Jump to content

SPFL and Covid ( Leagues 1 and 2 to restart )


Heres Rixxy

Recommended Posts

Bazzas right boot

This is as depressing as the actual match day threads the past year.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mikey1874

    2099

  • Pasquale for King

    1723

  • Ethan Hunt

    1598

  • Beast Boy

    1415

Jamboelite

Can we put one of these ****ing chances away Hearts or is there no bite upfront???

Edited by Jamboelite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring Back Paulo Sergio
Just now, bobskeldon said:

i think we have just had 44 corners😉

We're on the attack. Still need to score

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil Dongcaster said:

Penalty Hearts

Need to take it!! Might not get many chances in this match 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robbo-Jambo
9 minutes ago, kila said:

 

Do you ever go caravaning with a relative from Hamilton?

 

🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring Back Paulo Sergio
1 minute ago, Neil Dongcaster said:

Hearts goal cancelled out by VAR

Yep. Think VAR has been shocking today.

Edited by Bring Back Paulo Sergio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clark Griswold
1 minute ago, bobskeldon said:

just noticed the opposition are playing with a one armed goalie!

Is his name Perreira per chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Forever Hearts said:

I think the football puns are needing a rest. 

Gie's a break, don't start with the snooker ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Treasurer
1 minute ago, Forever Hearts said:

I think the football puns are needing a rest. 

Unbelievable Geoff !!

It's a case of two halves at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, David McCaig said:

 

I’ll try my best to type up some notes again this afternoon and post at the end of proceedings

👍 ’McCaig Files part 2’!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rick Sanchez said:

Is the judge likely to go away and mull it over or give his opinion right away like Rinder?

I think it'll be tomorrow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig

Heart of Midlothian/Partick Thistle v SPFL: Day 2

 

 

David Thomson QC – Hearts/Partick

 

The effect of Section of 2010 Arbitration Act – the language is clear, unambiguous and speaks for itself.

 

The court does not have a discretion to overlook this language.  This seems to be at odds with the position in England and is based on different historical context.

 

Feels that the motion is ill-conceived and that the right to seek a sist depends on the applicant doing neither of the actions stated in 10(1d). To retain the right to seek a sist the respondents must not place substantive answers.

 

Thomson disputed Borland’s argument that they had to give a substantive answer. There is no basis that this could be considered to be a 2-sided dispute.

 

Motions for interim order argued daily without defences being lodged.

 

Therefore argues that the right to seek arbitration has been lost.

 

Any referral to arbitration would lead to valuable time being lost and more importantly the matters raised are of significant public interest and concern.

 

Reference is made to the extraordinary communication made to clubs last week telling them that it was necessary for them to support the SPFL in order to see the papers.

 

Lord Clark highlights that the email from Dundee was received at 4:48pm on the day on question.  Does this help in speeding things up.?

 

DT refers to the debacle of the Dundee vote and the public interest in clearing this up.

 

We are entitled to discover the truth of what happened in that episode.

 

Lord Clark: Will evidence, afadavits and witness statements be required? Will witnesses be required to be led.

 

DT – the focus of the petitioners is likely to be on documentary evidence, but cant say for certain there would be no need for cross-examination… particularly the conversations between John Nelms and Neil Doncaster.  There would also be an evidence requirement for any compensation demand.

 

Lord Clark: A requirement for evidence and limited cross-examination.

 

DT – Submission 2

 

No valid arbitration clause is in play.  The starting point in any consideration should be the SPFL rules and these are not clear or definitive about arbitration

 

Reliance about SFA disciplinary rule 78 by Moynihan to suggest agreement to arbitration process does no such thing.

 

In the context of the present petition the arbitration provision of article 99 has not been incorporated.

 

Lord Clark – Is there a members agreement amongst clubs to resolve disputes via arbitration.

 

DT – Yes but only under article 99 and this petition is brought as shareholders within the SPFL Ltd. This why this is not a football dispute.

 

Temporary break in proceedings due to Broaband Issues – court not in session

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd think QC's could afford additional devices like a 4G modem for when their home broadband is pish. Especially given courts are online right now. And a decent speakerphone too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig

Just to add the court is not currently in session as they are attempting to reboot the broadband!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gordiegords

Just seen some sensational headlines in both the Glasgow rags, “the rebels could be kicked out” as warned by lawyer, was that in yesterday’s hearing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, David McCaig said:

Just to add the court is not currently in session as they are attempting to reboot the broadband!!

 

I think it was the Hearts QC who has the shite connection.

 

Probably forgot to close his bit torrent client :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig
1 minute ago, kila said:

 

I think it was the Hearts QC who has the shite connection.

 

Probably forgot to close his bit torrent client :ninja:

Too busy reading JKB for advice!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, David McCaig said:


DT – Yes but only under article 99 and this petition is brought as shareholders within the SPFL Ltd. This why this is not a football dispute.

 

Temporary break in proceedings due to Broaband Issues – court not in session

Thanks David once again. 👍 Did we score there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • jkbmod 9 changed the title to SPFL declare league (2019/20) due to Covid (Arbitration panel upholds SPFL decision )
  • davemclaren changed the title to SPFL and Covid ( Leagues 1 and 2 to restart )

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...