wavydavy Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 I think we have a poor group of specialist centre halfs. Do not rate any of the senior players there, though have not seen enough of Barr. He did not look special at Falkirk however. As a result our best central defensive pairing in my opinion is Jonsson and Wallace. But they are needed elsewhere. Barr deserves a good chance to see if he is up to it though. I don't think many of the faults in Zaliukas' game have improved at all. He is so regularly out of position on the wrong side of the striker and lacks the pace to get back. Well said I agree totally with your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marky73 Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 Totally agree with the OP... had a go at him for waving his arms around and pointing at folk after losing the 2nd goal last night ditrect from the throw in - needs to stop and get that f'n defence sorted out!!!! There is still time though... Oh and said at that point that I think a combination of being the captain, defending and keeping his heed at the same might just be too much for Zal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debut 4 Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 To be fair the Hearts defence may not come up against a better , mobile frontline all season. However , it doesn`t excuse the schoolboy errors from Zal in the first half. im all for playing the ball out from defence but you don`t try and turn forwards who are closing you down from behind when you can`t see them! Needs to keep it far more simple on the ball when being shut down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic1874 Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 C'mon folks still pre season - not had time to warm up yet - couple of games under his belt and he'll be kicking everything but the ball - getting booked and sent off and Hearts will once again face massive fines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Treasurer Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 Oh here we go again - unless something can be proven as fact then it can't be said. I thought this was a forum where people can share opinion and debate that opinion with others - opinion being simply one persons perspective or take on a situation. It is the easiest ploy in the world to avoid entering reasoned debate by slamming the door shut on possibilities simply by saying that it is not a proven fact. Such retorts just go to stifle any real debate and indeed the denying of debate was the cornerstone of the society in which our glorious leader grew up in. Come to think of it he still hasn't managed to move into the enlightened world of debate - preferring to make pronouncements from his position of power and having no truck with discussion ! It is a shame that many on this forum show similar intolerance to open discussion. BTW Treasurer this particular rant of mine is not targeted specifically at you (in fact I find some of your posts very good) - you just gave me the opening to make my point. I don't take it personally TJ Of course everyone is entitled to their OPINION on this board but it's the posters that come out with random "in-the-know" facts and then refuse to give any clue as to where the info has come from that gets on my chest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.