Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 For the foul that led up to the second goal? The ref couldn't have done more to help them today. ******* seething. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:shitwine: Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 If it was high feet, Papac's was high as well. If in doubt, give it to Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vladtheexhaler Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Looked below the waist to me and he was not actually that close to Papac. Wrong decision imo, but one of those you see given time and time again. It would not be mentioned had it not happened in the lead up to their winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest C00l K1d Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 I thought it looked like they both went in pretty high, could've went either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Back of the Bus Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 happened right in front of us. 50/50 unless against the old firm chasing a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 happened right in front of us. 50/50 unless against the old firm chasing a win. Yip. 50/50. They need goal to win = free kick rangers. ****s. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambonian Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 I actually said with a wry grin and a shake of the head when the board went up with 5 minutes on it that it'll be just enough time for Rangers to get their usual dodgy free-kick or a possible penalty desision. Oh well.... just another to add to the last 25 years worth of video/dvd of dodgy decisions against the oldfirm, i await the next one next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASSASSIN Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 papac was high feet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 I didn't think there was anything in it at all, it was never a free kick to either side. However, it was given Thomson was out of position as a result and Rangers scored from it, and the game almost immediately finished, strangely enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Was it hell. Cheating ***** ref. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted October 2, 2010 Author Share Posted October 2, 2010 If it was high feet, Papac's was high as well. If in doubt, give it to Rangers. That's how I saw it as well. I was hoping folk who saw it on TV could confirm either way but it just goes to show how much of a 50/50 it was. Add that to the ref running and passing the ball back to them for free kicks and you've got a joke of a performance. Was it Skacel booked for absolutely nothing as well? Absolute disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 I didn't think there was anything in it at all, it was never a free kick to either side. However, it was given Thomson was out of position as a result and Rangers scored from it, and the game almost immediately finished, strangely enough. It wasn't Thomson that lost Naismith for the goal. It was Jonsson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 The official closest to the incident did not signal for free kick. Said on another thread, would it have been a foul to hearts if that had been naismith attacking in last minute? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Back of the Bus Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 The official closest to the incident did not signal for free kick. The official closest to the incident is a moron. This is the same guy who watched Weiss take a free kick TO HIMSELF and did nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted October 2, 2010 Author Share Posted October 2, 2010 The official closest to the incident is a moron. This is the same guy who watched Weiss take a free kick TO HIMSELF and did nothing. Aye wtf was that all about. He knocked it infront of himself and ran onto it. JOKE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hate_hibs Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 It wasn't Thomson that lost Naismith for the goal. It was Jonsson. Yip and Eggy should have done better at marking him instead of letting the cheat make that run. Didn't think it was a free kick, looked like a 50/50 tbh.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currahee! Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 The official closest to the incident is a moron. This is the same guy who watched Weiss take a free kick TO HIMSELF and did nothing. Did the ref actually give them a free kick then though? I didn't hear the whistle in section N. I just thought we stood still expecting it to be given. We do need to wake up at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboinglasgow Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 What about the time when one of the Rangers players got nudged by Elliot (I think or could of been Jonsson) the ref raised his arms to say play on but the Rangers player looked (from my position) to bend down to stop it with his hand then kick it as if it was a quick free-kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Back of the Bus Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Did the ref actually give them a free kick then though? I didn't hear the whistle in section N. I just thought we stood still expecting it to be given. We do need to wake up at times. It was definitely blown for a free kick..... Thomson pointed to the spot it was to be taken from and turned his back. Weiss looked a bit unsure but just carried on. The spineless erse on the touchline looked on but did nowt. Trumpet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBjambo Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Was it hell. Cheating ***** ref. This. That ***** Thomson couldn't do enough to help them and the linesman were ******* hopeless. The sfa are a ******* disgrace, bent as **** the lot of them. Typical Rangers tho... that old ***** weir got away with murder as per... and that diving ***** naismith did his usual again... ******* little albino *****. Kello was outstanding today.. well done lad... shame to lose... but not a bit unexpected to those cheating ******* *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol1874 Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 It was definitely blown for a free kick..... Thomson pointed to the spot it was to be taken from and turned his back. Weiss looked a bit unsure but just carried on. The spineless erse on the touchline looked on but did nowt. Trumpet. The free kick was taken, 15 yards from where it should have been, but it was taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelly Terraces Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 This. That ***** Thomson couldn't do enough to help them and the linesman were ******* hopeless. The sfa are a ******* disgrace, bent as **** the lot of them. Typical Rangers tho... that old ***** weir got away with murder as per... and that diving ***** naismith did his usual again... ******* little albino *****. Kello was outstanding today.. well done lad... shame to lose... but not a bit unexpected to those cheating ******* *****. Wow. Superb post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currahee! Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 It was definitely blown for a free kick..... Thomson pointed to the spot it was to be taken from and turned his back. Weiss looked a bit unsure but just carried on. The spineless erse on the touchline looked on but did nowt. Trumpet. I hope you mean the lineman is the trumpet and not me. The Weiss just ran away with the ball once the ref had turned his back made me think maybe he hadn't given a freekick at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky jamboa Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Another one was where the ball went out of play, the ref and linesman looked at each other, linesman shrugged (as if to say, I've no idea who it came off last) so they just gave it to Rangers! And in the first half, ref played on but the rangers player bent down to touch the ball with his hand. Thats a free kick to Hearts in my opinion but not when it's against Rangers. No wonder the bigot brothers have won every game this season!!! Will just be brushed under the carpet as usual though. rediculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4marsbars Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 It was definitely blown for a free kick..... Thomson pointed to the spot it was to be taken from and turned his back. Weiss looked a bit unsure but just carried on. The spineless erse on the touchline looked on but did nowt. Trumpet. The way I saw it was that a Rangers player "took" the free kick by passing the ball to Weiss (cannot remember which player it was) who was then free to do what he liked with it. The real issue is that they "took" the free kick from 30 yards behind where the offence was committed, and I'm pretty sure the ball was moving. I also wonder whether the ball was stationary for the free kick that led to their second goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysthereinspirit Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 If it was high feet, Papac's was high as well. If in doubt, give it to Rangers. Both players were going in at the same height. Probably to high. Why that then becomes a Rankgers foul is hardly surprising. The best part of our $#!tty league is finding out who from the OF gets screwed by a crap official in one of their 4 head to heads. Sad really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chat Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Someone once told me that Craig Thompson was a tim. I have to say I fecking doubt it after watching that pish today. When is a 50/50 not a 50/50 ? When its against either of the old firm. ***** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boof Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 The award of the free kick stopped a promising Hearts attack. I don't think a free kick should have been awarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walrus Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Someone once told me that Craig Thompson was a tim. I have to say I fecking doubt it after watching that pish today. When is a 50/50 not a 50/50 ? When its against either of the old firm. ***** The Rankgers fans seem to think he is aswell with that lovely song they sang about him today. They really don't sing many songs about their football team. As for the challenge, there was nothing wrong with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.14eeb16ab01c6a19c6d8cffca3fd8ff1.jpeg)
4,472
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.