Dazo Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign no one was this a lie ? If a Manager is not appointed within the current transfer window, will you trust and follow up on Steven Frail?s recommendations regarding transfer targets? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truejambo81 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Another yarn that VR spun us no doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign no one was this a lie ? What if Frail said to Vlad,Nah we dont need anyone!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign no one was this a lie ? Assuming we sign none of Frails recommendations then YES it was a lie. But it won't have been the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 reading the question and answer I would have to say it is impossible to tell yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flogel98 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Frail has consistently talked up the squad so that actually wouldn't surprise me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Sidious Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 If Moutinho (surely a Frail target) has knocked us back as well as Gow. Then we tried and failed. NOT GOOD ENOUGH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted January 31, 2008 Author Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign none of Frails recommendations then YES it was a lie. But it won't have been the first one. First one that came from the horses mouth that was not lost in translation though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo, Goodbye Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign none of Frails recommendations then YES it was a lie. But it won't have been the first one. Maybe all of Frail's targets or the target's clubs said no when we approached them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign none of Frails recommendations then YES it was a lie. But it won't have been the first one. That is assuming that Frail had targets/recommendations and that we did not follow them up. Signing them has nothing to do with the 'statement'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flogel98 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Also, if you have nothing to play for and haven't yet appointed your "manager", would you give money to the caretaker knowing that when you get your man, he may well dispense with a chunk of the existing squad..?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 One constant with VR is he always lies to us. Still some lap it all up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted January 31, 2008 Author Share Posted January 31, 2008 That is assuming that Frail had targets/recommendations and that we did not follow them up. Signing them has nothing to do with the 'statement'. I think its fair to assume that Frail would have had signings in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 If a Manager is not appointed within the current transfer window,(so wait a couple hours to see if a manager is produced from a HAT) will you trust and follow up on Steven Frail?s recommendations regarding transfer targets?(starting 1/2/8 and ending?) Yes LIE??????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkserino Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Can't be arsed with Frail or Vlad now to be honest. Frail can't manage Vlad can't listen I love the club but can't stomach the people representing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letsmakesomenoise Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Assuming we sign none of Frails recommendations then YES it was a lie. But it won't have been the first one. Frail said we needed a stiker the other day. Where the feck is he then? Or was the botched attempt for the Falkirk boy the nearest we'll get? Suckered again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 That is assuming that Frail had targets/recommendations and that we did not follow them up. Signing them has nothing to do with the 'statement'. Frail did have targets/recommendations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted January 31, 2008 Author Share Posted January 31, 2008 Frail did have targets/recommendations. Frail said the other day he hoped to have at least 1 player in. If he is talking about Screpis then the erse should get his jotters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Can't be arsed with Frail or Vlad now to be honest. Frail can't manage Vlad can't listen I love the club but can't stomach the people representing it. So true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazo Posted February 1, 2008 Author Share Posted February 1, 2008 Well the window is closed and the expected happened. So were we lied to or did SF think we did not need to add any quality ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 If Moutinho (surely a Frail target) has knocked us back as well as Gow. Then we tried and failed. NOT GOOD ENOUGH! If they turned us down, then I am relieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 That is assuming that Frail had targets/recommendations and that we did not follow them up. Signing them has nothing to do with the 'statement'. Yes it is important to know all the FACTs. I am quite sure that Hearts were going all out to sign quality players in the transfer window. After all a swan looks serene on the surface, but is paddling away furiously. Before it breaks your arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cut The Crap Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Yes it is important to know all the FACTs. I am quite sure that Hearts were going all out to sign quality players in the transfer window. After all a swan looks serene on the surface, but is paddling away furiously. Before it breaks your arm. It's a while since anything at Hearts looked "serene" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j442211 Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Signing players is a two-way thing. I've no doubt we tried to get a few but if a player has a choice of clubs and the money is pretty much the same, he is going to choose the club which suits his own interests best. Now, we all know that everything at Tynecastle has changed (cos our glorious leader has thus decreed) but if we don't even believe that on here, it will take more than one half-hearted (no pun intended) press release to convince any player with serious career ambitions that Hearts are the team to join. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigPeasAndGravy Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Assuming we sign no one was this a lie ? Before Frail became caretaker he stated on the website (this is a paraphrase and not his exact words) "..there is money available for transfers in January, we are deciding whether to spend all the available money on one player to lift the whole thing or whether we sign players to improve the squad." Does anyone remember him saying this or have I imagined it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Before Frail became caretaker he stated on the website (this is a paraphrase and not his exact words) "..there is money available for transfers in January, we are deciding whether to spend all the available money on one player to lift the whole thing or whether we sign players to improve the squad." Does anyone remember him saying this or have I imagined it Can't remember Frail saying and I'd be astonished if he had said anything like that. Of course I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy the Jambo Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Before Frail became caretaker he stated on the website (this is a paraphrase and not his exact words) "..there is money available for transfers in January, we are deciding whether to spend all the available money on one player to lift the whole thing or whether we sign players to improve the squad." Does anyone remember him saying this or have I imagined it Well actually he said we are going to sign someone who would light up our season.Just goes to show what liars Frail and the madone and mann and ogilvie really are a meeting in lithuania to discuss targets my arse they should all GTF and as for the fans representatives that went over with them all they were doing was yes vlad no vlad anything you say vlad whatever you say we will agree withthey should have told the mad one what they really thought .If i could get half an hour alone with vlad he would be coming out that room on a stretcher with serious injuries . He has turned us into a farce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighusref Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 It is a lie and is not the first. VR has lost all credibility with 99% of Hearts fans, the sooner he leaves this club the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.