jambretta Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 maybury will train with hearts from monday dont no any more than that
Juanimator Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is the last planet in our solar system . . . . don't know any more than that.[ATTACH]32[/ATTACH]
Coco Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Hopefully he will get himself fit and find another club.
DETTY29 Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is the last planet in our solar system . . . . don't know any more than that.[ATTACH]32[/ATTACH] Has Pluto not been down graded and replaced by another?
Guest Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Heard he's been released by Leicester so maybe its true. Do we need a right back?
Rawrrrrrrr Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 It would be an excellent signing and he still has another few years however Id imagine levein would be in for him in a snap especially given their left back is leaving at the end of the season Furthermore I dont think maybs was over impressed with romanov and jumped at the first chance he got so why would he come back
jambretta Posted January 19, 2008 Author Posted January 19, 2008 because he needs to be playing football
adayinmay Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is the last planet in our solar system . . . . don't know any more than that.[ATTACH]32[/ATTACH] Pluto is not a planet anymore. De-classified last year to a 'dwarf planet'. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.html That means you know nothing. Sorry, no offence intended, just couldn't resist.
Goldenboy Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Furthermore I dont think maybs was over impressed with romanov and jumped at the first chance he got so why would he come back Maybury never left because of Romanov. He buggered off to Leicester with Levien because he was paid more and had the carrot of a possible Premiership place to aim for. Of course that didn't quite work out. I liked Maybury a lot and if he was to recapture the kind of form when he played at right back for the JTs, then I'd have him back in a heart beat.
Le Chat Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 It would be an excellent signing and he still has another few years however Id imagine levein would be in for him in a snap especially given their left back is leaving at the end of the season Furthermore I dont think maybs was over impressed with romanov and jumped at the first chance he got so why would he come back He left before Romanov took over to go with his mentor to Leicester. What's the rationalle behind the 'not impressed with Romanov' remark ? Or isn't there any, as per usual ?
Rawrrrrrrr Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 He left before Romanov took over to go with his mentor to Leicester. What's the rationalle behind the 'not impressed with Romanov' remark ? Or isn't there any, as per usual ? By that time it was clear romanov was pulling the strings He could have waited a few months and got a neilson/mccallister contract instead left It was made clear at the time that levein wasnt too keen on romanovs plans and it sounded like to me that this at least played a factor in maybury and de vries going - obviously money was also a factor
Guest Freewheelin' Jambo Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Remember, Maybury was played mostly on the left to accomodate Neilson. When Irish Alan played at right back he was far superior to anything we have had recently. If we got him back to play at his best position, Robbie would at last be finally emptied and good riddance.
Slobbo Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Would play Maybury ahead of Neilson any day, so would welcome him re-signing for us. If Levein was interested, would he not have him up in Dundee training with the terrors so he could run the rule over him?
Juanimator Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is not a planet anymore. De-classified last year to a 'dwarf planet'. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.htmlThat means you know nothing. Sorry, no offence intended, just couldn't resist. Bah Humbug . . . What do astronomers know ? It was always a planet when I was a laddie. I'm away to phone Patrick Moore, he'll sort this out.
Goldenboy Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 By that time it was clear romanov was pulling the strings He could have waited a few months and got a neilson/mccallister contract instead left It was made clear at the time that levein wasnt too keen on romanovs plans and it sounded like to me that this at least played a factor in maybury and de vries going - obviously money was also a factor Nonsense. Levien was in the process of leaving just as Romanov arrived. The first thing he did was come back in for Maybury etc. Romanov's not to blame for everything you know. Pretty sure he wasn't in Dallas in November 1963 and I'd guess he's got a pretty decent alibi for the day Manhattan crumbled.
Le Chat Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 By that time it was clear romanov was pulling the strings He could have waited a few months and got a neilson/mccallister contract instead left It was made clear at the time that levein wasnt too keen on romanovs plans and it sounded like to me that this at least played a factor in maybury and de vries going - obviously money was also a factor Levein has always stated that it was personal reasons that made him leave. He's always been very clear that it had nothing to do with Romanov. I suppose its just your style to speculate in a negative manner rather than just think that Maybury's decision was more to do with the chance of playing in a better league, earning more money and staying with a manager who obviously rates him, like the rest of us. Unless you actually know AM or CL and they've told you this ?
CornhillHearts Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Prancer not checking his facts again D Utd have just signed a left back. Maybury nowt to do with Romanov. He only knows Godsa.
K1874M Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Levien leaving had nothing to do with Romanov.... I think he would return if the package and was right and the promises were made. He was splitting up with his mrs after chasing muff and wanted out, Leicester offered him decent money and he was off. Like so many managers before him he tried to take players he knew and failed (JJ Bradford and soon to be Mcleish)
gooders Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Liked him first time round but would be reluctant to have him back. The old saying of never go back applies here. Look at Neil McCann!!!
Craig R Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Liked him first time round but would be reluctant to have him back. The old saying of never go back applies here. Look at Neil McCann!!! Look at John Robertson!
Garrincha Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Liked him first time round but would be reluctant to have him back. The old saying of never go back applies here. Look at Neil McCann!!! Maybury is a lot younger though - he should be around about his peak now. I'd take him back and see how it works out. He would be a reasonably cheap option and he is captain material.
Tazio Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is not a planet anymore. De-classified last year to a 'dwarf planet'. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.htmlThat means you know nothing. Sorry, no offence intended, just couldn't resist. Thank god Walt Disney isn't still alive, that would have broken his heart.
gooders Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 I know there are always exceptions to the rule like Robbo and JC, but to be honest Maybury is not in their class. To be honest I never rated him that highly anyway, he was a hot head and a clumsy tackler. On the plus side he couold play on either side of defence and he always gave 100%. I would not hate to see him back but I am cautious.
K1874M Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Wow.... just googled Maybury and cant believe he's only 29, changes my opinion on this one.
Bigsmak Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Has Pluto not been down graded and replaced by another? It's been replaced by URANUS (actually, Neptune is the last planet now, but not as childish so,.... )
Rawrrrrrrr Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Wow.... just googled Maybury and cant believe he's only 29, changes my opinion on this one. Id take de vries too Hes only 32/33 Would do a job for the rest of this season or next A vastly underrated hearts legend
Elmo Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Pluto is the last planet in our solar system . . . . don't know any more than that.[ATTACH]32[/ATTACH] Just to add Pluto although now downgraded was only usually the last planet in our solar system as sometimes it is neptune. So there
K1874M Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Id take de vries too Hes only 32/33 Would do a job for the rest of this season or next A vastly underrated hearts legend If you think Nade's looking unfit I'm guessing you never seen DeVries play his last few games at leicester.... oooooft. Levien had a look and decided against it. He's past it big time.
Walter Bishop Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Id take de vries too Hes only 32/33 Would do a job for the rest of this season or next A vastly underrated hearts legend :rofl::rofl::rofl:
Rawrrrrrrr Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 If you think Nade's looking unfit I'm guessing you never seen DeVries play his last few games at leicester.... oooooft. Levien had a look and decided against it. He's past it big time. He has regained his fitness and has been doing well for leeds Loan just finished during the week past
K1874M Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 He has regained his fitness and has been doing well for leeds Loan just finished during the week past Not what we need but each to their own... 2 power forwards are enuff, we sorely need some one to compliment them.
fordy Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 I know there are always exceptions to the rule like Robbo and JC, but to be honest Maybury is not in their class. To be honest I never rated him that highly anyway, he was a hot head and a clumsy tackler. On the plus side he couold play on either side of defence and he always gave 100%. I would not hate to see him back but I am cautious. Agree Gooders,.
colinzeal Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 What age is MAybury? Certainly better right back than Neilson and would definately do as a stop gap!
jambos142 Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 I do not know if there is anything in it,but the paper's down here were linking Maybury with the Hobos.
jambretta Posted January 19, 2008 Author Posted January 19, 2008 he turned them down noway would he play for them
Musemic Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 What age is MAybury? Certainly better right back than Neilson and would definately do as a stop gap! Date of birth 08-08-1978 - still got 3-4 years at the top level
whats the future Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Big Mark was at the game today and said he would love to be back at hearts
BobbyJenkins Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Serious Youre needin a severe dose of prozac or just get to ****. U are a ****. End of Im fairly tolerant but mods come on do we need these reptiles? I doubt it very much. sick joke
jambojambo Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 remember maybury saying that when robbo came in noone knew what they were meant to be doing as tactics didnt exist, he said elvis held the dressing room together, under levein everyone always knew what they were meant to be doing. thought it was pretty interesting, he was still here for a couple of months under robbo.
john brownlee Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Thank god Walt Disney isn't still alive, that would have broken his heart. Pluto was named after the greek god pluto, not the Disney cartoon animal :5643::5643:
troonjambo Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Remember, Maybury was played mostly on the left to accomodate Neilson. When Irish Alan played at right back he was far superior to anything we have had recently. If we got him back to play at his best position, Robbie would at last be finally emptied and good riddance. must admit i will take him back with open arms even if he is 75 percent off what he was he is twice as good as what we have at moment as to robbie being emptied bit harsh;) considering some off the wasters :mw_tease:sorry meant players we have at the moment
Salvatori5 Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 He has regained his fitness and has been doing well for leeds Loan just finished during the week past I was at the Leeds game on New Years Day and asked a few Leeds fans their opinons on MDV - "rank", "slow as a week in jail", "useless" was a summary of the replies! Hardly doing well was he? I think he scored 1goal for the most potent team in the division! And as for the term "legend" - have a word with urself!
wavydavy Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Heard he's been released by Leicester so maybe its true. Do we need a right back? He can play either side and has been desperate to get away from Leicester for a long time. I was told that he was coming to Hearts on Monday also.
Dougie Masterton Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Id take de vries too Hes only 32/33 Would do a job for the rest of this season or next A vastly underrated hearts legend Legend, your having a laugh, just because he scored four against the vermin.
Tazio Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Pluto was named after the greek god pluto, not the Disney cartoon animal :5643::5643: Baws. Next you'll be trying to claim Mars isn't named after the chocolate bar.
sandyseymour Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 He can play either side and has been desperate to get away from Leicester for a long time. I was told that he was coming to Hearts on Monday also. Definitely don't fancy Maybury coming back .....no better than Robbie ....too wee as well (at least Robbie can heid the ball)....first thing big Jefferies did when Killie played the JTs was put a big forward out on Marbury's wing to win the big punts from the goalie/defenders ....Maybury never won a ball...by all accounts he's gone backwards ....please don't sign him SF or I'll change my mind about you
Robbo27_22 Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Maybury could play with two broken legs at right back and still be a better option than our current incumbent.
inside right Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Maybury could play with two broken legs at right back and still be a better option than our current incumbent. You have got to be kidding my goldfish has a longer attention span then Maybury. He's so busy patting himself on the back for doing something very ordinary that he doesn't notice when he drops us deeper in the ***** than before he moved.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.