Guest S.U.S.S. Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 This would be a great title for a book. I think 2.4 miles would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest S.U.S.S. Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Let's face it, they are both disgusting. It's getting harder to decide which one is ****mier. It's like choosing between a turd A and turd B, why bother deciding? The Rangers fans and their neanderthal behaviour in Manchester really annoyed me last year but Sellik fans are a bunch of nasty, smelly tramps who celebrate terrorism. And thats their good points! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 And thats their good points! The only good thing I can think to say for both of the Old Firm is the fact that I really enjoy Old Firm derbies. Especially the old-skool, 3 red cards, 11 bookings, refs getting hit with coins, tramps falling out of the stands on their way to get pies, players having square goes at full time, players going mental at the ref, dubious penaties etc Despite them both being about as pleasant as a solid kick in the baws, Old Firm games usually make good entertainment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 It's what other fans call us in my experience. Certainly I hate it when Rangers fans that I've met try and use the 'we're cousins' crap. Gets right on my goat. You've got a goat Dave? Are you a mason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hinksikensi Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 In reply to the OP, they are not. smelltic are! Just to clear one thing up though: 99% of rangers fans behaved fine in manchester. Remember there was over 150,000 fans there so don't be blinkered into thinking all the rangers fans are neanderthals. Also i do recall the people involved in the mayhem in manchester were from england, fans of teams like City, Oldham, Stockport and Stoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 In reply to the OP, they are not. smelltic are! Just to clear one thing up though: 99% of rangers fans behaved fine in manchester. Remember there was over 150,000 fans there so don't be blinkered into thinking all the rangers fans are neanderthals. Also i do recall the people involved in the mayhem in manchester were from england, fans of teams like City, Oldham, Stockport and Stoke. Is that you Chick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Kurtz Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 1. In my youth (and much of my adulthood) Rangers operated a discriminatory policy of never signing a Catholic 2. In my youth, Celtic played fantastic football under a Protestant manager with an all-Scottish team from all denominations 3. Being Orange is saying you are anti-catholic. Being catholic is just being catholic. 4. The assumption by Rangers fans that we are somehow related. 5. The assumption by fans of other teams that we are somehow related. 6. The assumption by some idiot Hearts fans that we are somehow related, and the imitation / adoption of Rangers iconography and discography All of the above lead me to dislike Rangers much more than Celtic. I don't know if my line of reasoning is PC, but it is mine, it is how I feel, and I feel it very strongly, because:- I support Hearts because I was brought up two miles from Tynecastle, and imbibed stories of Conn, Bauld and Wardhaugh from birth. Hearts are my local team. They have nothing to do with anyone's religion. That's the Hearts I support. Whereas the Rangers-wannabes in our support are a threat to "my" vision of Hearts, Celtic are no threat. What aload of crap Celtic and Rangers are just different ends of the same turd. Celtis fans are in the main plastic paddies,some of them who go in the Marmion have never ben furthur west than Oxgangs,the green roling hill of danderhall is\all they have seen Do you think that seperate schools has anything to do with bigotry ,also why does the Vatican refuse to extradite the 2 priests they are currently shelterng from child abuse charges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighusref Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 In reply to the OP, they are not. smelltic are! Just to clear one thing up though: 99% of rangers fans behaved fine in manchester. Remember there was over 150,000 fans there so don't be blinkered into thinking all the rangers fans are neanderthals. Also i do recall the people involved in the mayhem in manchester were from england, fans of teams like City, Oldham, Stockport and Stoke. Did you have a match ticket or did you just go for the banter? Largely, R@ng*rs fans (much like C*lt!c fans) ARE neandrethals. The occasional fan is almost human, but not many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 You've got a goat Dave? Are you a mason? No, but my father was. I was 20 before I realised you didn't have to take a wee brown briefcase with you to get drunk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Did you have a match ticket or did you just go for the banter? Largely, R@ng*rs fans (much like C*lt!c fans) ARE neandrethals. The occasional fan is almost human, but not many. Now that is an excellent post. There are the odd OF fans who just like football and happen to support a Glasgow team but most are indeed complete and utter tossers who are not even from Glasgow and care more about religeon / terrorism / England / Ireland than they do the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coatbridgejambo Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 OK I'll bite. Rangers aren't even on the same planet of hatred as the mhanks are to the majority of Jambos. And that is a FACT:) well said boo:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coatbridgejambo Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 mod edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighusref Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 No, but my father was. I was 20 before I realised you didn't have to take a wee brown briefcase with you to get drunk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Now that is an excellent post. There are the odd OF fans who just like football and happen to support a Glasgow team but most are indeed complete and utter tossers who are not even from Glasgow and care more about religeon / terrorism / England / Ireland than they do the game. I'm yet to meet a Rangers fan who actually gives a crap about football. Might sound harsh but it's true. They're both hideous, but my experience of Rangers fans has been infinitely worse. Maybe that colours my opinion a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Rangers are like the guy who cocks his leg, lets a stinker rip and laughs about it as others look on in disgust. Celtic are the guy who does a silent but deadly and then denies it, instead blaming it all on the guy who loudly lets one rip. They might fool some people, but it doesn't make them innocent. At the end of the day, they're both smelly b***ards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Rangers are like the guy who cocks his leg, lets a stinker rip and laughs about it as others look on in disgust. Celtic are the guy who does a silent but deadly and then denies it, instead blaming it all on the guy who loudly lets one rip. They might fool some people, but it doesn't make them innocent. At the end of the day, they're both smelly b***ards. Great analogy. Hehe. I think that's another reason I dislike Rangers slightly more, they're just that bit more thick than their neighbours. As a collective, they tend to remind me a lot of that monster human type creature in the Goonies whose name I forget...but you get the picture.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Great analogy. Hehe. I think that's another reason I dislike Rangers slightly more, they're just that bit more thick than their neighbours. As a collective, they tend to remind me a lot of that monster human type creature in the Goonies whose name I forget...but you get the picture.... He's called Sloth. He looks like my mate Ryan. "I loooove you chunk etc" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 He's called Sloth. He looks like my mate Ryan. "I loooove you chunk etc" That's the fella. Rangers fan personnified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Rangers are like the guy who cocks his leg, lets a stinker rip and laughs about it as others look on in disgust. Celtic are the guy who does a silent but deadly and then denies it, instead blaming it all on the guy who loudly lets one rip. They might fool some people, but it doesn't make them innocent. At the end of the day, they're both smelly b***ards. Top post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Rangers are like the guy who cocks his leg, lets a stinker rip and laughs about it as others look on in disgust. Celtic are the guy who does a silent but deadly and then denies it, instead blaming it all on the guy who loudly lets one rip. They might fool some people, but it doesn't make them innocent. At the end of the day, they're both smelly b***ards. Post of the day. And you are from Blackhall. Doesnt get much better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Great analogy. Hehe. I think that's another reason I dislike Rangers slightly more, they're just that bit more thick than their neighbours. As a collective, they tend to remind me a lot of that monster human type creature in the Goonies whose name I forget...but you get the picture.... Okay so you prefer sleekit types who blame others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Okay so you prefer sleekit types who blame others? In public, I'd rather people fart silently if they're going to do so at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 In public, I'd rather people fart silently if they're going to do so at all. Depends, public farting can be very funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Depends, public farting can be very funny. But not on a crowded train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 Mcdonald Jardine you have awarded the slaveing erse of the day. Congratulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor FinnBarr Posted November 2, 2008 Share Posted November 2, 2008 But not on a crowded train. Best place Shaun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.J Posted November 2, 2008 Share Posted November 2, 2008 All huns are poofs. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.