Jump to content

Irving - signs for SK Austria Klagenfurt ( updated )


wattie exploited

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Zen Jambo said:

A lot of potentially great young players drop a load when they are expected to perform to first team standards day in day out.

 

Irving has well and truly put on his big boy pants and is showing senior players how it should be done. Playing football that is, not wearing big boy pants. Although...

 

Get him on a 3 year deal and do it now. Massively important. 

 

He was shouting instructions to senior players around him yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Bazzas right boot

    116

  • Bongo 1874

    95

  • A_A wehatethehibs

    93

  • sadj

    73

He’ll end up being our second biggest incoming transfer fee ever if we do this right Hopefully not for a good while yet obviously but it’s really important we get him contracted. I hope we’re offering him serious money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimmyCant said:

He’ll end up being our second biggest incoming transfer fee ever if we do this right Hopefully not for a good while yet obviously but it’s really important we get him contracted. I hope we’re offering him serious money.

Big statement. How much did we get for Hickey? 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

Big statement. How much did we get for Hickey? 😄

I’m sure we got about £1.6M for Berra. Hickey was less than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimmyCant said:

He’ll end up being our second biggest incoming transfer fee ever if we do this right Hopefully not for a good while yet obviously but it’s really important we get him contracted. I hope we’re offering him serious money.

 

One of the things that annoys me about Scottish football is this ingrained attitude that youngsters don't deserve good wages. Like, we'll happily pay a mediocre journeyman a couple of grand a week no bother at all despite them being shite and having no sell on potential, but we'll hum and haw over a giving a clearly talented young player a wage that gives them parity with first team players. 

 

Obviously just rumours, but I've heard multiple times that we were only offering Hickey improved terms of a few hundred quid. Obviously, this could be wrong, but I've heard it enough times to think there could be something to it. I don't think this is a problem exclusive to us, virtually all clubs have serious issues retaining talent and I think its down to this mentality. 

 

With Irving, we're unlikely to get another contract out of him beyond this extension, so the club should show a bit of faith in the laddie, recognise his potential and treat him like one of the faceless cast of thousands we've thrown money at in the past. We should also be push hard for a 3/4 year deal. He's physical capable of managing the SPL, he's also got more technique and doesn't seem to shit the bed like other young players. Much like with Hickey, we've got a great young talent here and its imperative actually do this properly and make sure he stays. 

 

Please for the love of god Robbie, do not come back with a 2 year deal and put us through the torment of him running his deal down. 3 year deal minimum. 

 

FWIW, I know every single contract we offer is a risk. I'd just much rather take those risks with home grown talent than shite like Martin, Damour, Oshinawa, Amankwaa Vanecek, Grzlak, Sowah, Struna, Avolantis, Bozanic, Lee, White, Watt, Sammon, Frear, Roberts etc. At a certain point we need to perhaps take on board that the foreign market isn't working out enough to justify it. Focus on domestic players. Retain our young talent for 1 more contract cycle. Focus in on players 23-26 at other SPFL sides we can pinch for free who are all ready tried and tested whilst also weakening rivals plus internationals over 30 who we can get to come to us (Gordon, Cowie, Berra, Naismith types). At every point since 2014 we've had unusable players on our books that made no sense to sign other than as a complete gamble. Its not ****ing good enough. We're talking millions wasted on utter dross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil D. Corners

I’m not sure why the club has not given him a deal on par with other senior players. You think they would want to lock him down with deal that matches his performances. The guy has been stand out.
 

Maybe Robbie already has someone else planned for that position next season. Or maybe they just tried to low amount as they know he’s a local Jambo and would want to stay. 
 

Hopefully the club goes back to him with a serious offer before someone else does. Would hate to lose him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Phil D. Corners said:

I’m not sure why the club has not given him a deal on par with other senior players. You think they would want to lock him down with deal that matches his performances. The guy has been stand out.
 

Maybe Robbie already has someone else planned for that position next season. Or maybe they just tried to low amount as they know he’s a local Jambo and would want to stay. 
 

Hopefully the club goes back to him with a serious offer before someone else does. Would hate to lose him.

Maybe still seething about the first offer. Maybe fancies following Hickey abroad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selkirk_Jambo
1 hour ago, Rudolf said:

I’m sure we got about £1.6M for Berra. Hickey was less than that. 

 

£2.3M was the number I remember from back in the day. 

 

Certainly more than £1.6M though

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selkirk_Jambo
21 minutes ago, BarneyBattles said:


There was also Niemi, Bednar, McCann and Cameron who all went for around £2m (was Bednar not £2.3m?). 

 

Berra was £2.5m, according to BBC

 

You're absolutely right about Bednar, £2.3m apparently 

 

The heady days of £2m plus transfers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more about the clauses should we receive a bid for him

 

He has in mind a figure over which we have no option but to let him go

 

We of course would prefer no minimum fee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rudolf said:

I’m sure we got about £1.6M for Berra. Hickey was less than that. 

 

I think it was Euro 2 million = £ 1.8 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sign him to a five year contract. Don't disrespect the boy by trying to pay him like an unproven player or a squad player. Pay him like he is a valued member of the first team. If he's not keen, then insert a minimum fee release clause at something like £3million. I'd be disappointed in Irving if he wouldn't sign a contract in that ballpark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ToqueJambo
6 hours ago, Ecce Romanov said:

His passing last nigh was just top notch. If we can, a 3 year deal would be amazing. 

 

Agreed. So composed on the ball, often looking for a killer pass and capable of making it. And has a great shot and dead ball delivery on him. If he can do it in these games on these tight pitches where the opposition treat it like a cup final and press like crazy, he should be able to do it at a higher level. Feel like he has the potential to be our Jordan Henderson or Xavi Alonso in terms of style how they influenced games, maybe just needs to add more bite and physicality to his game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wattie exploited
21 hours ago, JimmyCant said:

He’ll end up being our second biggest incoming transfer fee ever if we do this right Hopefully not for a good while yet obviously but it’s really important we get him contracted. I hope we’re offering him serious money.

we got 9 million for Gordon he will not even come close to that possible  2million  if he gets even better in a few years time :rifle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Byyy The Light
18 hours ago, OTT said:

 

One of the things that annoys me about Scottish football is this ingrained attitude that youngsters don't deserve good wages. Like, we'll happily pay a mediocre journeyman a couple of grand a week no bother at all despite them being shite and having no sell on potential, but we'll hum and haw over a giving a clearly talented young player a wage that gives them parity with first team players. 

 

Obviously just rumours, but I've heard multiple times that we were only offering Hickey improved terms of a few hundred quid. Obviously, this could be wrong, but I've heard it enough times to think there could be something to it. I don't think this is a problem exclusive to us, virtually all clubs have serious issues retaining talent and I think its down to this mentality. 

 

With Irving, we're unlikely to get another contract out of him beyond this extension, so the club should show a bit of faith in the laddie, recognise his potential and treat him like one of the faceless cast of thousands we've thrown money at in the past. We should also be push hard for a 3/4 year deal. He's physical capable of managing the SPL, he's also got more technique and doesn't seem to shit the bed like other young players. Much like with Hickey, we've got a great young talent here and its imperative actually do this properly and make sure he stays. 

 

Please for the love of god Robbie, do not come back with a 2 year deal and put us through the torment of him running his deal down. 3 year deal minimum. 

 

FWIW, I know every single contract we offer is a risk. I'd just much rather take those risks with home grown talent than shite like Martin, Damour, Oshinawa, Amankwaa Vanecek, Grzlak, Sowah, Struna, Avolantis, Bozanic, Lee, White, Watt, Sammon, Frear, Roberts etc. At a certain point we need to perhaps take on board that the foreign market isn't working out enough to justify it. Focus on domestic players. Retain our young talent for 1 more contract cycle. Focus in on players 23-26 at other SPFL sides we can pinch for free who are all ready tried and tested whilst also weakening rivals plus internationals over 30 who we can get to come to us (Gordon, Cowie, Berra, Naismith types). At every point since 2014 we've had unusable players on our books that made no sense to sign other than as a complete gamble. Its not ****ing good enough. We're talking millions wasted on utter dross.

 

Good post.  I think the difference with Irving and Hickey is at the time Hickey had played 3 games and if rumours were to be believed, his agent/dad or whatever were asking for top earner money. £3-4k a week.  I know there's a balance but if we'd given Cochrane that money after his 3 or 4 game cameo then the club would be getting hammered for it.  This is obviously all rumour so we don't know what actually happened.

 

For me Irving has proved that he's not a flash in the pan and over the next 2 or 3 years he will physically develop and get stronger and fitter.  With his natural footballing talent he's got everything it takes to be a top midfielder and we should be paying him the going rate now in line with senior pros in the team.  Longer term contract with a realistic release clause and a percentage sell on fee after that would be the way to go for me.  As a Hearts fan, why wouldn't he sign that??  Live the dream and then move on to bigger things.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/01/2021 at 17:46, OTT said:

 

 

 

Obviously just rumours, but I've heard multiple times that we were only offering Hickey improved terms of a few hundred quid. Obviously, this could be wrong, but I've heard it enough times to think there could be something to it. I don't think this is a problem exclusive to us, virtually all clubs have serious issues retaining talent and I think its down to this mentality. 

 

With Irving, we're unlikely to get another contract out of him beyond this extension, so the club should show a bit of faith in the laddie, recognise his potential and treat him like one of the faceless cast of thousands we've thrown money at in the past. We should also be push hard for a 3/4 year deal. He's physical capable of managing the SPL, he's also got more technique and doesn't seem to shit the bed like other young players. Much like with Hickey, we've got a great young talent here and its imperative actually do this properly and make sure he stays. 

 

Please for the love of god Robbie, do not come back with a 2 year deal and put us through the torment of him running his deal down. 3 year deal minimum. 

 

FWIW, I know every single contract we offer is a risk. I'd just much rather take those risks with home grown talent than shite like Martin, Damour, Oshinawa, Amankwaa Vanecek, Grzlak, Sowah, Struna, Avolantis, Bozanic, Lee, White, Watt, Sammon, Frear, Roberts etc. At a certain point we need to perhaps take on board that the foreign market isn't working out enough to justify it. Focus on domestic players. Retain our young talent for 1 more contract cycle. Focus in on players 23-26 at other SPFL sides we can pinch for free who are all ready tried and tested whilst also weakening rivals plus internationals over 30 who we can get to come to us (Gordon, Cowie, Berra, Naismith types). At every point since 2014 we've had unusable players on our books that made no sense to sign other than as a complete gamble. Its not ****ing good enough. We're talking millions wasted on utter dross.

I definitely think there's a lot of truth in this, and I think it's a perception thing, which stretches to most fans too. A young player coming through the ranks, like Irving, tends to (rightly) get a fair degree of leeway for inconsistent performances or shortcomings in their game, as they tend to be thought of as basically a trainee, whereas anyone signed from elsewhere, is just seen as another signing, even if they're only about 19 or 20 themselves.  Pay/reward offered seems to mirror that perception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Byyy The Light said:

 

Good post.  I think the difference with Irving and Hickey is at the time Hickey had played 3 games and if rumours were to be believed, his agent/dad or whatever were asking for top earner money. £3-4k a week.  I know there's a balance but if we'd given Cochrane that money after his 3 or 4 game cameo then the club would be getting hammered for it.  This is obviously all rumour so we don't know what actually happened.

 

For me Irving has proved that he's not a flash in the pan and over the next 2 or 3 years he will physically develop and get stronger and fitter.  With his natural footballing talent he's got everything it takes to be a top midfielder and we should be paying him the going rate now in line with senior pros in the team.  Longer term contract with a realistic release clause and a percentage sell on fee after that would be the way to go for me.  As a Hearts fan, why wouldn't he sign that??  Live the dream and then move on to bigger things.

 

 

 

 

Maybe too late. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not read the whole thread but Irving’s passing is very impressive not just at the current level but also above. He can make defence splitting passes and is able to make long distance passes which count too.

 

sign the lad and nurture him - it’ll make him and us a lot of dough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Clerry Jambo said:

Hearts have made better offer and waiting on response 

Rejects this one and I reckon his agents had some big offers in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Irving Hearts contract update as Robbie Neilson confirms improved offer - Edinburgh Live

 

Hearts have made an improved contract offer to Andy Irving after the midfielder responded to their previous proposal with one of his own.

The boyhood Jambo is in fine form for the Championship leaders, but as things stand is free to talk to other clubs and leave for nothing in the summer.

Robbie Neilson is keen to tie him down at Tynecastle, and negotiations have been ongoing with both player and club hopeful an agreement can be reached soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1874robbo said:

He is the Best to come out of the academy for years!! this laddie will go on to play at the top level without a doubt.

Agreed.  Hearts are very lucky to have him,every few players with his attributes come through the academy system...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scottie Wanshot.

Yes he's improving in every game, the only thing he's lacking a bit is he needs to more aggressive. get harder tackles in, get in other players faces,  be NASTY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Scottie Wanshot. said:

Yes he's improving in every game, the only thing he's lacking a bit is he needs to more aggressive. get harder tackles in, get in other players faces,  be NASTY.

Yeah. That’s his weakness. Quite easily knocked of the ball. And maybe limit the quarter back passes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MooseMich said:

Agreed.  Hearts are very lucky to have him,every few players with his attributes come through the academy system...


Lucky to have him ? We have been nurturing his talent since he was a bairn. Let’s not forget the hours and money hearts have given to develope the lad.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get this done Hearts, for the sake of a few thousand or whatever is holding it up,  it will cost us more trying to replace him. 

Great age and will only get better the more he plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seymour M Hersh
1 hour ago, it_hearts said:

Get this done Hearts, for the sake of a few thousand or whatever is holding it up,  it will cost us more trying to replace him. 

Great age and will only get better the more he plays. 

 

I'll give you one guess. His agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Riccarton3 said:

If Hearts don't get this over the line I will be well pissed

 

I think Savage is about to cock this up. The first offer comes in short of the mark, and no new offered given. Despite what Bazza writes. If Hearts aren't interested in being serious, I wouldn't blame him to start listening to other offers.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malinga the Swinga
4 minutes ago, I.T.K said:

 

I think Savage is about to cock this up. The first offer comes in short of the mark, and no new offered given. Despite what Bazza writes. If Hearts aren't interested in being serious, I wouldn't blame him to start listening to other offers.  

 

 

Based on absolutely nothing, Savage is cocking it up. You couldn't make some of the shit on here up even if you were a Hibs fan, which I am not saying you are. 

Just be patient. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berra than you
31 minutes ago, I.T.K said:

 

I think Savage is about to cock this up. The first offer comes in short of the mark, and no new offered given. Despite what Bazza writes. If Hearts aren't interested in being serious, I wouldn't blame him to start listening to other offers.  

 

 

It's being reported we have tabled a second offer. Are you trying to say this isn't true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for once the fans seem to agree we should be handing out a longer term deal for a player

 

Somewhat different from opinions on other threads about contract length etc for other players........guess it just goes to show you that if you've had a chance to have a good look first you are happier to hand out a good deal but trusting others to make a decision for you is a hard thing to accept hence the critics for 3/4 year deals for other signings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, I.T.K said:

 

I think Savage is about to cock this up. The first offer comes in short of the mark, and no new offered given. Despite what Bazza writes. If Hearts aren't interested in being serious, I wouldn't blame him to start listening to other offers.  

 

 

Was he involved in the first offer? I don't think Doc Savage was at the club when the offer was made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CJGJ said:

So for once the fans seem to agree we should be handing out a longer term deal for a player

 

Somewhat different from opinions on other threads about contract length etc for other players........guess it just goes to show you that if you've had a chance to have a good look first you are happier to hand out a good deal but trusting others to make a decision for you is a hard thing to accept hence the critics for 3/4 year deals for other signings

It was obvious when he came into the team at the very first instances way back that he had it. He should genuinely have been on a 5 year deal then. Seriously like looking  at John Collins at 16, 17 and thinking, just no sure eh? Utterly ridiculous from the club.

 

We should pay him whatever he wants just as a punishment for being dense

Edited by Riccarton3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what the club are playing at here. But, there was no counter-offer from Irving or his agents and there has been no second offer made to them either. Seems strange for Robbie to come out with this stuff, especially before an important game. Are they trying mess with Irving's head before arguably our biggest game of the league campaign ? Hopefully Andy just blocks it all out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, buzzbomb said:

Not sure what the club are playing at here. But, there was no counter-offer from Irving or his agents and there has been no second offer made to them either. Seems strange for Robbie to come out with this stuff, especially before an important game. Are they trying mess with Irving's head before arguably our biggest game of the league campaign ? Hopefully Andy just blocks it all out.

How do you know this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A_A wehatethehibs

Maybe we’re just waiting to see how much Juventus / City / Bayern bid for him on deadline day. 
 

Being serious though, he is our most sellable asset, with 6 months left on his deal it could be the case we’re waiting to see if someone comes in, stranger things have happened. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems as though this is going to drag on and we will end up losing him. When you think of all the guff we have gave big wages to and long contracts, the one player with ability and age on his side we are mucking about with. Absolute disgrace IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never Let Them Forget
2 minutes ago, PapaShango said:

Seems as though this is going to drag on and we will end up losing him. When you think of all the guff we have gave big wages to and long contracts, the one player with ability and age on his side we are mucking about with. Absolute disgrace IMO. 

You don’t know the terms that Hearts have offered do you? So how can you say it’s a disgrace?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, buzzbomb said:

Not sure what the club are playing at here. But, there was no counter-offer from Irving or his agents and there has been no second offer made to them either. Seems strange for Robbie to come out with this stuff, especially before an important game. Are they trying mess with Irving's head before arguably our biggest game of the league campaign ? Hopefully Andy just blocks it all out.

 

I smell 5h1te.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Kalamazoo Jambo changed the title to Irving - signs for SK Austria Klagenfurt ( updated )

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...