I P Knightley Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 . Uncanny! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I don't remember which character Mayall spotted a goatee for but the photo of Whyte being escorted to court made me think immediately of Rik. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tartofmidlothian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 . Uncanny! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Shooter B'stard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldar Hadzimehmedovic Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Keeping to the Rik Mayall theme, he looks like Lord Flashheart in the recent pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tartofmidlothian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Many self made businessmen also have a degree of arrogance about them - they know best, and I'd guess that Whyte's gamble was based on CL qualification - when that didn't happen the whole house of cards came tumbling down. I'd love to know how much the Kaunas defeat contributed to where they are now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 If Ashley underwrites the share issue then he is potentially committing to take up all the new shares and pump his money into the club to allow the spivs to continue to bleed it dry. I just can't see him doing this, unless it's in return for him getting control of the stadium / MP. He didn't even take up his own option on the previous rights issue, instead buying a chunk of shares on the open market which allowed him to increase his holding without giving money to the club. He then waited until they were on the verge of running out of cash before offering his loans, in return for security over some of the heritable assets. His behaviour has been inconsistent to say the least. It's too long since I studied tax to be able to say whether he's "investment" pattern is shielding his other earnings but I strggle to think why he would underwrite a new share issue. If he wanted to have ?1brox, he'd need to lend as equity shares, by definition, carry no security, meaning hed stand to lose all cash invested at the next liquidation. His recent loans support the theory of an asset grab - as well as allowing him to buy control on the cheap. His earlier refusal to take up rights would also support a strategy of lending with security. His buying shares on the "open market" (helping out a mate who needed to ditch them?) doesnt tally with anything that makes sense to me. Many self made CONMEN also have a degree of arrogance about them - they know best, and I'd guess that Whyte's gamble was based on CL qualification - when that didn't happen the whole house of cards came tumbling down.A slight alteration there. Was Whyte ever a successful businessman? If he was, where did his successful businesses go once he came into ?1brox? I have a suspicion that he has been a front man all along for people far more financially successful and ruthless than him. Either that or his 'off the radar wealth' was down to some kind of Ponzi scheme as, indeed, was his use of Ticketus to fund the acquisition of Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gasman Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 By the way - how did a complete con man and an obvious flight risk get bail ? Probably forced to surrender his passport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Keeping to the Rik Mayall theme, he looks like Lord Flashheart in the recent pic. Flash by name, Flash by nature. Woof! I'm getting more of a Branson vibe from him now myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Tsk Edited November 29, 2014 by Smithee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Probably forced to surrender his passport. That's my point though. Con men can get round that sort of thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Swanson Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Probably forced to surrender his passport.So much for no surrender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franco Fascione Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Whyte should be commended for his efforts in messing up that horrible bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allowayjambo1874 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Don't know if its been mentioned but the union bears (whoever they are) have called off their boycott and asked people to go back to ibrox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Rangers fans thinking it's all down to Whyte.... Deary me That is the story that will be told to comfort themselves that it is actually Sir David Murray, Graeme Souness, Walter Smith, Dick Advocaat, Ally McCoist, their Fans superiority complex / sense of entitlement that is the root cause of their demise, their liquidation and subsequent spunking another ?70M since then. They are not a viable business or football club they are a vanity project. 50k attendances are only possible with constant success / constant overspending to achieve that. They are now scraping the bottom of funding options and will accept anyone who will let the pretence continue, sadly so will our football "authorities" feckin charlatans.. Edited November 29, 2014 by Charlie-Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchmul Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Rangers fans thinking it's all down to Whyte.... Deary me They have been conned by SDM & the succulent lamb eating reporters. SDM knew exactly what he was doing and who he was selling to, remember, whyte was described as having "wealth off the radar" by the scottish press. Re any future share issue, ashley won't underwrite that, not a chance. I would imagine that right now he is trying to consolidate and strengthen his position regarding rangers retail and as soon as that is completed, he'll get out of dodge. including getting rid of his shares, all he is interested in is watertight contracts for the kit and merchandising, anything else has no interest for him. Sevco are a disaster of a company and just burn cash, it's the way they have been set up, the spivs are picking the carcass clean, they will go bust, and then we will see t'rangers mark 3. Their latest accounts are a complete omnishambles and things have deteriorated since june this year - 2.8m raised in a share issue - gone, 3m in loans(repayable in april 2015) required for october and november payroll now almost gone, suppliers unpaid(expect legal action very soon on recovering payments), not enough money for december payroll, auditors saying that they are not a going concern and can't meet their day to day obligations. Any company doing business with them should now be requesting cash on delivery. If they manage to get to january(which is 50/50 right now) expect players to go, Wallace and mcleod probably, as they are the only players that anyone else might want. If they are lucky they may get cash up front for them but it isn't going to be much as every one knows they need the cash which makes it a buyers market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasavallan Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 So "off the radar wealth" actually means money that you haven't got. The SFA are not going to come out of this without a bit of mud sticking. Their means of checking if Whyte was banned from holding directorships was to just ask him and when he said he wasn't to go "that's fine, then, you'll do". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackhallJambo Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 That's my point though. Con men can get round that sort of thing. Will Whyte be able to cope with jail with half of the inmates gunning for him. No danger. Unless his lawyers are giving absolute guarantees he will not be found guilty, which they clearly cannot, he will disappear into the night IMO using his dodgy mates to get him a fake passport. And this time making sure he disappears to a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 So "off the radar wealth" actually means money that you haven't got. The SFA are not going to come out of this without a bit of mud sticking. Their means of checking if Whyte was banned from holding directorships was to just ask him and when he said he wasn't to go "that's fine, then, you'll do". The SFA (and SPL/SPFL) will continue on their Teflon coated way I am afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) The SFA (and SPL/SPFL) will continue on their Teflon coated way I am afraid. 5 way agreements, ignoring their own rules, the law of the land and deliberately misleading one of Scotland's top law lords. All for one club and protecting all those (bar Whyte) associated with it. What a mess. Edited November 29, 2014 by DETTY29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasavallan Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 The SFA (and SPL/SPFL) will continue on their Teflon coated way I am afraid. What does one expect with FIFA as the pathfinder. Rules are for our members, not for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 What does one expect with FIFA as the pathfinder. Rules are for our diddy members, not for us or our masters. FTFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart McNeill Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) EDIT : phone screwed up and sent a reply. Edited November 29, 2014 by Stuart McNeill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobNox Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 They have been conned by SDM & the succulent lamb eating reporters. SDM knew exactly what he was doing and who he was selling to, remember, whyte was described as having "wealth off the radar" by the scottish press. Re any future share issue, ashley won't underwrite that, not a chance. I would imagine that right now he is trying to consolidate and strengthen his position regarding rangers retail and as soon as that is completed, he'll get out of dodge. including getting rid of his shares, all he is interested in is watertight contracts for the kit and merchandising, anything else has no interest for him. Sevco are a disaster of a company and just burn cash, it's the way they have been set up, the spivs are picking the carcass clean, they will go bust, and then we will see t'rangers mark 3. Their latest accounts are a complete omnishambles and things have deteriorated since june this year - 2.8m raised in a share issue - gone, 3m in loans(repayable in april 2015) required for october and november payroll now almost gone, suppliers unpaid(expect legal action very soon on recovering payments), not enough money for december payroll, auditors saying that they are not a going concern and can't meet their day to day obligations. Any company doing business with them should now be requesting cash on delivery. If they manage to get to january(which is 50/50 right now) expect players to go, Wallace and mcleod probably, as they are the only players that anyone else might want. If they are lucky they may get cash up front for them but it isn't going to be much as every one knows they need the cash which makes it a buyers market. How long to go on these players' contracts and how much are they earning? They won't willingly move for a pay cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allowayjambo1874 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 How long to go on these players' contracts and how much are they earning? They won't willingly move for a pay cut. Shamelessly cut from bears den: Here is the list of summer expiries- McCulloch Miller Boyd Black Daly Moshni Smith Hutton Foster Simonsen Robinson Faure 2016 McGregor Shiels Templeton Clark Zaliukas Law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allowayjambo1874 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 They can all sign pre contracts with other clubs in Jan too. Serious question mate, who would want them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 The shirt sales thing is a real belter. I know it got mentioned yesterday but for the daily ranger to print it will drive home the Ashley being in it for Ashley to the orcs!! Savior my erse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Serious question mate, who would want them? We could take Wallace, as back up to Eckersley whilst McHattie is out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 The shirt sales thing is a real belter. I know it got mentioned yesterday but for the daily ranger to print it will drive home the Ashley being in it for Ashley to the orcs!! Savior my erse. Make no mistake Mike Ashley has saved Rangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Make no mistake Mike Ashley has saved Rangers Of this there can be no mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armageddon Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Shamelessly cut from bears den: Here is the list of summer expiries- McCulloch Miller Boyd Black Daly Moshni Smith Hutton Foster Simonsen Robinson Faure 2016 McGregor Shiels Templeton Clark Zaliukas Law Isn't Gatusso coming back though??? Haha I feel a little sorry for their pantomime villain, Murray, Walter, Green, Whyte, Ahmed, Sally, that speccy finance boy, Duff & Phlaps and all the others are just as culpable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alva-Jambo Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Am I right in seeing that they have about 51 players on the books? The difference , the ?8Million, seems to be mostly getting spent on them. Get the player total to 20, and they will balance their books . Mind , I don't care, and I suspect neither does Ashley, who will simply mop up the assets for pennies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo mark Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 They're total wages fell by 3.2m as staff numbers dropped by 21 people .... That's ?152,380 each per annum!! Wholly bajingo!! Also the first team wages are 26% of turnover. Is that not a pretty decent figure in the grand scheme of things? It just shows money must be disappearing down the rabbit whole to wonderland!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allowayjambo1874 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 They're total wages fell by 3.2m as staff numbers dropped by 21 people .... That's ?152,380 each per annum!! Wholly bajingo!! Also the first team wages are 26% of turnover. Is that not a pretty decent figure in the grand scheme of things? It just shows money must be disappearing down the rabbit whole to wonderland!' Smoking mirrors about methinks. Playing staff budget wise is actually ok % to turnover. McCoist, McDowell and Durrant are rumoured to cost ?1.3m per year, given Sally is on 16k per week the other 2 must be on about roughly ?4.5k per week. This is the problem, not the players but the other personnel connected to the playing staff. All on big bucks (Scottish football wise). Put that into perspective, will Robbie even be on ?4.5k a week and we are 3rd biggest club in Scotland. Previous years accounts gave wages as 97% of turnover (if I recall correctly) and Radio Clyde 'revealed' that the kit man at Ibrox earned more than all but 7 Scottish football team managers. Needs a total cull and realistic people/wages put in, but it may be too late even for that. I would think this is exactly where Ashley will try and change things, however there will be much squealing and negative press as people get pushed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Also the first team wages are 26% of turnover. Is that not a pretty decent figure in the grand scheme of things? It just shows money must be disappearing down the rabbit whole to wonderland!' Smoking mirrors about methinks. Playing staff budget wise is actually ok % to turnover. It should be noted that they are saying first team wages at 26%, not all wages, or all football wages as other clubs do. I doubt Ally and co's wages are included. And just to repeat; the first teams wages at 26% of turnover.Their turnover was ?25million. So a first team wage bill in excess of ?6 million, to win the third division, against part-time players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Using the same measure as everyone else the ratio was 58%, coincidentally the same as Celtic. Hearts last published number for 2012/13 was 74%. We will get the 2014 figure in a couple of weeks time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Rangers 1st team basic wages at 26% of turnover. Basic. More fudge please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambovambo Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/wise-guy/#more-5365 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/wise-guy/#more-5365 Do people still read his shite? He's clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathgatejt Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 90% of sport direct staff are on zero hour contracts perhaps mike Ashley will have all the Huns on zero hour contracts aswell so they only get paid for total hours of work and no Salary s to pay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/wise-guy/#more-5365Considering this guy wrote for a paper printed by Sinn Fein I would think he will over egg everything ?18-?20m to do the stadium up, aye right. Thank **** we managed to get rid of our charlatan and are now on a stable foothold they just seem to go from one tosser to another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Considering this guy wrote for a paper printed by Sinn Fein I would think he will over egg everything ?18-?20m to do the stadium up, aye right.Thank **** we managed to get rid of our charlatan and are now on a stable foothold they just seem to go from one tosser to another. Seems to be pretty common knowledge though that the stadium is in a pretty poor state of repair though. That in it's self would seem to call into question why Ashley would ever take the stadium as security over any loan he might make to them, well knowing that if they did go tits up he would be left holding an asset that might well need several million pounds spent on it to make safe and serviceable. Seems to me that they are heading for the buffers at a rate of knots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkishcap Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Zero hours contract bugs me as I used to be on one myself, no wonder the bugger is rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Seems to be pretty common knowledge though that the stadium is in a pretty poor state of repair though. That in it's self would seem to call into question why Ashley would ever take the stadium as security over any loan he might make to them, well knowing that if they did go tits up he would be left holding an asset that might well need several million pounds spent on it to make safe and serviceable. Seems to me that they are heading for the buffers at a rate of knots.Perhaps ?3-4m but ?18-20m Feck me you could build a new stadium for that, obviously not as big as ibrox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rods Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Perhaps ?3-4m but ?18-20m Feck me you could build a new stadium for that, obviously not as big as ibrox. He is clearly just spraffing now he knows nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahim Tall Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Perhaps ?3-4m but ?18-20m Feck me you could build a new stadium for that, obviously not as big as ibrox. To be fair it would probably cost atleast ?150m to build a brand new stadium the size of Ibrox so ?18m for 'major renovations' isn't that bad. Not saying the fantasist is telling the truth in this case but the numbers aren't that unrealistic if things are as bad as claimed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 To be fair it would probably cost atleast ?150m to build a brand new stadium the size of Ibrox so ?18m for 'major renovations' isn't that bad. Not saying the fantasist is telling the truth in this case but the numbers aren't that unrealistic if things are as bad as claimed. But it's not really "major renovations" though if that's what he's on about bloody hell big stores install new lifts all the time and it doesn't cost ?18m,just have a look at the guys profile and you'll see why he's saying things like that, relly no one knows whats going on there now I suppose the hun fans will just have to hope that it works out for the better like it did for us but I would think that they will have more enemies closer to home to stop any good will unlike us, we were dealing with foreigners who didn't really have any agendas against Heart of Midlothian football club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Perhaps ?3-4m but ?18-20m Feck me you could build a new stadium for that, obviously not as big as ibrox. There was some talk of major safety concerns about the Club Deck there. Has it been open this season? I would doubt that Ashley would see spending lots of money on Ibrox as a good investment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 He is clearly just spraffing now he knows nothingHas been the case for quite a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wibble Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Ashley leaking scare stories to Philmacgullible to bring down the amount he has to loan to get security over Ibrox? Clever move if that's the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Slim Stylee Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Ashley leaking scare stories to Philmacgullible to bring down the amount he has to loan to get security over Ibrox? Clever move if that's the case. To be fair he probably has bigger media friends to leak stuff to than that gutter-crawling spraff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgie rd eh11 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Considering this guy wrote for a paper printed by Sinn Fein I would think he will over egg everything ?18-?20m to do the stadium up, aye right. Thank **** we managed to get rid of our charlatan and are now on a stable foothold they just seem to go from one tosser to another. Rudi getting uptight at any criticism of rangers or the sfa, there's a surprise. Are you andy davis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts