The People's Chimp Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Seeing this photo in another thread got me reminiscing and I went and checked out youtube for some highlights. Great to see again, but just how blatant was MacHobo. Sickening really, that this RAT might have cheated us out of a cup win. Thankfully he still couldn't stop us, but just how could he deny Skacel a penalty? That's before we even get to the Hartley red/no booking for the Gretna player. A chump who has met his comeuppance, a total ****ing rasper of a man, the epitome of a cheating stroker, Dougie MacHobo get it right up you. I hope it hurts every time you see that medal in your little refereeing cabinet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted April 12, 2011 Author Share Posted April 12, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOegLpe7E6Y&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Like when your mum warned you about the kids who would "come to a bad end" McHobo has met his. "Cheats never prosper" that was another good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Not too mention the absolute instantaneous decision to give Gretna their penalty. Absolutely choking to give it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denny Crane Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 However, that Hobo moron did everything in his power and still failed to stop us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I despise that ****. His face as he sends Hartley off is one of pure delight. Pity for him we lifted the cup & his team is utter shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossthejambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 The rage I had when he failed to award that penalty will be hard to surpass for a long time. Utter rasper of a man. Still remember Takis giving him absolute pelters then as well, and considering how mild mannered he was on the park it really tells it's own story. The whole fiasco that surrounded his and Hugh Dallas's removal from refereeing circles really couldn't have happened to two more deserving tossers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 What the heck, Let's go for it. No ref would have given Skacel a penalty. There just wasn't quite enough of a clear infringement for any ref to point to the spot. It would be interesting though if we did have TV evidence. When watching closely you do see Main give Skacel a quick look, then raising his leg towards him to put him off and make contact. (Not that contact automatically means a foul, or conversely that no contact means no foul) But we don't use TV evidence so it doesn't matter. And there you have it. Conspiracists, Mchobo cheat or whatever. It was too marginal to give. Simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 A chump who has met his comeuppance, a total ****ing rasper of a man, the epitome of a cheating stroker, Dougie MacHobo get it right up you. I hope it hurts every time you see that medal in your little refereeing cabinet. He used to stay just down the road from me, next door to the missus folks. After that game, a certain person who posts here now and again, planted a Hearts flag in his garden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Bateman Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I've always questioned why, in a cup final involving a team from Edinburgh, was a referee who was not only from Edinburgh (and KNOWN as a Hibs fan) but who had also been involved in a court case involving our club, ever appointed? It was always incredibly strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossthejambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 What the heck, Let's go for it. No ref would have given Skacel a penalty. There just wasn't quite enough of a clear infringement for any ref to point to the spot. It would be interesting though if we did have TV evidence. When watching closely you do see Main give Skacel a quick look, then raising his leg towards him to put him off and make contact. (Not that contact automatically means a foul, or conversely that no contact means no foul) But we don't use TV evidence so it doesn't matter. And there you have it. Conspiracists, Mchobo cheat or whatever. It was too marginal to give. Simple This has to be a wind up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 He used to stay just down the road from me, next door to the missus folks. After that game, a certain person who posts here now and again, planted a Hearts flag in his garden. Superb!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Nice shot of "Zanny" at around the 0:40 mark in that video, by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_jambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Nice shot of "Zanny" at around the 0:40 mark in that video, by the way. boke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 This has to be a wind up? No it's not. I very much doubt any ref (sorry Grade 1 ref) would have given a penalty under the same circumstances. The closest you might get might be a spineless homer at Ibrox/Parkhead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossthejambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 No it's not. I very much doubt any ref (sorry Grade 1 ref) would have given a penalty under the same circumstances. The closest you might get might be a spineless homer at Ibrox/Parkhead. So clear contact by a goalkeeper on an attacking player impeding him from scoring a goal isn't a foul? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 No it's not. I very much doubt any ref (sorry Grade 1 ref) would have given a penalty under the same circumstances. The closest you might get might be a spineless homer at Ibrox/Parkhead. I think the among the reasons a penalty wasnt given was that Skacel tried too hard to stay on his feet. If he'd gone down that was a pen and a red card. Definite penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I think the among the reasons a penalty wasnt given was that Skacel tried too hard to stay on his feet. If he'd gone down that was a pen and a red card. Definite penalty. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted April 12, 2011 Author Share Posted April 12, 2011 What the heck, Let's go for it. No ref would have given Skacel a penalty. There just wasn't quite enough of a clear infringement for any ref to point to the spot. It would be interesting though if we did have TV evidence. When watching closely you do see Main give Skacel a quick look, then raising his leg towards him to put him off and make contact. (Not that contact automatically means a foul, or conversely that no contact means no foul) But we don't use TV evidence so it doesn't matter. And there you have it. Conspiracists, Mchobo cheat or whatever. It was too marginal to give. Simple It was as clear a penalty as I've ever seen. You don't need to "watch closely" to see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego10 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 No it's not. I very much doubt any ref (sorry Grade 1 ref) would have given a penalty under the same circumstances. The closest you might get might be a spineless homer at Ibrox/Parkhead. I doubt any ref apart from Dougie MacDonald wouldn't have given it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I think the among the reasons a penalty wasnt given was that Skacel tried too hard to stay on his feet. If he'd gone down that was a pen and a red card. Definite penalty. The ONLY reason that wasn't a penalty was the referee. The ONLY reason Skacel even tried to stay on his feet was the referee. Had he gone over, I can guarantee you that he would have seen his second yellow for diving and been sent off. You can take that to the bank. DM was a cheating arsehole of a 'man'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 the hartley red isn't one to complain about. hartley lashed out and can only have himself to blame. the gretna player did kick him and he knew exactly what he was doing but hartley was moronic for getting himself sent off there. the gretna penalty was a dive and it's not the only dive that mcvermin has given a penalty against us for. sickening cheating. the skacel one was a clear foul but it just so happened that rudi had the quick thinking required to stay on his feet otherwise he was going off... no question. it was very easy for mcvermin to avoid giving that and predictably he did just that. it should also be said that rudi got an unnecessary booking for removing his shirt and that's why he HAD to avoid another booking. without the booking he could have made enough of the foul to give mcvermin a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 The ONLY reason that wasn't a penalty was the referee. The ONLY reason Skacel even tried to stay on his feet was the referee. Had he gone over, I can guarantee you that he would have seen his second yellow for diving and been sent off. You can take that to the bank. DM was a cheating arsehole of a 'man'. "Among the reasons..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_jambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Rulebook. Denied a clear goalscoring opportunity. Penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraggle Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Nice shot of "Zanny" at around the 0:40 mark in that video, by the way. I got cold shivers when I seen his ugly coupon in the video, and felt physically sick and thought of that mutant pulling on the famous maroon! Not only ugly as sin, but a cheat as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 "Among the reasons..." Nah, the only thing Skacel staying on his feet did was ensure he remained on the park. I've never been more sure of anything in my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 What the heck, Let's go for it. No ref would have given Skacel a penalty. There just wasn't quite enough of a clear infringement for any ref to point to the spot. It would be interesting though if we did have TV evidence. When watching closely you do see Main give Skacel a quick look, then raising his leg towards him to put him off and make contact. (Not that contact automatically means a foul, or conversely that no contact means no foul) But we don't use TV evidence so it doesn't matter. And there you have it. Conspiracists, Mchobo cheat or whatever. It was too marginal to give. Simple In isolation you could almost, almost argue that. When compiled with all the other shockers he has made against us then it comes down to plain cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 The ONLY reason that wasn't a penalty was the referee. The ONLY reason Skacel even tried to stay on his feet was the referee. Had he gone over, I can guarantee you that he would have seen his second yellow for diving and been sent off. You can take that to the bank. DM was a cheating arsehole of a 'man'. Spot on. Case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgie rd eh11 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I think the among the reasons a penalty wasnt given was that Skacel tried too hard to stay on his feet. If he'd gone down that was a pen and a red card. Definite penalty. If Skacel went down he would have been booked for diving. It was a definite penalty and sending off but macdonald was trying his best for Gretna after his dissapointment watching the 02/04/06 semi. Nae luck dougie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hansel Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 He will try and get revenge.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted April 12, 2011 Author Share Posted April 12, 2011 If Skacel went down he would have been booked for diving. It was a definite penalty and sending off but macdonald was trying his best for Gretna after his dissapointment watching the 02/04/06 semi. Nae luck dougie I can picture it now, his disgusting, smug puss as he tried to cheat us out of the cup.... He probably still fantasises about the possibility of sending off Skacel to this very day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trotter Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 as a quick aside (I've not watched that video in a couple of months)... Robbie's last-gasp slide tackle just gets better and better every time I watch it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 After that game, a certain person who posts here now and again, planted a Hearts flag in his garden. Brilliant!! Best kinda wind ups, simple, effective and to the point..... but nobody really gets hurt. Would have loved to see his face in the morning. Despicable cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah O Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 While I was in the pub last week Dougie McScum was standing next to me at the bar. I pussied out of punching him in the coupon. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I've always questioned why, in a cup final involving a team from Edinburgh, was a referee who was not only from Edinburgh (and KNOWN as a Hibs fan) but who had also been involved in a court case involving our club, ever appointed? It was always incredibly strange. But, not at all surprising! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 What the heck, Let's go for it. No ref would have given Skacel a penalty. There just wasn't quite enough of a clear infringement for any ref to point to the spot. It would be interesting though if we did have TV evidence. When watching closely you do see Main give Skacel a quick look, then raising his leg towards him to put him off and make contact. (Not that contact automatically means a foul, or conversely that no contact means no foul) But we don't use TV evidence so it doesn't matter. And there you have it. Conspiracists, Mchobo cheat or whatever. It was too marginal to give. Simple And Peter Sutcliffe was a lovely man!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartgarfunkel Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 The ONLY reason that wasn't a penalty was the referee. The ONLY reason Skacel even tried to stay on his feet was the referee. Had he gone over, I can guarantee you that he would have seen his second yellow for diving and been sent off. You can take that to the bank. DM was a cheating arsehole of a 'man'. Absolutely BANG ON the cash with this. Haven't watched the footage and was too sparkled at the match on the hospitality booze to remember anything that happened with certainty, but I KNOW you're right. I absolutely ******* cannot stand that ugly, angry, twisted hateful ***** DM, and revel in his downfall. I'm sure he was in the EEN a bit back for allegedly bullying his elderly neighbour in Craigentinny. Stay ******* clear of the Ellwyn and Broadfields 'Dougie'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Gordons Gloves Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 as a quick aside (I've not watched that video in a couple of months)... Robbie's last-gasp slide tackle just gets better and better every time I watch it that was exactly my thoughts - i forgot just what a tackle that was. Is it the best tackle ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 In isolation you could almost, almost argue that. When compiled with all the other shockers he has made against us then it comes down to plain cheating. Saves me replying to Detty's post, absolutely spot on Merse. That cheating barstard has got exactly what he deserves and it's about the only good thing that Lennon has instigated in the Scottish game, now, we just need to get rid of Brines and we're going to be on about as much of a level playing field as we could possibly get, considering! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereward Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 While I was in the pub last week Dougie McScum was standing next to me at the bar. I pussied out of punching him in the coupon. FACT. Painful to read. I'd be happy to chip some folding into a regular "Dougie gets into stramashes in pubs" fund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbojumbojambo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 If he hadn't done the decent thing (for once) and resigned I was all for asking the SFA to investigate his reasons for changing his mind on the penalty awarded to us against Falkirk in the Cup a few seasons ago. It looked awfully like a full dress rehearsal for the one that led to his demise in that a brief word with a linesman (who had already positioned himself at the junction of the penalty box and the goal line) resulted in a change of decision. If the linesman had any misgivings he would surely have stayed on the sideline and called McHobo over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondo Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I've always questioned why, in a cup final involving a team from Edinburgh, was a referee who was not only from Edinburgh (and KNOWN as a Hibs fan) but who had also been involved in a court case involving our club, ever appointed? It was always incredibly strange. What was the court case he was involved in ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Some class replies on this thread. The boy is an arsehole. Cheat. Peice of shit lowlife ****. Fair play to the guy who planted the flag in his garden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Sexington Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I've never despised a referee like I despised that cheating piece of trash. His spectacular and humiliating demise was one of the highlights of my year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radge21 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 While I was in the pub last week Dougie McScum was standing next to me at the bar. I pussied out of punching him in the coupon. FACT. What pub is that then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Dover Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 If he hadn't done the decent thing (for once) and resigned I was all for asking the SFA to investigate his reasons for changing his mind on the penalty awarded to us against Falkirk in the Cup a few seasons ago. It looked awfully like a full dress rehearsal for the one that led to his demise in that a brief word with a linesman (who had already positioned himself at the junction of the penalty box and the goal line) resulted in a change of decision. If the linesman had any misgivings he would surely have stayed on the sideline and called McHobo over. To paraphrase Woody Allen's rant from the movie Bananas ! ( ) "I object, your honor! This trial is a travesty. It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham" The Falkirk decision ( whilst maybe right in the end ) was an absolute fiasco and how that went almost unmentioned says it all about the game up here. I, for one, dont doubt for a moment that had any Hearts player taken the same stance as Phressley he would have been booked and told to go away like school child. Lets face facts. McHobo absolutely revelled in his ability to influence the outcome of that game. Sad fact is he's actually a good ref but he was about as fair minded as Ian Murray when Hearts were involved The Tannadice affair actually pales into insignificance when placed alongside that carve up And as for the cup final. Did the Gretna boy get any sanction for booting Hartley....I don't think so ? So McHobo surely can't claim he had "no option" if he'd dipped out of booking the opponent ? Personally I'd have "had a word" with both players and done my best not to make a fuss in the showpiece of the Scottish game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N User Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 McDonald is a cheating Hibernian supporting referee. He also happens to be a *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currahee! Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 I've always questioned why, in a cup final involving a team from Edinburgh, was a referee who was not only from Edinburgh (and KNOWN as a Hibs fan) but who had also been involved in a court case involving our club, ever appointed? It was always incredibly strange. Because the SFA couldn't care less unless one of their favoured friends are involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted April 12, 2011 Author Share Posted April 12, 2011 McDonald is a cheating Hibernian supporting referee. He also happens to be a *****. Succinct and to the point. I like it. He's a ****ing putrid boil on the face of humanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 It's ironic his demise came about after a decision which was actually called correctly. Only he could have made a mess of that situation. Utter tosser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.