cazzyy Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 5 hours ago, highlandjambo3 said: Sorry……I’ve a habit of loggin in a not reading back previous posts…..my bad 🙄 Sorry, my post came across a bit aggressive and it wasn't meant to 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highlandjambo3 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, cazzyy said: Sorry, my post came across a bit aggressive and it wasn't meant to 👍 Too late…..the lads are on their way 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock _turd Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) 1 hour ago, By The Light.. said: Where are you seeing that? I think that is incorrect to be honest. It seems like 6 hours ago, By The Light.. said: I think its six Search this - How many bookings before suspension in Scotland? I think you are right here are the rules. It is a bit ambiguous though you could read that as meaning if you do not get 5 in the first 19 games then you need to acumulate a total of ten efore game 32 to get a two match suspension? This seems a bit leanient in as much as say you only had one in the first 19 games you would in effect have the luxury of having 9 in the next 13 games and a possible 5 from the next 6 games ! The current rules this season stipulate that any player accumulating a certain number of yellow cards will face disciplinary action in the form of match bans. It works on the following principles: Five yellows accumulated before match week 19 results in a one-match ban. Ten yellows accumulated by week 32 will result in a two-match ban. Fifteen yellows by week 38 means a three-match ban. Twenty yellows in a season can result in the Regulatory Commission punishing the player in a manner that they deem to be most fitting. Generally, the suspensions laid out above refer to league matches only, not tournaments. Edited February 19 by jock _turd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benny Factor Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 30 minutes ago, jock _turd said: I think that is incorrect to be honest. It seems like I think you are right here are the rules. It is a bit ambiguous though you could read that as meaning if you do not get 5 in the first 19 games then you need to acumulate a total of ten efore game 32 to get a two match suspension? This seems a bit leanient in as much as say you only had one in the first 19 games you would in effect have the luxury of having 9 in the next 13 games and a possible 5 from the next 6 games ! The current rules this season stipulate that any player accumulating a certain number of yellow cards will face disciplinary action in the form of match bans. It works on the following principles: Five yellows accumulated before match week 19 results in a one-match ban. Ten yellows accumulated by week 32 will result in a two-match ban. Fifteen yellows by week 38 means a three-match ban. Twenty yellows in a season can result in the Regulatory Commission punishing the player in a manner that they deem to be most fitting. Generally, the suspensions laid out above refer to league matches only, not tournaments. Where did you pluck that from, @jock _turd?????? As it definitely isn't anything to do with the SPFL. I've already given an example of a player this season getting a sixth yellow after game 19 and NOT being suspended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock _turd Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 13 minutes ago, Benny Factor said: Where did you pluck that from, @jock _turd?????? As it definitely isn't anything to do with the SPFL. I've already given an example of a player this season getting a sixth yellow after game 19 and NOT being suspended. Yer right I was looking at the wrong site! I was looking at the PFSA it has F'k all to do with the SPFL if is for the EPL 😂😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 On 19/02/2024 at 14:26, jock _turd said: Yer right I was looking at the wrong site! I was looking at the PFSA it has F'k all to do with the SPFL if is for the EPL 😂😂😂 Ya slaver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tynecastle Valhalla Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 It wasn’t a foul and it should not have been a yellow card but….. his heel did briefly catch the well player after the tackle which is why the referee acted one of those that a few years ago it would have been waved on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pasquale for King Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 15 hours ago, Tynecastle Valhalla said: It wasn’t a foul and it should not have been a yellow card but….. his heel did briefly catch the well player after the tackle which is why the referee acted one of those that a few years ago it would have been waved on They did collide but it was their player that ran into the back of Shanklands foot, he made contact and should’ve been a foul to us in Kingsley territory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambo85 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 16 hours ago, Tynecastle Valhalla said: It wasn’t a foul and it should not have been a yellow card but….. his heel did briefly catch the well player after the tackle which is why the referee acted one of those that a few years ago it would have been waved on I would argue that because Shankland was the one that clearly won the ball and the Motherwell player was late, it was actually Shankland that was fouled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john thomas Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Lambo85 said: I would argue that because Shankland was the one that clearly won the ball and the Motherwell player was late, it was actually Shankland that was fouled. Shankland played the ball , didn't win it , no tackle made . Then Motherwell player came in late . Not sure what ref saw but there should be a mechanism to give refs a chance to rescind these yellows after games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAndy Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Poor poor decision but a genuine mistake by ref as the contact (after the ball was played) was instigated by the Motherwell player. It's an issue for us if that booking contributes to keeping Shankland out a big game later in season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hackney Hearts Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 On 19/02/2024 at 02:24, jamborich said: So wrong on so many counts. The ball's not even in that picture! Shankland's left leg is on the ground before he clears the ball (bent back at the knee too, i.e. not leading with it). He toe pokes the clearance with his right. The Motherwell player is VERY late and is responsible for the contact. Even if both feet had been off the ground (they clearly weren't) - that doesn't mean automatic red card, otherwise anyone who does a bicycle kick would be sent off for a start!. This wasn't a tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pettigrewsstylist Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 hour ago, TexasAndy said: Poor poor decision but a genuine mistake by ref as the contact (after the ball was played) was instigated by the Motherwell player. It's an issue for us if that booking contributes to keeping Shankland out a big game later in season. The idea they cant be cancelled by panel, after all the time effort and expense of installing VAR is another folly. Its about putting entertainers on the pitch to improve our undervalued product. This just compounds the problem when these contribute to suspensions, red cards or players application for remainder of the match concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTT Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 21 hours ago, Hackney Hearts said: So wrong on so many counts. The ball's not even in that picture! Shankland's left leg is on the ground before he clears the ball (bent back at the knee too, i.e. not leading with it). He toe pokes the clearance with his right. The Motherwell player is VERY late and is responsible for the contact. Even if both feet had been off the ground (they clearly weren't) - that doesn't mean automatic red card, otherwise anyone who does a bicycle kick would be sent off for a start!. This wasn't a tackle. Its just more bad refereeing in Scottish football. There really needs to be a drive to improve standards. IMO that starts with stopping this weegie-centric promotion process. As things stand, if you're a talented referee in Aberdeen, Dundee or Edinburgh, you're wasting your time. Completely pissing in the wind, because absolute ****witts like David Munro and Son of Dallas are being overpromoted because of the local refereeing association they belong to. Proper punishment for bad calls. There doesn't seem to be any accountability whatsoever for referees making game defining errors - that is, unless its against the OF which just further feeds into the honest mistakes that we continually fall victim to in Glasgow. By promoting from across Scotland they would have a healthy and deep pool of referees to draw from. This would improve standards as competition to be a top ref would be fierce and force referees to be at the top of their game. Willie Collum has been a FIFA list referee since 2006, I don't think any fan has ever been impressed with Collums style of refereeing, nor his competence. I also find it hard to believe he's genuinely been one of the best referees at all times between 2006 and 2024 to justify his inclusion. I don't know what Crawford Allan actually does, because standards are if anything, getting worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Berry Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 23 hours ago, TexasAndy said: Poor poor decision but a genuine mistake by ref as the contact (after the ball was played) was instigated by the Motherwell player. It's an issue for us if that booking contributes to keeping Shankland out a big game later in season. Unless Shanks gets a further 7 bookings between now and the end of the season, he won't be suspended at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambo85 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 15 minutes ago, Chuck Berry said: Unless Shanks gets a further 7 bookings between now and the end of the season, he won't be suspended at all. Hopefully he doesn’t get booked for his goal celebration when he scores the winner at Ibrox on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAndy Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 hours ago, Chuck Berry said: Unless Shanks gets a further 7 bookings between now and the end of the season, he won't be suspended at all. Yeah but funnier things have happened. I was just making the point that bad decisions could potentially be costly even though unlikely in this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyRightPeg Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 He's guaranteed a yellow on Saturday. If he so much as makes contact with Goldson, he's gonna hit the deck and give Walsh a decision to make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.