Geoff Kilpatrick Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 WTF is that about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted November 26, 2011 Author Share Posted November 26, 2011 N.B.: Before people respond this thread may be a response to another similar thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northernsoulboy01 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Sarcasm is crap when you have to explain it. Im sure there's a banking thread for you to lavish your knowledge on in the Shed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted November 26, 2011 Author Share Posted November 26, 2011 Sarcasm is crap when you have to explain it. Im sure there's a banking thread for you to lavish your knowledge on in the Shed. I might need to explain sarcasm to you then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid A Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Swapped his boots, went back on to the field, they took their free kick and scored.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMBO.LOU Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 WTF is that about? I am no expert but I would hazard a guess at - there was a problem with his boots and he felt that he needed to change them! simple really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm astounded no one has blamed Zal for the "boot problem - yet!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Maroonblood Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Swapped his boots, went back on to the field, they took their free kick and scored.... Case explained. Close the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Strolled it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2NaFish Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 i'm raging at webster. when he swapped his boots he clearly tied them using the 'Bunny Ears' technique. Everyone knows that the "loop, swoop and pull" technique is far more reliable. But oh, no, Mr Flash had to go for the bunny ears style. Geoff, i feel your pain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northernsoulboy01 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I might need to explain sarcasm to you then. Can you make it a bit interesting then please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJGJ Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 The foul was contributed to by his abscence from the field -- just unprofessional -- why not change then at half time ? He has to take a share of the blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deko 94 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 The foul was contributed to by his abscence from the field -- just unprofessional -- why not change then at half time ? He has to take a share of the blame. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Both centre halfs were poor today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Who lost their man and left Andy marking two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Who lost their man and left Andy marking two? Sounds like a total twunt whoever it was. Was it you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Who lost their man and left Andy marking two? The stick Webster was giving Zaliukas certainly made it look like Zaliukas had lost his man. We shall see when some highlights appear. It had shades of the goal that Paksi scored against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRC HMFC Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm astounded no one has blamed Zal for the "boot problem - yet!" This. Suprised nobody has suggested that Zal put the ball in the net for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnybob72 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm quite sure that the players wear their name on their shirt thus rendering the need to refer to their shirt number redundant. However, should you require help in this matter, I do believe that the number 6 is Mr Andrew Webster. To keep referring to him as number 6 is pi$$ poor patter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Who lost their man and left Andy marking two? Not one for getting in the way of a god Zal bashing but I don't think he was the one who lost his man but Webster was definitely left with 2 on more than one occasion. Zal is pish thought so crack on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Not one for getting in the way of a god Zal bashing but I don't think he was the one who lost his man but Webster was definitely left with 2 on more than one occasion. Zal is pish thought so crack on. Webster certainly had a go at him and it is conceivable that Tokeley was supposed to be marked by Zaliukas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Who lost their man and left Andy marking two? Mrowiec. What do I win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambonian Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Webster certainly had a go at him and it is conceivable that Tokeley was supposed to be marked by Zaliukas. Boy next to me said that Zaliukas was marking Tokely but Tokely got in front of him without Zal reacting, that was what Webster was apparently screaming at him for but we'll see on the highlights tomorrow. Hamill was actually on the line as it came in and should've stayed where he was, the ball went in the exact spot he was standing at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Mrowiec. What do I win? That was the next time that they had a free header. And at that one Hamill and Webster were having a go at Mrowiec; and the baldy monkey looking coach then bawled out Mrowiec too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sten Guns Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm quite sure that the players wear their name on their shirt thus rendering the need to refer to their shirt number redundant. However, should you require help in this matter, I do believe that the number 6 is Mr Andrew Webster. To keep referring to him as number 6 is pi$$ poor patter. Been pointed out before. Wouldn't worry about it too much. It's only showing the terrible level of their banter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spitonastranger Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Not one for getting in the way of a god Zal bashing but I don't think he was the one who lost his man but Webster was definitely left with 2 on more than one occasion. Zal is pish thought so crack on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 That was the next time that they had a free header. And at that one Hamill and Webster were having a go at Mrowiec; and the baldy monkey looking coach then bawled out Mrowiec too. I know but HGW never specified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 the baldy monkey looking coach I'm surprised the Racism police haven't swooped yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambohog Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I am no expert but I would hazard a guess at - there was a problem with his boots and he felt that he needed to change them! simple really SIMPLE REALLY?? Yes you are, it took him over an hour to decide he had the wrong footwear for the conditions? WTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighusref Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm okay with blaming Zaliukas when he is to blame. The goal was Webster's fault. It was really annoying to watch him chum Tokely (from the wrong side I may add) to the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johanes de Silentio Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Boy next to me said that Zaliukas was marking Tokely but Tokely got in front of him without Zal reacting, that was what Webster was apparently screaming at him for but we'll see on the highlights tomorrow. Hamill was actually on the line as it came in and should've stayed where he was, the ball went in the exact spot he was standing at. Harsh to blame Hamill when their guy scored from a free header from a routine free-kick delivery. Maybe if Hamill was meant to be marking Tokely, then aye, but he wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I'm okay with blaming Zaliukas when he is to blame. The goal was Webster's fault. It was really annoying to watch him chum Tokely (from the wrong side I may add) to the goal. I think Webster was marking Foran at the far post. But we shall see when we get the highlights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clerry Jambo Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Both centre halfs were poor today. Correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primrose Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I thought Tokeley was down to be marked by Adrian Mrowiec at set pieces, it seemed like a good foul at the time as AW was off the pitch changing his boots due to a broken lace. However the marking at the free kick was shocking and RT had a free header that he had to stoop to connect with. Still a win is a win, would be hard for any centre half today as the swirling wind made it impossible to predict where the ball would go once it was in the air. I am more concerned that Jamie Hammil threw the ball to Zal when the forward was 5 yards away causing the miss kick and the 1 on 1 for chance for Tade, cracking save by Kello who has a great record at 1 v 1s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Just Came To Say Kello Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 He was ******* shite today. If Zal put in that performance there'd be a 10 page thread slagging him. P.S Boo Boo it looks like you're still upset and hurt from the Mackay thread, sunshine. Didn't realise you were so touchy about it. Man up you soft *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 He was ******* shite today. If Zal put in that performance there'd be a 10 page thread slagging him. P.S Boo Boo it looks like you're still upset and hurt from the Mackay thread, sunshine. Didn't realise you were so touchy about it. Man up you soft *****. Both our central defenders made errors yesterday though to be fair conditions were terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Palmer Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Both our defenders should have strolled through the conditions with ease....especially with a couple of Championship scouts in the crowd. No.6 can't pass the ball along the ground and prefers to hoof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 He was ******* shite today. If Zal put in that performance there'd be a 10 page thread slagging him. P.S Boo Boo it looks like you're still upset and hurt from the Mackay thread, sunshine. Didn't realise you were so touchy about it. Man up you soft *****. To be fair, Webster is prone to the odd error that costs us once in a while - Zal does it with a lot more regularity. It really is that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I'm okay with blaming Zaliukas when he is to blame. The goal was Webster's fault. It was really annoying to watch him chum Tokely (from the wrong side I may add) to the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KilbrideJambo Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Both centre halfs were poor today. I admire your politeness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Palmer Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 No.6 was amazingly brilliant. Still, we could sell him for a massive fee in January...helps us with the cash flow and the wages. Everyone's a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Both our defenders should have strolled through the conditions with ease....especially with a couple of Championship scouts in the crowd. No.6 can't pass the ball along the ground and prefers to hoof. Don't think Webster is taking enough responsibility on the ball. He is shelling long balls and playing the Pressley style hospital ball to shovel it on. He is a better passer than Zaliukas in my book and should be taking more responsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam Tarts 1874 Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 The foul was contributed to by his abscence from the field -- just unprofessional -- why not change then at half time ? He has to take a share of the blame. How the **** do you work that one out Sherlock? I can't remember seeing Webster playing in a left midfield position for Hearts before so I can't see how the foul which was committed by Jonnson not far from the touchline would have had anything to do with Webster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnold Rothstein Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 How the **** do you work that one out Sherlock? I can't remember seeing Webster playing in a left midfield position for Hearts before so I can't see how the foul which was committed by Jonnson not far from the touchline would have had anything to do with Webster. Do you not think that maybe Jonsson committed the foul because he didn't want the ball crossed in when we were a centre half down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Do you not think that maybe Jonsson committed the foul because he didn't want the ball crossed in when we were a centre half down? Probably just because he didn't want it crossed in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4,403
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.