Tazio Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 So according to Billy Dodds Rangers dominated and tore us apart for 65 minutes. Obviously apart from us scoring. And the frisbee eared little hun apologist thinks that Nade sent in the cross for the equaliser. No Billy, but maybe they all look the same to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitster Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Gotta laugh at how biased (and thick he really is) didn't we score in the 63 and 67th minutes? oh aye Rangers well dominated for 65 minutes..we level a 2 goal deficit 2 minutes later...CLOWN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benzinho Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 They're at it again as well with this crap about Fletcher playing against Holland. Aside from the fact that Scotland will obviously play with one up front against Holland and that will be Miller, there's no way Fletcher should get in ahead of Iwelumo or McCormack on form alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertracoon Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 what's with the fuds in the Motherwell end waving what looks like Russian flags behind the goal at Killie? ***** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted March 23, 2009 Author Share Posted March 23, 2009 what's with the fuds in the Motherwell end waving what looks like Russian flags behind the goal at Killie? ***** Probably Slovakian flags for Klimpl that plays for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 It really sticks in that little neds throat when anyone takes anything from his beloved huns, he really cant hide his bias at all, little scrote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Probably Slovakian flags for Klimpl that plays for them. Though it wouldn't surprise me if it really was Russian flags, and they just don't know the difference. A bit like those Middlesbrough fans who greeted Juninho's signing... by wearing sombreros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshallschunkychicken Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 what's with the fuds in the Motherwell end waving what looks like Russian flags behind the goal at Killie? ***** I like how your name is censored when quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scratchy Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 old boy network....ignore it. I'm increasingly disappointed by dicky gordon. Buys into the weegie duopoly big time. Shameful. No mention of the fact that his beloved aberdeen didn't have a shot on target against the hobos. Calderwood gets of the hook yet again. WHY IS THAT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 They're at it again as well with this crap about Fletcher playing against Holland. Aside from the fact that Scotland will obviously play with one up front against Holland and that will be Miller, there's no way Fletcher should get in ahead of Iwelumo or McCormack on form alone. McCormack's been on fire this season. I'd seriously consider starting him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertracoon Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 I like how your name is censored when quoted. Arf, just noticed that. I blame whoever started the thread about South Park the other day as before that was brought up I never had this problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hambone Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Quote "YouTube will be undergoing scheduled maintenance, starting around 7:00 pm PDT" Trying to upload the highlights for over an hour,don't know if the above is having an effect . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deevers Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 So according to Billy Dodds Rangers dominated and tore us apart for 65 minutes. Obviously apart from us scoring. And the frisbee eared little hun apologist thinks that Nade sent in the cross for the equaliser. No Billy, but maybe they all look the same to you? A hun friend of mine was at the game on a corporate ticket and spoke to him after the game on Saturday and he was almost greetin' with rage at Rangers dropping points and against us. Dodds apparently hates us with a passion. Hope the wee erse has an aneurysm. I can never quite understand why the BBC has him onboard as a pundit - he's clearly very biased and usually extremely unknowlegable about anything outside Glasgow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homme Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 You know, i don't think i'd have as much of a problem with pundits if they just declared their allegiences. It might make for some better tv / radio. I'm sick of all the fly digs / snidey comments and pathetic attempts to sound impartial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 I'm not sure what the uproar is about to be honest. I think most folk who were there will agree that Rangers did dominate for the first hour. Whats important is that for all their domination...... we achieved as much in half an hour as they did in an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 He was, hilariously, raging during commentary on sportsound. I fully accept we were horrifically bad until the second half, but his comments were so outrageously biased that it was an absolute joy to get it right up him. Dodds est un stroker extraordinaire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 You know, i don't think i'd have as much of a problem with pundits if they just declared their allegiences. It might make for some better tv / radio. I'm sick of all the fly digs / snidey comments and pathetic attempts to sound impartial. Its funny, but on the whole you do know who the better pundits support. Cowan, Cosgrove, Gordon etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Arf, just noticed that. I blame whoever started the thread about South Park the other day as before that was brought up I never had this problem! You could always change it to Bertrakaffa lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N User Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 Its funny, but on the whole you do know who the better pundits support. Cowan, Cosgrove, Gordon etc. Even Pat Nevin. He's not a great pundit but he's not terrible and he's pretty open about his Hibby allegiances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.