Philstampscleaner Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Anyone understand what this was for? I saw him win the ball and pass it forwards. I didn't think it was even a free kick but he got a booking. Have I missed something or was this both bizarre and wrong as I saw it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kaiser Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Don't watch the video of it.....horrendous decision to book him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmreido Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, Philstampscleaner said: Anyone understand what this was for? I saw him win the ball and pass it forwards. I didn't think it was even a free kick but he got a booking. Have I missed something or was this both bizarre and wrong as I saw it? Ref's an erse..end of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feej Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 A nonsense booking, won the ball clearly and fairly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T.F.Robertson Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Dissent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philstampscleaner Posted February 17 Author Share Posted February 17 1 minute ago, rmreido said: Ref's an erse..end of. Just now, feej said: A nonsense booking, won the ball clearly and fairly. That was exactly how I saw it. Also what's with the refs shoulder pads? Looks like a quarter back!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddysBar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, J.T.F.Robertson said: Dissent? No. It was for the ‘foul’. Ludicrous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedBoy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Didn’t even think it was a foul. Then the lad next to me said they want him sent off for Saturday. Then it made sense. I hate everything to do with Scottish football authoritarianism. I hope we at least burst one of their fecken bubbles in May. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philstampscleaner Posted February 17 Author Share Posted February 17 Just now, Philstampscleaner said: That was exactly how I saw it. Also what's with the refs shoulder pads? Looks like a quarter back!! Must have said something very quickly ...as he booked him straight away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, ShedBoy said: Didn’t even think it was a foul. Then the lad next to me said they want him sent off for Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Mikey Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 1 minute ago, J.T.F.Robertson said: Dissent? If so, then the 'Well player near the front of section N should've been in the book. He went full-on radge and only got a talking to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feej Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, Philstampscleaner said: That was exactly how I saw it. Also what's with the refs shoulder pads? Looks like a quarter back!! Thought the ref had strange running style might have been down to his shoulder pads lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Gin Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Ridiculous booking. Won the ball cleanly and fairly. Wasn't even a free kick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 https://x.com/kd_corona/status/1758876922942046358?s=46 Terrible decision by referee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboozy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 That shook his head in disappointment when Motherwell’s goalkeeper kicked the ball straight out for a throw in to Hearts , the guy that sits next to me said “did you see his reaction there?” I said “ yup,wait till you see how many blatant fouls Well get away with “ and low and behold, he kept waving for play on when it was as straightforward yellow as ever you would see, more than once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Makes it even more unbelievable that the guy that karate kicked Rowles on the halfway line didn’t get booked. Consistency eh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WDJ87 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Doubt it will be shown on highlights. Joke of a decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Shankland got booked for winning the ball with an exceptionally clean tackle. Must be a new rule that nobody is aware of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTT Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Should be able to appeal it on the grounds that it was an absolutely shocking ****ing decision Shanks is a big physical striker, so much like his red against Hibs last season, it put him on a needless tightrope that could easily have stung us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mre Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Is it possible to appeal a yellow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedBoy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, mre said: Is it possible to appeal a yellow? Can we ask for a blue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WDJ87 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Ignored dissent, kicking the ball away, time wasting. Books Shanks for winning the ball 🤪 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Idle Talk Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 His studs were off the ground and made contact with the top of the Motherwell player's foot. That's what I think it was given for. An absolutely ridiculous decision. It wasn't even a foul. He took the ball fair and square and it was not by any stretch of the imagination dangerous play either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
been here before Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Didnt look like a foul at the game and it cerialy isnt a foul in the clip I've seen... 13 minutes ago, ShedBoy said: Didn’t even think it was a foul. Then the lad next to me said they want him sent off for Saturday. Then it made sense. I hate everything to do with Scottish football authoritarianism. I hope we at least burst one of their fecken bubbles in May. ...nor was it part of some lunatic conspiracy Just shite refereeing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobNox Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 12 minutes ago, Wee Mikey said: If so, then the 'Well player near the front of section N should've been in the book. He went full-on radge and only got a talking to. Correct, a clear blue card in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddysBar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 3 minutes ago, mre said: Is it possible to appeal a yellow? Only for diving or mistaken identity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 2 minutes ago, No Idle Talk said: His studs were off the ground and made contact with the top of the Motherwell player's foot. That's what I think it was given for. An absolutely ridiculous decision. It wasn't even a foul. He took the ball fair and square and it was not by any stretch of the imagination dangerous play either. Nope, look at the clip I posted and you’ll see that didn’t happen, the Motherwell player stood on Shanklands foot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armageddon Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 You can guarantee Shankland gets booked for nothing against Hibs meaning he will have to serve a ban v Celtic 😂 GFA shitebags Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Idle Talk Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 2 minutes ago, Brick Tamland said: Nope, look at the clip I posted and you’ll see that didn’t happen, the Motherwell player stood on Shanklands foot. Just watched it again and sorry mate I think you've got that one wrong there. It's tricky to tell because they have similar coloured boots on but Shankland's studs hit the boy's foot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T.F.Robertson Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 21 minutes ago, Wee Mikey said: If so, then the 'Well player near the front of section N should've been in the book. He went full-on radge and only got a talking to. I actually had that thought at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Ramsay Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 17 minutes ago, Brick Tamland said: https://x.com/kd_corona/status/1758876922942046358?s=46 Terrible decision by referee Great tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobNox Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 3 minutes ago, mre said: Is it possible to appeal a yellow? Don't think a yellow can be overturned unless it's for simulation that turns out not be the case, but not sure if you can actually appeal against it. I'm sure in the latest review of VAR decisions one of those that wrongly went against us was the failure to review a possible penalty when Forrest was fouled in the box against Ross County. As well as concluding that it should have been a penalty, the panel also rescinded the yellow card given to Forrest for simulation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedBoy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, been here before said: Didnt look like a foul at the game and it cerialy isnt a foul in the clip I've seen... ...nor was it part of some lunatic conspiracy Just shite refereeing. I agree. But you have to look at the challenges that went in previously in the half that went totally unpunished. Then you look at why LS was cautioned for one of the cleanest tackles of the game. Then you ask why? The game is fecken rancid. Top to bottom. Referees should not make you question your sanity 👍🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Clear as day if you're the referee. If not? No words can explain how bad a decision it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger Rudi Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Not even discussed on Sportscene! Shocker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canscot Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Clean win of the ball. Motherwell player came in late. Ball was long gone. Never a foul. Obscene that he was booked for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
been here before Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 8 minutes ago, ShedBoy said: I agree. But you have to look at the challenges that went in previously in the half that went totally unpunished. Then you look at why LS was cautioned for one of the cleanest tackles of the game. Then you ask why? The game is fecken rancid. Top to bottom. Referees should not make you question your sanity 👍🏻 They shouldnt but they do primarily down to incompetence and inconsistancy. Its nothing to do with this mythical "they" who want him out of next weeks game. Thats tinfoil hat shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ1977 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Only saw it at the game and it looked ridiculous. Won the ball cleanly and ended up booked with a freekick to Motherwell 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 (edited) Thought today's referee was absolutely rank rotten. Shankland booking was a joke. Edited February 17 by Deevers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Mikey Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 15 minutes ago, Sooperstar said: Clear as day if you're the referee. If not? No words can explain how bad a decision it was. Surely, no argument. Great tackle. Shanks, in the last few games, has cleared TW0 off the line, and does some superb defending. See if h1b5 had a defender as good as him? Oh, wait ... they have Hanlon, Stevenson, and Rocky ... 🤣🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Absolute nonsense decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 6 minutes ago, Wee Mikey said: Surely, no argument. Great tackle. Shanks, in the last few games, has cleared TW0 off the line, and does some superb defending. See if h1b5 had a defender as good as him? Oh, wait ... they have Hanlon, Stevenson, and Rocky ... 🤣🤣🤣 As bad a decision as it was from the referee I just want to clarify that we were attacking here. This wasn't a defensive tackle from Shanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBJambo Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Corrupt as that means he misses the Celtic game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millerjames398 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Watched the highlights, as good a tackle as your likely to see,,an absolute travesty he got booked, as well as penalised for the challenge🤬🇱🇻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyRightPeg Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 27 minutes ago, Sooperstar said: Clear as day if you're the referee. If not? No words can explain how bad a decision it was. It’s this shitey follow through thing that refs have brought in over the last few years. Any tackle these days if you roll about regardless of whether the player gets the ball it’s deemed as reckless/dangerous. Hoff had one in the 2nd half that he steamed into about 70 mins in and I immediately thought he’s gonna punish him here but he never even gave a foul. Total inconsistency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddysBar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 52 minutes ago, mre said: Is it possible to appeal a yellow? 48 minutes ago, PaddysBar said: Only for diving or mistaken identity 38 minutes ago, RobNox said: Don't think a yellow can be overturned unless it's for simulation that turns out not be the case, but not sure if you can actually appeal against it. I'm sure in the latest review of VAR decisions one of those that wrongly went against us was the failure to review a possible penalty when Forrest was fouled in the box against Ross County. As well as concluding that it should have been a penalty, the panel also rescinded the yellow card given to Forrest for simulation. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkirkhmfc1874 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Shocker of a booking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedBoy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 38 minutes ago, been here before said: They shouldnt but they do primarily down to incompetence and inconsistancy. Its nothing to do with this mythical "they" who want him out of next weeks game. Thats tinfoil hat shite. I respect your opinion 👍🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 21 minutes ago, GBJambo said: Corrupt as that means he misses the Celtic game He doesn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedBoy Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 22 minutes ago, GBJambo said: Corrupt as that means he misses the Celtic game well 👀 well 👀 well 👀 who’d have thought it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.