Jump to content

Edinburgh Trams Farce Continues


Ribble

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Spellczech said:

You are comparing 11.5miles/ 43mph top speed to 330 miles/ 225mph top speed. It is like comparing from 20th century to 21st century...

No, I'm comparing overspends, not top speeds and distance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EIEIO said:

Some seemed to have been learned on the project to complete the line to Newhaven. Though it should have been  "easy" as they presumably made some  progress during the first abandoned attempt.

I'm in favour of trams and improved rail links but the original project was managed disgracefully. 

As others have said what's the point of an inquiry ? No one was sacked or put in jail for their actions or lack of.

Public enquiries are basically to provide stats for one political party to hit another over the head. Even the one in power likes them though as generally they take so long that they can deflect saying "lessons have been learned" in the meantimes...Meanwhile lawyers and experts who could've been better used being involved in the original project make money from stating the obvious...

 

I'll never forget my father telling me that a consultant is defined as "someone you pay a lot of money to tell you what you already know".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PortyJambo said:

No, I'm comparing overspends, not top speeds and distance...

So what are they (in % terms)? 100% for Edinburgh? What for HS2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Spellczech said:

So what are they (in % terms)? 100% for Edinburgh? What for HS2?

In 2012, HS2 was estimated at £33bn, but it's now £90-100bn...and that's for a reduced line, so it has that in common with the trams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The M74 extension and Aberdeen bypass were well over (£ hundreds of millions over) original estimates too.

 

The Queensferry Crossing was - I think - on time and on budget.  Maybe we should let those designers & builders to all our major infrastructure stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
hereford_hearts

I'm my humble opinion, any large infrastructure project in the UK should be given to Tesco. I live in the west Midlands, and years ago Tesco wanted to improve one of their stores off junction 5 of the M42. 

Their solution -  Build a new store in the carpark. Knock down the old store, rebuild it double the size. Knock down the store in the carpark, and relay the carpark. 

All done in 4 months, the store was never closed, and I bet it came in on budget!

Edited by hereford_hearts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

henrysmithsgloves
3 hours ago, hereford_hearts said:

I'm my humble opinion, any large infrastructure project in the UK should be given to Tesco. I live in the west Midlands, and years ago Tesco wanted to improve one of their stores off junction 5 of the M42. 

Their solution -  Build a new store in the carpark. Knock down the old store, rebuild it double the size. Knock down the store in the carpark, and relay the carpark. 

All done in 4 months, the store was never closed, and I bet it came in on budget!

That's Tesco value for you😬😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

luckyBatistuta
31 minutes ago, FWJ said:

Too clever for me 🤔

🪝

 

it’s not funny now I’m having to explain it…in fact it isn’t, but was in my wee childish mind at the time 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Based on over fifty years major project’s quantity surveying and project management experience, in my opinion, the ability to deliver a construction project on time and within budget is wholly dependent on the quality and experience of the design team consultants, as well as an early involvement of a premier league contractor. 
All too often in the case of publicly funded projects, costs are presented based on best case scenarios arising from inexperience and what can only be described as sketchy design information to produce a figure that the client wants to hear to make the project go head, with no or very limited assessment of the financial risks involved.

In addition, inadequate allowances are often deliberately made for the exclusions and identified risks on the basis that if properly allowed for, then these would effectively kill the project.

A further more contentious factor is the public procurement requirement to assess tenders on the basis of not only price but is known as the “quality” with disproportionately high weightings given to the “quality” in order that there is considerable scope for the public body to appoint a favoured contractor at the expense of value for money. 
Apologies to anyone reading this who is involved in public procurement if the foregoing sounds very cynical but that is my view as to why publicly funded projects invariably go horribly wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Stuart Lyon said:

There is little or no integrity from holders of public office.

Prime ministers lie.

First ministers lie

Ministers claim 11 grand and want pity when caught.

As for the council in Edinburgh. 

The same council who committed fraud against its own citizens through the compulsory repair scandal.

We have tens of billions filtered to the rich  during a pandemic.

No one held to account unless its 10 years after the fact.

Thieving from the public purse is OK if you hold office.

That's why you have career politicians.

And they are all at it.

Imagine the petty thievery that goes on and never comes to light.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ked said:

There is little or no integrity from holders of public office.

Prime ministers lie.

First ministers lie

Ministers claim 11 grand and want pity when caught.

As for the council in Edinburgh. 

The same council who committed fraud against its own citizens through the compulsory repair scandal.

We have tens of billions filtered to the rich  during a pandemic.

No one held to account unless its 10 years after the fact.

Thieving from the public purse is OK if you hold office.

That's why you have career politicians.

And they are all at it.

Imagine the petty thievery that goes on and never comes to light.

 

 

Spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/11/2023 at 10:49, Wonfiveone said:

Based on over fifty years major project’s quantity surveying and project management experience, in my opinion, the ability to deliver a construction project on time and within budget is wholly dependent on the quality and experience of the design team consultants, as well as an early involvement of a premier league contractor. 
All too often in the case of publicly funded projects, costs are presented based on best case scenarios arising from inexperience and what can only be described as sketchy design information to produce a figure that the client wants to hear to make the project go head, with no or very limited assessment of the financial risks involved.

In addition, inadequate allowances are often deliberately made for the exclusions and identified risks on the basis that if properly allowed for, then these would effectively kill the project.

A further more contentious factor is the public procurement requirement to assess tenders on the basis of not only price but is known as the “quality” with disproportionately high weightings given to the “quality” in order that there is considerable scope for the public body to appoint a favoured contractor at the expense of value for money. 
Apologies to anyone reading this who is involved in public procurement if the foregoing sounds very cynical but that is my view as to why publicly funded projects invariably go horribly wrong.

Should send that an an email to every Edinburgh councillor. At least they then might know to ask questions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Spellczech said:

Should send that an an email to every Edinburgh councillor. At least they then might know to ask questions...

I would if I thought it would make any difference. Again based on my previous experience in seeking help with any problems with the Council, is that of a half hearted interest in the problem at best, arising from a far too cosy relationship with the senior management, in my opinion.
Incidentally, I should have added in my original post, the lack of notices for contractors in the Public Contracts Scotland portal relating to this Council’s projects..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...