3 guests/presenters with one view shouting down the token guest with the opposite view. Or the 'balance' providing guest joining by sattelite link and being shut off when they start to get their point across. It's as balanced as FOX news, where they have 4 raving Maga nutters and 1 sane woman trying to insert some sanity into their discussions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 17 minutes ago, i wish jj was my dad said: It demonstrates the length these spivs will go to try and control the narrative. With such a narrow audience you have to wonder why though? Presenters like Rees Mogg, McVey and Lee Anderson are hardly going to attract the average viewer so there must be a point when they go down the streaming route like Murdoch. They'll still have their market of permanently outraged screechbots trawling for reasons to be angry and it would be a damn sight cheaper than losing £30 odd million a year Their "Business model" is not to have the highest viewership figures for their broadcasts. As Mikey says, they're investing in a brand and building influence, however unsavoury, through the use of social media, with folk watching snippets of their output on Twitter and JKB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 25 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Bear in mind also though that the rest of the media reports what happens on GB News. They are helping shape the debate. Certainly influencing the Conservative Party. I think that is the point. Other news platforms report what GB News say which does end up reaching the wider audience. I suspect they are following that strategy because of the disproportionate exposure Farage got from more credible news channels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 26 Author Share Posted March 26 54 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Bear in mind also though that the rest of the media reports what happens on GB News. They are helping shape the debate. Certainly influencing the Conservative Party. They appeal to the extreme elements though some of recent departees are now calling GB "too woke". It is reported but rarely for anything groundbreaking or noteworthy - usually for borderline legality or schisms. Sure, the Tories are on board but GB is helping grow the schisms there too. On the other hand, it pushes the political centre-ground further to the right which means that conservatism and xenophobia wins be it Tory or Labour in No.10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 (edited) 2 hours ago, Seymour M Hersh said: You never watch it do you. Course he doesn’t . He’s blames everything on the “ right wing media” or “ tufton street “ , 😂😂 it’s boring as deck now . Bla bla bla Edited March 26 by JudyJudyJudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Is it at this point that I am supposed to post a stupid gif and squeal about obsession? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 (edited) You know what JJ , god love you , you’re consistent if anything ! Edited March 26 by JudyJudyJudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 6 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: Its an investment they are happy with. Shaping the news agenda quite nicely. And well placed for the election. Exactly, it's owned and operated by billionaires; they don't give a toss how much money it loses as long as it's pushing the message, driving the national media narrative and getting away with being little than a Tory propaganda channel because the regulator is feckin useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 I think the responses confirm a total lack of watching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 13 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: I think the responses confirm a total lack of watching. Too busy watching RT 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 27 Author Share Posted March 27 Lozza Fox... 😆 In a hole with a spade and still digging. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.7d2eb04fc6e1ac22a4f023ea64cda41e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.