Radioactive Mince Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Who the duck sanctioned this staged payment offer from those tinks anyway? Rangers must've been pissing themselves at the sheer stupidity of it all. It has been common knowledge for nearly two years that this day might come. Very interested to see how this plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJambo Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Who the duck sanctioned this staged payment offer from those tinks anyway? Rangers must've been pissing themselves at the sheer stupidity of it all. It has been common knowledge for nearly two years that this day might come. Very interested to see how this plays out. It seemed a very bizzare deal at the time since rangers problems were very much out in the open. Was it maybe more important for Hearts to shift Lee off the wage bill than it was to actually get paid the amount they agreed for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabienleclerq Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I'm sure Ibrox must be worth more than ?10 million just as land, plus the car-park across the road, must be about half that, add in murray park for a similar amount then with just those three assets sold that should produce over ?20 million, which is more than being mentioned as the amount being 'invested' and available through a CVA. They don't own Murray park (murray does) and im sure the stadium is under another company too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hansel Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Temps needs to bulk up a bit. Too light weight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdl2002 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 They don't own Murray park (murray does) and im sure the stadium is under another company too. rangers group, (craig whyte), owns murray park, ibrox and car park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 They still owe ?1m for Jelavic,sold to Everton for ?5m and pocketed the cash for a player that they hadn't paid for.Why is football a law unto itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubsJT Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Think we will just have to be like everyone else and wait see what happens, if they are liquidated roughly how much could we expect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Khali Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Aye but what is the opposite of opposite? Youse have just been bamboozled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Aye but what is the opposite of opposite? The original subject matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandylejambo Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Aye but what is the opposite of opposite? Youse have just been bamboozled I was befuddled by the word `Youse` Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PsychocAndy Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Aye but what is the opposite of opposite? Youse have just been bamboozled This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 They still owe ?1m for Jelavic,sold to Everton for ?5m and pocketed the cash for a player that they hadn't paid for.Why is football a law unto itself. They can't pay for Jelavic now, since they are in administartion. If they handed over any money to Vienna (?) they would be treating them as a preffered creditor, which they are not. Similarly they (Rangers) are not able to pay any of the small bills to the paper shop or the face painting lady or Edinburgh council, as if they did they would be treating them as preferred creditors and that would be 'illegal'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Khali Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 This Aye but is it though? Surely it would be identical? It's a conundrum though. I also was befuddled by the word youse but it was 6 in the mornin and I had just opened up my work. Had a million things running through my mind. One of which was must check KB for posts that had Jo relevance to original thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gasman Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 They can't pay for Jelavic now, since they are in administartion. If they handed over any money to Vienna (?) they would be treating them as a preffered creditor, which they are not. Similarly they (Rangers) are not able to pay any of the small bills to the paper shop or the face painting lady or Edinburgh council, as if they did they would be treating them as preferred creditors and that would be 'illegal'. I agree with you, but the Administrators have already made payments to both Dunfermline and Dundee United. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I agree with you, but the Administrators have already made payments to both Dunfermline and Dundee United. I thought the Fighting Fund paid Dunfermline? And was the Utd one not for handling tickets rather than a debt as such, so wasn't in the creditors list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3,567
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.