JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, Lone Striker said: His sexuality was only part of the potential embarrassment/humiliation - an MP isn't supposed to be giving out other MPs phone number without permission, especially to some random bloke he found on Grindr. VERY naive and downright stupid, I'd say. MPs getting involved in that sort of "social media" stuff are risking political suicide. And for what ? A penis . That’s all it really is . Many a man has fallen due to the desire for it ! 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 12 minutes ago, Victorian said: James is beelin' that he hasn't found something to be in conflict about. Beelin'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionDJambo Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 16 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: I have dear . Try not getting your knickers in a twist . The brits love a good old fashioned sex scandal No sex, please. We’re British! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Striker Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 9 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: And for what ? A penis . That’s all it really is . Many a man has fallen due to the desire for it ! 😂 And now its being reported that another 2 MPs have received msgs from dodgy unknown persons asking for pics of their bits & pieces, which they then actually went ahead & did !! Fecking hell...... Wragg's explanation - “They had compromising things on me. They wouldn’t leave me alone. They would ask for people. I gave them some numbers, not all of them. I told him to stop. He’s manipulated me. Well aye, .... and who's to blame for that, ya daftie ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
periodictabledancer Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 11 minutes ago, Lone Striker said: And now its being reported that another 2 MPs have received msgs from dodgy unknown persons asking for pics of their bits & pieces, which they then actually went ahead & did !! Fecking hell...... Wragg's explanation - “They had compromising things on me. They wouldn’t leave me alone. They would ask for people. I gave them some numbers, not all of them. I told him to stop. He’s manipulated me. Well aye, .... and who's to blame for that, ya daftie ? This guy isn't just an MP , he's a relatively senior figure who chairs committees and is part of the 1922 Committee loons. He used his Westminster connections to get sex and then crapped all over his colleagues to save his own skin , exposing them to the kind of blackmail he inflicted on himself. "piece of shit" seems 100% appropriate. Yet another example of the "good chap" syndrome that's f'd up this country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 A sitting MP firing dick pics and then phone numbers of other MP's with 'similar interests' to some random on t'internet? I suppose it would be unfair not to acknowledge that the participants of this particular sordid Tory sex scandal appear to have been willing, which is generally not the case when they're at their usual noncing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 The basic functions of MPs are : 1. Local representative. 2. Legislator. A guy spends his time whinging out photographic evidence of his chub to people he doesn't know. Remarkably then finds himself the subject of blackmail. Caves in and provides contact details of his parliamentary colleagues. What must his constituents think of his ability, judgement, interest in assisting with local matters, both personal and community? This guy casts votes and debates towards the creation of the law. Further morons then join in the circulation of chub-pics. No wonder the women of parliament appear to be perpetually aghast at the behavior and activities of the men. It's really just the utter dregs masquerading as average people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 11 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: similar interests' to And what are you suggesting by this ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 34 minutes ago, Lone Striker said: And now its being reported that another 2 MPs have received msgs from dodgy unknown persons asking for pics of their bits & pieces, which they then actually went ahead & did !! Fecking hell...... Wragg's explanation - “They had compromising things on me. They wouldn’t leave me alone. They would ask for people. I gave them some numbers, not all of them. I told him to stop. He’s manipulated me. Well aye, .... and who's to blame for that, ya daftie ? Like I said it’s all very niave of him . Could have not have had the sense to endure his face wasn’t in the pics ? I assume it was hence the blackmailing . Apparently one dick really looks like another so would be hard ( pardon the pun. ) to identify him 😂 it’s all very 1980s “ news of the world “ nonsense with a whiff of slight homophobia thrown in . In fact a poster on this did just that . Quelle surprise it’s him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: And what are you suggesting by this ? Just now, JudyJudyJudy said: Like I said it’s all very niave of him . Could have not have had the sense to endure his face wasn’t in the pics ? I assume it was hence the blackmailing . Apparently one dick really looks like another so would be hard ( pardon the pun. ) to identify him 😂 it’s all very 1980s “ news of the world “ nonsense with a whiff of slight homophobia thrown in . In fact a poster on this did just that . Quelle surprise it’s him If you’re calling this out as homophobia you’re miles of the mark and grasping for things to be offended by. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 minutes ago, Victorian said: The basic functions of MPs are : 1. Local representative. 2. Legislator. A guy spends his time whinging out photographic evidence of his chub to people he doesn't know. Remarkably then finds himself the subject of blackmail. Caves in and provides contact details of his parliamentary colleagues. What must his constituents think of his ability, judgement, interest in assisting with local matters, both personal and community? This guy casts votes and debates towards the creation of the law. Further morons then join in the circulation of chub-pics. No wonder the women of parliament appear to be perpetually aghast at the behavior and activities of the men. It's really just the utter dregs masquerading as average people. That’s why men and women are very different in sexual matters . Hence their insistence that men who dress as women stay out their safe spaces . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, Tazio said: If you’re calling this out as homophobia you’re miles of the mark and grasping for things to be offended by. Really “ similar interests ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, JudyJudyJudy said: That’s why men and women are very different in sexual matters . Hence their insistence that men who dress as women stay out their safe spaces . You're a trier James. I'll give you that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, Victorian said: You're a trier James. I'll give you that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 5 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Really “ similar interests ? Nothing homophonic about that. Less homophobic than your next post was transphobic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tazio said: Nothing homophonic about that. Less homophobic than your next post was transphobic. Good try dear . Edited April 5 by JudyJudyJudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 16 minutes ago, Tazio said: If you’re calling this out as homophobia you’re miles of the mark and grasping for things to be offended by. That’s nothing unusual for the Drama Queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Good try dear . Pathetic as usual. The great debater resorts to shit GIF tactics. A conversation about an MP sending dick pics and you managed to put a post about women’s safe spaces to continue your obsessive agenda against trans people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 "... men who dress as women... ". Tasters' choice on that being transphobic or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Striker Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 15 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Like I said it’s all very niave of him . Could have not have had the sense to endure his face wasn’t in the pics ? I assume it was hence the blackmailing . Apparently one dick really looks like another so would be hard ( pardon the pun. ) to identify him 😂 it’s all very 1980s “ news of the world “ nonsense with a whiff of slight homophobia thrown in . In fact a poster on this did just that . Quelle surprise it’s him Its not clear if the dodgy bloke was actually gay himself, or just pretending in order to get pics which he could then use for blackmail. But the report suggests that the dodgy bloke knew he was an MP - and probably targeted him because he was an MP which would increase the shame of it becoming public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 32 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: And what are you suggesting by this ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 11 minutes ago, Tazio said: Pathetic as usual. The great debater resorts to shit GIF tactics. A conversation about an MP sending dick pics and you managed to put a post about women’s safe spaces to continue your obsessive agenda against trans people. 31 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Like I said it’s all very niave of him . Could have not have had the sense to endure his face wasn’t in the pics ? I assume it was hence the blackmailing . Apparently one dick really looks like another so would be hard ( pardon the pun. ) to identify him 😂 it’s all very 1980s “ news of the world “ nonsense with a whiff of slight homophobia thrown in . In fact a poster on this did just that . Quelle surprise it’s him I'm assuming you can back that accusation of homophobia up? If not I'll accept an immediate apology. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 8 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: I'm assuming you can back that accusation of homophobia up? If not I'll accept an immediate apology. Thanks. “ similar interests “ Has a nudge nudge wink wink stink to it ,and I did say “ slight “ you’ll get an apology once I get an apology from the numerous numpties on this accusing me of “ transphobia “ … so you'll be like me , you'll have a long wait . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydug Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: I'm assuming you can back that accusation of homophobia up? If not I'll accept an immediate apology. Imagine the state of Judy if it had been an SNP politician. The giff machine would be in overdrive. 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: “ similar interests “ Has a nudge nudge wink wink stink to it ,and I did say “ slight “ you’ll get an apology once I get an apology from the numerous numpties on this accusing me of “ transphobia “ … so you'll be like me , you'll have a long wait . I'm not interested in what you think has a nudge wink wink stink. You accused me of homophobia and are not able to back that up. You're out of order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Meanwhile another Tory MP seemingly engaged in dirty tricks by buying up various URLs carrying the name of his Lib-Dem opponent (.uk, .co.uk and .com) and redirecting them to the Tory's campaign website. Unfortunately it's not illegal to buy unused URLs, unless an offence of impersonation is involved. https://inews.co.uk/news/tory-mp-simon-jupp-lib-dem-2991069 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 5 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said: I'm not interested in what you think has a nudge wink wink stink. You accused me of homophobia and are not able to back that up. You're out of order. It’s my “ perception “ isn’t that now valid ? See how stupid it all is now ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 9 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: “ similar interests “ Has a nudge nudge wink wink stink to it ,and I did say “ slight “ you’ll get an apology once I get an apology from the numerous numpties on this accusing me of “ transphobia “ … so you'll be like me , you'll have a long wait . "... men dressed as women... ". Clear implication that trans people are equivalent to cross-dressers. A wholly false equivalence. Transphobic ✔ Not transphobic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, Victorian said: "... men dressed as women... ". Clear implication that trans people are equivalent to cross-dressers. A wholly false equivalence. Transphobic ✔ Not transphobic Nope . I said men who dress as women . I didn’t mention trans at all . Take that to the bank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, JudyJudyJudy said: Nope . I said men who dress as women . I didn’t mention trans at all . Take that to the bank It's what was clearly implied James. Transphobic ✔ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, Victorian said: It's what was clearly implied James. Transphobic ✔ Your “ perception “ . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Thor Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 (edited) 11 minutes ago, JudyJudyJudy said: It’s my “ perception “ isn’t that now valid ? See how stupid it all is now ? No you threw out a fairly serious accusation you're unable to substantiate then when challenged pulled out the victim card. If you're not a big enough boy to apologise fair enough. Edited April 5 by The Mighty Thor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 hour ago, Victorian said: You're a trier James. I'll give you that. I've called him a lot worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Any chance of taking your trans discussion to the appropriate thread? This one is about Tory lies. There's more than enough to discuss on that topic, without the repeated off topic stuff from JJJ and those who engage with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 minutes ago, Footballfirst said: Any chance of taking your trans discussion to the appropriate thread? This one is about Tory lies. There's more than enough to discuss on that topic, without the repeated off topic stuff from JJJ and those who engage with him. Unfortunately the majority of threads turn into all about that poster. Bizarre behaviour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Striker Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 29 minutes ago, Footballfirst said: Meanwhile another Tory MP seemingly engaged in dirty tricks by buying up various URLs carrying the name of his Lib-Dem opponent (.uk, .co.uk and .com) and redirecting them to the Tory's campaign website. Unfortunately it's not illegal to buy unused URLs, unless an offence of impersonation is involved. https://inews.co.uk/news/tory-mp-simon-jupp-lib-dem-2991069 One wonders if the chap dreamed up this bizarre ruse himself, or if its in the official Head Office handbook of permitted electioneering tactics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
periodictabledancer Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 31 minutes ago, Footballfirst said: Any chance of taking your trans discussion to the appropriate thread? This one is about Tory lies. There's more than enough to discuss on that topic, without the repeated off topic stuff from JJJ and those who engage with him. Amen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxy Hearts Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2 hours ago, JudyJudyJudy said: And for what ? A penis . That’s all it really is . Many a man has fallen due to the desire for it ! 😂 Only a bigger one, for me! 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB52 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 hour ago, Footballfirst said: Any chance of taking your trans discussion to the appropriate thread? This one is about Tory lies. There's more than enough to discuss on that topic, without the repeated off topic stuff from JJJ and those who engage with him. I think you'll find that every thread is a trans thread when that person is losing an argument Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 13 hours ago, I P Knightley said: There's so much more to pick apart in that collage: * King Prince Charles should be spitting feathers that his image has been used in a party political piece. * Apart from the Red Arrow jets, one of the others is an American made F35, the other is a Eurofighter Typhoon - a celebration of the success of European collaboration. * Somewhere in the background they've effed around with the union flag when only a fortnight ago, they had their panties in a bunch over messing with the union flag. * Now women featured. * England's football team there to represent the 'power' of the UK. There you have it, Scotland, Wales and NornIron. Not even a half decent version of the England team but I'm certain the likes of Harry Maguire and Marcus Rashford won't be too happy about being used to promote the Tories. * And there's more... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundermann Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konrad von Carstein Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 The usually hair trigger fingered moderators must be on the lash... Well done Jimbob, another thread sidetracked by your good self 🏅 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 It gets even better. He's proud to be a Conservative, but for **** sake don't call him a Conservative. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/06/west-midlands-mayor-distances-himself-from-tories-urging-voters-to-distinguish-between-party-and-me?CMP=share_btn_url Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Striker Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 13 hours ago, Ulysses said: Its worth noting that this controversial montage is to remind us that we're the SECOND most powerful country in the world. Presumably the USA is the first. So countries 1 and 2 in the power stakes just happen to be numbers 1 and 2 in the debt stakes too. Purely a coincidence though ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 24 minutes ago, Ulysses said: Dearie me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 (edited) 7 hours ago, Ulysses said: It gets even better. He's proud to be a Conservative, but for **** sake don't call him a Conservative. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/06/west-midlands-mayor-distances-himself-from-tories-urging-voters-to-distinguish-between-party-and-me?CMP=share_btn_url It's berserk on a number of levels. I wonder if he informed Tory HQ that he was going to virtually disown the party and admit their national performance has been shit when he was provided with whatever financial and campaigning support he gets for his local election. Was he distancing himself from the party and portraying himself as his own individual man when he won the last two mayoral terms at a time when the Tories weren't quite as ludicrous and unelectable? I think not. Edited April 6 by Victorian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
periodictabledancer Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 9 hours ago, Ulysses said: It gets even better. He's proud to be a Conservative, but for **** sake don't call him a Conservative. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/06/west-midlands-mayor-distances-himself-from-tories-urging-voters-to-distinguish-between-party-and-me?CMP=share_btn_url The man's a complete windbag who threatened to quit over the Tory run HS2 fiasco but, predictably, did not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 Get rid of your Adidas Sambas if you have any. Adidas Sambas were this year’s coolest shoes – until Rishi Sunak got a pair | Michael Hogan | The Guardian Or as Ruth Davidson said, "Holy shitbiscuits." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToadKiller Dog Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 Where did the fantasy notion that the UK was the 2nd most powerful nation in the world come from ? Has Jacob Rees Mogg been having those zulu war dreams again ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.