Captain Lithuania Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Oh dear.. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsNewsDetail/0,,10289~1547600,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonjambo Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I love the way they use the phrase "lead the line" That'll be a line of one then eh ? Unless of course .... GC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Oh dear.. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsNewsDetail/0,,10289~1547600,00.html So you'd rather have Clum up front then?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lithuania Posted February 6, 2009 Author Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you'd rather have Clum up front then?? I'd rather not have him 'lead' the line on his own. He cant do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makateer Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Oh dear.. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsNewsDetail/0,,10289~1547600,00.html Oh dear??? Have we a better alternative we should be playing instead of Nade? Is the 'supporter' in your username meant to be ironic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lithuania Posted February 6, 2009 Author Share Posted February 6, 2009 Oh dear??? Have we a better alternative we should be playing instead of Nade? Is the 'supporter' in your username meant to be ironic? I'll say it again, I would rather not have him up front on his own, we have Glen who has shown he can perform. Even Elliot, when partnered with someone at Livingston proved he could do a job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambojim52 Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I'll say it again, I would rather not have him up front on his own, we have Glen who has shown he can perform. Even Elliot, when partnered with someone at Livingston proved he could do a job. Elliot proved on video that when partnered but someone, he can't dance. What makes you think him and Nade would do any better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lithuania Posted February 6, 2009 Author Share Posted February 6, 2009 Elliot proved on video that when partnered but someone, he can't dance. What makes you think him and Nade would do any better? I wasn't suggesting Elliot and Nade. I was suggesting that two strikers are better than having one 'lead' the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy the Jambo Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I thought the boost might have meant he was still injured unfortunately Csaba thinks he can play on his own up front .If the fat useless lump is fit why not play Glen up front with him .WE might start to score goals and win matches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 "I thought the boost might have meant that he was still injured"? Away and boil yer heid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy the Jambo Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 "I thought the boost might have meant that he was still injured"? Away and boil yer heid. So you are happy that we never signed a striker and the fat useless lump is our main striker for the rest of the season .3 fecking goals this season Nade has scored and he has played most of the season .We should have signed a striker in the window and tore up Nade,s contract and told him to GTF and done the same with Tullberg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makateer Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you are happy that we never signed a striker and the fat useless lump is our main striker for the rest of the season .3 fecking goals this season Nade has scored and he has played most of the season .We should have signed a striker in the window and tore up Nade,s contract and told him to GTF and done the same with Tullberg What do you propose then? We go back in time and sign someone better? How about getting behind the team and the players for an important game? And if it goes tits up, then come back on here and slag off the team/players/manager/anyone and everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Stinkfinger Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 A box of Cadbury's Boost's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you are happy that we never signed a striker and the fat useless lump is our main striker for the rest of the season .3 fecking goals this season Nade has scored and he has played most of the season .We should have signed a striker in the window and tore up Nade,s contract and told him to GTF and done the same with Tullberg The fact that we never signed a striker and the news that Nade is now fit are unrelated. It just gives you another excuse to be a sourpuss. I agree that playing Glen up front with him would probably give us more attacking options and goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lithuania Posted February 6, 2009 Author Share Posted February 6, 2009 The fact that we never signed a striker and the news that Nade is now fit are unrelated. It just gives you another excuse to be a sourpuss. I agree that playing Glen up front with him would probably give us more attacking options and goals. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Canada Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 It's clear Nade needs someone up there with him, could we not just get Tullberg to stand on the spot and flick on some headers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leginten Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Oh dear.. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsNewsDetail/0,,10289~1547600,00.html Great photo on that page. A penny for the thoughts of the Hobo who's sitting watching the Dunbar End erupt as Nade turns away to celebrate. I reckon he's trying to cast his mind back to the fateful day he opted to follow that shower of ****e and wondering why it all went wrong for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboSean Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Glad to have him fit. One week he's murder and can't run, the next week he's a handful and creates incredible ammount of space and holds the ball up well. Last week he was murder, this week... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Spackler Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 It's a pity Ruben is still out but that's all. It sounds like he will be fit a week tomorrow though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMA MAROON Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you are happy that we never signed a striker and the fat useless lump is our main striker for the rest of the season .3 fecking goals this season Nade has scored and he has played most of the season .We should have signed a striker in the window and tore up Nade,s contract and told him to GTF and done the same with Tullberg That is illegal, we would not get away with it. Bruno is supposed to create chances for Nade. Of all the chances he has created, how many has Nade missed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambonian Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I thought the boost might have meant he was still injured unfortunately Csaba thinks he can play on his own up front .If the fat useless lump is fit why not play Glen up front with him .WE might start to score goals and win matches Well we'll have to start doing something! Now Berra's gone, we'll leak more goals, we NEED to score, I hope i'm wrong but, if we're not careful at the back against Falkirk tomorrow, we'll find ourselves out the Cup, for that I blame all of the arses behind the scenes for doing feckall about the situation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelly Terraces Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Playing Nade up front on his jack is one of the most pointless exercises in football. Unless you play someone else who is actually a goal scorer, (something that Nads is most certainly not), along with him, then it's a waste of time. This story is a total flatliner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I'll say it again, I would rather not have him up front on his own, we have Glen who has shown he can perform. Even Elliot, when partnered with someone at Livingston proved he could do a job. The choice isn't just between having one up front and having two up front. Let's put one and a half up front. Get Nade super-fit and have him supporting Glen or even Templeton as our main striker. (sits back waiting for pelters ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Thank you! Cheers, but I also think that Glen up front with Nade will make us weaker in midfield and could contribute to us losing more goals, given our already weakened defence. Its a difficult choice and depends very much on how Falkirk set themselves up. We'll see in 24hrs what way Csaba plays it and whether his decision was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMA MAROON Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Cheers, but I also think that Glen up front with Nade will make us weaker in midfield and could contribute to us losing more goals, given our already weakened defence. Its a difficult choice and depends very much on how Falkirk set themselves up. We'll see in 24hrs what way Csaba plays it and whether his decision was correct. I'd like to see the Bruno/Nade partnership split up, it is without pace, they are both slow as .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So you are happy that we never signed a striker and the fat useless lump is our main striker for the rest of the season .3 fecking goals this season Nade has scored and he has played most of the season .We should have signed a striker in the window and tore up Nade,s contract and told him to GTF and done the same with Tullberg Not the quickest of cats at the best of times, are you? Tear up Nade's contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.