Geoff Kilpatrick Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 His ankle's still a problem apparently. Maybe Vlad was right. He's helping to "kill the club". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest juvehearts Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 yes could be due to his saves because of his ****e defence infont of him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Drago Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Has CG been a failure down south? this article thinks so - bit harsh if you ask me though. "He has plainly overpaid for some - Michael Chopra, Greg Halford - and arguably been undone by the failure of his most expensive purchase - Craig Gordon" http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,8742_4588515,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Has CG been a failure down south? this article thinks so - bit harsh if you ask me though. "He has plainly overpaid for some - Michael Chopra, Greg Halford - and arguably been undone by the failure of his most expensive purchase - Craig Gordon" http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,8742_4588515,00.html Baws. It's not Craig's fault he went for ?9m. That created almost impossibly high expectations, and he's done fine I'd say: he's the best British goalkeeper around (I'd put Robert Green 2nd, by the way). I expect Villa to come calling for him in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Baws. It's not Craig's fault he went for ?9m. That created almost impossibly high expectations, and he's done fine I'd say: he's the best British goalkeeper around (I'd put Robert Green 2nd, by the way). I expect Villa to come calling for him in the summer.I think it was a bad choice signing for the Mackems. Set his move to a top club back by years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I think it was a bad choice signing for the Mackems. Set his move to a top club back by years. Did he get to choose, though? Wasn't it that Sunderland offered us a bit more than Villa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Did he get to choose, though? Wasn't it that Sunderland offered us a bit more than Villa? I heard it was because Craig didn't fancy playing for a specky, twisted, republican sympathiser - and he'd have been right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I heard it was because Craig didn't fancy playing for a specky, twisted, republican sympathyser - and he'd have been right He'll be playing for him before long, though. If so, will you wash your hands of the Jhudas ***********? EDIT: the censored word rhymes with 'sympathiser'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 It was always going to happen, wasn't it. Put him behind a capable defence and he is brilliant. Look at his performances for Scotland ... never puts a foot wrong. You can't win when you have some of the donkeys Sunderland have in defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Drago Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Did he get to choose, though? Wasn't it that Sunderland offered us a bit more than Villa? i think Villa AND MAn City were both in as well as sunderland? dont know if there offers got accepted tho. Both would have been much better moves it has to be said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I heard it was because Craig didn't fancy playing for a specky, twisted, republican sympathiser - and he'd have been right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 It was always going to happen, wasn't it. Put him behind a capable defence and he is brilliant. Look at his performances for Scotland ... never puts a foot wrong. You can't win when you have some of the donkeys Sunderland have in defence. From Pressley and Webster to Nyron Nosworthy. It's called moving up in the world, apparently... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 He'll be playing for him before long, though. If so, will you wash your hands of the Jhudas ***********? EDIT: the censored word rhymes with 'sympathiser'. I'll always like Craig, I still feel sorry for him and Paul getting roped into that nonsense by the sleekit rheptile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 i think Villa AND MAn City were both in as well as sunderland? dont know if there offers got accepted tho. Both would have been much better moves it has to be said They certainly would. He's better than Joe Hart, and miles better than Scott Carson, Villa's dodgepot of a keeper last season. As I said though, I'm not sure if he was given the choice: Vlad played hardball, and only Sunderland matched his valuation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 yes could be due to his saves because of his ****e defence infont of him Have you seen some of the goals he's conceded since his move? Granted, Sunderland are gash, but CG hasn't exactly covered himself in glory in the EPL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'll always like Craig, I still feel sorry for him and Paul getting roped into that nonsense by the sleekit rheptile You'll still be talking about Pressley on your death bed, won't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chat Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Do we have a sell-on clause ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Have you seen some of the goals he's conceded since his move? Granted, Sunderland are gash, but CG hasn't exactly covered himself in glory in the EPL. He won over the Sunderland fans in the second half of the season. Sure, he's made mistakes - but a number of them were ridiculously ignorant at first, and he redeemed himself with some brilliant shot stopping. No-one's pretending he's Iker Cassilas - but as EPL keepers go, he's a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 They certainly would. He's better than Joe Hart, and miles better than Scott Carson, Villa's dodgepot of a keeper last season. As I said though, I'm not sure if he was given the choice: Vlad played hardball, and only Sunderland matched his valuation. Big bad Vlad doing something that benefited Hearts, surely not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Do we have a sell-on clause ?I would like to think so mate. It was around about the time Vlad wasn't taking any old offer so I would say yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 You'll still be talking about Pressley on your death bed, won't you? I'd prefer to talk about him on his death bed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Big bad Vlad doing something that benefited Hearts, surely not Correction: Big Bad Vlad does something that benefits UBIG. It's been one consistent positive of his time in charge - but I doubt whether the team has seen much benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'll always like Craig, I still feel sorry for him and Paul getting roped into that nonsense by the sleekit rheptile Roped in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Roped in? I wouldn't bother mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Correction: Big Bad Vlad does something that benefits UBIG. It's been one consistent positive of his time in charge - but I doubt whether the team has seen much benefit. I think you'll find it benefited Hearts Did Big Bad Vlad benefit UBIG when he bought them ?12million worth of shares, in a club about to go to the wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I think you'll find it benefited Hearts Did Big Bad Vlad benefit UBIG when he bought them ?12million worth of shares, in a club about to go to the wall We'll see. Let's see what the accounts say when they're released: my suspicion at the time was we'd hit out overdraft limit, and UBIG had no choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 We'll see. Let's see what the accounts say when they're released: my suspicion at the time was we'd hit out overdraft limit, and UBIG had no choice. So when you said the Gordon money went to UBIG, you didn't actually know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Roped in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 So when you said the Gordon money went to UBIG, you didn't actually know? I'm basing that entirely on whether it was re-invested in the team: as far as I can see, it wasn't at all. Now granted, the absurd wages we've been paying out (without much result between 2006 and 2008) necessitate player sales. I have no problem with that, and above all want us to live within our means. But if all player sales do is benefit the parent company, with no knock-on benefit for Hearts, that's a different story. My suspicion re: the ?40m overdraft was based on what the club website said when the debt for equity conversion was announced: ?12m is 30% (the percentage announced by the website) of ?40m. It was also announced at the very last moment whereby an EGM could be called within the 07/8 financial year (the meeting took place on July 31), and I believe UBIG owed Ukio a substantial loan at exactly that point. As I said, we'll see - and I'll be happy to hold my hands up if I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'm basing that entirely on whether it was re-invested in the team: as far as I can see, it wasn't at all. Now granted, the absurd wages we've been paying out (without much result between 2006 and 2008) necessitate player sales. I have no problem with that, and above all want us to live within our means. But if all player sales do is benefit the parent company, with no knock-on benefit for Hearts, that's a different story. My suspicion re: the ?40m overdraft was based on what the club website said when the debt for equity conversion was announced: ?12m is 30% (the percentage announced by the website) of ?40m. It was also announced at the very last moment whereby an EGM could be called within the 07/8 financial year (the meeting took place on July 31), and I believe UBIG owed Ukio a substantial loan at exactly that point. As I said, we'll see - and I'll be happy to hold my hands up if I'm wrong. Are you not going to take into account the money invested into the club in player salaries and registrations? Hearts cannot be said to have 'benefited the parent company' if it is having to write off debts. if that works i might give the Nationwide Anglia a buzz and see if they will ''benefit themselves' by writing off my mortgage, then they can sell off a few of my more valuable second hand books and trouser the proceeds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Are you not going to take into account the money invested into the club in player salaries and registrations? Hearts cannot be said to have 'benefited the parent company' if it is having to write off debts. if that works i might give the Nationwide Anglia a buzz and see if they will ''benefit themselves' by writing off my mortgage, then they can sell off a few of my more valuable second hand books and trouser the proceeds It depends why they wrote off the debt, Scott - and also whether it helps or hinders them in any future sale of the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 His ankle's still a problem apparently. Maybe Vlad was right. He's helping to "kill the club". Vlad never said that about Gordon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamorgan Jambo Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 My understanding was that both Sunderland and Villa had bids accepted by Hearts. Craig initially went to spend a few days at both clubs but after a few days chose the Mackems. Anyone who watched the highlights of the Bolton game last week could see he was injured. he broke a bone in his foot a month or so back. As far as a possible move for him if Sunderland get relegated I'd say it's unlikely he'd get an offer, on current form, from another EPL club. Villa have Friedel and Man City have Hart, both better keepers than Craig at the moment. Hopefully the new manager at Sunderland will stabilise the club and get Craig his confidence back. My source (and its an extremely good one albeit with an axe to grind) says the squad were delighted with this weeks resignation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahim Tall Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Useless *****, Rooney should have been shut down about 20 yards before he was. They would never have had that chance if they had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozzyonthefence Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'd prefer to talk about him on his death bed And would you thank him for winning the Scottish Cup for us & leading us to he Champions League? And for standing up to the man who is ruining our club? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 And for standing up to the man who is ruining our club?Standing up for feck all. The man saved our club! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PresidentRomanov Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 And would you thank him for winning the Scottish Cup for us & leading us to he Champions League? And for standing up to the man who is ruining our club? It was the man he betrayed that won us the Scottish Cup and led us into the Champions League. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
123kid Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 His time at Sunderland has ruined him and his reputation, cant see him getting a big move now. That fecking defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellycopter Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Craig is injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 His time at Sunderland has ruined him and his reputation, cant see him getting a big move now. That fecking defence. The defence is rank rotten but i've seen him let in some howlers as well. He's not blameless in that Sunderland team. Confidence looks shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 We got ?9 million for a huddy, ?9 million for a Huuuudy, we got ?9 million for a huddy, who cares he doesn't play for Heart of Midlothian anymore, the international team can GTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millfield_Mackem Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 He's been injured for quite a few weeks now. It was clear as day to see he was knacked against Bolton. He asked to come off at half time, yet Keane took other outfield players off instead, even without asking how CG was. Gordon has made mistakes since he's been here, but far less than other keepers. He put in some match winning performances towards the end of last season which helped us stay clear of the drop. If CG can get behind a settled defence, like last year, we'll see him shine. Its Fulop's shirt to lose now, CG needs to show what he's made of to get back in the side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack D and coke Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 He's been injured for quite a few weeks now. It was clear as day to see he was knacked against Bolton. He asked to come off at half time, yet Keane took other outfield players off instead, even without asking how CG was. Gordon has made mistakes since he's been here, but far less than other keepers. He put in some match winning performances towards the end of last season which helped us stay clear of the drop. If CG can get behind a settled defence, like last year, we'll see him shine. Its Fulop's shirt to lose now, CG needs to show what he's made of to get back in the side He looks a shadow of the keeper we know he can be. Who knows maybe your next manager can rebuild his confidence cos he's got the talent. Who's getting the job do you reckon, or who would you like to get it mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyw_1874 Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 He's been injured for quite a few weeks now. It was clear as day to see he was knacked against Bolton. He asked to come off at half time, yet Keane took other outfield players off instead, even without asking how CG was. Gordon has made mistakes since he's been here, but far less than other keepers. He put in some match winning performances towards the end of last season which helped us stay clear of the drop. If CG can get behind a settled defence, like last year, we'll see him shine. Its Fulop's shirt to lose now, CG needs to show what he's made of to get back in the side Do you know how wrong that sounds to anyone that has seen Gordon play behind a good defence?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted December 7, 2008 Author Share Posted December 7, 2008 He's been injured for quite a few weeks now. It was clear as day to see he was knacked against Bolton. He asked to come off at half time, yet Keane took other outfield players off instead, even without asking how CG was. Gordon has made mistakes since he's been here, but far less than other keepers. He put in some match winning performances towards the end of last season which helped us stay clear of the drop. If CG can get behind a settled defence, like last year, we'll see him shine. Its Fulop's shirt to lose now, CG needs to show what he's made of to get back in the side If Fulop had kept a clean sheet at OT yesterday, it would have been one of the worst performances there in the process. He was a total Dracula on every cross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Examiner Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Vlad never said that about Gordon. Correct. Why do people make these things up? It thoroughly demeans their credibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 It depends why they wrote off the debt, Scott - and also whether it helps or hinders them in any future sale of the club. Does it? You can argue the rights or wrongs of their strategy and building up debts in the first place, but I don't see any argument that overall they aren't losing financially out of the situation. We are where we are and they could have cut their losses rather than invest the ?12m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted December 7, 2008 Author Share Posted December 7, 2008 Correct. Why do people make these things up? It thoroughly demeans their credibility I never claimed Vlad said it! People are getting a little too touchy. It was a throwaway remark meant sardonically. However, if I've upset anyone I do apologise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysthereinspirit Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Have you seen some of the goals he's conceded since his move? Granted, Sunderland are gash, but CG hasn't exactly covered himself in glory in the EPL. He has absolutely no confidence in the players in front of him. I've watched quite a bit of Sunderland and they're a poor excuse for the premier league at the back. Terrible defending. Keane should have shored up that before spending millions on the midfield and up front. In saying that, Gordon has looked bad on a few occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millfield_Mackem Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 He looks a shadow of the keeper we know he can be. Who knows maybe your next manager can rebuild his confidence cos he's got the talent. Who's getting the job do you reckon, or who would you like to get it mate? I reckon this job is tailor made for Big Sam. Plenty of experience of the situation we are in at the moment. My ideal man would be Martin Jol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.