jamborich Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 Controversial here I’ve watched it many times and was convinced it was never a booking however looking at it again his two feet are off the ground yes he gets the ball but if he didn’t it’s a red. yellow card for me is the right decision Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddysBar Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 40 minutes ago, jamborich said: Controversial here I’ve watched it many times and was convinced it was never a booking however looking at it again his two feet are off the ground yes he gets the ball but if he didn’t it’s a red. yellow card for me is the right decision Utter nonsense. Shankland got tackled after he cleared the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canscot Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 50 minutes ago, jamborich said: Controversial here I’ve watched it many times and was convinced it was never a booking however looking at it again his two feet are off the ground yes he gets the ball but if he didn’t it’s a red. yellow card for me is the right decision Nah. Even if his feet were up the Motherwell guy was late enough he could have avoided it but still stuck a foot in and the ref bought it. Imo of course😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just now, Canscot said: Nah. Even if his feet were up the Motherwell guy was late enough he could have avoided it but still stuck a foot in and the ref bought it. Imo of course😉 Doesn’t matter two foot tackle your off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 14 minutes ago, PaddysBar said: Utter nonsense. Shankland got tackled after he cleared the ball. Which part of two feet tackle do you don’t understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, jamborich said: Doesn’t matter two foot tackle your off 2 minutes ago, jamborich said: Which part of two feet tackle do you don’t understand You might want to watch it again. It’s not a two footed tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just now, Des Lynam said: You might want to watch it again. It’s not a two footed tackle. As I have said many times I’ve watched it many times he goes in with two feet off the ground, look let’s be thankful it’s not a red wonder why the club have not appealed it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, jamborich said: As I have said many times I’ve watched it many times he goes in with two feet off the ground, look let’s be thankful it’s not a red wonder why the club have not appealed it He goes in with one foot. The second is at his side. It wasn’t even a yellow let alone a red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: He goes in with one foot. The second is at his side. It wasn’t even a yellow let alone a red. It ends up at his side but it was a two footed two begin with yes looks a great clearance but his initial lunge is against the rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just now, jamborich said: It ends up at his side but it was a two footed toobegin with yes looks a great clearance but his initial lunge is against the rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, jamborich said: It ends up at his side but it was a two footed two begin with yes looks a great clearance but his initial lunge is against the rules Two too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 12 minutes ago, jamborich said: It ends up at his side but it was a two footed two begin with yes looks a great clearance but his initial lunge is against the rules Can you explain what rule covers going for a ball when no one else is in contact or control of it and then a player collides with you AFTER th ball has moved away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, brownkg said: Can you explain what rule covers going for a ball when no one else is in contact or control of it and then a player collides with you AFTER th ball has moved away Two foot off the ground it doesn’t matter if you won the ball it’s a dangerous tackle that’s the rules look I’m happy Shankland got a booking and not a sending off if he missed the tackle, let’s just move on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy2 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 12 minutes ago, brownkg said: Can you explain what rule covers going for a ball when no one else is in contact or control of it and then a player collides with you AFTER th ball has moved away Do not feed the troll. He’s obviously watched it many times hoping to come to the conclusion he has by drinking special brew after special brew. Nothing about that tackle made it a foul, let alone a yellow card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, Shaggy2 said: Do not feed the troll. He’s obviously watched it many times hoping to come to the conclusion he has by drinking special brew after special brew. Nothing about that tackle made it a foul, let alone a yellow card. Shut up ya twat please explain why hearts haven’t appealed it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 51 minutes ago, jamborich said: As I have said many times I’ve watched it many times he goes in with two feet off the ground, look let’s be thankful it’s not a red wonder why the club have not appealed it It wasn't a tackle because there was no one in possession of the ball. He won it before the Well player made contact with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 10 minutes ago, jamborich said: Shut up ya twat please explain why hearts haven’t appealed it Because you cannot appeal a yellow unless it is for mistaken identity or leads to a sending off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Because you cannot appeal a yellow unless it is for mistaken identity or leads to a sending off. Yep get that thanks for clearing up Geoff I got that wrong apologies to the guys I slagged still think there’s a rule that says shankland was lucky to get yellow rather than a red, anyway FTH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamborich Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Des Lynam said: You might want to watch it again. It’s not a two footed tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Never even a foul. I repeat, Well player kicked sole of Shanklands boot. He arrived after Shankland had got the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 hours ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Because you cannot appeal a yellow unless it is for mistaken identity or leads to a sending off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 hours ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: It wasn't a tackle because there was no one in possession of the ball. He won it before the Well player made contact with him. Exactly and someone said he misses the Hibs or Celtic game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 hours ago, jamborich said: Two foot off the ground it doesn’t matter if you won the ball it’s a dangerous tackle that’s the rules look I’m happy Shankland got a booking and not a sending off if he missed the tackle, let’s just move on Two footed tackle, where bothe feet are together or both feet simultaneously make contact at the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 7 hours ago, jamborich said: Controversial here I’ve watched it many times and was convinced it was never a booking however looking at it again his two feet are off the ground yes he gets the ball but if he didn’t it’s a red. yellow card for me is the right decision I humbly suggest you book an appointment with an optician ASAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, colinmaroon said: Exactly and someone said he misses the Hibs or Celtic game. He doesn't miss any game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 5 hours ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Because you cannot appeal a yellow unless it is for mistaken identity or leads to a sending off. It's mistaken identity and simulation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 28 minutes ago, John Findlay said: He doesn't miss any game. Thank goodness. Hibby mole on here, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 6 hours ago, jamborich said: Shut up ya twat please explain why hearts haven’t appealed it You can only appeal a simulation booking. This is nothing new. Anyone who gets close to the uglies will get shafted. Just watch Shanks score next week and VAR to disallow the goal. Or he'll get a comical red ruling him out for the derby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By The Light.. Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 9 hours ago, KyleLafferty said: No he won’t. He needs 12 bookings I think its six Search this - How many bookings before suspension in Scotland? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddiepolio3 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 So if Shanks had gone over the points limit with that tackle he would have missed the celtic game? Is it worth him "taking" a late booking in the rangers game to get his suspension out the way for the game after (Ross County away) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highlandjambo3 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Scores against rangers this weekend…….banned for the Celtic match…….flat earthers will love this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 9 minutes ago, By The Light.. said: I think its six Search this - How many bookings before suspension in Scotland? It resets half way through the season and changes to 12 yellows and a 2 game suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 10 minutes ago, Eddiepolio3 said: So if Shanks had gone over the points limit with that tackle he would have missed the celtic game? Is it worth him "taking" a late booking in the rangers game to get his suspension out the way for the game after (Ross County away) 4 minutes ago, highlandjambo3 said: Scores against rangers this weekend…….banned for the Celtic match…….flat earthers will love this As I said above (and others have pointed out) he now needs another 7 bookings to get a ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highlandjambo3 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 3 minutes ago, cazzyy said: As I said above (and others have pointed out) he now needs another 7 bookings to get a ban. Sorry……I’ve a habit of loggin in a not reading back previous posts…..my bad 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo-Jambo Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 6 hours ago, jamborich said: Two foot off the ground it doesn’t matter if you won the ball it’s a dangerous tackle that’s the rules look I’m happy Shankland got a booking and not a sending off if he missed the tackle, let’s just move on A sending off it wasn't even a foul !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 58 minutes ago, By The Light.. said: I think its six Search this - How many bookings before suspension in Scotland? It is 6. Shanks on 5. Gets booked v the huns and he misses Killie game if I'm right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) 7 hours ago, jamborich said: Shut up ya twat please explain why hearts haven’t appealed it You can only appeal a yellow for simulation or mistaken identity. Edited February 19 by Deevers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy2 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 7 hours ago, jamborich said: Shut up ya twat please explain why hearts haven’t appealed it You can only appeal yellows for simulation or mistaken identity. Ya Twat? 😂 Lost the argument there (apart from not knowing the laws of the game) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy2 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 6 hours ago, jamborich said: FFS you’d be as well saying Rowles’ head is in a position to butt the guy. It’s closer in that shot than Shankland’s “two footed” tackle. 🤦♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooks Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 6 hours ago, jamborich said: He has not outstretched his legs yet though . If he only extended one leg from this point on he would sheer his bawsack clean off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddysBar Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Marvin said: It is 6. Shanks on 5. Gets booked v the huns and he misses Killie game if I'm right. Think that’s been cleared up a few times. it resets after a certain number of games and the 6 bookings = a ban no longer applies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john thomas Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 9 hours ago, PaddysBar said: Utter nonsense. Shankland got tackled after he cleared the ball. Correct . Astonished this has to be stated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 11 hours ago, jamborich said: Doesn’t matter two foot tackle your off At no point in this clip is his left foot extended towards the ball: It's safely tucked under his well-cushioned arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By The Light.. Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 4 hours ago, cazzyy said: It resets half way through the season and changes to 12 yellows and a 2 game suspension. Where are you seeing that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Rob Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Only two issues with it being a two-footed tackle. 1. It isn’t two-footed. One foot plays the ball, the other doesn’t go in at all. 2. It isn’t a tackle. It isn’t even a 50:50. It’s a clearance. The ball is long gone by the time the Well player reaches Shankland. I’d agree a booking was the correct decision - a booking for simulation for the Well player, who pretended to have been fouled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMFC01 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) It's never a booking. It's not a foul from the challenge. The only reasonable thought of a foul could be it looked like Shankland raised his foot after he won the ball. Tripping the Motherwell player. It's still not a booking. He's got his card out before any reaction as well. Its basically nuts. An overreaction by the Referee. I'm still saying it's not a foul or a booking. If there is a Ref Watch episode or write up for this I'd like to know about it. It needs explained. Edited February 19 by HMFC01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daktari Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 29 minutes ago, Doc Rob said: The ball is long gone by the time the Well player reaches Shankland He even has to stretch to get to where Shankland is with the ball already gone. That's how far away from even being a tackle this was, never mind a foul. Showed it to a friend who is a referee. His verdict? Disgraceful mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirror Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Can we appeal it? I'm unsure of the rules around appealing yellow cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock _turd Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 12 hours ago, jamborich said: It ends up at his side but it was a two footed two begin with yes looks a great clearance but his initial lunge is against the rules Give it up mate you are slavering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock _turd Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 12 hours ago, jamborich said: Which part of two feet tackle do you don’t understand Goalkeepers make clearances like that all the time ... there are no separate rules for goalkeepers when it comes to playing the ball in play with their feet. I have never seen a goal keeper give away a penalty for such a clearance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.