Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Bill Clinton, Tom Hanks, Will Ferrell, Beyonce, Robert downey jr. The lisy goes on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, Der Kaiser said: Trump, Clinton, Andrew, Glenn Dubin and Jean Luc Brunel also mentioned as well Didn't see Trumps name on the files, do you have a link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Der Kaiser said: Trump, Clinton, Andrew, Glenn Dubin and Jean Luc Brunel also mentioned as well Wasn't JLB there go to guy in Europe for getting "talent". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kaiser Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, Day@theraces said: Didn't see Trumps name on the files, do you have a link? Details from here.. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-unsealed-doe-court-documents-2024-1 And here.... https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-full-dozens-names-revealed-1857103 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Streep also, but believable after her pandering to Harvey in an awards speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Der Kaiser said: Details from here.. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-unsealed-doe-court-documents-2024-1 And here.... https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-full-dozens-names-revealed-1857103 Interesting. Seems to be missing a good few names I have seen online, but sure all will come out. Seen Kimmel has been kicking upma fuss about being named before the lists were revealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Alec Baldwin also, hasn't been the best few years for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kaiser Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc Link to actual documents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 33 minutes ago, Day@theraces said: Bill Clinton, Tom Hanks, Will Ferrell, Beyonce, Robert downey jr. The lisy goes on. 29 minutes ago, Day@theraces said: Streep also, but believable after her pandering to Harvey in an awards speech. 27 minutes ago, Day@theraces said: Alec Baldwin also, hasn't been the best few years for him. You just taking these from random social media accounts or something? Don't see them confirmed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 31 minutes ago, Der Kaiser said: Details from here.. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-unsealed-doe-court-documents-2024-1 And here.... https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-full-dozens-names-revealed-1857103 As these articles say, being on the list doesn't mean wrongdoing. It's not a client list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kaiser Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, AlphonseCapone said: As these articles say, being on the list doesn't mean wrongdoing. It's not a client list. Yes....sorry I thought folk knew that. Witnesses, Victims, Visitors, Other persons mentioned etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Der Kaiser said: Yes....sorry I thought folk knew that. Witnesses, Victims, Visitors, Other persons mentioned etc Bumders, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) This is the only list I've seen so far and can't recognise anyone other that Sweaty Andrew. Edited January 4 by hughesie27 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I think folk are getting a bit excited over nothing, to be honest. Unless we're just assuming that literally every single person he ever spoke to or knew was a wrong'un, then all these names being leaked really doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas-voss Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas-voss Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said: I think folk are getting a bit excited over nothing, to be honest. Unless we're just assuming that literally every single person he ever spoke to or knew was a wrong'un, then all these names being leaked really doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Aye they will be smeared non the less but as someone said earlier it's probably those redacted names that are the ones under serious investigation. Edited January 4 by vegas-voss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
south morocco Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 8 minutes ago, vegas-voss said: That’s funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 39 minutes ago, vegas-voss said: Aye they will be smeared non the less but as someone said earlier it's probably those redacted names that are the ones under serious investigation. Someone a few pages back I thi k said the redacted names were not significant. One was redacted because they were named but have been able to prove no connection or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Having your name associated with JE is not good. You have either been (allegedly): Received a Bheasting.. Been a Bheast. Knew about Bheastings and ignored it. Been invited to Bheasting parties and either: went/not went but knew about it. Accepted gifts/favours from a know Bheast and been obliged to him in some way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Japan Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, vegas-voss said: Hadn't seen that, bit too direct for many in that crowd by the look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the posh bit Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said: I think folk are getting a bit excited over nothing, to be honest. Unless we're just assuming that literally every single person he ever spoke to or knew was a wrong'un, then all these names being leaked really doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Which has most likely been designed to protect the genuine nonces on the list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Stephen hawking 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlimOzturk Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just seen the one about Stephen hawking. WTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
periodictabledancer Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 58 minutes ago, Pans Jambo said: Having your name associated with JE is not good. You have either been (allegedly): Received a Bheasting.. Been a Bheast. Knew about Bheastings and ignored it. Been invited to Bheasting parties and either: went/not went but knew about it. Accepted gifts/favours from a know Bheast and been obliged to him in some way. Tony Blair & Alasdair Campbell - some swingers party that. A load of conspiracy nuts thrashing themselves into a state over nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 12 minutes ago, AlimOzturk said: Just seen the one about Stephen hawking. WTF Has there been more names released that he is on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, periodictabledancer said: Tony Blair & Alasdair Campbell - some swingers party that. A load of conspiracy nuts thrashing themselves into a state over nothing. Not really. Its well documented what he was about. Wasn't a 'conspiracy nut' who released the names on the list. Why would he have their names on his list if they were not friends/associates/employees/guests etc.? Do you have 'random's' like Tom Hanks, Bill Clinton, Bruce WIllis and Tony Blair on your mobile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 28 minutes ago, Pans Jambo said: Not really. Its well documented what he was about. Wasn't a 'conspiracy nut' who released the names on the list. Why would he have their names on his list if they were not friends/associates/employees/guests etc.? Do you have 'random's' like Tom Hanks, Bill Clinton, Bruce WIllis and Tony Blair on your mobile? Pretty sure none of those people are on the list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Pans Jambo said: Having your name associated with JE is not good. You have either been (allegedly): Received a Bheasting.. Been a Bheast. Knew about Bheastings and ignored it. Been invited to Bheasting parties and either: went/not went but knew about it. Accepted gifts/favours from a know Bheast and been obliged to him in some way. Or simply named during depositions for another reason that isn't necessarily related to "bheasting". Folk are just naming loads of folk and people are passing it on without it being true at all. Ruining folks names because of people either being intentionally malicious or stupid, and then stupid people that simply share them without doing any looking for themselves because they're really lazy. It's actually a ridiculous situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphonseCapone Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, hughesie27 said: Pretty sure none of those people are on the list. Yup case in point of folk believing anything they read. We really are in the era of stupidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malinga the Swinga Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, AlphonseCapone said: Or simply named during depositions for another reason that isn't necessarily related to "bheasting". Folk are just naming loads of folk and people are passing it on without it being true at all. Ruining folks names because of people either being intentionally malicious or stupid, and then stupid people that simply share them without doing any looking for themselves because they're really lazy. It's actually a ridiculous situation. Agree, it is getting stupid. Names getting thrown out into public with no evidence of any wrong doing. Already folk at my work convinced Taylor Swift is a bad un, both the Clinton's are pedo's, Hawking liked to watch bad stuff, Springsteen is involved, the old Michelle Obama is a man and many other celebrities are involved. The fact that there is no evidence whatsoever of any offence being committed doesn't matter, it's because they know the stars are guilty while I and others have been conditioned to be unaware of what is happening. Don't get them started on satanic cults as that's behind it all. Problem is, there is no way of convincing them they're wrong or people are innocent. If they are charged and found not guilty, that's because there's a cover up apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 17 minutes ago, AlphonseCapone said: Or simply named during depositions for another reason that isn't necessarily related to "bheasting". Folk are just naming loads of folk and people are passing it on without it being true at all. Ruining folks names because of people either being intentionally malicious or stupid, and then stupid people that simply share them without doing any looking for themselves because they're really lazy. It's actually a ridiculous situation. This. Guy turns out to be a beast, and now suddenly everybody he has ever spoken, or has ever known, or has ever had his picture taken with, is also a beast and definitely knew he was a beast etc… Weird how desperate folk are for a witch hunt, based on absolutely nothing at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrysmithsgloves Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 1 hour ago, henrysmithsgloves said: Stephen hawking 😆 https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGe2PNoof/ Edited January 4 by henrysmithsgloves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Paedo is the shout of half wits nowadays. It’s the insult of choice for idiots and some of those people are obsessed to an unhealthy level that they are everywhere. Epstein was a wrong ‘un for sure but it doesn’t mean anyone who ever met him is guilty by association. For instance a few years ago a guy I knew returned to Edinburgh after studying in London and one of his London mates used to come up and visit a lot of the time and became part of our social circle for a while. Nice lad, funny with an off the wall sense of humour and very sharp. Imagine our surprise when news stories came out about Ronnie Barker the comedians son being on the run from the police for child pornography charges and it was the same bloke. None of us more shocked than the lad that had been great pals with him. But by some standards people should instantly have known as soon as they met him and no way could someone have spent 3 years at uni and not known. If there’s one thing these people are good at its hiding their proclivities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Tazio said: Paedo is the shout of half wits nowadays. It’s the insult of choice for idiots and some of those people are obsessed to an unhealthy level that they are everywhere. Epstein was a wrong ‘un for sure but it doesn’t mean anyone who ever met him is guilty by association. For instance a few years ago a guy I knew returned to Edinburgh after studying in London and one of his London mates used to come up and visit a lot of the time and became part of our social circle for a while. Nice lad, funny with an off the wall sense of humour and very sharp. Imagine our surprise when news stories came out about Ronnie Barker the comedians son being on the run from the police for child pornography charges and it was the same bloke. None of us more shocked than the lad that had been great pals with him. But by some standards people should instantly have known as soon as they met him and no way could someone have spent 3 years at uni and not known. If there’s one thing these people are good at its hiding their proclivities. Except Epstein was convicted in 2006. Given a ridiculously lenient sentence. Also worth pointing out his suicide in a high security jail. It's hardly surprising given what we definitely know that people and not just conspiracy theorists are looking at the "friends " of Epstein . Just for starters does anyone believe he committed suicide? Your last sentence is true but it has no relation to this imo . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said: This. Guy turns out to be a beast, and now suddenly everybody he has ever spoken, or has ever known, or has ever had his picture taken with, is also a beast and definitely knew he was a beast etc… Weird how desperate folk are for a witch hunt, based on absolutely nothing at all. He was convicted in 2006. Are you seriously suggesting that those people didn't know he pimped children? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Would anyone posting go to a known paedophile who pimped children's house for a party? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawnrazor Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 20 minutes ago, Ked said: Would anyone posting go to a known paedophile who pimped children's house for a party? Just to kick his ****ing head in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Dawnrazor said: Just to kick his ****ing head in. I've always liked you as a poster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmfc_liam06 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, AlphonseCapone said: Or simply named during depositions for another reason that isn't necessarily related to "bheasting". Folk are just naming loads of folk and people are passing it on without it being true at all. Ruining folks names because of people either being intentionally malicious or stupid, and then stupid people that simply share them without doing any looking for themselves because they're really lazy. It's actually a ridiculous situation. Very much this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 16 minutes ago, Ked said: He was convicted in 2006. Are you seriously suggesting that those people didn't know he pimped children? No, that's a hysterical conclusion you've jumped to in your own head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day@theraces Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Malinga the Swinga said: Agree, it is getting stupid. Names getting thrown out into public with no evidence of any wrong doing. Already folk at my work convinced Taylor Swift is a bad un, both the Clinton's are pedo's, Hawking liked to watch bad stuff, Springsteen is involved, the old Michelle Obama is a man and many other celebrities are involved. The fact that there is no evidence whatsoever of any offence being committed doesn't matter, it's because they know the stars are guilty while I and others have been conditioned to be unaware of what is happening. Don't get them started on satanic cults as that's behind it all. Problem is, there is no way of convincing them they're wrong or people are innocent. If they are charged and found not guilty, that's because there's a cover up apparently. To be fair old Bill has more incriminating photos floating around than nonce Andrew. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
periodictabledancer Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 hours ago, Pans Jambo said: Not really. Its well documented what he was about. Wasn't a 'conspiracy nut' who released the names on the list. Why would he have their names on his list if they were not friends/associates/employees/guests etc.? Do you have 'random's' like Tom Hanks, Bill Clinton, Bruce WIllis and Tony Blair on your mobile? I know exactly what he was about. I have no idea what your "randoms" comment is about - unless you are inferring that just by his having their phone numbers they are somehow immplicated in his child trafficking/prostitution schemes. Which is utter nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 44 minutes ago, Ked said: Except Epstein was convicted in 2006. Given a ridiculously lenient sentence. Also worth pointing out his suicide in a high security jail. It's hardly surprising given what we definitely know that people and not just conspiracy theorists are looking at the "friends " of Epstein . Just for starters does anyone believe he committed suicide? Your last sentence is true but it has no relation to this imo . I didn’t realise dates were on the list. Were they? It’s recorded in several places that many people cut any ties to him after his conviction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 hours ago, AlphonseCapone said: Or simply named during depositions for another reason that isn't necessarily related to "bheasting". Folk are just naming loads of folk and people are passing it on without it being true at all. Ruining folks names because of people either being intentionally malicious or stupid, and then stupid people that simply share them without doing any looking for themselves because they're really lazy. It's actually a ridiculous situation. Always thought Tony Blair was a 'wrong un'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 **** and The Gang had it right. Sweaty Nonce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 30 minutes ago, periodictabledancer said: I know exactly what he was about. I have no idea what your "randoms" comment is about - unless you are inferring that just by his having their phone numbers they are somehow immplicated in his child trafficking/prostitution schemes. Which is utter nonsense. The fact (if it is a fact) that he had their personal contact details doesn't implicate them in child trafficking; however, it does beg the question how they are associated with a convicted man. You cat tell me some of the folk mentioned on that list are not at least on the"dubious" side of decent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said: This. Guy turns out to be a beast, and now suddenly everybody he has ever spoken, or has ever known, or has ever had his picture taken with, is also a beast and definitely knew he was a beast etc… Weird how desperate folk are for a witch hunt, based on absolutely nothing at all. BURN THEM ALLLLLL!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 1 hour ago, Shooter McGavin said: No, that's a hysterical conclusion you've jumped to in your own head. Is it? You posted 3 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said: This. Guy turns out to be a beast, and now suddenly everybody he has ever spoken, or has ever known, or has ever had his picture taken with, is also a beast and definitely knew he was a beast etc… Weird how desperate folk are for a witch hunt, based on absolutely nothing at all. And I posted he was convicted in 2006. Are you seriously suggesting that even prior to his conviction people that move in those circles didn't know? It's hardly hysterical ffs . The guy committed suicide in a high security prison where two cameras stopped working. Come on Shooter you can't just accuse me of hysterical conclusions? Edited January 4 by Ked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ked Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 54 minutes ago, Tazio said: I didn’t realise dates were on the list. Were they? It’s recorded in several places that many people cut any ties to him after his conviction. Mate I don't know . But I doubt very much the likes of Clinton and other powerful men didn't know pre conviction . The situation you described is /was very different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter McGavin Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Ked said: And I posted he was convicted in 2006. Are you seriously suggesting that even prior to his conviction people that move in those circles didn't know? It's hardly hysterical ffs . The guy committed suicide in a high security prison where two cameras stopped working. Come on Shooter you can't just accuse me of hysterical conclusions? You’re assuming they all knew prior to his convictions, based on what exactly? If there’s evidence to support your claim that the whole of Hollywood was in on it, then I’d like to see it. But at this moment in time, we’ve essentially got a bunch of celebrities names being cast around because they knew him or were associated with him. Hardly incriminating, is it? Seen a picture earlier where the Brazilian Ronaldo was at a party that Epstein and Maxwell just happened to be at as well. Is that him on the beast list now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.