Shanks said no Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 8 hours ago, Smithee said: There is a Times article this morning doubting he will get immunity. Basically diplomatic immunity was attached to the Duke of York’s role when he was a trade envoy but not to him as an individual. The Queen is the only member of the royal family who has sovereign immunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
¼½¾ Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 3 hours ago, The Frenchman Returns said: There is a Times article this morning doubting he will get immunity. Basically diplomatic immunity was attached to the Duke of York’s role when he was a trade envoy but not to him as an individual. The Queen is the only member of the royal family who has sovereign immunity. Other royals can't be arrested in the presence of The Queen, and can't be arrested at various royal residences. The Queen might find herself with a constant companion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 The Prince and the Epstein Scandal - Panorama tonight BBC1 9pm Virginia Roberts-Giuffre gives her side of the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJGJ Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: The Prince and the Epstein Scandal - Panorama tonight BBC1 9pm Virginia Roberts-Giuffre gives her side of the story. Are we allowed to think she's at it ?..in terms of her 'relationship' with Prince Andrew being somewhat exaggerated She may well be a victim of Epstein in other matters The prince is still an idiot though at best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, CJGJ said: Are we allowed to think she's at it ?..in terms of her 'relationship' with Prince Andrew being somewhat exaggerated She may well be a victim of Epstein in other matters The prince is still an idiot though at best Folks can think what they want, I'd rather prefer to wait for evidence to emerge, one way or another. Edited December 2, 2019 by Jambo-Jimbo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 45 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: Folks can think what they want, I'd rather prefer to wait for evidence to emerge, one way or another. This is a high profile member of the Royal family. Evidence does not always emerge. No doubt in my mind he is lying through his teeth. The guy is an absolute tosser of the highest order Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said: This is a high profile member of the Royal family. Evidence does not always emerge. No doubt in my mind he is lying through his teeth. The guy is an absolute tosser of the highest order Stevie Wonder could see that. He's been a tosser his whole life. As for evidence I think Ms Maxwell is the key to all of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 5 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: As for evidence I think Ms Maxwell is the key to all of this. If that's the case then best bring her in soon before somebody gets a chance to take her out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 21 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said: If that's the case then best bring her in soon before somebody gets a chance to take her out. I'm more than surprised that she hasn't been questioned thus far, assuming the FBI know where she is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourcandles Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 20 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: I'm more than surprised that she hasn't been questioned thus far, assuming the FBI know where she is. Maybe she’s out for a trip on her old mans boat...? . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gorgie Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) The mrs just said to me they were talking at work that the terror attack in london was planned by the royal family to take the heat off them. Get the tin foil hats oot! Edited December 2, 2019 by TheStig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagger Is Back Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 38 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: I'm more than surprised that she hasn't been questioned thus far, assuming the FBI know where she is. Wonder if she’s already been taken care of? You’d imagine that there were quite a few ‘names’ in her little black book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Sailor Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Reports suggest Ghislaine Maxwell has been laying low in a New England beach town. She might be laying a lot deeper than that as she can't be that difficult to track down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Better call Saul Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 6 hours ago, TheStig said: The mrs just said to me they were talking at work that the terror attack in london was planned by the royal family to take the heat off them. Get the tin foil hats oot! Don't you just love a Conspiracy... Can't imagine this would distract those in the States. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Boy Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 “I would hardly call it a party, there were only eight to ten people there... “ Okay then, Andrew. You attended a dinner to celebrate the release of a sex-trafficking paedophile pimp then. That does scan better to be fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 8 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said: If that's the case then best bring her in soon before somebody gets a chance to take her out. Being in custody dudnt protect Epstein. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 9 hours ago, CJGJ said: Are we allowed to think she's at it ?..in terms of her 'relationship' with Prince Andrew being somewhat exaggerated She may well be a victim of Epstein in other matters The prince is still an idiot though at best She has retracted statements about Clinton. Interestingly . If Andrew is being fed makes me wonder who is not. Given the circles Epstein moved in and the fact he had some of these girls in tow plenty were well aware. At least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 9 hours ago, Dagger Is Back said: Wonder if she’s already been taken care of? You’d imagine that there were quite a few ‘names’ in her little black book I really think that she's already been interviewed by the FBI, especially considering she was the closest person to Epstein over many years, which makes her the prime witness, I would be flabbergasted if the authorities hadn't interviewed her by now. The reason why she seems to have 'disappeared' could easily be because she's already in witness protection, hence why nobody seems to know where she is, and more importantly nobody at least publicly seems to be trying to find her. 3 hours ago, Icon of Symmetry said: “I would hardly call it a party, there were only eight to ten people there... “ Okay then, Andrew. You attended a dinner to celebrate the release of a sex-trafficking paedophile pimp then. That does scan better to be fair. Absolutely, I said earlier in this thread, that Andrew completely missed the fact that it didn't matter how many people were there at the dinner party, the very fact he was there was the most damning fact. 2 hours ago, jake said: She has retracted statements about Clinton. Interestingly . If Andrew is being fed makes me wonder who is not. Given the circles Epstein moved in and the fact he had some of these girls in tow plenty were well aware. At least. We all know that there will probably be some very rich & powerful people involved here and if the only way for this to go away is for someone to be thrown to the wolves then it'll happen, Andrew could be that sacrificial lamb, but if he were, and a Prince was offered up, then just who the feck is pulling the strings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 8 hours ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: I We all know that there will probably be some very rich & powerful people involved here and if the only way for this to go away is for someone to be thrown to the wolves then it'll happen, Andrew could be that sacrificial lamb, but if he were, and a Prince was offered up, then just who the feck is pulling the strings. We can only guess . I doubt we will ever know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Trump. "No... I don't know Prince Andrew... ". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Victorian said: Trump. "No... I don't know Prince Andrew... ". He forgot he knew Epstein too. Bit forgetful is our Donald. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: He forgot he knew Epstein too. Bit forgetful is our Donald. Trump must be going senile if he can't remember knowing Epstein, because Epstein was a fairly regular visitor to Mar-a-Lago, indeed by a strange quirk of total sheer coincidence, it turns out that was where in 1999 Epstein met Virginia Roberts when she was working at Mar-a-Lago as a locker room attendant then aged only 15. Then there is the 1992 NBC news video clip of Trump laughing & talking with Epstein at a party at Mar-a-Lago where there were numerious young women present, and there's also the flight manifesto from January 1997 which named a passenger by the name of Donald Trump as flying on Epstein's private jet from Palm Beach, Florida to Newark, New Jersey, yet Trump says he never knew the guy, yeh of course you didn't Donald. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-and-trump-mar-a-lago-resort-connections?r=US&IR=T https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/09/documents-released-about-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 44 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: He forgot he knew Epstein too. Bit forgetful is our Donald. He was good friends of the the Clintons, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, The Mighty Thor said: He forgot he knew Epstein too. Bit forgetful is our Donald. Indeedy. It's not like the ordinary joe im the street not realising they know someone. Do you know Darren? Scott's mate. Naw. Aye you do. Naw I don't The boy behind the bar in the bowling club. Aw aye, that boy. Yeah right enough. No I don't know Prince Andrew. What? No. That guy you've been photographed with many times and played golf with. Ex-forces. Officer type. His maw is the Queen. Aw aye... the Duke of York bod. Yeah right enough. Edited December 3, 2019 by Victorian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Boy Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Hang on... is “the side” institutionalised paedophile sex trafficking rings? If so, then the headline is pretty much spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 The latest is, that the US prosecutors are less than happy with the lack of response from Andrew. Despite repeated opportunities Andrew has failed to cooperate with the FBI, not happy are the FBI. More pressure on Andrew, he'll only get away with being un-cooperative for so long before he doesn't get a choice anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Haggis Posted January 27, 2020 Author Share Posted January 27, 2020 54 minutes ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: The latest is, that the US prosecutors are less than happy with the lack of response from Andrew. Despite repeated opportunities Andrew has failed to cooperate with the FBI, not happy are the FBI. More pressure on Andrew, he'll only get away with being un-cooperative for so long before he doesn't get a choice anymore. Sauce? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, Angry Haggis said: Sauce? Main item on Sky News. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milky_26 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, Angry Haggis said: Sauce? bbc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robroy1874 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 hours ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: The latest is, that the US prosecutors are less than happy with the lack of response from Andrew. Despite repeated opportunities Andrew has failed to cooperate with the FBI, not happy are the FBI. More pressure on Andrew, he'll only get away with being un-cooperative for so long before he doesn't get a choice anymore. Must be the makings of a deal here. Couldn't we extradite him to the States in return for the so-called diplomat's wife who killed the young biker being sent back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Gin Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 26 minutes ago, robroy1874 said: Must be the makings of a deal here. Couldn't we extradite him to the States in return for the so-called diplomat's wife who killed the young biker being sent back? Good shout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJGJ Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 41 minutes ago, robroy1874 said: Must be the makings of a deal here. Couldn't we extradite him to the States in return for the so-called diplomat's wife who killed the young biker being sent back? The good old USA want it all their way..tough when it comes back to bite you Putting that feeling aside if they want to speak to him he should speak to them either in the UK or in the USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maple Leaf Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 hour ago, CJGJ said: The good old USA want it all their way..tough when it comes back to bite you Putting that feeling aside if they want to speak to him he should speak to them either in the UK or in the USA Do members of the Royal Family have any protection from the law? Maybe HRH is nervous about speaking to the authorities in case he gets caught in a lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the general Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 9 hours ago, robroy1874 said: Must be the makings of a deal here. Couldn't we extradite him to the States in return for the so-called diplomat's wife who killed the young biker being sent back? Exactly.. usual double standards from the yanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 8 hours ago, Maple Leaf said: Do members of the Royal Family have any protection from the law? Maybe HRH is nervous about speaking to the authorities in case he gets caught in a lie. No he does not, the Queen is the only member of the royal family who is considered to be above the law, everybody else can be arrested and convicted of a crime, however there are certain loopholes, such as none of the Royal family can be arrested whilst in the presence of the Queen. So as long as Andrew clings onto mummy's coat tail he'll be alright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 Bit of a war of words has broken out between Prince Andrew & US prosecutors. It would appear that despite offering to co-operate with US police, Andrew has yet to be interviewed. People will have their own views, mine's is that it can't be that hard to schedule an hour or two in your diary to speak to the police. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52973219 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 He keeps saying he is willing to help as a witness. You're not a witness Andrew you're a prime suspect! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 1 hour ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: Bit of a war of words has broken out between Prince Andrew & US prosecutors. It would appear that despite offering to co-operate with US police, Andrew has yet to be interviewed. People will have their own views, mine's is that it can't be that hard to schedule an hour or two in your diary to speak to the police. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52973219 My view is that HRH Prince Andrew is a kiddy fiddler and a slimy ****, the personification of everything that's wrong with the concept of a family that's encouraged to think it's better than us. But of course that's just my opinion and nothing to interest any lawyers. On 27/01/2020 at 23:43, Maple Leaf said: Do members of the Royal Family have any protection from the law? Maybe HRH is nervous about speaking to the authorities in case he gets caught in a lie. When you get prosecuted it's The Crown vs Maple Leaf, and basically it can't be The Crown vs The Crown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I P Knightley Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 2 hours ago, Jambo-Jimbo said: Bit of a war of words has broken out between Prince Andrew & US prosecutors. It would appear that despite offering to co-operate with US police, Andrew has yet to be interviewed. People will have their own views, mine's is that it can't be that hard to schedule an hour or two in your diary to speak to the police. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52973219 Especially when your diary has been cleared of all those pesky, arduous royal duties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ri Alban Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 (edited) Attica! Attica! Dog day Afternoon Wallace speech in Braveheart 😁 Edited June 9, 2020 by ri Alban Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milky_26 Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 44 minutes ago, Smithee said: My view is that HRH Prince Andrew is a kiddy fiddler and a slimy ****, the personification of everything that's wrong with the concept of a family that's encouraged to think it's better than us. But of course that's just my opinion and nothing to interest any lawyers. When you get prosecuted it's The Crown vs Maple Leaf, and basically it can't be The Crown vs The Crown. i'm sure it is only the queen who cannot be prosecuted. previously princess anne has been prosecuted and convicted under the dangerous dogs at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/nov/21/monarchy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 6 minutes ago, milky_26 said: i'm sure it is only the queen who cannot be prosecuted. previously princess anne has been prosecuted and convicted under the dangerous dogs at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/nov/21/monarchy I think that's right enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo-Jimbo Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 1 hour ago, I P Knightley said: Especially when your diary has been cleared of all those pesky, arduous royal duties. Indeed, that's why I mentioned his diary, he surely can't be rushed of his feet with engagements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawnrazor Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 Just now, Jambo-Jimbo said: Indeed, that's why I mentioned his diary, he surely can't be rushed of his feet with engagements. Id not be too sure........all the schools are still closed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CostaJambo Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 I wish his missus would **** off an' all. They have been divorced for years, her kids are grown up now and yet she is always hanging around him and trying to get the public to put their hand in their pocket for her latest charity scam. Sorry, scheme! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maple Leaf Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 1 hour ago, milky_26 said: i'm sure it is only the queen who cannot be prosecuted. previously princess anne has been prosecuted and convicted under the dangerous dogs act https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/nov/21/monarchy Seems a bit unkind to me. A wee touch of make-up and she looks not too bad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodanny Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 59 minutes ago, Maple Leaf said: Seems a bit unkind to me. A wee touch of make-up and she looks not too bad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 Oooft. Sky News might have to fork out for some lawyers. They did their pre-round up of what was coming up and part of it was on Maddie McCann. New evidence to suggest she's dead. All of this while the VT showed Andy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawnrazor Posted June 9, 2020 Share Posted June 9, 2020 6 minutes ago, Normthebarman said: Oooft. Sky News might have to fork out for some lawyers. They did their pre-round up of what was coming up and part of it was on Maddie McCann. New evidence to suggest she's dead. All of this while the VT showed Andy. 🤣 when your down your down!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.