We_are_the_Hearts Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Don't get me wrong I like Csaba and still have faith in him but his comment in the paper yesterday was "Palazuelos has a 100% chance of playing"? EH? And also, what was the point of Karipidis last night? 120 minutes against Airdire at Home playing with 4 defenders and him...............no need!! Get the team sorted for Saturday Csaba......................Driver back and Mole out please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 It's not like Csaba to contradict himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Don't get me wrong I like Csaba and still have faith in him but his comment in the paper yesterday was "Palazuelos has a 100% chance of playing"? EH? And also, what was the point of Karipidis last night? 120 minutes against Airdire at Home playing with 4 defenders and him...............no need!! Get the team sorted for Saturday Csaba......................Driver back and Mole out please! He di dnot say he will play 100%. He said he would have a chance 100%, not the same thing, picky maybe, and probably misleading, but lets not start another lies thread over something that was maybe a bad decision, but not a lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted August 28, 2008 Author Share Posted August 28, 2008 He di dnot say he will play 100%. He said he would have a chance 100%, not the same thing, picky maybe, and probably misleading, but lets not start another lies thread over something that was maybe a bad decision, but not a lie. There is a difference between talking **** a nd lying. Very misleading in my book. 100% means you are playing surely? "Eggert Jonsson is making good development. In the future we will give him more chances, maybe even at right-back," said Laszlo. "Ruben is a good football player who played a little bit more last year. At the moment, there is competition and he must work to come in the team. Tonight he has a 100 per cent chance to play." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 It's not like Csaba to contradict himself. It appears to be the general trend at Tynecastle these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 csaba needs to be more positive with his tactics because 1 man up front agaist airdrie is complete rubbish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 csbas talked a good game but nows time to play a good game on grass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack49 Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 let's face it he opened his mouth before he read Vlad's fax!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 There is a difference between talking **** a nd lying. Very misleading in my book. 100% means you are playing surely? "Eggert Jonsson is making good development. In the future we will give him more chances, maybe even at right-back," said Laszlo. "Ruben is a good football player who played a little bit more last year. At the moment, there is competition and he must work to come in the team. Tonight he has a 100 per cent chance to play." To me this say's he has a 100% chance of playing, not 100% he will play Very, very big difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboAl Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Don't get me wrong I like Csaba and still have faith in him but his comment in the paper yesterday was "Palazuelos has a 100% chance of playing"? EH? And also, what was the point of Karipidis last night? 120 minutes against Airdire at Home playing with 4 defenders and him...............no need!! Get the team sorted for Saturday Csaba......................Driver back and Mole out please! ...but this is your first posting on the way to not liking him? And you are certain Pala would have made a difference or does it confirm his thoughts that we need a defensive MF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshallschunkychicken Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 I remember Craig Levein once told us Mark De Vries had NO chance of playing against Braga... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Future's Maroon Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 To me this say's he has a 100% chance of playing, not 100% he will play Very, very big difference Agreed 100% I don't get all the doom and gloom after a bad result......yes we should have enough to beat Airdrie in a home cup tie, but in football you don't always get what you want/expect - it just doesnt happen that way. If it did we should be winning the league and, as Vlad said, the Champions League. People need to get a grip, we lost, we got put out of the cup - get over it ffs. I am not happy about it myself, but you have to be realistic and as I said football doesnt always work out the way you expect it too. The underdogs win games all the time.....e.g Hearts in Scottish Cup '98, Artmidia v Celtic, Kaunas v Rangers and even Morton at Hibs on Tuesday to name just a couple of examples. I will add though - Karipidis playing at DM, Eggy at RB.....doesnt take a brain surgeon to see whats wrong there?! Hopefully after last nights performance Csaba/Vlad or who ever see's the fact it is vital we get someone (maybe two) in who can put the ball in the back of the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 I remember Craig Levein once told us Mark De Vries had NO chance of playing against Braga... And I'll bet Kenny Black was utterly shocked when Ruben wasn't in the starting line up last night. Would've completely spoiled his plans. Genius from Csaba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Kidd Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 And I'll bet Kenny Black was utterly shocked when Ruben wasn't in the starting line up last night. Would've completely spoiled his plans. Genius from Csaba. What plans? That was Romanov/Korobbutchup's team last night. No doubt in my mind at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Nowhere outside of theological study can so much attention be paid to every syllable, word and sentence. Ridiculous! Plans change and "no plan survives first contact with the enemy". I would be more concerned at a coach or manager that was inflexible in approach to developing situation in a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshallschunkychicken Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 And I'll bet Kenny Black was utterly shocked when Ruben wasn't in the starting line up last night. Would've completely spoiled his plans. Genius from Csaba. Tongue was firmly in my cheek. That'll teach me to post via mobile on the way into work, when I don't know all the smileys..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Don't get me wrong I like Csaba and still have faith in him but his comment in the paper yesterday was "Palazuelos has a 100% chance of playing"? EH? And also, what was the point of Karipidis last night? 120 minutes against Airdire at Home playing with 4 defenders and him...............no need!! Get the team sorted for Saturday Csaba......................Driver back and Mole out please! I can understand that you're upset about last night but you shouldn't pay quite so much attention to what Csaba says. For a start, he speaks ten to the dozen, and he has to convert his first language into English. Then you have the journalists who will put their own take on his words. And finally, as folk have said, he had a "chance" of playing: which is different from saying "he is" playing. But we're all upset about last night. Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Tongue was firmly in my cheek. That'll teach me to post via mobile on the way into work, when I don't know all the smileys..... I know mate. Mine was too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 I can understand that you're upset about last night but you shouldn't pay quite so much attention to what Csaba says. For a start, he speaks ten to the dozen, and he has to convert his first language into English. Then you have the journalists who will put their own take on his words. And finally, as folk have said, he had a "chance" of playing: which is different from saying "he is" playing. But we're all upset about last night. Buffalo Bill . not just "a chance" though - "a 100% chance". I can see where people are coming from thinking this is strange. It'd be a lot more normal to say he has a 50% chance of playing or whatever if he's a maybe. It could be down to translation/english as you say, but this is HMFC. Nothing is ever that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Nowhere outside of theological study can so much attention be paid to every syllable, word and sentence. Ridiculous! Plans change and "no plan survives first contact with the enemy". I would be more concerned at a coach or manager that was inflexible in approach to developing situation in a game. Yes, it is possible that Laszlo was just saying that there was a chance Palazuelos would play. Or his plans changed between the press conf and the game. But there is also a chance that he received the phone call instructing him who was going to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 not just "a chance" though - "a 100% chance". I can see where people are coming from thinking this is strange. It'd be a lot more normal to say he has a 50% chance of playing or whatever if he's a maybe. It could be down to translation/english as you say, but this is HMFC. Nothing is ever that simple. Csaba uses "200%" to describe when he's going for a pee so I wouldn't read anything into it. Is this really worth debating? Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Csaba uses "200%" to describe when he's going for a pee so I wouldn't read anything into it. Is this really worth debating? Is there a problem with people debating it if they feel like doing so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cut The Crap Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Nowhere outside of theological study can so much attention be paid to every syllable, word and sentence. Ridiculous! Plans change and "no plan survives first contact with the enemy". I would be more concerned at a coach or manager that was inflexible in approach to developing situation in a game. The part in bold accurately describes Csaba last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted August 28, 2008 Author Share Posted August 28, 2008 The part in bold accurately describes Csaba last night. Agreed and that is a big worry. We set our stall out and that is us. Every sub is like for like. Fair enough if you have a game plan that is working.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Is there a problem with people debating it if they feel like doing so? There's a 100% chance I'll leave you to get on with it. Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cut The Crap Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Agreed and that is a big worry. We set our stall out and that is us. Every sub is like for like. Fair enough if you have a game plan that is working.......... I see a common thread developing here. It's starting to feel like groundhog day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Tiresias Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 csaba needs to be more positive with his tactics because 1 man up front agaist airdrie is complete rubbish Correct. We've been playing this crazy 4-5-1 system for too long now that a suspicious mind like mine would lead me to think that it's not Csaba's idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1874robbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Correct. We've been playing this crazy 4-5-1 system for too long now that a suspicious mind like mine would lead me to think that it's not Csaba's idea. Have to agree. Was it not printed when he first came in that he was attack minded and liked playing 4-4-2 as his favoured formation?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelly Terraces Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 I couldn't give a flying duck what Shabbs said before the game, no point really, it's over, what I'm interested in hearing is what he said AFTER it. Would like to think he tore the team to ribbons in the dressing room afters and has said how bollax we were last night. Anyone seen any comments from him post game?? Cheers. Tucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 I couldn't give a flying duck what Shabbs said before the game, no point really, it's over, what I'm interested in hearing is what he said AFTER it. Would like to think he tore the team to ribbons in the dressing room afters and has said how bollax we were last night. Anyone seen any comments from him post game?? Cheers. Tucker. Worryingly, he thinks we just need to take our chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busby1985 Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 What plans? That was Romanov/Korobbutchup's team last night. No doubt in my mind at all. Totally agree!! I DO like Shabba he seems to be getting the best out of a bad bunch but lets not kid our selfs on, any other manager with full control would not have played 4-5-1 for the whole 120 mins against a team 2nd bottom of the 1st division last night, no other manager with full control would have made straight forward like for like subs last nite!! The guys who are good at the stats could work this one out for me, when was the last time we made all three subs and it never included miko, chesney, iva cho cho, 29, benny, pillow bitter, zali.....? Since the arrival of Vlad maybe, its been a while? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Correct. We've been playing this crazy 4-5-1 system for too long now that a suspicious mind like mine would lead me to think that it's not Csaba's idea. A suspicious mind isnt needed to think that. Just an open mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Yes, it is possible that Laszlo was just saying that there was a chance Palazuelos would play. Or his plans changed between the press conf and the game. But there is also a chance that he received the phone call instructing him who was going to play. Interestingly his thoughts changed re Nade also between press conference and game. What with his thoughts changing on Banksy and Jamie Mac within a few days, at least his changes of mind are taking less time now. Probably the internal lines of communication are clearer now that the working relationship has bedded in.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Until the "provisional list" that Shabba has prepared is passed to Romanov & Co, everyone on it has a 100% chance of playing. It's what's happening after that point that's the worry. I think that if Shabba is having more of the team imposed upon him than he expected (as well as a 4-5-1 playing style) it won't be long before disillusionment sets in. Someone said earlier in the thread that we may well have a Stevie Frail Mk2 on our hands. If so, how long will it last? Strangely, even though I know we could be top of the league on Saturday,it's times like this when I find myself looking at my signature more than once! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Until the "provisional list" that Shabba has prepared is passed to Romanov & Co, everyone on it has a 100% chance of playing. It's what's happening after that point that's the worry. I think that if Shabba is having more of the team imposed upon him than he expected (as well as a 4-5-1 playing style) it won't be long before disillusionment sets in. Someone said earlier in the thread that we may well have a Stevie Frail Mk2 on our hands. If so, how long will it last? Strangely, even though I know we could be top of the league on Saturday,it's times like this when I find myself looking at my signature more than once! A lot of people on here suggested that the original press conference dodging of the question on 'who will pick the team' was just issues about English ability. It might be becoming clear that the 'together' situation is more than just that. It would call into question the Laszlo comments about picking the team as per my thread yesterday. http://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/showthread.php?t=26484 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenerjambo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 What's the point in asking Laszlo to get the team right for Saturday?? It is becoming so obvious that the mad lunatic is selecting the team and transfers yet again!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboRossi79 Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 What plans? That was Romanov/Korobbutchup's team last night. No doubt in my mind at all. If I was Romanov and I had spent 3 months going after a player and finally got him, I think I might want him to start and at the very least play a part of the game. So who wants to make up an excuse for that (Ruben) then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 If I was Romanov and I had spent 3 months going after a player and finally got him, I think I might want him to start and at the very least play a part of the game. So who wants to make up an excuse for that (Ruben) then. LOL. Flag boy calling Walter Kidd a hobo. Let the fireworks begin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmfc_steve Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Quite obvious in my mind that the mad **** is still picking the team, and deciding tactics, subs etc.... more so last night, but I still an uneasy feeling with all the games we've played this season that he's still pulling the strings team-wise. We get beat on Saturday with the obvious tones of tinkering, and it'll be the night of the long knives again, and mad vlads coat will be back on the shoogly peg with the natives threatening another uprising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Worryingly, he thinks we just need to take our chances. Time for another change of signature soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4,204
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.