chuck677 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilly Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 The offence happened just outside the box, their player flung himself as far inside the box as possible. Would it have been given to us i doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boof Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Yup - Witteveen was definitely barged by Bougherra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Foul yes, penalty no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxteth O'Grady Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Yup - Witteveen was definitely barged by Bougherra. Correct, a stonewaller at the Gorgie end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecosse Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 replays show it was outside the box so no penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck677 Posted August 23, 2009 Author Share Posted August 23, 2009 The penalty that was awarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck677 Posted August 23, 2009 Author Share Posted August 23, 2009 Correct, a stonewaller at the Gorgie end I mean the one the ref awarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERjambo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 touch and go, but just outside area for me - and went down far too easily. stupid, unnecessary tackle though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxteth O'Grady Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I mean the one the ref awarded I don't know about that one, wrong end of the pitch for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebles jambo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 if it had been for hearts, no way would he have given it, same old same old, one law for us, different law for the ugly sisters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo121 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Just back and not seen it again but for me Boyd fouled before the penalty incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennytheJambo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 if it had been for hearts, no way would he have given it, same old same old, one law for us, different law for the ugly sisters The usual old story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
number16 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 foul by boyd for the ball to get through - so no barely a foul - so no outside the box - so no against rangers - yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shuggs Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Boyd fouled before the penalty incident. Fecking Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do The Dance Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Wish you'd made this a public vote, maybe help ship out some of the hidden hibs fans on here.. It wasn't a penalty, as the foul was shown to be outside the box. Stupid error by Bouzid though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acey Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 My dad, who was watching Sky, said it was inside the box. I was at the other end of the ground, but I thought it was a penalty too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveofthegame Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Foul by Boyd in the lead up means its should have been a freekick to us. After that i'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip Douglas Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I think the Naismith incident was a penalty. I'm not a Hibs fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonedinoz Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 touch and go, but just outside area for me - and went down far too easily. stupid, unnecessary tackle though. wot he said. Definitel penalty at the other end though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovecraft Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Yup - Witteveen was definitely barged by Bougherra. And Ruben was also shoved by Buggera Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambokezza Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 No i dont think it was, looked outside the box to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radge21 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Palazelous was pushed off the ball when he went for a cross at the Gorgie road end. Scottish Referees are quite simply corrupt. The SPL recently released a statement saying they need the title to go to the wire this season for income reasons to keep attracting television money. Referees will have to make sure Rangers and Celtic stay close to each other all season and the rest of the SPl will suffer from corrupt decisions. Scottish referees are corrupt!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cabbie754 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 just outside the box, decision foul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERjambo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 And Ruben was also shoved by Buggera but it was hearts v rankgers. "play on" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winston churchill Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 just outside the box but bombscare takes another daft lunge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdl2002 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 also at wrong end for me to see, but i could see it coming. Nade shoulder charge - booked. Whole flippin rangers team pushin, shovin and even a clear punch, play on. Fould at edge of box - penalty rangers:realmad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horne1282 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 it wouldnt have mattered its rangers after all so they have to get a penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johanes de Silentio Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Outside the box, so no. Bougherra's barge on Pittenweem - of the stonewall variety. I wish chronic piles on on all Rangers players/fans/refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
einiebroon Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 1st Impression was free kick outside the box, seen the replay and still think it was outside the box. The ref couldnae wait to point to the spot and where was the linesman? He SHOULD have seen it was just a free kick(if he was up with the play) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savage Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Just back and not seen it again but for me Boyd fouled before the penalty incident. exactly how much of jose's shirt did he need to pull for the ref to see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysterion Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 anyone able to put up a vid of the tackle at the end for the pen. would like to see what the deal was, esp as i thought there was a foul right before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 the penalty that was (pre arranged) given... outside the box. a complete collapse from the knees from the player (can't even bring myself to name him because he's a slimy cheating ****). ref gives it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboJen Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Was it just me who thought one of the Rangers defenders (Bougherra?) blatantly armed the ball away from Witeveen in the box in the second half? He knew he was the right side of the ref and linesman for them not to see it. Witeveen seemed to be claiming for it, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Gilbert Wauchope Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 anyone able to put up a vid of the tackle at the end for the pen. would like to see what the deal was, esp as i thought there was a foul right before. Vid of the Pen? Not as good as Stig of the Dump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Apart from being outside the box it looked as if the defederr touched the ball first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willie wallace Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 The linesman was right in line with the incident and he didn't even flag for a free kick.Bouzid was still stupid to dive in like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 the penalty that was (pre arranged) given... outside the box. a complete collapse from the knees from the player (can't even bring myself to name him because he's a slimy cheating ****). ref gives it. Maybe that is why Boyd came on, they knew it was coming!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Maybe that is why Boyd came on, they knew it was coming!! that's why it's so sickening. they bring on the penalty taker in chief.... very strange to me that they only give him 2 mins. looky looky... they get a pen. who can say with all honesty that smith didn't bring on boyd in case they got a pen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berrasbraw Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 It was outside the box so NO But the ref had to even things up as he didn't want the wrath of Walter for sending Thomson off:hang: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Make up your own mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acey Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Either way, it makes people screaming "CORRUPTION" look pretty stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Outside the box. No pen. Also surprised Bouzid wasn't booked (or even sent off!) Last man. Another error by the ref. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboJen Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 It was a stupid challenge to make. No point in worrying about it now though. Bring on the Saints! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slashishere Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 well blow me, Rangers got a penatly that never was! Failry conclusive I would say, case closed, step forward GFA......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Either way, it makes people screaming "CORRUPTION" look pretty stupid. never mind corruption. it's just a case of cheating. naismith knew he was going down no matter what. he did go down very very easily. lo-and-behold rangers get the 'luck' of getting a penalty when it quite simply wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Either way, it makes people screaming "CORRUPTION" look pretty stupid. Yes, it does. Did the ref get the benefit of a freeze frame, or was he watching it at normal speed? At normal speed, as soon as the incident occurred, my instinct was to look at the ref in panic. By the way, I can't remember who it was (Goncalves maybe?), but I'm sure there was an accidental handball in our box at one point. And I hope the stonewaller people are on about wasn't Witteveen going down after next to nothing, which would've been an unbelievably soft award. Plus the ref correctly sent Thomson off for a foul many wouldn't have dismissed him for. Corruption, my arse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.J Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I think it's patently clear to anyone who has, you know, eyes, that it was outside the box. But it's happened before, and it'll happen again. No amount of moaning and bitching will make any difference now. Save that for when "things even themselves out" by Celtic being given one against us too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyJenkins Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 How we didnt get a penalty for Bougherra barging Witt in teh back Ill never know. Their first goal also came from a free kcik that never was. The ref gave them most 50/50s in the second half. Utterly disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERjambo Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 the penalty that was (pre arranged) given... outside the box. a complete collapse from the knees from the player (can't even bring myself to name him because he's a slimy cheating ****). ref gives it. does anyone else think it's funny how boyd came on seconds before the penalty was given? and how often do we read this: goal rangers - boyd (90, pen) ffs, what a joke. i'll post a vid of incident if i can find one. in the meantime, it's being rerun over and over on skysports news (which you can get online all over the place if you don't already have it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.