CBjambo Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 :mad: :mad: A vile, odious, slimy individual. He can never be bracketed with true legends such as Bauld and Busby. Wind yer neck you blowhard... He lifted the SC for us and IS A LEGEND, Fact... etc etc ... END OF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 When Henry played only Leighton & latterly Goram were better than him in Scotland, maybe Chris Woods for a year or two but no one else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Sure. As I acknowledged to Charlie above, because I only became a Jambo in 1991, I'm aware of most of Smith's long decline - but much less of what went before it. Such a part timer. If you were not there in 86 you are not a real Hearts fan. Fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts Heritage Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 The nature of a football career has changed and it is very unlikely now if a player is really good that he'll stay with a club like Hearts for the vast majority of his career e.g. Compare Jim Cruikshank and Craig Gordon. So the criteria for naming Legends may well have changed. I would class ANY of the players who played in a Cup winning as Legends. The Team is Legendary but not necessarily the members of the team. Here is list of Hearts players by Career Length Eammon Bannon is top but I'd exclude him because most of his best days were spent away from Hearts. Walter Kidd Tam McKenzie are those two Legends? Zico generates a lot of debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.