Clerry Jambo Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport/football/hearts/craig-levein-hopes-sfa-don-t-ruin-betfred-cup-run-1-4771813 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCK LOBSTER Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 12 hours ago, luckyBatistuta said: I always think folk are too quick to jump in with the pitchforks when an honest mistake is made by someone. If you were to look at this from another angle...say it was your wife who had made this mistake and she had been in the job for years, without making any prior errors, would you honestly be telling her she should be sacked? Look at it if it was hibs or Celtic or rangers who had made the mistake we would want them kicked out. There is an other point the authorities could also be at fault, in friendlies a team sheet must be handed in and to play a trialist you need permission from the governing body, now the young lad has played in some of our friendlies so how has it taken for now for it to be picked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 8 hours ago, feedthefox said: Utter utter gash to suggest anyone should be sacked over this. Feck me these things happen, it’s totally nuts to think everyone is immune from it happening to them. A genuine innocent error should never be reason to ruin someone, I’m sure they feel bad enough. What it simply highlights is how draconian the punishment is for what is nothing more than a clerical error. I’ve yet to hear ever that this type of error has any bearing on the game. Compare this to blatant diving etc which has a potential direct impact on a match result and yet you can airbrush a whole result on the back of a technicality. Well said ! The number of posters who seem to think that Cove should get the 3 points is bizarre. We just happened to be playing them when a clerical error that had no bearing on the result occurred. How about folk getting behind the club for a change ? Somebody behind the scenes has made a mistake a small fine should cover it. Points deductions for things like this make a mockery of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCK LOBSTER Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 8 minutes ago, Barack said: He's a contracted player. Not sure what you're trying to get at mentioning trialists. Unfortunately he is not contracted and this is why it happened. His registration ran out in June and he hasn't been re registered so he should have been shown as a trialist on the team sheet in the friendlies but wasn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soonbe110 Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, ROCK LOBSTER said: Unfortunately he is not contracted and this is why it happened. His registration ran out in June and he hasn't been re registered so he should have been shown as a trialist on the team sheet in the friendlies but wasn't Get your hard hat on. Flak coming your way. You are very wrong on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCK LOBSTER Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, luckydug said: Well said ! The number of posters who seem to think that Cove should get the 3 points is bizarre. We just happened to be playing them when a clerical error that had no bearing on the result occurred. How about folk getting behind the club for a change ? Somebody behind the scenes has made a mistake a small fine should cover it. Points deductions for things like this make a mockery of the game. Cove won't get 3 points but neither will we I can't see us getting chucked out so a fine it is and a word in the ear of the person that mucked up and we move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecce Romanov Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 My thoughts: - No-one should be sacked over this. We are a supportive and compassionate club - learn from it and move on - A fair result would be for us to be docked the 3 points. Any way you look at it Hearts didn't register the player properly. It's the clubs responsibility - Given the points deduction, there is no reason why we shouldn't still be able to progress. It might even act as extra motivation - Imagine if we went on to win it. the seethe from Leith would be amazing So, a good win against RR today will set us up for the rest of the competition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Awarding points to Cove makes very little sense. Yes there is a credible accusation against us regarding a potential advantage gained via using a player who was not fully registered according to the rules and processes in place, but the award of points to Cove creates an artificial status of our mini-league as well. It does not adequately return the status of our group to that of a group where no offence occured. Cove have not achieved anything to merit the points. Only a retrospective and wholly separate deduction from our points makes any sense. Given that the match was played with a total of 3 mini-league points at stake then surely the maximum number of points to deduct would be 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCK LOBSTER Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, soonbe110 said: Get your hard hat on. Flak coming your way. You are very wrong on this one. 4 minutes ago, soonbe110 said: Get your hard hat on. Flak coming your way. You are very wrong on this one. If I'm wrong explain why and if I'm wrong why do I need a hard hat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCK LOBSTER Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, Barack said: "Due to an administrative error on the club's part at the end of the January transfer window, Andrew Irving entered the field of play in the 65th minute as an unregistered player. "Andrew was given an extension contract in January 2018 and his extension paperwork was all properly completed and in order. However, it was not loaded onto the online SFA registration system at the time. His official registration, therefore, ran out on 9th June 2018. Unfortunately, this was not picked up in advance of last night's game." Therefore in the friendlies he played in it should have been flagged up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmreido Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 26 pages WOW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgie_Rules Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 (edited) Baffled at how many people seem to think we will/can still qualify if we are docked the 3 points. For us to go through we’ll need to win every game - not impossible but not a given Inverness will need to not beat Raith at home - unlikely If they do we’ll need to score a fair few goals in each of the games, particularly against Inverness at home. Even if that happens it still may not be enough depending on the other groups. Peterhead finished on 9 points last year and didnt progress as the 5th best 2nd placed team. Not sure how the seedings work but I assume if we make it through in 2nd place we’ll play one or Celtic, Rangers, Aberdeen etc Shambles of a situation Edited July 21, 2018 by Gorgie_Rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartmussel Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 24 minutes ago, luckydug said: Well said ! The number of posters who seem to think that Cove should get the 3 points is bizarre. We just happened to be playing them when a clerical error that had no bearing on the result occurred. How about folk getting behind the club for a change ? Somebody behind the scenes has made a mistake a small fine should cover it. Points deductions for things like this make a mockery of the game. At last sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 32 minutes ago, luckydug said: Well said ! The number of posters who seem to think that Cove should get the 3 points is bizarre. We just happened to be playing them when a clerical error that had no bearing on the result occurred. How about folk getting behind the club for a change ? Somebody behind the scenes has made a mistake a small fine should cover it. Points deductions for things like this make a mockery of the game. It's nothing to do with "getting behind the club". We are discussing potential sanctions for a feck up. There are people on here who try to defend the indefensible. You're one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTBCAL Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 8 minutes ago, Gorgie_Rules said: Baffled at how many people seem to think we will/can still qualify if we are docked the 3 points. For us to go through we’ll need to win every game - not impossible but not a given Inverness will need to not beat Raith at home - unlikely If they do we’ll need to score a fair few goals in each of the games, particularly against Inverness at home. Even if that happens it still may not be enough depending on the other groups. Peterhead finished on 9 points last year and didnt progress as the 5th best 2nd placed team. Not sure how the seedings work but I assume if we make it through in 2nd place we’ll play one or Celtic, Rangers, Aberdeen etc Shambles of a situation If you want to win the cup you will need to play one of them sooner or later. if you are unseeded do you get home advantage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 17 minutes ago, rmreido said: 26 pages WOW! Maybe it wouldn't be if the sanction had been applied already, which it should have been. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 11 minutes ago, Gorgie_Rules said: Baffled at how many people seem to think we will/can still qualify if we are docked the 3 points. For us to go through we’ll need to win every game - not impossible but not a given Inverness will need to not beat Raith at home - unlikely If they do we’ll need to score a fair few goals in each of the games, particularly against Inverness at home. Even if that happens it still may not be enough depending on the other groups. Peterhead finished on 9 points last year and didnt progress as the 5th best 2nd placed team. Not sure how the seedings work but I assume if we make it through in 2nd place we’ll play one or Celtic, Rangers, Aberdeen etc Shambles of a situation You seemed to recover from your bafflement very quickly indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 11 hours ago, Jodami said: Gross negligence does not even exist in Scottish law but let's settle on negligence. To sack someone on unintentional negligence would be difficult to defend if they have a record of good conduct at work and it would cause us considerable reputational damage. If the club didn't have written procedures in place detailing the activities and review and sign off on registration then it would be automatically overturned for a start. Surely you can see that is an own goal all round MJ. You know what I mean, and I'm perfectly well aware of legal terminology thank you. On the assumption one person had responsibility for the registration and failed to do so I'd be confident that could be defended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_R Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 39 minutes ago, luckydug said: Well said ! The number of posters who seem to think that Cove should get the 3 points is bizarre. We just happened to be playing them when a clerical error that had no bearing on the result occurred. How about folk getting behind the club for a change ? Somebody behind the scenes has made a mistake a small fine should cover it. Points deductions for things like this make a mockery of the game. If irving had came on and scored a hat trick to win us the game would your opinion be the same? Rules cant be ambiguous unfortunately. Even the club have admitted its our fault and will have to take whatever punishment on the chin. Sadly should have been decided by now. Sceptic in me things SPFL will take the lazy route (we win today = deduction, we lose= fine. and the cup continues as normal) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 hour ago, ROCK LOBSTER said: Look at it if it was hibs or Celtic or rangers who had made the mistake we would want them kicked out. There is an other point the authorities could also be at fault, in friendlies a team sheet must be handed in and to play a trialist you need permission from the governing body, now the young lad has played in some of our friendlies so how has it taken for now for it to be picked up. Well I wouldn't. That's a massive overreaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soonbe110 Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 30 minutes ago, ROCK LOBSTER said: If I'm wrong explain why and if I'm wrong why do I need a hard hat He was properly contracted just not registered with SFA therefore clearly not a trialist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 11 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: It's nothing to do with "getting behind the club". We are discussing potential sanctions for a feck up. There are people on here who try to defend the indefensible. You're one of them. There are people on here who enjoy sticking the boot in at every opportunity. You are one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 14 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Maybe it wouldn't be if the sanction had been applied already, which it should have been. Correct. Plenty time to work out what to do. Get the feeling they are waiting til this weekends results are in to help them decide which is very wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, luckydug said: There are people on here who enjoy sticking the boot in at every opportunity. You are one of them. And there are people on here who see any kind of criticism as being unsupportive of the club/Levein/Budge etc so they try and sweep the negatives. under the rug. You are are one of them. If I was representing the club at the hearing and said “yeah, we should probably be kicked out”, then that is being unsupportive. Saying it on a message board is just chat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David McCaig Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Hopefully there is some mitigation in the fact that we chose to weaken our team by bringing on a Youth player in favour of a more experienced colleague, as the match was effectively won by this stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, Nookie Bear said: And there are people on here who see any kind of criticism as being unsupportive of the club/Levein/Budge etc so they try and sweep the negatives. under the rug. You are are one of them. If I was representing the club at the hearing and said “yeah, we should probably be kicked out”, then that is being unsupportive. Saying it on a message board is just chat. Just have to agree to disagree then. BTW I have also criticised the club on occasion. I just think there has been a massive over reaction to this. Wanting some ordinary worker sacked for a single mistake gies peace. If it was that important it should have been supervised at a high level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hungry hippo Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 33 minutes ago, Gorgie_Rules said: Baffled at how many people seem to think we will/can still qualify if we are docked the 3 points. For us to go through we’ll need to win every game - not impossible but not a given Inverness will need to not beat Raith at home - unlikely If they do we’ll need to score a fair few goals in each of the games, particularly against Inverness at home. Even if that happens it still may not be enough depending on the other groups. Peterhead finished on 9 points last year and didnt progress as the 5th best 2nd placed team. Not sure how the seedings work but I assume if we make it through in 2nd place we’ll play one or Celtic, Rangers, Aberdeen etc Shambles of a situation Not that confusing that we could still qualify. Peterhead are the only one of the 5 second placed teams to finish on 9 points and not qualify in the two seasons so it would still be very possible. As for not being seeded in a potential last 16 it wouldn't be ideal but hardly mean we are automatically out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, luckydug said: Just have to agree to disagree then. BTW I have also criticised the club on occasion. I just think there has been a massive over reaction to this. Wanting some ordinary worker sacked for a single mistake gies peace. If it was that important it should have been supervised at a high level. I agree the future if that employee should be considered after a proper investigation, and not see him or her sacked without it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnthomas Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, David McCaig said: Hopefully there is some mitigation in the fact that we chose to weaken our team by bringing on a Youth player in favour of a more experienced colleague, as the match was effectively won by this stage. Trying not to be biased but I feel losing all 3 points (or any) is harsh . Yes we , accidentally , broke a rule . We , yes arguably , gained no advantage from it . The punishment should fit the crime , personally think a fine would be fair . Unfortunately football authorities often appear to be heavy handed in these matters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, johnthomas said: Trying not to be biased but I feel losing all 3 points (or any) is harsh . Yes we , accidentally , broke a rule . We , yes arguably , gained no advantage from it . The punishment should fit the crime , personally think a fine would be fair . Unfortunately football authorities often appear to be heavy handed in these matters It does appear he was legally under contract ( paperwork signed ) but we hadn’t registered that contract with the Footy authorities. We need a good lawyer for this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnthomas Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 minute ago, davemclaren said: It does appear he was legally under contract ( paperwork signed ) but we hadn’t registered that contract with the Footy authorities. We need a good lawyer for this... Yes it is basically a technicality . Hopefully it is regarded as such Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannibal Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 36 minutes ago, PTBCAL said: If you want to win the cup you will need to play one of them sooner or later. if you are unseeded do you get home advantage? I though the seedings were based on your league position last season? So top 8 in the premier last season assuming Killie, Hearts, Motherwell and St Johnstone make it out of the groups will be seeded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannibal Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, allyjambo said: I though the seedings were based on your league position last season? So top 8 in the premier last season assuming Killie, Hearts, Motherwell and St Johnstone make it out of the groups will be seeded. Nope I am wrong, last season the 4 group winners with the highest points and the 4 teams in Europe were the seeds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EIEIO Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, davemclaren said: It does appear he was legally under contract ( paperwork signed ) but we hadn’t registered that contract with the Footy authorities. We need a good lawyer for this... Agree any points deduction here would be harsh as he had signed a contract extension. Small fine otherwise major seethe from me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboGraham Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 49 minutes ago, Gorgie_Rules said: Baffled at how many people seem to think we will/can still qualify if we are docked the 3 points. For us to go through we’ll need to win every game - not impossible but not a given Inverness will need to not beat Raith at home - unlikely If they do we’ll need to score a fair few goals in each of the games, particularly against Inverness at home. So baffled that within a paragraph you stated exactly why so many people think we can qualify. Even with a maximum points deduction of 3 points it all remains in our own hands regardless of what anyone else does. If we don’t get maximum points from Raith and Cowdenbeath then we don’t deserve to go through anyway. Win both and we will know exactly how many goals we will need to beat Inverness by before the game kicks off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gashauskis9 Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 minute ago, JamboGraham said: So baffled that within a paragraph you stated exactly why so many people think we can qualify. Even with a maximum points deduction of 3 points it all remains in our own hands regardless of what anyone else does. If we don’t get maximum points from Raith and Cowdenbeath then we don’t deserve to go through anyway. Win both and we will know exactly how many goals we will need to beat Inverness by before the game kicks off. This. If we win our remaining games then the only team that could finish above us on points would be Cove, and I’d doubt they would win all theirs. Simply put, we need to win comfortably and in 90 mins and we should be sorted. Last year, a win in 90 against Dunfermline would have been enough to qualify, so no real change here if we ‘lose’ to Cove. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboGraham Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 27 minutes ago, David McCaig said: Hopefully there is some mitigation in the fact that we chose to weaken our team by bringing on a Youth player in favour of a more experienced colleague, as the match was effectively won by this stage. This would be my approach with the panel. The fine is for the technicality, we will get a fine. Anything else is a judgement on sporting advantage. I hope the club are currently working on a full data set regarding experience, appearances, level played at, etc for the two players. I would also have someone go over the match video in fine detail. Number of times he touched the ball, number of seconds involved the action zone, tackles, passes, etc, etc, etc. As much evidence as possible to help the panel confirm that we were weakened by him coming on and he wasn’t as effective as other players on the park whilst on. If we can’t provide evidence for that it’s difficult to argue no sporting advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pasquale for King Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 8 hours ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: A whataboutery argument won't support incompetence in your own role. It would in court if the persons punjshment is more extreme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pasquale for King Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Nookie Bear said: That’s not a defence at all as it’s whataboutery. However, if they can point out another member of staff made an identical mistake and kept their job, then that’s different. In an unfair dismissal case whataboutery is relevant, if you get sacked for costing the club thousands and someone else hasn’t been sacked for costing millions you will win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 58 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: Maybe it wouldn't be if the sanction had been applied already, which it should have been. Number Crunching. Time taken for SPL to hold a board meeting to discuss a (falsely) alleged breach of a non-existent rule (about timely payment of wages) - 6 hours Time taken for the SPL to meet to discuss an admitted breach of a long standing rule with many precedents - 6 days. (with apologies to Private Eye) Scottish football works in mysterious ways ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 46 minutes ago, Nookie Bear said: And there are people on here who see any kind of criticism as being unsupportive of the club/Levein/Budge etc so they try and sweep the negatives. under the rug. You are are one of them. If I was representing the club at the hearing and said “yeah, we should probably be kicked out”, then that is being unsupportive. Saying it on a message board is just chat. Quite. However, unless you follow those you mention in the first sentence, you are "sticking the boot in". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: It would in court if the persons punjshment is more extreme. How would it be more extreme precisely? Scot Gardiner, he of the alleged seats, is no longer in gainful employment. On the playing side, how do you determine "waste" precisely? That's entirely subjective. Therefore, even your whataboutery is a bit daft as a defence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 17 minutes ago, Gashauskis9 said: This. If we win our remaining games then the only team that could finish above us on points would be Cove, and I’d doubt they would win all theirs. Simply put, we need to win comfortably and in 90 mins and we should be sorted. Last year, a win in 90 against Dunfermline would have been enough to qualify, so no real change here if we ‘lose’ to Cove. It's Inverness's goal difference that is the problem. They would also finish on 9 points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 .While stringent processes are already in place to try to prevent something of this nature occurring, clearly mistakes can happen. An additional step in our internal procedures will be implemented immediately to try to ensure this cannot happen again. There will be no dismissals, going by that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 So what we're now looking at is the distinct possibility of a MUNNEY-SPINNAR match vs the vermin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 8 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: In an unfair dismissal case whataboutery is relevant, if you get sacked for costing the club thousands and someone else hasn’t been sacked for costing millions you will win. But that's only really applicable if you are comparing similar jobs and responsibilities. Signing players is a judgement call, and it's difficult to quantify what is a success or failure. It is only really reflected in League positions and, if that suffers then yes, the manager will be sacked. Incidentally - not aimed at you, by the way - if we go to the hearing and try to use the "we only brought a kid on and lost a goal, so where's the harm" argument then we would deserve to be kicked out of the tournament. It's embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar PHM Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said: It's Inverness's goal difference that is the problem. They would also finish on 9 points. We may have to score 10-12 goals in 3 games. Not impossible given the opposition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Just now, Escobar PHM said: We may have to score 10-12 goals in 3 games. Not impossible given the opposition Indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Escobar PHM said: We may have to score 10-12 goals in 3 games. Not impossible given the opposition Bring. It. On. I think we've stumbled on an exciting new League Cup format. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar PHM Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Just now, Nookie Bear said: Bring. It. On. I think we've stumbled on an exciting new League Cup format. Also. We could really do without ICT running up a score against Raith. I imagine they’ll go on a goal chase and could easily hit 3 or 4. Hopefully not more than that as it might take them out of sight. Cowdenbeath we’ve got to go at hard for 90 minutes. Yes. Could be a bit more exciting than the warm up stroll it looked like being. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.