RustyRightPeg Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Thrown out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GYL Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBJambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Look forward to hearing their reasoning . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
south morocco Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Laughable. Can’t admit they made a mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkirkhmfc1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Corrupt to the core Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brawlad74 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Jeez there's no justice with SFA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Selkirkhmfc1874 said: Corrupt to the core How is it corruption in this case? I personally think if a Ross County player had done the same we’d all be highlighting how the officials got it spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just adds to the notion that they are thoroughly inept and covering up incompetence by officials is all important Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GinRummy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Nice that they didn’t let the fact it wasn’t an act of simulation affect their decision. An absolutely laughable sack of shite 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: How is it corruption in this case? I personally think if a Ross County player had done the same we’d all be highlighting how the officials got it spot on. Brilliant if we kick players and no penalty is given. Good result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, Deevers said: Just adds to the notion that they are thoroughly inept and covering up incompetence by officials is all important Decided we've had our quota of apologies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Mikey1874 said: Brilliant if we kick players and no penalty is given. Good result. Sorry I might have this wrong but I thought this judgement was for the interfering with the goalkeeper? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgierools Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: Sorry I might have this wrong but I thought this judgement was for the interfering with the goalkeeper? It was for the "simulation" for a penalty claim, which he in fact didn't claim. Face saving farce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a11ank Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Joke! No surprise!! Idiots will be Idiots!!!😍 Club should be calling this out... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Gorgierools said: It was for the "simulation" for a penalty claim, which he in fact didn't claim. Face saving farce Yeah I’ve been as incompetent as the SFA 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgierools Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Des Lynam said: Yeah I’ve been as incompetent as the SFA 🤣 I wouldn't knock yourself that much mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merrymac Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 5 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: Sorry I might have this wrong but I thought this judgement was for the interfering with the goalkeeper? Think he might be looking at jail time for that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgierools Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, merrymac said: Think he might be looking at jail time for that one 😁😁😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WheatfieldWarrior Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Des Lynam said: Yeah I’ve been as incompetent as the SFA 🤣 I would argue that you have realised and acknowledged your mistake ..... SFA not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Add it to the portfolio of incidents over the past umpteen seasons that have been clearly corrupt, including one of the worst ones,forrests booking for simulation!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunny Munro Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Total nonsense. Bet if a player called a referee a cheat they'd be up the tunnel, incorrectly calling a player a cheat is fine though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 It's actually embarrassing. No doubt the ref's are whinging about the number of times they are being called out and this is a bone thrown their way. Utter nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: Sorry I might have this wrong but I thought this judgement was for the interfering with the goalkeeper? It's from Shankland being booked for diving when he was fouled. Edited March 19 by Mikey1874 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GinRummy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 9 minutes ago, a11ank said: Joke! No surprise!! Idiots will be Idiots!!!😍 Club should be calling this out... The beaks have had to backtrack so many times recently that they are now doubling down on their incompetence. The same at Hibs , apologised to them for mistake after mistake and then just stopped apologising while continuing to make mistakes. They are an embarrassment to Scottish football. A disgrace who show no shame. Edited March 19 by GinRummy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaap's Sigh Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 SFA being the SFA and protecting their own. Quelle surprise! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Well I’m shocked I tell ye….SHOCKED!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Winchester Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Kangaroo court Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joondalupjambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Uphold it and that is admitting it was a foul and therefore a penalty missed by the ref and VAR so no way that was going to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlasgoJambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Seems weird to get thrown out for simulation when he didn’t er… simulate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Next VAR review might still say it should have been a penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts_fan Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 31 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: How is it corruption in this case? I personally think if a Ross County player had done the same we’d all be highlighting how the officials got it spot on. Are you saying Shankland dived? Pretty crappy thing to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joondalupjambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Next VAR review might still say it should have been a penalty. Imagine if it does. What a shambles that would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgierools Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Hearts_fan said: Are you saying Shankland dived? Pretty crappy thing to say. He's since admitted he was assuming it was about the disallowed goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinbad the Sailor Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 SFA corrupt to the core. Never a dive and even through non-maroon glasses it was technically a penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
five wan Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 21 minutes ago, Jambof3tornado said: Add it to the portfolio of incidents over the past umpteen seasons that have been clearly corrupt, including one of the worst ones,forrests booking for simulation!!! And Kinsley’s against der the rangers in the league cup semi final, was being sent off for second yellow and simulation in der the rangers penalty box Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozzyonthefence Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 8 minutes ago, joondalupjambo said: Uphold it and that is admitting it was a foul and therefore a penalty missed by the ref and VAR so no way that was going to happen. They did with the Forrest non penalty though. And with all the other mistakes they’ve admitted to this season. Bit of a strange one, normally when there is contact there is no yellow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts_fan Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 A smaller, weaker player than Shankland would have been given a penalty for that. Reminds me of the treatment Uche used to get. Two players tackling him at a time, hands all over the him, but he was a “strong guy” so opponents not penalised. Saw that often enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joondalupjambo Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Fozzyonthefence said: They did with the Forrest non penalty though. And with all the other mistakes they’ve admitted to this season. Bit of a strange one, normally when there is contact there is no yellow. Yep, forgot that one but even more reason to reject it. Imagine admitting twice in one season they were wrong. Mind you plenty games left for more of these horrendous errors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooks Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 41 minutes ago, Des Lynam said: How is it corruption in this case? I personally think if a Ross County player had done the same we’d all be highlighting how the officials got it spot on. Really ? Not me . He went down and there was contact , but he was straight back up and never claimed for a foul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 7 minutes ago, Sooks said: Really ? Not me . He went down and there was contact , but he was straight back up and never claimed for a foul He wasn't happy at getting booked though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 39 minutes ago, Gorgierools said: It was for the "simulation" for a penalty claim, which he in fact didn't claim. Face saving farce I know. He bounced straight up. Might have been a soft pen if given but it was no dive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooks Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Mikey1874 said: He wasn't happy at getting booked though. Rightly so , it was not a booking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Mikey Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Sinbad the Sailor said: SFA corrupt to the core. Never a dive and even through non-maroon glasses it was technically a penalty. Technically, yes; morally no? Had that been Goldson then the VAR team would've scrutinised it to the Nth degree, spotted the slight touch, ignored the non-claim plus him getting up pronto, and awarded a penalty regardless. 1 minute ago, Sooks said: Really ? Not me . He went down and there was contact , but he was straight back up and never claimed for a foul As above. As someone has already pointed out, it perhaps falls in that grey area of neither a yellow card for simulation nor a penalty. He didn't dive, didn't 'milk it', and made no claim. Should've simply been 'play on'? Poor refereeing and a bit of a face-saving stitch up, methinks. That's one of our Season Ticket renewals into the coffers of the authorities. Maybe they're skint. Actually, given the £40 price of our up-coming 🏆 semi-final, they must be needing extra £££s to pay for all the hangers on and freebies dished out to those who could otherwise well afford to stump up for their own day oot at the footie. Harrumph! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgierools Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Shankland does have history though. Remember when he stimulated getting his shirt pulled over his head earlier this season! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 **** the SFA. Shanks should tell them to get to **** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watt-Zeefuik Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Actually surprised. Obviously disappointed. I might even blame Rodgers for this. The refs are pissed about his antics and are closing ranks against everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pasquale for King Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 They’re circling the wagons because they’re making so many mistakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22games nro Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Interesting hearts are saying they will look at the explanation given later this week before making a further statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Quaresma Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 They couldn't go giving us a penalty or letting a free kick stand if they're trying to stitch up the sheep; RC had to get all 3 points Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboozy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: They’re circling the wagons because they’re making so many mistakes. This is what they do, the fact Beaton was on VAR will have a huge bearing as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3,604
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.