jambovambo Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 (warning this link takes you to "The Celts are here" website) Imaginary reporters Moles in the SFA ... and so on. But - you know ? They're probably right. Here's the Herald article by "Martin MacMillan" (in yesterday's "Bougherra goes free" thread) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 (warning this link takes you to "The Celts are here" website) Imaginary reporters Moles in the SFA ... and so on. But - you know ? They're probably right. Here's the Herald article by "Martin MacMillan" (in yesterday's "Bougherra goes free" thread) I just find it really hard to side with them on anything unfortunately... Struggle to see past their odious behaviour and beliefs. I am probably far too biased to muster up any empathy for their ranting and tantrum throwing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 That's not paranoia! For once it's asking a good question! If Bougherra and El Huddy do not get "dealt" with for manhandling the ref and aggravating the situation above and beyond the red cards, it will confirm that the SFA are running scared of The Uglies (BOTH of them). Mind you, the skubala that came out of the meeting yesterday, with the Uglies now being presented as the "saviours" of the game rather than the pariahs they are, already proves that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossthejambo Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Said this in the other thread, but they're not actually "free". It wasn't reported in the referees report but they could still be punished by the SFA enquiry into the match. I'm not saying that's likely to happen but the paranoia express doesn't need to fly out the station just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Said this in the other thread, but they're not actually "free". It wasn't reported in the referees report but they could still be punished by the SFA enquiry into the match. I'm not saying that's likely to happen but the paranoia express doesn't need to fly out the station just yet. i think it's normally just violent conduct that can be revisitied from outwith the match report. it will maybe depend on whether or not 'someone' decides that their actions were violent conduct. i expect no action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboruss Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Don't worry our "it isn't bent" brigade will be along presently to explain it ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn quagmire Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 I thought bougherra should have been given another red when he grabbed the Ref and wouldn't let go. El Hadj should think himself lucky he never got jailed for his behaviour after the game, he would have been as well telling the coppers to **** off because thats what he basicly did when he threw his gear into the crowd. So going by this I can't believe none of them will get any more punishment. They'll not even be here next season to serve their suspensions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Said this in the other thread, but they're not actually "free". It wasn't reported in the referees report but they could still be punished by the SFA enquiry into the match. I'm not saying that's likely to happen but the paranoia express doesn't need to fly out the station just yet. I think they can still be punished if the supervisor notes it in his report but what do you reckon will happen. Murray might get marked down for having the temerity to referee, primarily the Rangers players the same way as every other player in world football. Brines will get off scot free when really on 2 occassions, once during the game and once at the end, Both Lennon and McCoist should have been sent off for squaring up to each other. Which is my main point. One guy treats everyone the same, the other makes allowances and look what's happened. So for all the alcohol bans, fixture changes, we are now back to square one. The OF cannot be reffed and treated the same way as every one else and after a couple of games of them being treated the same as the rest of us it's back to square one (i.e. OF priviledges) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eckauskas Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 I'm really struggling to give a shit. **** them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3,604
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.