moyseuk2000 Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 they said today hearts unbeaten run comes to an end today,is it just me or do we not need to lose to end an unbeaten run.to me that now 6 unbeaten including both sides of the old firm very happy jambo:xmasgrin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Towzer Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 they said today hearts unbeaten run comes to an end today,is it just me or do we not need to lose to end an unbeaten run.to me that now 6 unbeaten including both sides of the old firm very happy jambo:xmasgrin: thats why i dont pay the liecense fee.:xmasgrin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToYouToMe Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 The BBC is a joke. Whichever party promises to abolish the licence fee, I am voting for them. Absolute disgrace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest juvehearts Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 probally done before the match expecting hearts to lose. Lazy jurno IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scots civil war Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 they favour the establishment from the de menezes reporting to the old squirm vs us lot ******s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo191 Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 yes and because hibs won apparently they continued thier 5 games unbeatn run...emm excuse me but weren't most of them draws?!?! flakirk and sheep certainly were! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdewar42 Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 thats why i dont pay the liecense fee.:xmasgrin: How I wish that was an option, I'd take it up and never watch the O.F. sycophants again. The report on our game, which appeared as a strap along the bottom of the screen during their results show, mentioned " a controversial goal by Andy Driver". Why "controversial"? Of the many e-mails they must receive they chose to read out a mere handful, but felt it necessary to mention a anti-Hearts one from a Hibby called "I can see for miles". Paranoia is almost inevitable in the face of constant negative reporting and lack of credit for H.M.F.C. Then there's Chic Young benefitting from our licence fees. Need I say more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyboy38 Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Thats super scoreboard on the beeb is a nonesense, amatuers at best. Setanta beats them hands down with Jeff on Sky sports being top dog.:xmashappy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franky Frankopolous Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Of the many e-mails they must receive they chose to read out a mere handful, but felt it necessary to mention a anti-Hearts one from a Hibby called "I can see for miles". If you read the Scroatsman website the plum that posts as "I can see for miles" is some trumpet that supports the currants. Used to be "Bring Them On". Total fandango. Has an amazing hatred for the mighty JT's. Idiot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdewar42 Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Of the many e-mails they must receive they chose to read out a mere handful, but felt it necessary to mention a anti-Hearts one from a Hibby called "I can see for miles". If you read the Scroatsman website the plum that posts as "I can see for miles" is some trumpet that supports the currants. Used to be "Bring Them On". Total fandango. Has an amazing hatred for the mighty JT's. Idiot! Thanks for putting me right. I assumed he was a Hibby. I tend to ignore "The Hibsman". Can anyone enlighten me as to why our goal was "controversial". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CF11JamTart Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Then there's Chic Young benefitting from our licence fees. Need I say more? don't get me started on that bell-end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Can anyone enlighten me as to why our goal was "controversial". Because onside or not, In Glasgow, these 'decisions' generally favour the home side. When they don't, The natives ain't happy. As an aside, Clearly it wasn't Tom Murphy running that line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Palmer Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 The BBC should be warned that the licence fee will be reduced year on year until being stopped, say over 5 years? Should give them plenty warning and get rid of Young, Dodds, McLeaod, Paterson etc. They have no purpose other than to be the representitives of either side of the Old Firm, that is their job. None of them could be described as being a 'football expert' or a 'well respected pundit.' The more airtime Csaba receives with his in-depth look at football, rather than cheesy quotes, the better. Anyway, Feck everyone, except Heart of Midlothian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnetic Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Can anyone enlighten me as to why our goal was "controversial". Because it wasn't them that scored it :xmaswoot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpyespana Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 According to the comentator Driver was offside when he scored, on the replay they said because his head was in a offside position the goal should not have stood what a joke that was it was just nit picking. Grumpy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.