better_call_saul Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 🎣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, bean counter said: Well thank F%$* for that I'm in for over 8 hours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Griswold Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, bean counter said: Well thank F%$* for that I'm in for over 8 hours You’d have to resort to counting those beans again Edited July 3, 2020 by Clark Griswold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GorgieRules22 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 No been a goal for a while ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, GBJambo said: It’s free if you have inclusive mins on your contract! Yeah, just checked that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruyff Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, GBJambo said: It’s free if you have inclusive mins on your contract! I know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewB Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Folk really could make the mod's job easier by not posting things that only get deleted a moment later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stendel'sGorgieArmy Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 I've given up for the time being. There is boring, then there is this bit.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyces beard Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 12 minutes ago, Ricardo Quaresma said: How much is this per min? Here are the costs for calling the 020 number, sorry if already posted. Summary of 020 numbers UK telephone numbers starting with 020 area codes are generally registered to new numbers in the capital city of London by default, however there can be exceptions. Calls to these numbers are only free if you have inclusive minutes remaining on your mobile tariff or you have a free landline calls bundle. Otherwise you have to pay an access charge to your provider followed by a per-minute rate, note that these charges may be higher for mobile customers therefore you should consider phoning 020 numbers from a landline handset if you have run out of minutes. Minimum cost of calling 020 numbers on UK networks Lowest 020 call charges for EE customers: you will have to pay 30p plus a 44p access charge if calling from a pay as you go mobile. Alternatively EE landline customers can call 020 numbers for just 12.5p plus a 20p connection fee. Phoning 020 numbers on O2 Pay & Go will cost you 30p per minute plus a one-off access fee of 30p. Minimum cost of calling 020 numbers on Vodafone: you will pay 11.5p per minute (19p access fee) if you use your landline, alternatively if you phone London numbers from a Vodafone pay as you go handset you will pay 30p to connect the call followed by 30p per minute thereafter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruyff Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Nah its like £0.44 per minute on a landlines with no calls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Cruyff said: Nah its like £0.44 per minute on a landlines with no calls. Moneyspinner tie for the courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Got unlimited mins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plato Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 I am getting that terrible feeling that this is all going to go pear shaped for HMFC. That Killie (1965) Dundee 86) sinking feeling. Hope not but is just a feeling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Let's be clear: The SPFL DO NOT want a court to be involved and they DO NOT want to share documents.... ....anyone with any amount of common sense can work out why! Surely to goodness! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruyff Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, davemclaren said: Moneyspinner tie for the courts. The Judge will be a rockstar. This would be a huge case for him to preside over. Has to be streamed live. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hackney Hearts Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, Steve said: Let's be clear: The SPFL DO NOT want a court to be involved and they DO NOT want to share documents.... ....anyone with any amount of common sense can work out why! Surely to goodness! You’d think, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartsofgold Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, davemclaren said: Moneyspinner tie for the courts. Courts make nothing out of it but line providers will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Bacon Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Hackney Hearts said: You’d think, right? It's like there is a sensible solution that causes no harm to clubs, it's a slam dunk to get a vote approved, isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Hung up Full of shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Earlier in the thread (quite a bit earlier tbh) people were talking about this case setting a precedent. Now can anyone tell me if Judges are very keen to avoid doing this or are they keen to be the ones setting the precedent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo61 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Seymour M Hersh said: Earlier in the thread (quite a bit earlier tbh) people were talking about this case setting a precedent. Now can anyone tell me if Judges are very keen to avoid doing this or are they keen to be the ones setting the precedent? Maybes aye, maybes not! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylhmfc1 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 (edited) Can folk stop posting crap about phones n stuff, wading through tons of guff trying to find out pertanent info😁🧐 Edited July 3, 2020 by darylhmfc1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, Heartsofgold said: Courts make nothing out of it but line providers will. Once upon a time these lines used to make money for both BT and the line operator. When they first appeared there was a story (that may have been urban myth) going about that some crooks got a lot of lines to call out to a fictional number they set up with BT. The story goes the number was being called 24/7 by these lines and BT paid out the imaginary company's monthly cut before getting in the revenue. Rumoured to be a couple of hundred thousand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartsofgold Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: Earlier in the thread (quite a bit earlier tbh) people were talking about this case setting a precedent. Now can anyone tell me if Judges are very keen to avoid doing this or are they keen to be the ones setting the precedent? It'll depend on how popular the precedent is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluorescent Adolescent Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Neil Dongcaster said: Speaking from experience, delete your post. Best not to quote it either, m8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruyff Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: Earlier in the thread (quite a bit earlier tbh) people were talking about this case setting a precedent. Now can anyone tell me if Judges are very keen to avoid doing this or are they keen to be the ones setting the precedent? Keen imo. Then their name is up in lights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Heartsofgold said: It'll depend on how popular the precedent is. How do you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Feel sorry for the Judge as he's going to have to sift through this shit all weekend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Dongcaster Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Fluorescent Adolescent said: Best not to quote it either, m8 Dunno what you are referring to. 🤫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Dongcaster Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Ricardo Quaresma said: Feel sorry for the Judge as he's going to have to sift through this shit all weekend What do you think he has been doing for weeks now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, Cruyff said: Keen imo. Then their name is up in lights. I suppose it depends then how big an ego they have. No offence meant M'lud! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, darylhmfc1 said: Can folk stop posting crap about phones n stuff, wading through tons of guff trying to find out pertanent info😁🧐 You need 500 posts to request this sort of thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, Neil Dongcaster said: What do you think he has been doing for weeks now? Don't think it's been this bad for weeks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, Ricardo Quaresma said: Feel sorry for the Judge as he's going to have to sift through this shit all weekend Now he knows how we feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Is boreland's name a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamboelite Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, AlphonseCapone said: Is boreland's name a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Is he still going ?? Surely lunch soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonedinoz Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 So what’s the current consensus on it going our way? 60%? 40%? what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewB Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Keep coming on here wondering when the thread title will change. And peeking through my fingers in case it has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, Jamboelite said: Is he still going ?? Surely lunch soon. Lunch can't be far away. I know there are people out there that are prone to repeating themselves but it's so much worse when the topic they are covering is so technical and boring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vladisacoward Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Punted straight to the SFA for a variety of reasons not the least of which will be boredom with all this dross on something that, in the grand scheme of things, isn’t that important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartsofgold Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 5 minutes ago, Seymour M Hersh said: How do you mean? Well, this precedent could see Celtic have their title annulled (doubtful but not out of the question). It will also see 2 minor clubs lose promotion (more likely on my opinion). Celtic being denied 9IR may cause some of their more 'enthusiastic' supporters to seek a bit of payback from the judge. However the main thing is this would set, in Scot's Law, a precedent regarding the arbitration and settlement of disputes between companies and even constituent companies of larger holding corporations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newton51 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 They broke for lunch about 1pm previously so would presume same again today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluorescent Adolescent Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 minute ago, vladisacoward said: Punted straight to the SFA for a variety of reasons not the least of which will be boredom with all this dross on something that, in the grand scheme of things, isn’t that important. You hope anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, maroonedinoz said: So what’s the current consensus on it going our way? 60%? 40%? what? 50/50, no one knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylhmfc1 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 9 minutes ago, Ricardo Quaresma said: You need 500 posts to request this sort of thing 😂 Fair enough, ill get back in my box! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Boy Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, vladisacoward said: Punted straight to the SFA for a variety of reasons not the least of which will be boredom with all this dross on something that, in the grand scheme of things, isn’t that important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMJ_1874 Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, Heartsofgold said: Well, this precedent could see Celtic have their title annulled (doubtful but not out of the question). It will also see 3 minor clubs lose promotion (more likely on my opinion). Celtic being denied 9IR may cause some of their more 'enthusiastic' supporters to seek a bit of payback from the judge. However the main thing is this would set, in Scot's Law, a precedent regarding the arbitration and settlement of disputes between companies and even constituent companies of larger holding corporations. FTFY bud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluorescent Adolescent Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 Just now, Special Officer Doofy said: Not that important, but he’ll be glued to ‘various‘ online platforms currently. Obvious vermin is obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyces beard Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, vladisacoward said: Punted straight to the SFA for a variety of reasons not the least of which will be boredom with all this dross on something that, in the grand scheme of things, isn’t that important. Quite like your point of view at the moment! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruyff Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 5 minutes ago, vladisacoward said: Punted straight to the SFA for a variety of reasons not the least of which will be boredom with all this dross on something that, in the grand scheme of things, isn’t that important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.