cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 7 minutes ago, il Duce McTarkin said: It matters to whoever thinks that it matters, but the vast majority of folk will lie somewhere between apathy and ambivalence. Thankfully that is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrJambo Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 18 minutes ago, cazzyy said: Anyone able to translate? Give you that one mate 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 1 hour ago, cazzyy said: Would you have a problem with a man settling with a transgender? Absolutely not. Would you as a straight man or a female lesbian choose it though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctor jambo Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 5 hours ago, cazzyy said: Like your opinion on it, mine doesn't matter a jot. It does though. The law states they are women. However the law also states that believing they are not is a protected belief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 36 minutes ago, doctor jambo said: It does though. The law states they are women. However the law also states that believing they are not is a protected belief The law doesn't care what you think or believe. The law would have an issue if you discriminated against them though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 2 hours ago, Sarah O said: Absolutely not. Would you as a straight man or a female lesbian choose it though? Whether I would or not is moot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 27 minutes ago, cazzyy said: Whether I would or not is moot. It's not though is it? A trans woman is a man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 41 minutes ago, Sarah O said: It's not though is it? A trans woman is a man. Not legally, and round we go again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 39 minutes ago, Sarah O said: It's not though is it? A trans woman is a man. Reality isn’t TRA strong points . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 2 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Reality isn’t TRA strong points . I'll need to ask one of my TERF pals what TRA stands for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 30 minutes ago, cazzyy said: Not legally, and round we go again. Not the question I asked. Round we go again indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 42 minutes ago, Sarah O said: Not the question I asked. Round we go again indeed. That poster is on the wind up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 11 minutes ago, John Findlay said: That poster is on the wind up. Wrong again John, becoming a bit of a habit with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 40 minutes ago, cazzyy said: Wrong again John, becoming a bit of a habit with you. With all due respect, you think a woman can have a penis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 20 minutes ago, Sarah O said: With all due respect, you think a woman can have a penis. With all due respect, according to the law yes. I know, the law is an ass blah blah blah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 7 hours ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I’ve got him blocked Who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, Ulysses said: Who? I meant I have him blocked ! The one on this thread who mentions me every second posting ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic Username Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 "I've got them blocked" is a weird flex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 “ blocked “ or “ on ignore “ potato , potatoe !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 28 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I meant I have him blocked ! The one on this thread who mentions me every second posting ! Who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Ulysses said: Who? Edited April 27 by JudyJudyJudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 34 minutes ago, Ulysses said: Who? He means me, although he pretty much puts anyone who has a different opinion on ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, cazzyy said: He means me, although he pretty much puts anyone who has a different opinion on ignore. How would I know that unless someone told me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cazzyy Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 18 minutes ago, Ulysses said: How would I know that unless someone told me? Oh he'll tell you, he's mentioned it 28 times since he put me on ignore. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Jesus but this thread is pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 12 minutes ago, Tazio said: Jesus but this thread is pathetic. Er, yes, it would seem so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 28 Author Share Posted April 28 6 hours ago, Tazio said: Jesus but this thread is pathetic. You can all thank me later. It keeps all the swivel eyed, moon howling shite in the one place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benny Klack Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 46 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Agree that we should stop homophobia - but you seem to be ok gunning for the trans community. I appreciate that they are two different things but both marginalised in different ways. Like a lot of your takes / opinions I feel there are large inconsistencies / holes in a lot of your posts which makes me sceptical about most of your posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 3 hours ago, Jim_Duncan said: Most of your posts been deleted, Thor? But only half of mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Ah, Iraq. Sound like a lovely place, eh? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/state-department-blasts-new-iraq-anti-homosexuality-law-human-rights-t-rcna149688 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Free speech and aw https://x.com/novaramedia/status/1785746008531742740?s=46&t=Uyg6zS_aUfEwlXY6vOoxzQ the old chestnut about “ normal “ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 1 hour ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Free speech and aw https://x.com/novaramedia/status/1785746008531742740?s=46&t=Uyg6zS_aUfEwlXY6vOoxzQ the old chestnut about “ normal “ How do you feel about what he said Judy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 On 28/04/2024 at 13:49, Ulysses said: Ah, Iraq. Sound like a lovely place, eh? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/state-department-blasts-new-iraq-anti-homosexuality-law-human-rights-t-rcna149688 Cradle of civilisation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 1 hour ago, Ked said: How do you feel about what he said Judy? I’m out for meal just now I’ll answer later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartgarfunkel Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 On 26/04/2024 at 08:19, doctor jambo said: Well, perhaps its time we stopped psychology from coming up with conditions and wedging them into the mainstream? We seem locked in a cycle of categorizing, then pathologizing, then coming up with a treatment, then implementing that. Your kid is different, so we will label it, then come up with some life altering drugs and surgery, then do that. People are being exploited - their insecurities. Like the short guys having femur lengthening procedures the ludicrous pushing of cosmetic procedures onto people- teeth, breasts, noses, chins, ears just stop already. If trans always existed, they managed for millenia without having their arms peeled to create a useless meat sausage. Let alone pushing this onto vulnerable kids. GIDS own patient group was showing rising numbers of kids identifying as Asian too. Not everything needs medical treatment. Unhappiness is not a medical condition. Being unhappy at how you look is not either. So why are surgeons and endocrinologists involved at all? Or psychiatrists? and correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 6 hours ago, Ked said: How do you feel about what he said Judy? Well as strong advocate for freedom of speech it’s nice that a person is expressing this right . Hes perfectly entitled to it . It’s refreshing from a politician . I have issues with the word “ normal “ as conversely it means something is “ abnormal “ . “ Abnormal” is a very insulting word to use about a group of people . I think what he was trying to say is That relationships whether lesbian or gay ones are less than heterosexual for the only reason that they can’t procreate , unless they hire a womb ! He didn’t say he disapproved of gays just he disapproved of gays being in a parenting role as that isn’t “ normal “ . Hes right in the strictest understanding of biology . Completely disagree that a gay / lesbian cannot parent as effectively as a straight parent or couple . It brings up the debate are two parents better or more advantageous for a child than a one parent family too? I think there’s a slight advantage but I know plenty people from a single parent who have been brought up very well and are now successful . theres now the “ woke “ myth that gays / lesbians want to be parents now . Statistically that’s just not the case . Realistic gay / lesbian couple know it’s impossible for them to have children biologically and accept that . Plus they don’t need to societal validation of being a “ parent “ as if it makes one a more worthwhile member of society . It doesn’t . Most gays have a moral compass and would not go down the surrogacy route . It’s immoral . Adopt / foster . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 2 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: No idea what Galloway is talking about, but I do think there's too much about relationships and identity in education. My kids' primary school has a massive display about LGB(T) stuff. These are wee kids from 5-11 years old. They don't need to learn about gay icons (seriously, there's a massive picture of Elton John in the stairwell); they need to learn literacy and numeracy to the point where they're ready for secondary education, and to learn to be respectful of whoever they meet in their path through life. Agreed 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 4 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: They need to learn literacy and numeracy to the point where they're ready for secondary education, and to learn to be respectful of whoever they meet in their path through life. If only. I'd also add stress-management to the list of things that need to be taught. It's a difficult world to navigate at times, this wonderful world of ours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
il Duce McTarkin Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 11 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: My kids' primary school has a massive display about LGB(T) stuff. These are wee kids from 5-11 years old. They don't need to learn about gay icons (seriously, there's a massive picture of Elton John in the stairwell); they need to learn literacy and numeracy to the point where they're ready for secondary education, and to learn to be respectful of whoever they meet in their path through life. 👏 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Just now, Jim_Duncan said: I would have agreed with you before they started, but the truth is, my lads, like plenty of other kids, treat that kind of stuff as an excuse to daydream, whisper and otherwise be kids. I get the feeling that far too much of education these days is influenced by the insecurities of adults trying to reverse engineer their own lives, rather than support children. They did a big project on 'resilience'. There was loads of stuff about it in their homework and on the school website. I asked my son if he ever uses the techniques they taught and he shrugged and said it was a waste of time. I know for a fact they're not the only ones to behave this way. Hopefully some of it sticks for future reference, but I have my doubts! Oh well, there goes that idea. Thought-provoking bit in bold, by the way. Cheers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 5 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: Thanks - I mean no disrespect to anyone gay, bi, or whatever. Where you shove your bits is your business. We have a same sex couple as our elder son's godparents. But there's no need to actively promote alternative relationships as if not doing so were being discriminatory, IMO. The best foundation for a child is, IMO, a loving mother and father, bringing the right amounts of feminine and masculine traits into the dynamic. Galloway will have an agenda for whatever he's saying. I'd imagine that, if it’s about promoting 'traditional' family values, it's to shore up his support among the conservative Muslim population. Thsts fine Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 1 minute ago, Jim_Duncan said: You're welcome Now that I've got the Sword of Moderator-Damocles hanging above me once more, I thought I'd try posting something half-decent for a change! j I hope it doesn't sound too obsequious, but when you're not shit-posting, you often post really interesting and thoughtful stuff. It can't be nearly as fun for you though. Sorry to hear about the sword. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 11 minutes ago, Jim_Duncan said: They did a big project on 'resilience Children learn “ resilience “ usually from good parenting .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic Username Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 As long as it's not parents who've benefited from surrogacy am I right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 1 minute ago, Jim_Duncan said: And like most real-life skills, they’re not going to learn it from someone clunking their way through a PowerPoint after having been on a half-day course on the topic themselves. Yep 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Awe naw be prepared for a few pages of comments about the merits of taking advantages of economically and socially deprived women so a person / couple can have a baby of their own to fill their own narcissistic needs . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic Username Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Ah yes because everyone involved in surrogacy is economically and socially deprived 😅 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 I have that guy on ignore so won’t be getting into any debate about renting wombs . He can argue with his shadow or others about it . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic Username Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 If you have me on ignore, and no one has quoted my posts, how do you know I've posted 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.